Educational Objectives.
After reviewing this article, readers should be able to:
▪ Define preventative (prophylactic) pharmacotherapy and specify when it may be necessary in the treatment of migraine.
▪ List the various preventative pharmacotherapies and their role in migraine management.
▪ Describe the role of the various migraine pharmacotherapies for special populations, including children, pregnant women, and the elderly.
▪ Describe the general pharmacological treatment pathway for the management of migraine.
This is part 2 of a two-part series.
Introduction
Migraine, its pathophysiology, and abortive (acute) pharmacotherapy were described in Part 1 of this two-part series in the July issue of P&T. Part 2 discusses the role of preventative (prophylactic) pharmacotherapy and the role of migraine treatments in special populations. It also provides an overview and guideline summary for general treatment pathways for the pharmacotherapy of migraine.
Prophylactic Therapy
Preventative migraine therapy refers to the daily administration of drug therapy for various periods, usually three to 12 months. The goals are to reduce the frequency and severity of attacks, to improve and reduce disability, and to minimize or eliminate the need for abortive drug therapy. Patients may be candidates for preventative therapy if they are experiencing two or more migraines per week, if their attacks last more than 48 hours, or if they have ineffective responses or contraindications to abortive therapy.1–5 Although numerous medications are used in the management of migraine (Table 1), the commonly used agents that have been studied and that have reported efficacy include the beta blockers, the tricyclic antidepressants, and some anticonvulsants.1
Table 1.
Prophylactic Pharmacotherapies for Migraine Headache
Drug Class | Agent, Dose Range | Monitoring Parameter |
---|---|---|
Beta blockers | Propranolol (Inderal)* 40–240 mg/day in divided doses or LA q.d.
Nadolol (Corgard) 20–120 mg q.d. or b.i.d. Timolol (Blocadren)* 20–60 mg q.d. or b.i.d. Atenolol (Tenormin) 25–100 mg q.d. Metoprolol (Toprol) 50–200 mg b.i.d. |
Side effects
Efficacy |
Antidepressants | Tricyclic agents
SSRIs: Fluoxetine (Prozac) 10–80 mg q.d. |
Side effects
Efficacy |
Anticonvulsants | Valproic acid (Depakene):* start 250 mg h.s. or b.i.d., titrate dose to 1,500 daily in divided doses Divalproex sodium 1,000 mg q.d.
|
Side effects
Efficacy Cognitive effects |
Calcium-channel blockers | Verapamil (Calan) 240–360 mg daily in divided doses | Side effects
Efficacy |
NSAIDs | Naproxen sodium (Naprosyn) 550–1,100 mg daily in divided doses
Ketoprofen 150 mg daily in divided doses |
Side effects
|
These agents are FDA-approved for migraine prophylaxis.
b.i.d. = twice daily; ECG = electrocardiogram; ER = extended-release; h.s. = at bedtime; LA = long-acting; MAOI = monoamine oxidase inhibitor; NSAID = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; q.d. = once daily; t.i.d. = three times daily.
Beta-Adrenergic Blockers
Beta blockers were first recognized in the 1960s as effective in migraine prophylaxis; by the 1970s, their use was well established, and they continue to be a treatment of choice.1,6–10 Their mechanism of action is not completely understood, although it may involve modulation of the adrenergic nervous system and an influence on cranial blood vessels.11–13
Beta blockers have been reported to be effective in approximately 70% of patients, with most data available for the non-selective agents propranolol (e.g., Inderal, Wyeth), timolol maleate (e.g., Blocadren, Merck), and nadolol (Corgard, King).14–27 Studies with propranolol reported efficacy with doses of 80 to 240 mg, with both regular-release and controlled-release formulations.6–10,14–19 Nadolol had similar efficacy, compared with propranolol, in doses of 20 to 120 mg when administered twice daily.20,21
Studies with other beta blockers, including some nonselective agents (e.g., timolol and bisoprolol)22,27 and the beta-1 selective agents (e.g., metoprolol [Toprol, AstraZeneca] and atenolol [Tenormin, AstraZeneca]) have also been reported to be effective. Beta-1 selective agents may be an appropriate option in patients with severe respiratory disease,23–26 but agents with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity should be avoided because of a lack of reported efficacy.11,13 Comparison trials with beta blockers and other preventative therapies, including valproic acid (Depakene, Abbott) and topiramate (Topamax, Ortho-McNeil), reported similar efficacy, with some data suggesting improved tolerability.28–33 Although beta blockers are usually well tolerated, reported side effects may include sedation, dizziness, vivid dreams, depression, fatigue, orthostatic hypotension, and impotence. Absolute contraindications include asthma, heart block, severe peripheral vascular disease, and Raynaud’s phenomenon.11
Important interactions involve other cardiovascular drugs that influence heart rate or blood pressure, including numerous antihypertensive agents. One reported drug interaction with propranolol that might be significant in migraine patients who are using triptans that are metabolized by the monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) pathway—including sumatriptan (Imitrex, GlaxoSmithKline), almotriptan (Axert, Ortho-McNeil), and others—is propranolol’s inhibition of triptan metabolism and a potentially greater risk of side effects. The concurrent use of these triptans with propranolol should be monitored carefully. Lower doses of these triptans should be used, or they should be avoided in favor of an alternative agent.36,37
Beta blockers are considered a drug of choice for migraine prevention, especially in patients without absolute contraindications. They offer an excellent choice for patients with other morbidities, including hypertension and coronary artery disease. Beta blockers should be initiated at low doses along with monitoring of heart rate and blood pressure. An adequate trial of 3 to 12 months with continued assessment of efficacy and tolerability is recommended.11,13,35
Antidepressants
Tricyclic Agents
Although various classes of antidepressants have been studied and used to prevent migraine headache, more data are available for the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) (Table 1).4,38,39 Their proposed mechanism of action is thought to involve the inhibition of central cortical depression and sympathetic activity associated with migraine pathophysiology.40,41
Clinical trials with the TCA amitriptyline have reported a 50% to 70% reduction in the number and in intensity of migraine attacks, with doses ranging from 10 to 100 mg daily.38,42 Trials comparing amitriptyline with the beta blocker propranolol have reported similar efficacy.43
The side-effect profile of the TCAs includes dry mouth, constipation, urinary retention, and weight gain along with central effects (sedation, weakness, fatigue, and tremor), which may limit their use in some patients. The secondary-amine TCAs nortriptyline (Pamelor, Mallinckrodt) and desipramine (Norpramin, Sanofi-Aventis) may be better tolerated in some patients and may be an additional option. More serious adverse effects include potential cardiac events, such as sinus tachycardia, corrected QT (QTc) prolongation, and blood pressure fluctuations.
Drug interactions involve other central-acting agents, anti-cholinergic drugs, and serotonergic agents (Table 2). These medications are contraindicated for patients with angle-closure glaucoma, urinary retention, and orthostatic hypotension, which are seen primarily in the elderly. Monitoring in young migraine patients should include efficacy and adverse effects such as weight gain.38–42
Table 2.
Common Drugs with Serotonergic Properties
Monoamine oxidase inhibitors | Phenelzine (Nardil)
Selegiline (Zelapar, Eldepryl, Emsam) Isocarboxazid (Marplan) Tranylcypromine (Parnate) |
Antidepressants | Tricyclics: amitriptyline, others
SSRIs: fluoxetine (Prozac), others Miscellaneous: nefazodone (Serzone*), trazodone (Desyrel), venlafaxine (Effexor), bupropion (Wellbutrin) |
Others | Buspirone (BuSpar)
Dextromethorphan Lithium Amantadine (Symmetrel) Cocaine |
Within the antidepressant class, the TCAs are considered a first-line option for preventing migraine in patients who do not have any contraindications. These agents may be an excellent choice for patients with a concurrent comorbidity such as depression, anxiety, or insomnia.4,41,44,45
Other Antidepressants
The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have not shown consistent benefits in migraine prophylaxis. A few small, short-term trials with fluoxetine (Prozac, Eli Lilly) reported benefits,46,47 although a more recent analysis that looked at the class as a whole reported a lack of efficacy in migraine.48 Antidepressants that have been studied in small trials with some reported efficacy include venlafaxine (Effexor, Wyeth), mirtazapine (Remeron, Organon), the monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), and nefazodone HCl.49–58
Anticonvulsant Medications
Valproic Acid and Topiramate
The anticonvulsants are another class of medications that have demonstrated efficacy in the prophylaxis of migraine, with valproic acid and topiramate having the strongest evidence to support this indication (see Table 1).4,59,60 The rationale for their use is thought to be related to common mechanisms shared in seizure disorders and migraine involving imbalances between excitatory glutamate activity and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)–mediated inhibition in the brain.61
Valproic acid. Valproic acid and its derivatives were the first class of anticonvulsants approved for migraine prophylaxis. Trials dating back to the 1980s have been conducted with efficacy reported at variable doses but without a consistent correlation between effective dose and serum levels. Efficacy was described as a reduction in the severity and duration of migraine, with good tolerability reported with titration and individualized doses (see Table 1).62–67 Compared with other preventative agents, valproic acid is similar to propranolol in terms of its efficacy and tolerability, as noted with the beta blockers.30,31,33
Adverse events associated with valproic acid, including central nervous system (CNS) effects (e.g., sedation, tremor, confusion, gastrointestinal problems, and weight gain) may be problematic in some patients. More serious adverse events (e.g., blood dyscrasias, pancreatitis, and liver problems) are rare, but periodic monitoring is required if they occur. Valproic acid and its derivatives should be avoided in women who are planning pregnancy or in women of childbearing age because of the significant risk of teratogenicity with this agent. Drug interactions include other central-acting agents and drugs whose metabolism may be inhibited by valproic acid.44,45,68
Topiramate. The other anticonvulsant that has been studied extensively and has reported efficacy in migraine prophylaxis is topiramate (Topamax) (see Table 1).69–78 The drug’s proposed mechanism of action in migraine is probably similar to that of valproic acid, involving GABA-mediated inhibition in the CNS. Although serious adverse effects (kidney stones, myopia with angle-closure glaucoma, sedation, and cognitive changes) can occur,44,45,79 clinical trials reported good tolerability in most patients, especially with lower daily doses.69–74 Drug interactions may include other central-acting drugs, anti-depressants, and oral contraceptives.44,45,79
In comparison trials, topiramate was similar to valproic acid80,81 and propranolol32 in terms of efficacy and tolerability. Because of concerns about potential dose-related effects on cognition, patients who are taking topiramate must be monitored regularly, although the drug has excellent clinical utility and can be an option, especially if weight gain is a concern.1,79,82
Migraine patients who take topiramate should be apprised of the drug’s potential for visual and cognitive changes and their need to ensure adequate hydration.79
Summary. Valproic acid and topiramate provide an additional option in the prophylactic treatment of migraine headaches, but adverse effects may limit their use in some patients. Although they are probably considered second-line agents in many cases, they may be excellent choices for patients with a history of seizures disorders; obese patients (especially because of topiramate’s weight-loss benefits); or patients for whom beta blockers or antidepressants may be contraindicated.44,45,68,79
Other Anticonvulsant Agents
Small trials with additional anticonvulsant agents reported some benefit with gabapentin (Neurontin, Pfizer) and levetiracetam (Keppra, UCB Pharma), inconsistent findings with zonisamide (Zonegran, Eisai), and a lack of efficacy with lamotrigine (Lamictal, GlaxoSmithKline). Before these agents can be recommended for migraine prophylaxis, additional studies are needed.83–89
Additional Migraine-Prophylactic Agents
Other agents have also been used to prevent migraine; however, many of these therapies are less effective than those discussed earlier, or they need further study. Calcium-channel blockers have had mixed success in migraine prevention,90–94 with a few small trials suggesting modest benefits with verapamil (e.g., Calan, Pfizer) (see Table 1).90–92
Although primarily used in the abortive management of migraine, the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) have also demonstrated modest benefits in migraine prophylaxis. Trials with naproxen (Naprosyn, Roche), fenoprofen (Nalfon, Pedinol), tolfenamic acid (e.g., Clotam, Provalis), and ketoprofen reported decreases in duration and severity of migraine. Short-term prophylaxis with NSAIDs in menstrual migraine is discussed in the next column (Special Populations).95–102
Skeletal muscle relaxants, including baclofen (e.g., Lioresal, Novartis) and tizanidine (Zanaflex, Acorda), have been used in the prophylaxis of migraine, but the data are limited. One controlled trial and an open-label trial with tizanidine reported reduced headache frequency, duration, and intensity.103–105
Although more trials are needed, the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)–inhibitors and the angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have been effective for migraine prevention and may have a future role, especially in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities.106–109
The leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast (Singulair, Merck) was studied in migraine prevention with mixed results, suggesting that more trials may be needed to clarify its role.110,111 The association of migraine headaches and psychiatric disorders has prompted the consideration of anti-psychotic agents for migraine, and some data have shown benefits with aripiprazole (Abilify, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Otsuka) and olanzapine (Zyprexa, Eli Lilly).112,113
One of the more recent products to be studied in migraine prevention is botulinum toxin type A. Although numerous trials have been conducted, inconsistent findings have been reported, perhaps because of variable trial designs, treatment regimens, or the types of patients studied.114–120
Agents that might also be beneficial for migraine prophylaxis include antihistamines, salmon calcitonin (Miacalcin, Novartis, simvastatin (Zocor, Merck) and clonidine (Catapres, Boehringer Ingelheim).1,4,121 Other potential options include herbal products and supplements such as feverfew (Tanacetum parthenium), butterbur root (Petasites hybridus), co-enzyme Q10, melatonin, riboflavin, and magnesium.122–130
Combination Therapies
Various combinations of prophylactic agents have been used in patients who have not responded to monotherapy. The importance of careful and slow titration of additive agents is essential because of additive side effects, potential toxicities, and drug interactions.
Special Populations
Women. The link between female sex hormones and migraine has been studied extensively. A phenomenon known as menstrual migraine refers to migraine associated with or occurring around a woman’s menstrual cycle. This type of migraine appears to be associated with fluctuations in estrogen levels and the resultant biochemical effects of increased prostaglandins, enhanced prolactin release, and other physiological dysregulation.
Treatment has included a variety of agents, including hormonal manipulation and other therapies administered in conjunction with the menstrual cycle.131–135 The newest concept of treating menstrual migraine is the use of short-term prophylaxis with NSAIDs or triptans starting a few days before the cycle and continuing for about five to seven days.136–140 Refractory cases may respond to estrogen alone or to a combination of progesterone or testosterone in addition to the use of other hormonal manipulations.141–146
Migraine headaches usually improve during pregnancy, but treatment may be required in some patients. Simple analgesics like acetaminophen alone are the drugs of choice. Other therapies can be used with caution and in consideration of the risk–benefit ratio.147–152
Children and adolescents. The prevalence of migraine ranges from 3% to 11% in children younger than 15 years of age. Although more controlled trials are needed for evidence-based treatment of migraine in children and adolescents, the American Academy of Neurology offers some guidance. Options for abortive treatments are simple analgesics alone or triptans. The triptans, including sumatriptan (Imitrex, GlaxoSmithKline), rizatriptan (Maxalt, Merck), and zolmitriptan (Zomig, AstraZeneca), were reported to be safe but not superior to placebo. Fewer data are available for prophylactic treatment in children, although several agents have been proposed.153–159
Elderly Patients. New-onset headache in the elderly is considered a secondary disorder, and a comprehensive evaluation is warranted. As with pediatric patients, the safest agent for the abortive management in older adults is acetaminophen, and the use of the ergots and triptans may be limited if patients have cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease. The selection of preventative therapies can be determined by concurrent co-morbidities or contraindications.160–162
Treatment Plans and Guidelines for Care
As the choices for the pharmacotherapy of migraine expand, clinicians have multiple options to use for both abortive and preventative management. Various guidelines, including those of the U.S. Headache Consortium,4 have recently been revised, although updates are not yet in print.1,2,4,163–165
The available guidelines support the utility of the various pharmacological agents in migraine using a stepped-care approach, with simple analgesics or NSAIDs as first-line choices and stepping up to specific migraine therapies if the response is not sufficient. With the stratified-care approach, treatment choices are based on the severity of the headache.
The Disability in Strategies of Care (DISC) Study provided evidence that using a stratified-care approach might be able to improve headache response and disability time. In this multi-center study, which was conducted in 13 countries, the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) was used to compare the stratified-care and stepped-care approaches.166 Patients receiving stratified care were treated according to their MIDAS scores and initially received either aspirin plus metoclopramide (Reglan, Schwarz) or zolmitriptan (Zomig). For the stepped-care group, initial attacks were treated with aspirin and metoclopramide; patients could use a stepped-care strategy during an attack and zolmitriptan therapy with set parameters. Even though the study suggested that the stratified-care approach resulted in improved clinical outcomes, the study’s limitations included an open-label design, a small number of pharmacotherapies, different methods of selecting therapies for the stratified group, and concerns about whether rapid escalation of therapy was comparable to that in clinical practice.
Investigators conducting future trials of stratification might consider other factors, such as symptom profiles, genetics, and biological markers.166 The present guidelines suggest the use of simple analgesics or NSAIDs for aborting mild-to-moderate migraine and the triptans or possibly the ergots for aborting moderate-to-severe migraines. Considerations for preventive therapy are usually based on the frequency and severity of migraine and other comorbidities, and these approaches may include beta blockers, TCAs, and anticonvulsants.1,163–165
Conclusion
The pharmacotherapy of migraine is complex. The appropriate use of preventative medications requires an understanding of the various agents available and when they are best used. Part 1, in the July 2008 issue of P&T, reviewed the abortive pharmacotherapy for migraine, the role of these agents, and especially their frequency, which affects the use of preventative therapy.
The management of migraine requires a multidisciplinary approach and calls for physicians experienced in headache management along with nurses, social workers, and pharmacists. The large number of patients experiencing migraine results in significant medication usage and the potential for drug-related problems. Although all health care professionals constitute an important part of the care of the migraine patient, pharmacists can also play a major role by monitoring medication usage, evaluating patients’ responses to therapy, and assessing adverse effects and drug interactions. Pharmacists should also play a prominent part in educating patients about their medications and in providing information on appropriate use.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest (COI) Statement
Dr. DeMaagd has no relationships to disclose. This article contains discussions of off-label use. The content of this article has been reviewed under Jefferson’s Continuing Medical Education COI policy.
References
- 1.Silberstein SD, for the U.S. Headache Consortium Practice Parameter: Evidence-Based Guidelines for Migraine Headache (An Evidence-Based Review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2000;55:754–762. doi: 10.1212/wnl.55.6.754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Matchar DB, Young WB, Rosenberg JH, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache in the primary care setting: Pharmacological management of acute attacks. Available at: www.aan.com/public/practiceguidelines/03.pdf/. Accessed August 2007.
- 3.Diamond S, Bigal ME, Silberstein S. Patterns of diagnosis and acute and preventive treatment for migraine in the United States: Results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention study. Headache. 2007;47(3):355–363. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00631.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ramadan NM, Silberstein SD, Freitag FG, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache in the primary care setting: Pharmacological management for prevention of migraine. U.S. Headache Consortium. Available at: www/aan.com/professional/practice. Accessed August 2007.
- 5.McCory DC, Matchar DB, Rosenberg JH, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache: Overview of program description and methodology. Available at: www.aan.com/public/practiceguide-lines/03.pdf. Accessed August 2007.
- 6.Bekes M, Matos L, Rausch J, et al. Treatment of migraine with propranolol (Letter) Lancet. 1968;2:980. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(68)91219-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wideroe TE, Vigander T. Propranolol in the treatment of migraine. Br Med J. 1974;2:699–701. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5921.699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Forssman B, Henriksson KG, Johansson V, et al. Propranolol for migraine prophylaxis. Headache. 1976;16:238–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1976.hed1605238.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Borgesen SE, Nielsen JL, Moller CE. Prophylactic treatment of migraine with propranolol. Acta Neurol Scand. 1974;50:651–656. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1974.tb02810.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Diamond S, Medina JL. Double-blind study of propranolol for migraine prophylaxis. Headache. 1976;16:24–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1976.hed1601024.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hoffman BB, Lefkowitz RJ. Catecholamines and sympathomimetic drugs. In: Gilman AG, Rall TW, Nies AS, Taylor P, editors. Goodman and Gilman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 8th ed. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press; 1990. pp. 187–243. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Andersson KE, Vinge E. Beta-adrenoreceptor blockers and calcium antagonists in the prophylaxis of migraine. Drugs. 1990;39:355–373. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199039030-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Limmroth V, Mummel P. Migraine prophylaxis: Beta-blockers. Diener HD, editor. Drug Treatments of Migraine and Other Headaches. Monographs Clin Neurosci. 2000;17:256–268. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nadelmann JW, Phil M, Stevens J, et al. Propranolol in the prophylaxis of migraine. Headache. 1985;26:175–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1986.hed2604175.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zigelman M, Kuritzky A, Appel S, et al. Propranolol in the prophylaxis of migraine: Evaluation of spectral analysis of beat-to-beat heart rate fluctuations. Headache. 1992;32(4):169–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1992.hed3204169.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Diamond S, Kudrow L, Stevens J, et al. Long-term study of propranolol in the treatment of migraine. Headache. 1982;22:268–271. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1982.hed2206268.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pascual J, Polo JM, Berciano J. The dose of propranolol for migraine prophylaxis: Efficacy of low doses. Cephalalgia. 1989;9(4):287–291. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1989.0904287.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Carroll JD, Reidy M, Savundra PA, et al. Long-acting propranolol in the prophylaxis of migraine: A comparative study of two doses. Cephalalgia. 1990;10:101–105. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1990.1002101.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Linde K, Rossnagel K. Propranolol for migraine prophylaxis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2:CD003225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003225.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sudilovsky A, Elkind AH, Ryan RE, Sr, et al. Comparative efficacy of nadolol and propranolol in the management of migraine. Headache. 1987;27:421–426. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1987.hed2708421.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Olerud B, Gustavsson CL, Furberg B. Nadolol and propranolol in migraine management. Headache. 1986;26:490–493. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1986.hed2610490.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gallagher MR, Stagliano RA, Sporazza C. Timolol maleate, a beta blocker, in the treatment of common migraine headache. Headache. 1987;27:84–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1987.hed2702084.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Steiner TJ, Hedman C, Rose FC. Metoprolol in the prophylaxis of migraine: Parallel-group comparison with placebo and dose-ranging follow-up. Headache. 1987;28:15–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.1988.hed2801015.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Johannsson V, Nilsson LR, Widelius T, et al. Atenolol in migraine prophylaxis: A double-blind cross-over multicentre study. Headache. 1987;27:372–374. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1987.hed2707372.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Forssman B, Lindblad CJ, Zbornikova V. Atenolol for migraine prophylaxis. Headache. 1983;23:188–190. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1983.hed2304188.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Worz R, Reinhardt-Benmalek B, Grotemeyer K-H, et al. Bisoprolol and metoprolol in the prophylactic treatment of migraine with and without aura: Randomized double-blind cross-over multicenter study. Cephalalgia. 1991;11(Suppl 11):152–153. [Google Scholar]
- 27.van de Ven LLM, Franke CL, Koehler PJ. Prophylactic treatment of migraine with bisoprolol: A placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 1997;17:596–599. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1997.1705596.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Diener HC, Hartung E, Chrubasik J. Acetylsalicylic acid in migraine prophylaxis: A double-blind study in comparison with metoprolol. Cephalalgia. 1997;17:434. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sargent J, Solbach P, Damasio H, et al. A comparison of naproxen sodium to propranolol hydrochloride and a placebo control for the prophylaxis of migraine headache. Headache. 1985;25:320–324. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1985.hed2506320.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kozubski W, Prusinski A. Sodium valproate versus propranolol in the prophylactic treatment of migraine. Neurol Neurodur Pol. 1995;29:937–947. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kaniecki RG. A comparison of divalproex with propranolol and placebo for the prophylaxis of migraine without aura. Arch Neurol. 1997;54:1141–1145. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1997.00550210071015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Diener HC, Tfelt-Hansen P, Dahlof C, et al. Topiramate in migraine prophylaxis: Results from a placebo-controlled trial with propranolol as an active control. J Neurol. 2004;251(8):943–950. doi: 10.1007/s00415-004-0464-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ashrafi MR, Shabanian R, Zamani GR, et al. Sodium valproate versus propranolol in paediatric migraine prophylaxis. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2005;9(5):333–338. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2005.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Corbo J, Esses D, Bijur PE, et al. Randomized clinical trial of intravenous magnesium sulfate as an adjunctive medication for emergency department treatment of migraine headache. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38:621–627. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.119424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Limmroth V, Michel MC. The prevention of migraine: A critical review with special emphasis on beta-adrenoceptor blockers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;52(3):237–243. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01459.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ferrari A, Sternieri E, Ferraris E, Bertolini A. Emerging problems in the pharmacology of migraine: Interactions between triptans and drugs for prophylaxis. Pharmacol Res. 2003;48(1):1–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Goldberg MR, Sciberras D, De Smet M, et al. Influence of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists on the pharmacokinetics of rizatriptan, a 5-HT1b/1d agonist: Differential effects of propranolol, nadolol, and metoprolol. J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;52:69–76. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01417.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Couch JR, Hassanein RS. Amitriptyline in migraine prophylaxis. Arch Neurol. 1979;36:695–699. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1979.00500470065013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Colombo B, Annovazzi PO, Comi G. Therapy of primary headaches: The role of antidepressants. Neurol Sci. 2004;25(Suppl 3):S171–S175. doi: 10.1007/s10072-004-0280-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Punay NC, Couch JR. Antidepressants in the treatment of migraine headache. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2003;7(1):51–54. doi: 10.1007/s11916-003-0010-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Silberstein SD. Preventive treatment of migraine. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2006;27(8):410–415. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2006.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gomersall JD, Stuart A. Amitriptyline in migraine prophylaxis: Changes in pattern of attacks during a controlled clinical trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1973;36:684–690. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.36.4.684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ziegler DK, Hurwitz A, et al. Migraine prophylaxis: A comparison of propranolol and amitriptyline. Arch Neurol. 1987;44:486–489. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1987.00520170016015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.King DS, Herndon KC. Headache disorders. In: DiPiro JT, Talbert RL, Yee GC, Matzke GR, et al., editors. Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic Approach. 6th ed. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange; 2005. pp. 1105–1121. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Alldredge BK. Neurologic disorders: headache. In: Koda-Kimble MA, Young YL, editors. Applied Therapeutics: The Clinical Use of Drugs. 8th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005. pp. 52-1–52-27. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Adly C, Straumanis J, Chesson A. Fluoxetine prophylaxis of migraine. Headache. 1992;32(2):101–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1992.hed3202101.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Diamond S, Freitag FG. The use of fluoxetine in the treatment of headache. Clin J Pain. 1989;5:200–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Moja PL, Cusi C, Sterzi RR, et al. Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for preventing migraine and tension-type headaches. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(3):CD002919. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002919.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gardner DM, Lynd LD. Sumatriptan contraindications and serotonin syndrome. Ann Pharmacother. 1998;32:33–38. doi: 10.1345/aph.17204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Shapiro RE, Tepper SJ, et al. The serotonin syndrome, triptans and the potential for drug–drug interactions. Headache. 2007;47:266–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00691.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wooltorton E. Triptan migraine treatment and antidepressants: Risk of serotonin syndrome. Can Med Assoc J. 2006;175(8):874. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.061217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Eadie M. Clinically significant drug interactions with agents specific for migraine attacks. CNS Drugs. 2001;15(2):105–118. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200115020-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Goldberg MR, Lowry RC, Musson DG, et al. Lack of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between rizatriptan and paroxetine. J Clin Pharmacol. 1999;39:192–199. doi: 10.1177/00912709922007633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ozyalcin SN, Talu GK, Kiziltan E, et al. The efficacy and safety of venlafaxine in the prophylaxis of migraine. Headache. 2005;45:144–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.05029.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bulut S, Berilgen MS, Baran A, et al. Venlafaxine versus amitriptyline in the prophylactic treatment of migraine: Randomized double-blind, crossover study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2004;107(1):44–48. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2004.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Levy E, Margolese HC. Migraine headache prophylaxis and treatment with low-dose mirtazapine. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003;18(5):301–303. doi: 10.1097/01.yic.0000080803.87368.01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Anthony M, Lance JW. Monoamine oxidase inhibition in the treatment of migraine. Arch Neurol. 1969;21:263–268. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1969.00480150053007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Saper JR, Lake AE, Tepper SJ. Nefazodone for chronic daily headache prophylaxis: An open-label study. Headache. 2001;41:465–474. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.01084.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.D’Amico D. Antiepileptic drugs in the prophylaxis of migraine, chronic headache forms, and cluster headache: A review of their efficacy and tolerability. Neurol Sci. 2007;28(Suppl 2):S188–S197. doi: 10.1007/s10072-007-0775-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chronicle E, Mulleners W. Anticonvulsant drugs for migraine prophylaxis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD003226. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003226.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Calabresi P, Galletti F, Rossi C, et al. Antiepileptic drugs in migraine: From clinical aspects to cellular mechanisms. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2007;28(4):188–195. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2007.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sorensen KV. Valproate: A new drug in migraine prophylaxis. Acta Neurol Scand. 1988;78:346–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1988.tb03667.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Gallagher RM, Mueller LL, Freitag FG. Divalproex sodium in the treatment of migraine and cluster headaches. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2002;102(2):92–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Freitag FG, Collins SD, Carlson HA, et al. A randomized trial of divalproex sodium extended-release tablets in migraine prophylaxis. Neurology. 2002;58:1652–1659. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.11.1652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Freitag FG. Divalproex in the treatment of migraine. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2003;37(Suppl 2):98–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kinze S, Clauss M, Reuter U, et al. Valproic acid is effective in migraine prophylaxis at low serum levels: A prospective open-label study. Headache. 2001;41:774–778. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.01142.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lenaerts M, Bastings E, Sianard J, et al. Sodium valproate in severe migraine and tension-type headache: An open-label study of long-term efficacy and correlation with blood levels. Acta Neurol Belg. 1996;96:126–129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.McNamara JO. Drugs effective in the therapy of epilepsies. In: Gilman AG, Hardmen JG, Limbird LE, editors. Goodman and Gilman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 10th ed. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press; 2001. pp. 521–547. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Storey JR, Calder CS, Hart DE, et al. Topiramate in migraine prevention: A double-blind placebo-controlled study. Headache. 2001;41:968–975. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.01190.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Brandes JL, Saper JR, Diamond M, et al. Topiramate for migraine prevention: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291(8):965–973. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.8.965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Peres MF, Mercante JP, Tanuri FC, et al. Chronic migraine prevention with topiramate. Headache. 2006;7(4):185–187. doi: 10.1007/s10194-006-0339-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Li HL, Kwan P, Leung H, et al. Topiramate for migraine prophylaxis among Chinese populations. Headache. 2007;47(4):616–619. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00763_3.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Diener HC, Bussone G, Van Oene JC, et al. Topiramate reduces headache days in chronic migraine: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2007;27(7):814–823. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01326.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Dodick DW, et al. Efficacy and safety of topiramate for the treatment of chronic migraine: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Headache. 2007;47(2):170–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00684.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Rapoport A, Mauskop A, Diener HC, et al. Long-term migraine prevention with topiramate: Open-label extension of pivotal trials. Headache. 2006;46(7):1151–1160. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00506.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Silberstein SD, Feliu AL, Rupnow MF, et al. Topiramate in migraine prophylaxis: Long-term impact on resource utilization and cost. Headache. 2007;47(4):500–510. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00754.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Bussone G, Diener HC, Pfeil J, et al. Topiramate 100 mg/day in migraine prevention: A pooled analysis of double-blind randomized trials. Int J Clin Pract. 2005;59(8):961–968. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2005.00612.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Winner P, Gendolla A, Stayer C, et al. Topiramate for migraine prevention in adolescents: A pooled analysis of efficacy and safety. Headache. 2006;46(10):1503–1510. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00610.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Wenzel RG, Schwarz K, Padiyara RS. Topiramate for migraine prevention. Pharmacotherapy. 2006;26(3):375–387. doi: 10.1592/phco.26.3.375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Bartolini M, Silvestrini M, Taffi R, et al. Efficacy of topiramate and valproate in chronic migraine. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2005;28(6):277–279. doi: 10.1097/01.wnf.0000192136.46145.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Shaygannejad V, Janghorbani M, Ghorbani A, et al. Comparison of the effect of topiramate and sodium valproate in migraine prevention: A randomized blinded crossover study. Headache. 2006;46(4):642–648. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00413.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Krymchantowski A, Tavares C. Weight variations in patients receiving topiramate migraine prophylaxis in a tertiary care setting. Medscape Gen Med. 2004;6(3):48. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Pakalnis A, Kring D. Zonisamide prophylaxis in refractory pediatric headache. Headache. 2006;46(5):804–807. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00455.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ashkenazi A, Benlifer A, Korenblit J. Zonisamide for migraine prophylaxis in refractory patients. Cephalalgia. 2006;26(10):1199–1202. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01191.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Gupta P, Singh S, Goyal V, et al. Low-dose topiramate versus lamotrigine in migraine prophylaxis (the Lotolamp study) Headache. 2007;47(3):402–412. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00599.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Di Trapani G, Mei D, Marra C, et al. Gabapentin in the prophylaxis of migraine: A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study. Clin Ther. 2000;151(3):145–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Mathew N, Rapoport A, Saper J, et al. Efficacy of gabapentin in migraine prophylaxis. Headache. 2001;141:119–128. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.111006119.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Steiner TJ, Findley LJ, Yuen AW. Lamotrigine versus placebo in the prophylaxis of migraine with and without aura. Cephalalgia. 1997;17:101–102. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1997.1702109.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Rapoport AM, Sheftell FD, Tepper SJ, et al. Levetiracetam in the preventive treatment of transformed migraine. Curr Ther Res. 2005;66:212–221. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2005.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Solomon GD, Steel JG, Spaccavento LJ. Verapamil prophylaxis of migraine. JAMA. 1983;250:2500–2502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Markley GH, Cheronis JC, Piepho RW. Verapamil in prophylactic therapy of migraine. Neurology. 1984;34:973–976. doi: 10.1212/wnl.34.7.973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Solomon GD. Verapamil in migraine prophylaxis: A five-year review. Headache. 1989;29(7):425–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1989.hed2907425.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Stewart DJ, Gelston A, Hakim A. Effect of prophylactic administration of nimodipine in patients with migraine. Headache. 1988;28:260–262. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1988.hed2804260.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Kahan A, Weber S, Amor B, et al. Nifedipine in the treatment of migraine in patients with Raynaud’s phenomenon. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:1102–1103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Lindegaard KF, Ovrelid L, Sjaastad O. Naproxen in the prevention of migraine attacks: A double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Headache. 1980;20:96–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1980.hed2002096.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Sargent J, Solbach P, Damasio H, et al. A comparsion of naproxen sodium to propranolol hydrochloride and a placebo control for the prophylaxis of migraine headache. Headache. 1985;25:320–324. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1985.hed2506320.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Welch KM, Ellis DJ, Keenan PA. Successful migraine prophylaxis with naproxen sodium. Neurology. 1985;35:1304–1310. doi: 10.1212/wnl.35.9.1304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Ziegler DK, Ellis DJ. Naproxen in prophylaxis of migraine. Arch Neurol. 1985;42:582–584. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1985.04060060084014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.O’Neill BP, Mann JD. Aspirin prophylaxis in migraine. Lancet. 1978;2:1179–1181. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)92159-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Stensrud P, Sjaastad O. Clinical trial of a new anti-bradykinin anti-inflammatory drug, ketoprofen (19,583 r.p.) in migraine prophylaxis. Headache. 1974;14:96–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1974.hed1402096.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Mikkelsen BM, Falk JV. Prophylactic treatment of migraine with tolfenamic acid. Acta Neurol Scand. 1982;66:105–111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Diamond D, Solomon GD, Freitag FG, et al. Fenoprofen in the prophylaxis of migraine: A double-blind placebo controlled study. Headache. 1987;27:246–249. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1987.hed2705246.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Fogelholm R, Murros K. Tizanidine in chronic tension-type headache: A placebo-controlled double-blind crossover. Headache. 1992;32(10):509–513. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1992.hed3210509.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Saper JRT, Winner PK, Lake AE. An open-label dose titration study of the efficacy of tizanadine HCl tablets in chronic daily headache prophylaxis. Headache. 2001;41:357–368. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.111006357.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Hering-Hanit R. Baclofen for prevention of migraine. Cephalalgia. 1999;19(6):589–591. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1999.019006589.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Tronvik E, Stovner LJ, Helde G, et al. Prophylactic treatment of migraine with an angiotensin II receptor blocker: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;289:65–69. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.1.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Schrader H, Stovner L, Helde G, et al. Prophylactic treatment of migraine with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (lisinopril): Randomized, placebo controlled, crossover study. BMJ. 2001;322:19–22. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7277.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Paterna S, Di Pasquale P, D’Angelo A, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene deletion polymorphism determines an increase in frequency of migraine attacks in patients suffering from migraine without aura. Eur Neurol. 2000;43:133–136. doi: 10.1159/000008151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Etminan M, Levine MA, Tomlinson G, et al. Efficacy of angiotensin II receptor antagonists in preventing headache: A systematic overview and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2002;112:642–646. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01100-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Sheftell F, Rapoport A, Weeks R, et al. Montelukast in the prophylaxis of migraine: A potential role for leukotriene modifiers. Headache. 2000;40(2):158–163. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2000.00022.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Brandes JL, Visser WH, Farmer MV, et al. Montelukast for migraine prophylaxis: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Headache. 2004;44:581–586. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2004.446006.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.LaPorta LD. Relief from migraine headache with aripiprazole treatment. Headache. 2007;47(6):922–926. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00777.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Silberstein SD, Young WB, Hopkins MM, et al. Olanzapine in the treatment of refractory migraine and chronic daily headache (Abstract) Cephalalgia. 2000;20:382. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2002.02126.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Binder WJ, Brin MF, Blitzer A, et al. Botulinum toxin type A (Botox) for treatment of migraine. Semin Cutaneous Med Surg. 2001;20(2):93–100. doi: 10.1053/sder.2001.24423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Silberstein S, Mathew N, Saper J, et al. Botox Migraine Clinical Research Group. Botulinum toxin type A as a migraine preventive treatment. Headache. 2000;40:445–450. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2000.00066.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Anand KS, Prasad A, Singh MM, et al. Botulinum toxin type A in prophylactic treatment of migraine. Am J Ther. 2006;13(3):183–187. doi: 10.1097/01.mjt.0000212705.79248.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Vo AH, Satori R, Jabbari B, et al. Botulinum toxin type-A in the prevention of migraine: A double-blind controlled trial. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007;78(5 Suppl):B113–B118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Aurora SK, Gawel M, Brandes JL, et al. Botulinum toxin type A prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled exploratory study. Headache. 2007;47(4):486–499. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00624.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Elkind AH, O’Carroll P, Blumenfeld A, et al. A series of three sequential, randomized, controlled studies of repeated treatments with botulinum toxin type A for migraine prophylaxis. J Pain. 2006;7(10):688–696. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Freitag FG. Botulinum toxin type A in chronic migraine. Exp Rev Neurother. 2007;7(5):463–470. doi: 10.1586/14737175.7.5.463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Medeiros FL, Medeiros PL, Valenca MM, et al. Simvastatin for migraine prevention. Headache. 2007;47(6):855–856. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00824.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Pfaffenrath V, Diener HC, Fischer M, et al. The efficacy and safety of Tanacetum parthenium (feverfew) in migraine prophylaxis: A double-blind, multicentre, randomized placebo-controlled dose–response study. Cephalalgia. 2002;22:523–532. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2002.00396.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Lipton RB, Gobel H, Einhaupl K, et al. Petasites hybridus root (butterbur) is an effective treatment for migraine. Neurology. 2004;63:2240–2244. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000147290.68260.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Diener HC, Rahlfs VW, Danesch U. The first placebo-controlled trial of a special butterbur root extract for the prevention of migraine: Reanalysis of efficacy criteria. Eur Neurol. 2004;51:89–97. doi: 10.1159/000076535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Sandor P, Di Clemente L, Coppola G, et al. Efficacy of coenzyme Q10 in migraine prophylaxis: A randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2005;64:713–715. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000151975.03598.ED. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Peres MF, Zukerman E, da Cunha TF, et al. Melatonin, 3 mg, is effective for migraine prevention. Neurology. 2004;63:757. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000134653.35587.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Maizels M, Blumenfeld A, Burchette R. A combination of riboflavin, magnesium, and feverfew for migraine prophylaxis: A randomized trial. Headache. 2004;44(9):885–890. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2004.04170.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Schoenen J, Jacquy J, Lenaerts M. Effectiveness of high-dose riboflavin in migraine prophylaxis. Neurology. 1998;50:466–470. doi: 10.1212/wnl.50.2.466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Peikert A, Wilimzig C, Kohne-Volland R. Prophylaxis of migraine with oral magnesium: Results from a prospective, multicenter, placebo-controlled and double-blind randomized study. Cephalalgia. 1996;16:257–263. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1996.1604257.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Pfaffenrath V, Wessely P, Meyer C, et al. Magnesium in the prophylaxis of migraine: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Cephalagia. 1996;16:436–440. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1996.1606436.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.MacGregor EA, Frith A, Ellis J, et al. Incidence of migraine relative to menstrual cycle phases of rising and falling estrogen. Neurology. 2006;67:2154–2163. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000233888.18228.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Allais G, Bussone G, De Lorenzo C, et al. Advanced strategies of short-term prophylaxis in menstrual migraine: State of the art and prospects. Neurol Sci. 2005;(Suppl 2):S125–S129. doi: 10.1007/s10072-005-0424-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Martin V, Brandes JL. Strategies for optimizing management of menstrual migraine. J Fam Pract. 2005;54(12):S1–S7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Silberstein SD, Armellino JJ, Hoffman HD, et al. Treatment of menstruation-associated migraine with the non-prescription combination of acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine: Results from three randomized, placebo-controlled studies. Clin Ther. 1999;21(3):475–491. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)88303-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Sances G, Martignoni E, Fioroni L. Naproxen sodium in menstrual migraine prophylaxis: A double-blind placebo controlled study. Headache. 1990;30(11):705–709. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1990.hed3011705.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Tepper SJ. Tailoring management strategies for the patient with menstrual migraine: Focus on prevention and treatment. Headache. 2006;46(Suppl 2):S61–S68. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00556.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Newman LC, Lipton RB, Lay Cl, et al. A pilot study of oral sumatriptan as intermittent prophylaxis of menstruation-related migraine. Neurology. 1998;51:307–309. doi: 10.1212/wnl.51.1.307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Newman LC, Mannix LK, Landy S, et al. Naratriptan as short-term prophylaxis of menstrually associated migraine: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Neurology. 2000;54:14–21. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.111006248.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Brandes JL, Smith T, Diamond M, Ames MH. Open-label, long-term tolerability of naratriptan for short-term prevention of menstrually related migraine. Headache. 2007;47:886–894. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00809.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Silberstein SD, Elkind AH, Schreiber C, et al. A randomized trial of frovatriptan for the intermittent prevention of menstrual migraine. Neurology. 2004;63(2):261–269. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000134620.30129.d6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Silberstein SD. The role of sex hormones in headache. Neurology. 1992;42(Suppl 2):37–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Silberstein SD, Merriam GR. Estrogens, progestins, and headache. Neurology. 1991;41:786–793. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.6.786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.de Lignieres B, Vincens M, Mauvais-Jarvis P, et al. Prevention of menstrual migraine by percutaneous estradiol. Br Med J. 1986;293:1540–1546. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6561.1540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Lichten EM, Bennett RS, Whitty AJ, et al. Efficacy of danazol in the control of hormonal migraine. J Reprod Med. 1991;36(6):419–424. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.O’Dea JP, Davis EH. Tamoxifen in the treatment of menstrual migraine. Neurology. 1990;40:1470–1471. doi: 10.1212/wnl.40.9.1470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Herzog AG. Continuous bromocriptine therapy in menstrual migraine. Neurology. 1997;48:101–102. doi: 10.1212/wnl.48.1.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Fox AW, Diamond ML, Spierings EL. Migraine during pregnancy: Options for therapy. CNS Drugs. 2005;19(6):465–481. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200519060-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Silberstein SD. Headaches in pregnancy. Neurol Clin. 2004;(4):727–756. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2004.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Marcus DA. Headache in pregnancy. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2003;7:288–296. doi: 10.1007/s11916-003-0049-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Kallen B, Lygner PE. Delivery outcome in women who used drugs for migraine during pregnancy with special reference to sumatriptan. Headache. 2001;41:351–356. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.111006351.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Evans RW, Diamond ML. Expert opinion: Is sumatriptan use safe during pregnancy? Headache. 2000;40:856–857. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2000.00156.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Dey R, Khan S, Akhouri V, et al. Labetalol for prophylactic treatment of intractable migraine during pregnancy. Headache. 2002;42:642–645. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2002.02152.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Lewis D, Ashwal S, Hershey A, et al. Practice parameter: Pharmacological treatment of migraine headache in children and adolescents: Report of the American Academy of Neurology Quality Standards Subcommittee and Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology. 2004;63:2215–2224. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000147332.41993.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Hershey A, Scott WP, LeCates S, et al. Effectiveness of nasal sumatriptan in 5- to 12-year-old children. Headache. 2001;41:693–697. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.041007693.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Lewis DW, Winner P, Hershey AD, et al. Efficacy of zolmitriptan nasal spray in adolescent migraine. Pediatrics. 2007;120:390–396. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.de Souza Carvalho D, Fragoso YD, Coelho FM, et al. Asthma plus migraine in childhood and adolescence: Prophylactic benefits with leukotriene receptor antagonist. Headache. 2002;41:1044–1047. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2002.02236.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Wang F, Van Den Eden SK, Ackerson LM, et al. Oral magnesium oxide prophylaxis of frequent headaches in children: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Headache. 2004;44(5):445–446. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2003.03102.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Caruso JM, Brown WD, Exil G, et al. The efficacy of divalproex sodium in the prophylactic treatment of children with migraine. Headache. 2000;40:672–676. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2000.040008672.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Pakalnis A, Greenberg G, Drake ME, et al. Pediatric migraine prophylaxis with divalproex. J Child Neurol. 2001;16:731–734. doi: 10.1177/088307380101601005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Bigal ME, Liberman JN, Lipton RB. Age-dependent prevalence and clinical features of migraine. Neurology. 2006;67(2):246–251. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000225186.76323.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Sarchielli P, Mancini ML, Calabresi P. Practical considerations for the treatment of elderly patients with migraine. Drugs Aging. 2006;23(6):461–489. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200623060-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Martins KM, Bordini CA, Bigal ME, et al. Migraine in the elderly: A comparison with migraine in young adults. Headache. 2006;46(2):312–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00343.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Diener HC, Kaube H, Limmroth V. A practical guide to the management and prevention of migraine. Drugs. 1998;56(5):811–824. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199856050-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Evers S, Afra J, Frese A, et al. EFNS [European Federation of Neurological Societies] guideline on the drug treatment of migraine: Report of an EFNS Task Force. Eur J Neurol. 2006;13:560–572. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01411.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Pryse-Phillips WE, Dodick DW, Edmeads JG, et al. for the Canadian Headache Society Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of migraine in clinical practice. Can Med Assoc J. 1997;156:1273–1287. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Stone AM, et al. Stratified care vs. step care strategies for migraine: The Disability in Strategies of Care (DISC) Study: A randomized trial. JAMA. 2000;284(20):2599–2605. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.20.2599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]