We thank Brennan and colleagues for their comment in supporting our conclusion that dedicated neck lump clinics will achieve a higher yield of diagnostic neck node biopsies. Our paper referred to a time when there was no dedicated neck lump clinic and when there was limited use of fine needle aspiration cytology and ultrasound scanning. It was written to illustrate the problems that arise when there are no defined pathways of care and, as we concluded, may still represent a level of care in the absence of dedicated neck lump clinics.
. 2008 Nov;90(8):713. doi: 10.1308/003588408X321846d
Authors' Response
James W Moor
1, Chris Bem
1
James W Moor
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK
Find articles by James W Moor
Chris Bem
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK
Find articles by Chris Bem
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK
✉
Correspondence to James Moor, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford BD9 6RJ, UK. E: jim@docmoor.freeserve.co.uk
Copyright © 2008 by the Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
PMCID: PMC2727842
See the letter "Reducing the Number of Open Node Biopsies Carried Out for Benign Disease" on page 713.