Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1982 Dec;16(6):1157–1159. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.6.1157-1159.1982

Methods for distinguishing gram-positive from gram-negative bacteria.

G M Carlone, M J Valadez, M J Pickett
PMCID: PMC272558  PMID: 6186691

Abstract

Lysis by KOH and hydrolysis of L-alanine-4-nitroanilide were compared with the Gram reaction of aerobic, microaerophilic, and anaerobic bacteria. Both tests correlated well with the Gram reaction with nonfermentative bacilli and Bacillus species, whereas they did not correlate with nonsporulating anaerobes. Only campylobacteria were KOH positive and L-alanine-4-nitroanilide and gram negative.

Full text

PDF
1157

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. FARRAR W. E., Jr Serious infections due to "non-pathogenic" organisms of the genus Bacillus. Review of their status as pathogens. Am J Med. 1963 Jan;34:134–141. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(63)90047-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Halebian S., Harris B., Finegold S. M., Rolfe R. D. Rapid method that aids in distinguishing Gram-positive from Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Mar;13(3):444–448. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.3.444-448.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. von Graevenitz A. The role of opportunistic bacteria in human disease. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1977;31:447–471. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.31.100177.002311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES