Abstract
Atom economy1 and chemoselectivity2 constitute two of the major challenges for enhancement of synthetic efficiency. The syntheses of complex natural products constitute the most demanding arena for exploration of such principles. The combination of extraordinary promising biological activity and the structural complexity of the bryostatins with the benchmark provided by earlier syntheses of some members make them an excellent target for such studies. Herein, we report a concise total synthesis of bryostatin 16 (1). Bryostatin 16 was chosen as the specific synthetic target, most critically because bryostatin 16 could potentially act as a pivotal parent structure to allow access to almost all other bryostatins. Moreover, its synthesis could provide an essential chemical probe by enabling facile analogue syntheses with variations in most parts of the structure, to allow fine-tuning of the biological functions. Application of atom economical and chemoselective reactions under development in these laboratories provides ready access to polyhydropyrans, common structural features of numerous polyacetate-polypropionate derived natural products. Most notably, our strategy of employing the combination of two transition metal catalysts (palladium and gold) demonstrates a new chemoselective and atom-economical macrocyclization reaction between two different alkynes and subsequent formation of the C-ring dihydropyran in the context of a complex natural product synthesis.
The bryostatins 1–20 (Fig. 1), originally isolated from the marine bryozoan Bugula neritina, are a class of structurally complex macrolactone natural products, which exhibit exceptional biological activity, most notable their anticancer activity in vivo3. Clinical application of bryostatin in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents has shown significant potential to treat some cancers with high potency4,5. Furthermore, recent studies have revealed that bryostatin significantly affects both cognition and memory enhancement in animals, which suggests potential use of bryostatin for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease, depression and other cognitive impairments6. Although bryostatins’ activities could be attributed to their strong affinity for protein kinase C (PKC) isozymes7, their actual mode of action is still an important research subject. Unfortunately, their clinical advancement is hampered by the limited source of byrostatins from isolation: low yield (ca. 1.6 × 10−4%, 18 g of bryostatin 1, one of the most abundant members, from 14 t of animals on industrial scale8) and non-renewable supply. Therefore, efficient total syntheses of these natural products9–12 and their analogues13–16 remain in high demand.
Figure 1. Structures of bryostatins 1–20.
The structures of bryostatins constitute significant synthetic challenges, which include three heavily substituted polyhydropyran rings, two acid/base-sensitive exo-cyclic unsaturated esters, one congested C16–17 trans-olefin, as well as numerous oxygen-containing functionalities on a 26-membered lactone. As an example, the challenge posed by the C16–17 double bond led to failure in routes relying on its formation by metathesis reactions17, even in the case of a relay metathesis strategy16. Despite their biological, clinical and structural significance, to date only three of the twenty bryostatins have been accessed by total synthesis (bryostatin 7 by Masamune9, bryostatin 2 by Evans10, and bryostatin 3 by Nishiyama and Yamamura11).
With a goal of streamlining the strategy to these complicated targets to enable more extensive access, we chose bryostatin 16 (1)18 as the specific synthetic target, which was motivated by three circumstances: (i) bryostatin 16 could act as a pivotal parent structure to allow access to all other bryostatins (except bryostatin 3, 19 and 20; see Fig. 1) by elaboration of the electron-rich and relatively reactive C19–20 olefin10,16 (for a promising biosynthetic approach, see ref. 19); (ii) the dihydropyran entity of the C-ring in 1 offers an ideal forum for us to explore a Pd-catalyzed alkyne-alkyne coupling as a novel macrocyclization method20, which has not previously existed in a complex natural product synthesis; (iii) new analogues, which are not easily available from other syntheses, might be readily obtained simply by variations in this natural product’s synthesis.
From a view of retrosynthetic analysis, the acid and/or base sensitivity of the C-ring of bryostatins (see ref. 10) leads us to conceive a strategy of constructing the C-ring of bryostatin 16 at the very end of the synthesis. The benefits also include flexible late variations for the access to other bryostatins or analogues, as well as minimization of functional group transformation and protecting group usage. While all previous total syntheses have relied on assembling the macrocycle by a demanding Julia olefination followed by a lactonization, we envisioned the use of a Pd-catalyzed chemoselective alkyne-alkyne coupling followed by a metal-catalyzed 6-endo-dig cyclization would efficiently construct both the macrocycle and the C-ring of 1 (Fig. 2). Esterification between fragments 4 and 5 would give the requisite diyne precursor. Fragment 5 could be synthesized from vinyl silane 6. The 4-methylene-2,6-cis-tetrahydropyran moiety in intermediate 6 provides a perfect opportunity to examine our Ru-catalyzed alkene-alkyne coupling/Michael addition methodology21 between two complex fragments (7 and 8) aiming to address some chemoselectivity challenges. Given the difficulty to form the sterically hindered C16–17 olefin in the late stage (either by Julia olefination10 or ring-closing metathesis16,17), alkyne 8 was specifically designed to install this trans alkene in an early stage.
Figure 2. Retrosynthetic Analysis.
Alkene 7 has been previously synthesized in 16 steps from (R)-pantolactone16. This synthesis can be shortened (Fig. 3) however by starting from aldehyde 2. Asymmetric Brown allylation22, followed by PMB protection and oxidative olefin-cleavage quickly afforded aldehyde 10 as the same intermediate in our previous synthesis. With this modification, alkene 7 is now available in 11 steps from aldehyde 2. Enantioselective synthesis of alkyne 8 was achieved in four steps from the same aldehyde 2 (see Fig. 3). Homologation, followed by indium-mediated propargylation23 efficiently gave racemic 8 in good yield. (R)-8 was then obtained in 90% yield and 90% ee via careful Dess–Martin oxidation24 followed by CBS reduction25 of the corresponding ketone.
Figure 3. Synthesis of alkene 7 and alkyne 8.
Reaction conditions: a) (−)-(Ipc)2B(allyl), Et2O, −90 °C, 67%, 94% ee; b) PMB-Br, NaH, DMF, 90%; c) OsO4 (2 mol %), 2,6-lutidine, NaIO4, dioxane/water (3:1), 87%; d) (Z)-1-bromo-2-ethoxyethene, t-BuLi, Me2Zn, then 2, Et2O, −78 °C; then NaHSO4, rt, 97%; e) (3-bromo-1-propynyl)-trimethylsilane, indium powder, InF3 (10 mol %), THF, 65 °C, 68%; f) (i) Dess–Martin periodinane, NaHCO3, DCM; (ii) (S)-2-methyl-CBS-oxazaborolidine (5 mol %), catechol-borane, DCM, −78 °C, 90%, 90% ee over two steps. Ipc, isopinocamphenyl; PMB, p-methoxybenzyl; DMF, N,N-dimethylformamide. THF, tetrahydrofuran; DCM, dichloromethane. For tabulated spectral data of all depicted compounds, please see the Supplementary Information.
With both alkene 7 and alkyne 8 in hand, the Ru-catalyzed tandem alkene-alkyne coupling/Michael addition proceeded beautifully to generate cis-tetrahydropyran 6. The chemoselectivity was demonstrated by the high compatibility of a β,γ-unsaturated ketone, a six-membered lactone, an unprotected allylic alcohol, a PMB ether and two different silyl ethers in this reaction. DCM was found to be the optimal solvent for this reaction, while acetone or a DCM-DMF mixed solvent gave either lower conversion or more decomposition. Notably, only 1.2 equiv of alkene 7 is required in this coupling reaction (see Fig. 4A). Though the yield is moderate presumably due to the fact that additional olefin functionality in the alkyne fragment could lower the turnover number of the Ru catalyst, this result has been proved highly reproducible and both starting materials could be recovered, which guaranteed enough materials for the rest of the synthesis. Subsequent bromination of the exo-cyclic vinyl silane followed by a CSA catalyzed transesterification–methyl ketalization–desilylation all in one event, cleanly gave the desired alcohol 13 containing both the A-ring and B-ring substructures in over 90% yield. The vinyl bromide functionality may serve as a convenient handle for the syntheses of bryostatin analogues via the use of metal-catalyzed coupling reactions. Pd-catalyzed carbonylation was next used to install the exo-cyclic conjugated methyl ester. Dess–Martin oxidation of the primary alcohol 14 followed by Ohira–Bestmann alkynylation25 and desilylation provided donor alkyne 15 for the alkyne-alkyne coupling. The challenge of chemoselective hydrolysis of the β-hydroxy methyl ester in the presence of the α,β-unsaturated methyl ester was overcome by the use of trimethyltin hydroxide26 in DCE; we hypothesized that due to the Lewis acidity of trimethyltin hydroxide, the adjacent alcohol could act as a directing group in the saponification reaction. Subsequent TES protection completed the synthesis of acid fragment 5. Alcohol fragment 4 was synthesized in three steps from the known16 homo-propargyl alcohol 17 (Fig. 4B).
Figure 4. Synthesis of acid 5 and alcohol 4.
Reaction conditions: a) CpRu(CH3CN)3PF6 (13 mol %), DCM, 34% (80% brsm); b) NBS, DMF, 98%; c) CSA (10 mol %), MeOH, 0 °C, 93–96%; d) PdCl2(CH3CN)2 (10 mol%), dppf (30 mol %), CO (1 atm), MeOH, Et3N, DMF, 80 °C, 83% (90% brsm); e) Dess–Martin periodinane, NaHCO3, DCM, 88%; f) Ohira–Bestmann reagent, K2CO3, MeOH, 97%; g) TBAF, HOAc, THF, 90% (96% brsm); h) (CH3)3SnOH, DCE, 80 °C, 84%; i) TESOTf, 2,6-lutidine, DCM, −10 °C to 0 °C, 76–79%. j) Cu(OTf)2 (3 mol %), PMBOC(NH)CCl3, toluene, −10 °C; k) PPTS, MeOH, 93% over two steps; l) TBSOTf, 2,6-lutidine, DCM, −78 °C, 71%. Cp, cyclopentadienyl; brsm, based on recovered starting material; NBS, N-bromosuccinimide; CSA, camphorsulfonic acid; dppf, 1,1’-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene; TBAF, tetra-n-butylammonium fluoride; DCE, 1,2-dichloroethane; TES, triethylsilyl; OTf, trifluoromethanesulfonate; PPTS, pyridinium p-toluenesulfonate; TBS, t-butyldimethylsilyl. For tabulated spectral data of all depicted compounds, please see the Supplementary Information.
Esterification between acid 5 and alcohol 4 proceeded in 92% yield using Yamaguchi’s conditions28 (Fig. 5). Oxidative removal of the two PMB protecting groups using DDQ gave the macrocyclization precursor 3. After extensive experimentation, treatment of 3 with 12 mol % Pd(OAc)2 and 15 mol % TDMPP in toluene at room temperature successfully provided the desired macrocycle 20 with reasonably good yield (56%), while the use of THF or benzene as solvent, or lower ligand/Pd ratio proved less efficient. Like other macrocyclizations, low concentration [0.002M] proved to be critical, otherwise, formation of the dimeric byproducts could be observed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of using Pd-catalyzed alkyne-alkyne coupling as a macrocyclization method in a complex natural product synthesis, which illustrates a new avenue of using C-C bond formation to construct a macrocycle. Mechanistically, the Pd catalyst chemoselectively inserts into the C-H bond of the terminal alkyne that, then, sets the stage for the chemo- and regioselective intramolecular carbametalation of the disubstituted alkyne, which, after reductive elimination of the formed vinylpalladium hydride, creates the macrocycle efficiently in spite of the complexity of the substrate. The remaining challenge was to conduct a 6-endo-dig cyclization to form the C-ring of bryostatin. Due to the modest selectivity in the Pd-catalyzed reaction (5-exo vs 6-endo) and difficulty in separation of these isomers16, a more regioselective catalyst was sought. After extensive screening of a number of metals, we settled upon a cationic gold complex [Au(PPh3)]SbF6 as the catalyst (for a cationic gold-catalyzed 5-exo cyclization, see ref. 29). DCM-CH3CN (10:1) as a mixed solvent in the presence of NaHCO3 (10 equiv) as a buffer, gave the acid-sensitive 6-endo product in a satisfying 73% isolated yield. Subsequent pivalation of the hindered secondary alcohol under rather forcing conditions (Piv2O 50 equiv, DMAP 80 equiv, 50 °C)30 did afford the pivalate ester 21 in 62% yield. The following global deprotection proved to be nontrivial: HF-pyridine, aq. HF, aq. HOAc, PPTS, etc. gave either decomposition or isomerization. An unreported extreme acid-sensitivity of this natural product was eventually found. In contrast to these acid conditions, treatment of 21 with 5 equiv of TBAF and direct purification by reverse phase HPLC successfully provided bryostatin 16 (1), which was spectroscopically identical to the literature (Reported optical rotation [α]D: + 84, c 0.43, MeOH; Found [α]D: + 81, c 0.04, MeOH)18.
Figure 5. Synthesis of bryostatin 16.
Reaction conditions: a) 5, 2,4,6-trichlorobenzoyl chloride, Et3N, toluene, then 4, DMAP, 92%; b) DDQ, pH 7.0 buffer, DCM, 46% 3 and 58% 19; c) Pd(OAc)2 (12 mol %), TDMPP (15 mol %), toluene, 56%; d) AuCl(PPh3) (20 mol %), AgSbF6 (20 mol %), NaHCO3, DCM/CH3CN, 0 °C to rt, 73%; e) Piv2O, DMAP, DCM, 50 °C, 62%; f) TBAF, THF, ca 52%. DMAP, N,N-4-dimethylaminopyridine; DDQ, 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone; TDMPP, tris(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)phosphine; Piv, pivaloyl. For tabulated spectral data of all depicted compounds, please see the Supplementary Information.
In conclusion, we have developed a unique and highly concise strategy (26 longest linear sequence, 39 total steps from aldehyde 2) for the asymmetric total synthesis of bryostatin 16. The synthetic efficiency can be attributed to a tandem Ru-catalyzed alkene-alkyne coupling/Michael addition to form the B-ring, an acid-catalyzed one-pot cascade to form the A-ring, a directed chemoselective hydrolysis, a Pd-catalyzed alkyne-alkyne coupling as a novel macrocyclization reaction and a new gold-catalyzed 6-endo-dig cyclization to form the C-ring of bryostatin 16. We believe these atom-economical and chemoselective approaches could have indications beyond this work. The conciseness of this synthesis readily allows access to significant quantities of this key bryostatin and implementation of this strategy towards the syntheses of various bryostatins and their analogues, as well as the related biological experiments, is being undertaken.
Supplementary Material
is linked to the online version of the paper at www.nature.com/nature.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the National Institutes of Health (GM 13598) for their generous support of our programs. GD is a Stanford Graduate Fellow. We thank Dr. Hanbiao Yang for thoughtful discussion and his help characterizing compound 21, and we additionally thank him and Cheyenne S. Brindle for providing synthetic intermediates. Palladium and ruthenium salts were generously supplied by Johnson-Matthey. We acknowledge Dr. Stephen R. Lynch for his invaluable help on 2D-NMR analysis. We also thank the Wender group’s kind assistance on their reverse-phase HPLC.
References
- 1.Trost BM. The atom economy--a search for synthetic efficiency. Science. 1991;254:1471–1477. doi: 10.1126/science.1962206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Trost BM. Selectivity: a key to synthetic efficiency. Science. 1983;219:245–250. doi: 10.1126/science.219.4582.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hale KJ, Hummersone MG, Manaviazar S, Frigerio M. The chemistry and biology of the bryostatin antitumour macrolides. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2002;19:413–453. doi: 10.1039/b009211h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Marine natural products and related compounds in clinical and advanced preclinical trials. J. Nat. Prod. 2004;67:1216–1238. doi: 10.1021/np040031y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dowlati A, et al. Phase I and correlative study of combination bryostatin 1 and vincristine in relapsed B-cell malignancies. Clin. Cancer Res. 2003;9:5929–5935. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hongpaisan J, Alkon DL. A structural basis for enhancement of long-term associative memory in single dendritic spines regulated by PKC. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007;104:19571–19576. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709311104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dell’Aquilla ML, Harold CL, Kamano Y, Pettit GR, Blumberg PM. Differential effects of bryostatins and phorbol esters on arachidonic acid metabolite release and epidermal growth factor binding in C3H 10T1/2 cells. Cancer Res. 1988;48:3702–3708. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schaufelberger DE, et al. The large-scale isolation of bryostatin 1 from Bugula neritina following current good manufacturing practices. J. Nat. Prod. 1991;54:1265–1270. doi: 10.1021/np50077a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kageyama M, et al. Synthesis of bryostatin 7. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990;112:7407–7408. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Evans DA, et al. Total synthesis of bryostatin 2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121:7540–7552. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ohmori K, et al. Total synthesis of bryostatin 3. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000;39:2290–2294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Manaviazar S, et al. Enantioselective formal total synthesis of the antitumor macrolide bryostatin 7. Org. Lett. 2006;8:4477–4480. doi: 10.1021/ol061626i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wender PA, Verma VA. The design, synthesis and evaluation of C7 diversified bryostatin analogs reveals a hot spot for PKC affinity. Org. Lett. 2008;10:3331–3334. doi: 10.1021/ol801235h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wender PA, DeChristopher BA, Schrier AJ. Efficient synthetic access to a new family of highly potent bryostatin analogues via a Prins-driven macrocyclization strategy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:6658–6659. doi: 10.1021/ja8015632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Keck GE, et al. Convergent assembly of highly potent analogues of bryostatin 1 via pyran annulation: bryostatin look-alikes that mimic phorbol ester function. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:6660–6661. doi: 10.1021/ja8022169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Trost BM, Yang H, Thiel OR, Frontier AJ, Brindle CS. Synthesis of a ring-expanded bryostatin analogue. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:2206–2207. doi: 10.1021/ja067305j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ball M, et al. A preliminary evaluation of a metathesis approach to bryostatins. Tetrahedron. Lett. 2006;47:2223–2227. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pettit GR, et al. Antineoplastic agents. 340. Isolation and structural elucidation of bryostatins 16–18. J. Nat. Prod. 1996;59:286–289. doi: 10.1021/np960100b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sudek S, et al. Identification of the putative bryostatin polyketide synthase gene cluster from "candidatus endobugula sertula", the uncultivated microbial symbiont of the marine bryozoan bugula neritina. J. Nat. Prod. 2007;70:67–74. doi: 10.1021/np060361d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Trost BM, Matsubara S, Caringi JJ. Cycloisomerization of α,ω-diynes to macrocycles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989;111:8745–8746. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Trost BM, Yang H, Wuitschik GA. Ru-catalyzed tandem alkyne-enone coupling/Michael addition: synthesis of 4-methylene-2,6-cis-tetrahydropyrans. Org. Lett. 2005;7:4761–4764. doi: 10.1021/ol0520065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Brown HC, Jadhav PK. Asymmetric carbon-carbon bond formation via β-allyldiisopinocampheylborane. Simple synthesis of secondary homoallylic alcohols with excellent enantiomeric purities. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983;105:2092–2093. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lin M, Loh T. Indium-mediated reaction of trialkylsilyl propargyl bromide with aldehydes: highly regioselective synthesis of allenic and homopropargylic alcohols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:13042–13043. doi: 10.1021/ja037410i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dess DB, Martin JC. A useful 12-I-5 triacetoxyperiodinane (the Dess-Martin periodinane) for the selective oxidation of primary or secondary alcohols and a variety of related 12-I-5 species. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991;113:7277–7287. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Corey EJ, Helal JC. Reduction of carbonyl compounds with chiral oxazaborolidine catalysts: A new paradigm for enantioselective catalysis and a powerful new synthetic method. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998;37:1986–2012. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19980817)37:15<1986::AID-ANIE1986>3.0.CO;2-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Roth GJ, Liepold B, Müller SG, Bestmann HJ. Further improvements of the synthesis of alkynes from aldehydes. Synthesis. 2004:59–62. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nicolaou KC, Estrada AA, Zak M, Lee SH, Safina BS. A mild and selective method for the hydrolysis of esters with trimethyltin hydroxide. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005;44:1378–1382. doi: 10.1002/anie.200462207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Inanaga J, Hirata K, Saeki H, Katsuki T, Yamaguchi M. A rapid esterification by mixed anhydride and its application to large-ring lactonization. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1979;52:1989–1993. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu Y, Song F, Song Z, Liu M, Yan B. Gold-catalyzed cyclization of (Z)-2-en-4-yn-1-ols: highly efficient synthesis of fully substituted dihydrofurans and furans. Org. Lett. 2005;7:5409. doi: 10.1021/ol052160r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pettit GR, Sengupta D, Herald CL, Sharkey NA, Blumberg PM. Antineoplastic agents. 192. Synthetic conversion of bryostatin 2 to bryostatin 1 and related bryopyrans. Can. J. Chem. 1991;69:856–860. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
is linked to the online version of the paper at www.nature.com/nature.





