Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1983 Apr;17(4):601–604. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.4.601-604.1983

Value of routine aerobic subculturing of unvented blood culture bottles.

M A Pfaller, L M Westfall, P R Murray
PMCID: PMC272700  PMID: 6343420

Abstract

The value of performing routine aerobic subcultures of both vented and unvented blood culture bottles has not been evaluated critically. We studied 4,954 pairs of blood culture bottles consisting of one vented biphasic tryptic soy broth bottle (Roche Diagnostics) and one unvented Thiol broth bottle (Difco Laboratories). A total of 736 isolates were detected, of which 124 (17%) were in the Thiol broth bottle only. Some 15 isolates were detected only by subculturing the Thiol broth, and 13 of these isolates either were contaminants or were detected in previous positive cultures. Similar results were obtained when the unvented Thiol broth bottle was paired with a vented Difco tryptic soy broth bottle. Analysis of these pairs revealed a total of 360 isolates detected in 2,669 pairs of bottles, of which 83 isolates (23%) were in the Thiol broth bottle only. There were 11 isolates seen only in subcultures of the Thiol broth bottle, and 8 of these were probable contaminants. Thus, routine subculturing of unvented Thiol broth bottles had limited value. These results may differ with the use of other culture media or subculturing procedures. We recommend that each laboratory evaluate critically its experience with aerobic subcultures from unvented bottles.

Full text

PDF
601

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beckwith D. G., Etowski D. C. Evaluation of the necessity for routine terminal subculturing of blood cultures negative by radiometric methods. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jan;15(1):35–40. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.1.35-40.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blazevic D. J., Stemper J. E., Matsen J. M. Comparison of macroscopic examination, routine gram stains, and routine subcultures in the initial detection of positive blood cultures. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Mar;27(3):537–539. doi: 10.1128/am.27.3.537-539.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blazevic D. J., Stemper J. E., Matsen J. M. Effect of aerobic and anaerobic atmospheres on isolation of organisms from blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Feb;1(2):154–156. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.2.154-156.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Campbell J., Washington J. A., 2nd Evaluation of the necessity for routine terminal subcultures of previously negative blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Oct;12(4):576–578. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.4.576-578.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gill V. J. Lack of clinical relevance in routine terminal subculturing of blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Jul;14(1):116–118. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.1.116-118.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hall M., Warren E., Washington J. A., 2nd Comparison of two liquid blood culture media containing sodium polyanethole sulfonate: tryptic soy and Columbia. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Apr;27(4):699–702. doi: 10.1128/am.27.4.699-702.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McLaughlin J. C., Evers J. L., Officer J. L. Lack of requirement for blind subcultures of BACTEC blood culture media. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Nov;14(5):567–570. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.5.567-570.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Murray P. R., Sondag J. E. Evaluation of routine subcultures of macroscopically negative blood cultures for detection of anaerobes. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Oct;8(4):427–430. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.4.427-430.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pfaller M. A., Sibley T. K., Westfall L. M., Hoppe-Bauer J. E., Keating M. A., Murray P. R. Clinical laboratory comparison of a slide blood culture system with a conventional broth system. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Sep;16(3):525–530. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.3.525-530.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sliva H. S., Washington J. A., 2nd Optimal time for routine early subculture of blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Sep;12(3):445–446. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.3.445-446.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tenney J. H., Reller L. B., Mirrett S., Weinstein M. P., Wang W. L. Controlled evaluation of the effect of atmosphere of incubation on detection of bacteremia and fungemia in supplemented peptone broth. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Sep;16(3):437–442. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.3.437-442.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Todd J. K., Roe M. H. Rapid detection of bacteremia by an early subculture technic. Am J Clin Pathol. 1975 Nov;64(5):694–699. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/64.5.694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Washington J. A., 2nd Blood cultures: principles and techniques. Mayo Clin Proc. 1975 Feb;50(2):91–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES