Abstract
Use of inferential statistics should be based on the experimental question, the nature of the design, and the nature of the data. A hallmark of single-subject designs is that such statistics should not be required to determine whether the data answer the experimental question. Yet inferential statistics are being included more often in papers that purport to present data relevant to the behavior of individual organisms. The reasons for this too often seem to be extrinsic to the experimental analysis of behavior. They include lapses in experimental design and social pressure from colleagues who are unfamiliar with single-subject research. Regardless of whether inferential statistics are used, behavior analysts need to be sophisticated about experimental design and inferential statistics. Such sophistication not only will enhance design and analysis of behavioral experiments, but also will make behavior analysts more persuasive in presenting rationales for the use or nonuse of inferential statistics to the larger scientific community.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Branch M. N. Statistical inference in behavior analysis: Some things significance testing does and does not do. Behav Anal. 1999 Fall;22(2):87–92. doi: 10.1007/BF03391984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fisch G. S. Visual inspection of data revisited: Do the eyes still have it? Behav Anal. 1998 Spring;21(1):111–123. doi: 10.1007/BF03392786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hopkins B. L., Cole B. L., Mason T. L. A critique of the usefulness of inferential statistics in applied behavior analysis. Behav Anal. 1998 Spring;21(1):125–137. doi: 10.1007/BF03392787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perone M. Statistical inference in behavior analysis: Experimental control is better. Behav Anal. 1999 Fall;22(2):109–116. doi: 10.1007/BF03391988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SKINNER B. F. Are theories of learning necessary? Psychol Rev. 1950 Jul;57(4):193–216. doi: 10.1037/h0054367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]