Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1983 Dec;18(6):1335–1339. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.6.1335-1339.1983

Conventional and radiometric drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex.

A Laszlo, P Gill, V Handzel, M M Hodgkin, D M Helbecque
PMCID: PMC272903  PMID: 6418755

Abstract

A recently developed method of drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis which measures the evolution of labeled CO2 from [1-14C]palmitic acid (BACTEC 460 system) was compared to three conventional methods. The proportion method of drug susceptibility testing was the standard against which all test results were compared. Indirect drug susceptibility to isoniazid, streptomycin, rifampin, and ethambutol of 245 isolates belonging to the M. tuberculosis complex was determined. In 95% of the cases, results obtained by the radiometric method were available within 1 week, as opposed to 3 to 6 weeks needed in conventional methodology. Overall agreement was 96.4%. Specificity values ranged from 0.98 to 1.0; sensitivity values of 1.0 for rifampin, 0.96 for streptomycin, 0.91 for isoniazid, and 0.18 for ethambutol were obtained. The specificity of the absolute concentration and resistance ratio drug susceptibility testing methods were 0.99 and 1.0, respectively. The sensitivity of the former was higher than that of the radiometric method (0.99 verus 0.92), whereas that of the latter was lower (0.88 verus 0.96). Further testing indicated that the low sensitivity determined for ethambutol may be due to the choice of the critical concentration used, rather than to a shortcoming of the procedure. The radiometric method thus does not significantly differ in reliability from conventional methods of drug susceptibility testing of M. tuberculosis.

Full text

PDF
1335

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Canetti G., Fox W., Khomenko A., Mahler H. T., Menon N. K., Mitchison D. A., Rist N., Smelev N. A. Advances in techniques of testing mycobacterial drug sensitivity, and the use of sensitivity tests in tuberculosis control programmes. Bull World Health Organ. 1969;41(1):21–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Montalbine V., Collins F. M. Determination of drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cultures. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Apr;21(4):732–738. doi: 10.1128/am.21.4.732-738.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Siddiqi S. H., Libonati J. P., Middlebrook G. Evaluation of rapid radiometric method for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 May;13(5):908–912. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.5.908-912.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Snider D. E., Jr, Good R. C., Kilburn J. O., Laskowski L. F., Jr, Lusk R. H., Marr J. J., Reggiardo Z., Middlebrook G. Rapid drug-susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981 Apr;123(4 Pt 1):402–406. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1981.123.4.402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wayne L. G., Krasnow I. Preparation of tuberculosis susceptibility testing mediums by means of impregnated disks. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966 Jun;45(6):769–771. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/45.6_ts.769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES