Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 21.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2009 Apr 21;48(15):3325–3334. doi: 10.1021/bi900115w

Table 2.

Summary of the metal and DNA binding affinities and allosteric coupling free energies for metalloderivatives of wild-type and E90A Bsu CsoR

Bsu CsoR metal metal binding affinitya DNA binding affinityb Δ Gc
(M-1) K1 (M-1) K2 (M-1) (kcal/mol)
Wild-type apo - 3.1 (±0.8) × 107 8.3 (±2.2) × 107 -
Cu(I) ≥ 1021 2.9 (±0.4) × 106 ≤1.0 × 105 ≥ +5.4
Co(II) ≤ 105 - - -
Ni(II) 3.6 (±0.3) × 109 5.7 (±1.0) × 106 3.1 (±0.5) × 107 +1.6 (±0.3)
Zn(II) 1.6 (±0.1) × 108,c 1.0 (±0.3) × 107 1.5 (±0.4) × 107 +1.7 (±0.3)
E90A apo - 9.5 (±3.0) × 106 1.3 (±0.4) × 107 -
Cu(I) ≥ 1021 4.8 (±2.0) × 106 1.1 (±0.4) × 108 -0.9 (±0.4)
a

The results of fitting to a simple 1:1 (metal:monomer) binding model.

b

Solution conditions: 10 mM MES, 0.4 M NaCl, 2 mM DTT, pH 6.5, 25 °C. We note that unique values of K1 and K2 are not readily resolved in this assay (see Methods)

c

A fit to two-site step-wise dimer binding models gives KZn1= 1.7 (±0.4) × 109 M-1; KZn2= 4.5 (±0.3) × 107 M-1 (see Supplementary Figure S1).