Abstract
Gram-stained smears of specimens submitted for sputum cultures were compared with direct wet mounts examined by Nomarski interference contrast microscopy (NIM) for enumeration of squamous epithelial cells (EPC) and leukocytes (WBC). The results obtained by the two methods were comparable, but specimens were more rapidly screened and cell types were more readily differentiated by NIM. Specimens submitted for sputum culture over a 3-month period were examined for EPC and WBC by NIM. Twenty-two percent of the specimens had greater than 25 EPC/field or a predominance of EPC (class I), 30% had greater than 25 EPC and greater than 25 WBC/field (class II), and 48% had greater than 25 WBC/field or a predominance of WBC (class III). The clinical relevance of the culture results was determined by reviewing the records of patients whose specimens were included in the study. Class I specimens provided only 30% clinically relevant culture results. Specimens in class II provided useful culture results in 63% of the patients, and 96% of those in class III provided clinically relevant information. The results confirm the value of sputum screening and demonstrate that NIM provides a rapid, simple, and accurate method for sputum screening.
Full text
PDF
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barrett-Connor E. The nonvalue of sputum culture in the diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1971 Jun;103(6):845–848. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1971.103.6.845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chodosh S. Examination of sputum cells. N Engl J Med. 1970 Apr 9;282(15):854–857. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197004092821507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Epstein R. L. Constituents of sputum: a simple method. Ann Intern Med. 1972 Aug;77(2):259–265. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-77-2-259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geckler R. W., Gremillion D. H., McAllister C. K., Ellenbogen C. Microscopic and bacteriological comparison of paired sputa and transtracheal aspirates. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Oct;6(4):396–399. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.4.396-399.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenman R. L., Goodall P. T., King D. Lung biopsy in immunocompromised hosts. Am J Med. 1975 Oct;59(4):488–496. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(75)90256-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hahn H. H., Beaty H. N. Transtracheal aspiration in the evaluation of patients with pneumonia. Ann Intern Med. 1970 Feb;72(2):183–187. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-72-2-183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heineman H. S., Chawla J. K., Lopton W. M. Misinformation from sputum cultures without microscopic examination. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Nov;6(5):518–527. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.5.518-527.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray P. R., Washington J. A. Microscopic and baceriologic analysis of expectorated sputum. Mayo Clin Proc. 1975 Jun;50(6):339–344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Scoy R. E. Bacterial sputum cultures. A clinician's viewpoint. Mayo Clin Proc. 1977 Jan;52(1):39–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]