Abstract
More than 4,000 clinical urine specimens were evaluated with an automated microbial detection/identification system compared to a standarized manual analysis and the routine modalities used in five peer-group laboratories. The comparison indicates that the automated system recognizes the nine groups of significant microorganisms in urinary tract infections in hospitalized patients with the same efficiency as a standarized manual method. The automated system's ability to enumerate the bacterial populations in the original clinical specimen attained a high degree of accuracy.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Isenberg H. D., MacLowry J. D. Automated methods and data handling in bacteriology. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1976;30:483–505. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.30.100176.002411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith P. B., Gavan T. L., Isenberg H. D., Sonnenwirth A., Taylor W. I., Washington J. A., 2nd, Balows A. Multi-laboratory evaluation of an automated microbial detection/identification system. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Dec;8(6):657–666. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.6.657-666.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sonnenwirth A. C. Preprototype of an automated microbial detection and identification system: a developmental investigation. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Oct;6(4):400–405. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.4.400-405.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]