Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 14.
Published in final edited form as: Biotechniques. 2008 Apr;44(5):613–616. doi: 10.2144/000112792

RNAi mechanisms and applications

Daniel H Kim 1, John J Rossi 1
PMCID: PMC2727154  NIHMSID: NIHMS117712  PMID: 18474035

Abstract

Within the past two decades we have become increasingly aware of the roles that RNAs play in regulation of gene expression. The RNA world was given a booster shot with the discovery of RNA interference (RNAi), a compendium of mechanisms involving small RNAs (less than 30 bases long) that regulate the expression of genes in a variety of eukaryotic organisms. Rapid progress in our understanding of RNAi-based mechanisms has led to applications of this powerful process in studies of gene function as well as in therapeutic applications for the treatment of disease. RNAi-based therapies involve two-dimensional drug designs using only identification of good Watson-Crick base pairing between the RNAi guide strand and the target, thereby resulting in rapid design and testing of RNAi triggers. To date there are several clinical trials using RNAi, and we should expect the list of new applications to grow at a phenomenal rate. This article summarizes our current knowledge about the mechanisms and applications of RNAi.

INTRODUCTION

RNA interference (RNAi) is a regulatory mechanism of most eukaryotic cells that uses small double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) molecules as triggers to direct homology-dependent control of gene activity (Figure 1) (1). Known as small interfering RNAs (siRNA), these ~21–22 bp long dsRNA molecules have characteristic 2 nt 3′ overhangs that allow them to be recognized by the enzymatic machinery of RNAi, which eventually leads to homology-dependent degradation of the target mRNA. In mammalian cells, siRNAs are produced from cleavage of longer dsRNA precursors by the RNase III endonuclease Dicer (2), or they can be synthesized by chemical or biochemical methods. Dicer is complexed with RNA-binding proteins, the TAR-RNA-binding protein (TRBP), PACT, and Ago-2, which are involved in the hand-off of siRNAs to the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) (3). The core components of RISC are the Argonaute (Ago) family members. In humans there are eight members of this family but only Ago-2 possesses an active catalytic domain for cleavage activity (4,5). While siRNAs loaded into RISC are double-stranded, Ago-2 cleaves and releases the “passenger” strand, leading to an activated form of RISC with a single-stranded “guide” RNA molecule that directs the specificity of the target recognition by intermolecular base pairing (6). Rules that govern selectivity of strand loading into RISC are based on differential thermodynamic stabilities of the ends of the siRNAs (7,8). The less thermodynamically stable end is favored for binding to the PIWI domain of Ago-2.

Figure 1. Cellular pathways of gene silencing by RNA interference.

Figure 1

RNAi is multifaceted, and there are various pathways in which small double-stranded RNA (dsRNAs) regulate gene expression. The endogenous micro-RNA (miRNA) pathway begins with Pol II-transcribed primary miRNAs that are processed in the nucleus to pre-miRNAs, exported to the cytoplasm, and processed again into functional miRNAs. The primary function of miRNAs is to inhibit translation via incomplete Watson-Crick base pairing to the 3′ untranslated regions of targeted mRNAs. Alternatively, perfectly duplexed small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) can be produced intracellularly or supplied exogenously to cells. The guide strand is incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), where it guides sequence-specific degradation of the target transcript, irrespective of where the base pairing occurs. The miRNA and siRNA pathways are interchangeable, and the important determinants are the positions within the message and the extent of base pairing with the targeted transcripts. siRNAs can also trigger transcriptional gene silencing via interactions with chromatin, wherein they guide histone and DNA methylation leading to inactive chromatin.

MicroRNAs

An important arm of RNAi involves the microRNAs (miRNAs). These are endogenous duplexes that posttranscriptionally regulate gene expression by complexing with RISC and binding to the 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) of target sequences via short stretches of homology, termed “seed sequences” (9,10). The primary mechanism of action of miRNAs is translational repression, although this can be accompanied by message degradation (11). The miRNA duplexes possess incomplete Watson-Crick base pairing, and the antisense strand cannot be chosen by cleavage of the passenger strand as it is for siRNAs; therefore the antisense strand must be chosen by an alternative mechanism (1214). miRNAs are endogenous substrates for the RNAi machinery. They are initially expressed as long primary transcripts (pri-miRNAs), which are processed within the nucleus into 60–70 bp hairpins by the Microprocessor complex, consisting of Drosha and DGCR8 (15,16) into pre-miRNAs. The pre-miRNAs are further processed in the cytoplasm by Dicer and one of the two strands is loaded into RISC, presumably via interaction with one of the Dicer accessory proteins (3). Importantly, it is possible to exploit this native gene silencing pathway for regulation of gene(s) of choice. If the siRNA effector is delivered to the cell it will “activate” RISC, resulting in potent and specific silencing of the targeted mRNA. Because of the potency and selectivity of RNAi, it has become the methodology of choice for silencing specific gene expression in mammalian cells.

RNAi as a Therapeutic Approach for Treatment of Disease

Control of disease-associated genes makes RNAi an attractive choice for future therapeutics. Basically every human disease caused by activity from one or a few genes should be amenable to RNAi-based intervention. This list includes cancer, autoimmune diseases, dominant genetic disorders, and viral infections. RNAi can be triggered by two different pathways: (i) an RNA-based approach where synthetic effector siRNAs are delivered by various carriers to target cells as preformed 21 base duplexes; or (ii) via DNA-based strategies in which the siRNA effectors are produced by intracellular processing of longer RNA hairpin transcripts (reviewed in References 17 and 18). The latter approach is primarily based on nuclear synthesis of short-hairpin RNAs (shRNAs), which are transported to the cytoplasm via the miRNA export pathway and are processed into siRNAs by Dicer. While direct use of synthetic siRNA effectors is simple and usually results in potent gene silencing, the effect is transient. DNA-based RNAi drugs, on the other hand, have the potential of being stably introduced when used in a gene therapy setting, allowing, in principle, a single treatment of viral vector-delivered shRNA genes.

The first clinical applications of RNAi have been directed at the treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), which causes blindness or limited vision in millions of adults annually (19,20). Therapies based on RNAi are also currently being developed for viral infection, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV and HCV), and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (21). Strategies for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases and cancers are also well under way.

Although successful in vivo studies have shown the potential effectiveness of RNAi-based therapies, other studies have illustrated specific approaches to avoid when adopting an endogenous cellular mechanism for therapeutic benefit. Unwanted side effects have included activation of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and type 1 interferon responses, and competition with the endogenous RNAi pathway components (22). These findings indicate that although RNAi is potentially a revolutionary mechanism for treatment of disease, due caution is necessary when interpreting results from RNAi-mediated target knockdowns.

The challenge of cell- or tissue-specific delivery of siRNAs is also crucial when investigating the utility of RNAi-based therapies for a given disease; various strategies for nonviral and viral delivery of RNAi triggers have shown to be effective in their respective disease models. The relative advantages and disadvantages of using synthetic siRNAs versus expressed shRNAs must also be taken into consideration when designing RNAi-based therapies for a particular disease.

Chemically synthesized siRNAs are commonly screened for effective knockdown of a specific target gene. To increase siRNA stability, chemical modifications are introduced, such as 2′-O-methylpurines or 2′-fluoropyrimidines (23). When initially designing a siRNA molecule, computational algorithms are routinely used that incorporate various parameters, including siRNA duplex end stabilities for proper strand selection and mRNA secondary structures for target site accessibility. To improve the potency of an RNAi response, siRNA duplexes can also be designed to mimic substrates for Dicer processing (24). Longer siRNAs (e.g., 27-mers) are incorporated into the Dicer loading step of the RNAi pathway and may facilitate the activation of RISC. 27-mers are designed asymmetrically to exhibit a 2 nt 3′ overhang on one end and a blunt region on the other (25), which guides Dicer processing and biogenesis of the proper guide strand, since the PAZ domain of Dicer recognizes the overhang end. Furthermore, because of the efficiency of 27-mers in mediating gene silencing, a lower concentration of siRNAs can mediate a potent RNAi response.

From the perspective of therapeutic applications of RNAi, the most important concern is delivery of the siRNAs to the appropriate tissue. Numerous recent publications have shown that siRNAs can be systemically delivered to various tissues with resultant knockdown of target RNAs. Intravenous injection of siRNAs for systemic delivery is accomplished through conjugation of siRNA molecules to a cholesterol group or the packaging of siRNAs into liposomal particles. Systemic delivery using these approaches is effective for delivery to the liver and jejunum, but may not be appropriate for delivery to other organs. In a proof-of-concept study, siRNAs targeting apolipoprotein B (APOB) were used to modify cholesterol metabolism. The 3′ hydroxyl group on the siRNA passenger strand was chemically linked to a cholesterol group, and these conjugated siRNAs effectively knocked down gene expression by >50% in the liver and 70% in the jejunum (26).

Another approach for systemic delivery involves the use of specialized lipid bilayers called stable nucleic acid-lipid particles (SNALPs), which incorporate chemically modified siRNAs (27). Cationic and neutral lipids comprise the bilayer, along with an outer hydrophilic coating of polyethylene glycol (PEG). In one study, monkeys were administered a single dose of siRNA-containing SNALPs, which lowered cholesterol levels for 11 days or longer, with <10% of APOB expression remaining in the liver of this nonhuman primate model (28). No noticeable toxicities were observed, suggesting the potential utility of this method in systemic delivery.

For the in vivo efficacy of siRNA molecules, the dosage of delivered siRNAs is a practical consideration, and selective delivery of siRNAs to specific tissues would potentially lower the effective dosage required. Targeting cell surface receptors is an advantageous approach, as it would lower the siRNA dosage and potentially avoid off-target effects from siRNA delivery to irrelevant tissues. The coupling of siRNAs to aptamers or antibody fragments, or the use of nanoparticles coated with receptor-specific ligands, allows for the specific delivery of siRNA payloads to targeted cells and tissues. For targeting of HIV-infected cells, siRNAs were coupled to heavy chain antibody fragments (Fabs) that recognize the HIV envelope glycoprotein gp120. Positively charged protamine was conjugated to Fab molecules, and the negatively charged siRNAs interacted electrostatically with the protamine to form a Fab-siRNA complex. This antibody-based approach demonstrated >70% knockdown of p24 group-specific antigen protein (Gag) when targeting cultured T lymphocytes infected with HIV-1 (29). A different targeting approach took advantage of a peptide from rabies virus, which specifically binds to the acetylcholine receptor. When this peptide was conjugated to a polyarginine peptide that binds siRNAs, delivery of siRNAs to the central nervous system was accomplished, resulting in inhibition of a fatal encephalitis viral infection (30).

Aptamers, which are structured RNA ligands, can be designed to bind specifically to cell surface receptors and be covalently linked to siRNAs for specific in vivo delivery. One method used aptamers that bind to the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expressed on the surface of prostate cancer cells. When conjugated to siRNAs, these aptamer-siRNA hybrids effectively reduced tumor growth in mice (31). A similar approach using both biotinylated siRNAs and aptamers bound to the biotin-binding protein streptavidin made use of 27-mer siRNAs to potently induce gene silencing (32).

Coating nanoparticles with cell type–specific ligands is another powerful approach to systemically deliver RNAi-inducing molecules. In an important proof-of-concept study, Ewing sarcoma tumors were targeted in vivo with transferrin ligand-coated nanoparticles (33). These nanoparticles were constructed using cyclodextrin-containing polycations (CDPs) specifically designed to incorporate negatively charged siRNA molecules. For added stability and to prevent aggregation, PEG polymers were attached to the outer surface using terminal adamantane groups. Transferrin ligands were then covalently linked to the adamantane-PEG chains, and the nanoparticle design allowed for self-assembly into uniform, ~50 nanometer-sized nanoparticles. The nanoparticle-incorporated siRNAs targeted the Ews-Fli1 (Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1-flightless 1 homolog) gene fusion product and were shown to inhibit tumor l formation in mice (33).

Concluding Remarks

In summary, the progression from the initial discovery of RNAi to its clinical applications has been astounding. Understanding the fundamental biology of RNAi has led to its widespread applications in basic research and subsequently in applications for the treatment of disease. Within the next few years we should expect to unravel more RNAi-mediated regulation of gene expression, and will also see RNAi-based drugs approved for use in the treatment of disease. In addition, RNAi has proven to be a powerful tool for the study of gene function and has opened new areas of basic investigation. In the near future we should see continued development in our understanding and application of this remarkable cellular mechanism for posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the NIH Heart Lung and Blood Institute to J.J.R. D.H.K. is supported by a City of Hope pre-doctoral fellowship.

Footnotes

COMPETING INTERESTS STATEMENT The authors declare no competing interests.

To purchase reprints of this article, contact: Reprints@BioTechniques.com

References

  • 1.Almeida R, Allshire RC. RNA silencing and genome regulation. Trends Cell Biol. 2005;15:251–258. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhang H, Kolb FA, Jaskiewicz L, Westhof E, Filipowicz W. Single processing center models for human Dicer and bacterial RNase III. Cell. 2004;118:57–68. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee Y, Hur I, Park SY, Kim YK, Suh MR, Kim VN. The role of PACT in the RNA silencing pathway. EMBO J. 2006;25:522–532. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Meister G, Landthaler M, Patkaniowska A, Dorsett Y, Teng G, Tuschl T. Human Argonaute2 mediates RNA cleavage targeted by miRNAs and siRNAs. Mol Cell. 2004;15:185–197. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liu J, Carmell MA, Rivas FV, Marsden CG, Thomson JM, Song JJ, Hammond SM, Joshua-Tor L, et al. Argonaute2 is the catalytic engine of mammalian RNAi. Science. 2004;305:1437–41. doi: 10.1126/science.1102513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tang G. siRNA and miRNA: an insight into RISCs. Trends Biochem Sci. 2005;30:106–114. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2004.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schwarz DS, Hutvagner G, Du T, Xu Z, Aronin N, Zamore PD. Asymmetry in the assembly of the RNAi enzyme complex. Cell. 2003;115:199–208. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00759-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Khvorova A, Reynolds A, Jayasena SD. Functional siRNAs and miRNAs exhibit strand bias. Cell. 2003;115:209–216. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00801-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116:281–297. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bartel DP, Chen CZ. Micromanagers of gene expression: the potentially widespread influence of metazoan microRNAs. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:396–400. doi: 10.1038/nrg1328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bagga S, Bracht J, Hunter S, Massirer K, Holtz J, Eachus R, Pasquinelli AE. Regulation by let-7 and lin-4 miRNAs results in target mRNA degradation. Cell. 2005;122:553–563. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Leuschner PJ, Ameres SL, Kueng S, Martinez J. Cleavage of the siRNA passenger strand during RISC assembly in human cells. EMBO Rep. 2006;7:314–320. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gregory RI, Chendrimada TP, Cooch N, Shiekhattar R. Human RISC couples microRNA biogenesis and posttranscriptional gene silencing. Cell. 2005;123:631–640. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Matranga C, Tomari Y, Shin C, Bartel DP, Zamore PD. Passenger-strand cleavage facilitates assembly of siRNA into Ago2-containing RNAi enzyme complexes. Cell. 2005;123:607–620. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lee Y, Ahn C, Han J, Choi H, Kim J, Yim J, Lee J, Provost P, et al. The nuclear RNase III Drosha initiates microRNA processing. Nature. 2003;425:415–419. doi: 10.1038/nature01957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Han J, Lee Y, Yeom KH, Kim YK, Jin H, Kim VN. The Drosha-DGCR8 complex in primary microRNA processing. Genes Dev. 2004;18:3016–3027. doi: 10.1101/gad.1262504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hannon GJ, Rossi JJ. Unlocking the potential of the human genome with RNA interference. Nature. 2004;431:371–378. doi: 10.1038/nature02870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Scherer LJ, Rossi JJ. Approaches for the sequence-specific knockdown of mRNA. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21:1457–1465. doi: 10.1038/nbt915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fattal E, Bochot A. Ocular delivery of nucleic acids: antisense oligonucleotides, aptamers and siRNA. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006;58:1203–1223. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2006.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tolentino M. Interference RNA technology in the treatment of CNV. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2006;19:393–399. vi–vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ohc.2006.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Leonard JN, Schaffer DV. Antiviral RNAi therapy: emerging approaches for hitting a moving target. Gene Ther. 2006;13:532–540. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Svoboda P. Off-targeting and other non-specific effects of RNAi experiments in mammalian cells. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2007;9:248–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Czauderna F, Fechtner M, Dames S, Aygun H, Klippel A, Pronk GJ, Giese K, Kaufmann J. Structural variations and stabilising modifications of synthetic siRNAs in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:2705–2716. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kim DH, Behlke MA, Rose SD, Chang MS, Choi S, Rossi JJ. Synthetic dsRNA Dicer substrates enhance RNAi potency and efficacy. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:222–226. doi: 10.1038/nbt1051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Amarzguioui M, Lundberg P, Cantin E, Hagstrom J, Behlke MA, Rossi JJ. Rational design and in vitro and in vivo delivery of Dicer substrate siRNA. Nat Protocols. 2006;1:508–517. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Soutschek J, Akinc A, Bramlage B, Charisse K, Constien R, Donoghue M, Elbashir S, Geick A, et al. Therapeutic silencing of an endogenous gene by systemic administration of modified siRNAs. Nature. 2004;432:173–178. doi: 10.1038/nature03121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Morrissey DV, Lockridge JA, Shaw L, Blanchard K, Jensen K, Breen W, Hartsough K, Machemer L, et al. Potent and persistent in vivo anti-HBV activity of chemically modified siRNAs. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:1002–1007. doi: 10.1038/nbt1122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zimmermann TS, Lee AC, Akinc A, Bramlage B, Bumcrot D, Fedoruk MN, Harborth J, Heyes JA, et al. RNAi-mediated gene silencing in non-human primates. Nature. 2006;441:111–114. doi: 10.1038/nature04688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Song E, Zhu P, Lee SK, Chowdhury D, Kussman S, Dykxhoorn DM, Feng Y, Palliser D, et al. Antibody mediated in vivo delivery of small interfering RNAs via cell-surface receptors. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:709–717. doi: 10.1038/nbt1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kumar P, Wu H, McBride JL, Jung KE, Kim MH, Davidson BL, Lee SK, Shankar P, et al. Transvascular delivery of small interfering RNA to the central nervous system. Nature. 2007;448:39–43. doi: 10.1038/nature05901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.McNamara JO, II, Andrechek ER, Wang Y, Viles KD, Rempel RE, Gilboa E, Sullenger BA, Giangrande PH. Cell type-specific delivery of siRNAs with aptamer-siRNA chimeras. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:1005–1015. doi: 10.1038/nbt1223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chu TC, Twu KY, Ellington AD, Levy M. Aptamer mediated siRNA delivery. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:e73. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hu-Lieskovan S, Heidel JD, Bartlett DW, Davis ME, Triche TJ. Sequence-specific knockdown of EWS-FLI1 by targeted, nonviral delivery of small interfering RNA inhibits tumor growth in a murine model of metastatic Ewing’s sarcoma. Cancer Res. 2005;65:8984–8992. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES