Skip to main content
The Behavior Analyst logoLink to The Behavior Analyst
. 1999 Fall;22(2):109–116. doi: 10.1007/BF03391988

Statistical inference in behavior analysis: Experimental control is better

Michael Perone
PMCID: PMC2731354  PMID: 22478328

Abstract

Statistical inference promises automatic, objective, reliable assessments of data, independent of the skills or biases of the investigator, whereas the single-subject methods favored by behavior analysts often are said to rely too much on the investigator's subjective impressions, particularly in the visual analysis of data. In fact, conventional statistical methods are difficult to apply correctly, even by experts, and the underlying logic of null-hypothesis testing has drawn criticism since its inception. By comparison, single-subject methods foster direct, continuous interaction between investigator and subject and development of strong forms of experimental control that obviate the need for statistical inference. Treatment effects are demonstrated in experimental designs that incorporate replication within and between subjects, and the visual analysis of data is adequate when integrated into such designs. Thus, single-subject methods are ideal for shaping—and maintaining—the kind of experimental practices that will ensure the continued success of behavior analysis.

Full text

PDF
109

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bakan D. The test of significance in psychological research. Psychol Bull. 1966 Dec;66(6):423–437. doi: 10.1037/h0020412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Deprospero A., Cohen S. Inconsistent visual analyses of intrasubject data. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Winter;12(4):573–579. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lykken D. T. Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychol Bull. 1968 Sep;70(3):151–159. doi: 10.1037/h0026141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Matyas T. A., Greenwood K. M. Visual analysis of single-case time series: Effects of variability, serial dependence, and magnitude of intervention effects. J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Fall;23(3):341–351. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Perone M., Baron A. Reinforcement of human observing behavior by a stimulue correlated with extinction or increased effort. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Nov;34(3):239–261. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Behavior Analyst are provided here courtesy of Association for Behavior Analysis International

RESOURCES