Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 30.
Published in final edited form as: Tetrahedron Lett. 2009 Sep 30;50(39):5467–5469. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.07.061

Synthesis of Sulfur-Containing Aryl and Heteroaryl Vinyls via Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling for the Preparation of SERS-Active Polymers

Rolando Perez-Pineiro a,b, Sheng Dai a, Ramon Alvarez-Puebla a, James Wigginton a, Baker Jawabrah Al-Hourani a,b, Hicham Fenniri a,b,*
PMCID: PMC2727673  NIHMSID: NIHMS133038  PMID: 20161185

Abstract

The preparation of sulfur-containing aryl and heteroaryl vinyl co-monomers via Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling between the corresponding mercaptomethyl arylboronates and in situ-generated vinyl bromides is described. Surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) studies of the target compounds on gold nanoparticles confirmed their potential as spectroscopic tags in the fabrication of SERS–encoded polymers for combinatorial screening and biomedical diagnostics.


The barcoded resins (BCRs) were recently introduced for applications in combinatorial synthesis and screening,1 and for biomedical diagnostics.2 The defining characteristic of the BCRs is their preparation from spectroscopically active styrene co-monomers displaying unique IR and Raman vibrational fingerprints. Using the styrene co-monomers’ substitution pattern as the source of spectral diversity, over 600 BCRs were generated from a small set of unique styrene co-monomers.3 The BCRs can be identified using hyperspectral4 and/or time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry5 imaging/mapping.

A potentially important application for the BCRs is in Dual REcursive Deconvolution (DRED), a strategy devised for the rapid screening of resin-supported combinatorial libraries.6 DRED operates through the iterative identification of the first and last randomized positions of active members in a combinatorial library generated through split synthesis. The last building block can be readily obtained from pool screening after the last step of library generation while identification of the first randomized position could be determined from the BCR’s vibrational fingerprint. To this end we developed a rapid bead identification strategy based on Raman spectroscopy.4

Although this method is limited by low signal to noise ratio, we have been able to record reliable spectra of the BCRs in 10 ms using state-of-the-art instrumentation,4 which translates into a screening speed of 10–100 beads/s. To further push this limit and reduce the cost associated with the Raman detection set-up, we opted to design a new family of metal nanoparticle–BCR (NP–BCR) composites that can be detected with very high sensitivity using surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS).7 With enhancement factors reaching 1011 relative to Raman scattering, thousands of beads could in principle be classified in a fraction of a second.8 To take advantage of the SERS effect, the encoded polymer must be chemically or physically adsorbed on the surface of a SERS-active nanoparticle (silver or gold).9 A key step toward this goal requires the synthesis of a new family of methylthio styrene derivatives that we describe in this report along with their characterization by Raman and SERS spectroscopies. Because of their high affinity for metallic surfaces, we reasoned that the thioether groups would adsorb to the nanoparticle surface to generate a self-assembled monolayer, which can then be copolymerized with a styrene co-monomer in a suspension polymerization set-up1 to generate SERS-active BCRs.

Chart 1 shows sulfide-containing aryl and heteroaryl vinyl compounds obtained via Pd-catalyzed Suzuki cross-coupling between vinyl bromide generated in situ and the corresponding aryl/heteroaryl boronic acids. This strategy differs from our previously reported method10 for thioacetyl styrene derivatives not only from the synthetic point of view but also from a practical perspective. The thioethers prepared here are anticipated to be chemically more stable, thus preventing undesired crosslinking, known to dramatically affect the physical properties of the beads such as swelling, porosity, and on-bead reactivity.1b

Chart 1.

Chart 1

Mecaptomethyl styrenes have previously been obtained either by dehydration of (methylthiophenyl) methanol in the presence of Al2O311 or by reaction of Grignard reagents from halo-(alkyl)styrenes with dimethyl disulfide.12 Palladium catalyzed cross-coupling reactions are efficient to introduce a vinyl group onto aromatic rings. Examples covering the use of potassium vinyl-trifluorborate,13 vinyl-tributyltin,14 trivinyl-indium,15 vinyl-magnesium,16 vinyl-polysiloxane17 and vinyl-triethylsilane,18 have been extensively reviewed in the recent literature. However, the use of sulfur-containing substrates in vinylation reactions have not received as much attention.19,20 Recently Lando et al. reported a simple and efficient protocol for the synthesis of several functionalized styrenes via Pd-catalyzed Suzuki cross-coupling between arylboronic acids and vinyl bromide generated in situ from 1,2-dibromo ethane.20 Taking into account the simplicity of this experimental procedure, the use of mild reaction conditions and its functional group tolerance, we decided to extend its scope to the preparation of sulfur-containing aryl and heteroaryl vinyl co-monomers.

Monitoring of the reaction progress by GC-MS confirmed the formation of the desired compounds. After final work-up and purification by flash chromatography, the three mecaptomethyl styrene isomers, Table 1 (Entry a–c), were isolated in moderate yields as the main reaction products. Interestingly, the most sterically hindered ortho-mecaptomethyl styrene derivative 1c was obtained in higher yield. A possible explanation for this result could lie in the co-existence of a parallel competing homocoupling reaction inferred from the concomitant formation of the corresponding bis-mecaptomethyl-biphenyls 2a–c (Chart 1). We then explored the synthesis of vinyl heterocyclic compounds. The 3-vinylthiophene co-monomer (1d) was previously obtained via Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling of 3-bromo thiophene with potassium vinyltrifluorborate13 or triethyl vinylsilanes.18 However, these procedures tend to have long reaction times and/or poor yields, commonly associated with an inefficient oxidative addition step of the thiophene ring to the Pd(0) complex. In this context we have found that involvement of this heterocycle in the transmetalation step to the Pd(II) center, as a thiophene-3-ylboronic acid derivative, greatly improves the synthetic outcome of co-monomer 1d. Consistent with this result, a successful catalytic coupling reaction between thiophene boronic acid with heteroaryl bromides or activated heteroaryl chlorides in the presence of Pd(II) and monophosphines was recently reported.21 Finally, the cross-coupling reaction of 6-(mecaptomethyl)pyridin-3-ylboronic acid was also tested and the corresponding vinyl derivative 1e was obtained in low yields. In this case the major reaction product identified was the 2-(methylthio)pyridine resulting from a thermal protodeboronation process upon prolonged heating.

Table 1.

Results of the Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reaction between 1, 2-dibromoethane and the corresponding aryl or heteroaryl boronic acids.

graphic file with name nihms133038f3.jpg
Entry Product 1 Yield (%)a 1:2
a 1a 41:4.8
b 1b 33:12
c 1c 51:2.5
d 1d 60:2.8
e 1e 17:0
a

Isolated yields for cross-coupling product. All compounds were characterized by 1H/13C NMR, Raman, SERS, GC/MS, and MS.

To test the potential of compounds 1a–e in the preparation of SERS-active BCRs, the Raman spectra of co-monomers 1a–e were recorded and compared with the corresponding predicted spectra. Furthermore the SERS spectra were recorded in the presence of a Au(0) nanoparticle (Au–NP) solution22 (Figure 1). In all cases, the predicted spectra for the pure compounds correlated well with the experimental Raman and SERS spectra. While the Raman experiments were carried out on the bulk material, the SERS spectra were recorded using dilute solutions of each co-monomer (~10−5 M), thus confirming the coordination of the mecaptomethyl moiety onto the Au–NP. The significant enhancement of the C–S stretching vibrational mode is further evidence of the coordination to the Au–NP surface. Table S1 summarizes the assignment of the most characteristic Raman and SERS bands for each co-monomer. From this data, it is clear that each co-monomer features a unique vibrational spectrum, which is a key requisite for their utilization in the preparation of a library of SERS-active BCRs.1

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Calculated, Raman, and SERS spectra for compounds 1a–e.

Supplementary Material

01

Acknowledgments

We thank NRC–Canada, NSERC–Canada, and the US National Institutes of Health for supporting this program.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References and notes

  • 1.(a) Fenniri H, Ding L, Ribbe AE, Zyrianov Y. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:8151–8152. doi: 10.1021/ja016375h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Fenniri H, Chun S, Ding L, Zyrianov Y, Hallenga K. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:10546–10560. doi: 10.1021/ja035665q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Blais DR, Alvarez–Puebla RA, Bravo–Vasquez JP, Fenniri H, Pezacki J-P. Biotechnol J. 2008;3:948–953. doi: 10.1002/biot.200700236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Raez J, Blais DR, Zhang Y, Alvarez–Puebla RA, Bravo–Vasquez J–P, Pezacki JP, Fenniri H. Langmuir. 2007:6482–6485. doi: 10.1021/la700701x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Bravo–Vasquez J–P, Alvarez–Puebla RA, Fenniri H. Sensors & Actuators B: Chemical. 2007;125:357–359. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fenniri H, Chun S, Terreau O, Bravo–Vasquez J–P. J Comb Chem. 2008;10:31–36. doi: 10.1021/cc7001292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fenniri H, Terreau N, Chun S, Oh SJ, Finney WF, Morris MD. J Comb Chem. 2006;8:192–198. doi: 10.1021/cc050128i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chun S, Xu J, Cheng J, Ding L, Winograd N, Fenniri H. J Comb Chem. 2006;8:18–25. doi: 10.1021/cc050086y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fenniri H, Hedderich HG, Haber KS, Achkar J, Taylor B, Ben–Amotz D. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2000;39(24):4483–4485. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.(a) Farah AA, Alvarez–Puebla RA, Fenniri H. J Coll Interf Sci. 2008;319:572–576. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.11.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Farah AA, Bravo-Vasquez J-P, Alvarez-Puebla RA, Cho J-Y, Fenniri H. Small . 2009 doi: 10.1002/smll.200801398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Camden JP, Dieringer JA, Van Duyne RP. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:1662–1673. doi: 10.1021/ar800041s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kneipp K, Kneipp H. Acc Chem Res. 2006;39:443–450. doi: 10.1021/ar050107x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Jain PK, Huang X, El–Sayed IH, El–Sayed MA. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:1578–1586. doi: 10.1021/ar7002804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Zhao J, Pinchuk AO, McMahon JM, Li S, Ausman LK, Atkinson AL, Schatz GC. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:1710–1720. doi: 10.1021/ar800028j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Lal S, Clare SE, Halas JN. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:1842–1851. doi: 10.1021/ar800150g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Brus L. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:1742–1749. doi: 10.1021/ar800121r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.(a) Zhang J, Gao Y, Alvarez–Puebla R, Fenniri H, Buriak JM. Adv Mat. 2006;18:3233–3237. [Google Scholar]; (b) Alvarez–Puebla RA, Cui B, Bravo–Vasquez J–P, Veres T, Fenniri H. J Phys Chem C. 2007;1:6720–6723. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.200700085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Alvarez–Puebla RA, Bravo–Vasquez J–P, Cui B, Veres T, Fenniri H. ChemMedChem. 2007;2:1165–1167. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.200700085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Alvarez–Puebla R, Bravo–Vasquez J–P, Cheben P, Xu D–X, Waldron P, Fenniri H. J Coll Interf Sci. 2009;333:237–241. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.01.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jawabrah Al–Hourani B, Bravo–Vasquez J–P, High H, Fenniri H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007;48:9144–9147. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.10.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bachman GB, Carlson CL. J Am Chem Soc. 1951;73:2857–2858. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hirao A, Shione H, Ishizone T, Nakahama S. Macromolecules. 1997;30:3728–3731. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Molander GA. J Org Chem. 2006;71:9681–9686. doi: 10.1021/jo0617013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Su W, Urgaonkar S, McLaughlin PA, Verkade JG. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:16433–16439. doi: 10.1021/ja0450096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Perez I, Perez JS, Sarandeses LA. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:4155–4160. doi: 10.1021/ja004195m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bumagin NA, Luzikova EV. J Organomet Chem. 1997;532:271–273. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Denmark SE, Butler CR. Org Lett. 2006;8:63–66. doi: 10.1021/ol052517r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Battace A, Zair T, Doucet H, Santelli M. J Organomet Chem. 2005;690:3790–3802. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Berthiol F, Doucet H, Santelli M. Synthetic Commun. 2006;36:3019–3027. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lando VR, Monteiro R. Org Lett. 2003;5:2891–2894. doi: 10.1021/ol034948k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Billingsley K, Buchwald L. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:3358–3366. doi: 10.1021/ja068577p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kumar S, Gandhi KS, Kumar R. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2007;46:6066–6083. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES