Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1983 Apr;17(4):711–714. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.4.711-714.1983

Establishment of minimum inhibitory concentrations of cefoperazone for control and reference anaerobic organisms.

R J Zabransky, E Randall, V L Sutter, R J Birk, G Westenfelder, J Emmerman, A T Ghoneim
PMCID: PMC272725  PMID: 6222065

Abstract

The minimum inhibitory concentrations of cefoperazone were determined in a collaborative study for eight National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards control and reference strains of anaerobic bacteria by agar and microdilution techniques with several types and sources of media. Recommended minimum inhibitory concentrations for the control strains, Bacteroides fragilis ATCC 25285 and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron ATCC 29741, are 32 to 64 micrograms/ml and 64 micrograms/ml, respectively. Clostridium perfringens ATCC 13124 gave inconsistent results, and no value is recommended. Recommended values for reference strains are presented. Modification of media did not significantly change the minimum inhibitory concentrations.

Full text

PDF
711

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Jenkins S. G., Birk R. J., Zabransky R. J. Differences in susceptibilities of species of the Bacteroides fragilis group to several beta-lactam antibiotics: indole production as an indicator of resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Oct;22(4):628–634. doi: 10.1128/aac.22.4.628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jones R. N., Fuchs P. C., Barry A. L., Gavan T. L., Sommers H. M., Gerlach E. H. Cefoperazone (T-1551), a new semisynthetic cephalosporin: comparison with cephalothin and gentamicin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Apr;17(4):743–749. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.4.743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Rosenblatt J. E., Murray P. R., Sonnenwirth A. C., Joyce J. L. Comparison of anaerobic susceptibility results obtained by different methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Mar;15(3):351–355. doi: 10.1128/aac.15.3.351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Thornsberry C., Barry A. L., Jones R. N., Baker C. N., Badal R. E. Tentative interpretive standards for agar disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing of cefoperazone. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 May;15(5):769–776. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.5.769-776.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. West S. E., Wilkins T. D. Vaspar broth-disk procedure for antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Feb;17(2):288–291. doi: 10.1128/aac.17.2.288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wilkins T. D., Chalgren S. Medium for use in antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Dec;10(6):926–928. doi: 10.1128/aac.10.6.926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES