Abstract
Male infertility is a long-standing enigma of significant medical concern. The integrity of sperm chromatin is a clinical indicator of male fertility and in vitro fertilization potential1: chromosome aneuploidy and DNA decondensation or damage are correlated with reproductive failure. Identifying conserved proteins important for sperm chromatin structure and packaging can reveal universal causes of infertility. Here we combine proteomics, cytology and functional analysis in Caenorhabditis elegans to identify spermatogenic chromatin-associated proteins that are important for fertility. Our strategy employed multiple steps: purification of chromatin from comparable meiotic cell types, namely those undergoing spermatogenesis or oogenesis; proteomic analysis by multidimensional protein identification technology (MudPIT) of factors that co-purify with chromatin; prioritization of sperm proteins based on abundance; and subtraction of common proteins to eliminate general chromatin and meiotic factors. Our approach reduced 1,099 proteins co-purified with spermatogenic chromatin, currently the most extensive catalogue, to 132 proteins for functional analysis. Reduction of gene function through RNA interference coupled with protein localization studies revealed conserved spermatogenesis-specific proteins vital for DNA compaction, chromosome segregation, and fertility. Unexpected roles in spermatogenesis were also detected for factors involved in other processes. Our strategy to find fertility factors conserved from C. elegans to mammals achieved its goal: of mouse gene knockouts corresponding to nematode proteins, 37% (7/19) cause male sterility. Our list therefore provides significant opportunity to identify causes of male infertility and targets for male contraceptives.
Basic features of DNA compaction and partitioning differ during spermatogenesis and oogenesis2, but sperm-specific processes are conserved, making C. elegans appropriate for identifying and functionally validating male fertility factors. Whereas spermatocytes complete meiotic divisions rapidly to produce four haploid spermatids, oocytes complete meiosis after fertilization, creating one haploid cell and two polar bodies (Fig. 1a). In most species sperm DNA is packaged uniquely from that of oocytes using small basic structural proteins called sperm nuclear basic proteins (SNBPs). SNBPs in C. elegans are yet to be identified, as are factors in any organism that mediate somatic histone displacement, incorporate SNBPs or implement other sperm-specific processes such as transcriptional silencing.
We developed a strategy to identify abundant proteins that co-purify with spermatogenic chromatin and analysed their functions in fertility (Fig. 1b). Chromatin was isolated from populations of spermatogenic or oogenic germ nuclei (Methods). Proteins co-purified with chromatin were identified by using a combination of MudPIT (mass spectrometric analysis to acquire tandem mass spectra3) coupled with the SEQUEST algorithm to match spectra to predicted peptides4 and DTA Select to filter and assemble peptides into corresponding C. elegans proteins5. In all, 1,099 spermatogenic and 812 oogenic proteins were identified (Supplementary Tables 1–4).
Spermatogenic proteins were prioritized on the basis of abundance measurements derived from MudPIT, which was an advance over previous studies6,7. By choosing only abundant spermatogenic proteins that occurred in three or more preparations, we reduced the number of candidate proteins from 1,099 to 502 (Methods). The 597 eliminated proteins constitute only 12% of the relative mass of total spermatogenic proteins (Supplementary Table 5a).
A further reduction in the number of abundant proteins under consideration was achieved by subtracting factors common to spermatogenic and oogenic chromatin samples, eliminating 74% (370 of 502) of spermatogenic proteins (Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Table 5b, c).We expected the remaining proteins to include spermatogenesis-specific proteins and spermatogenesis-enriched proteins expressed in low abundance in oocytes. Thus, from 1,099 initial candidates that co-purify with chromatin, our strategy focused functional analysis on 132 abundant spermatogenic proteins (Supplementary Table 1).
The subcellular localization of 11 candidate proteins demonstrates that spermatogenesis-specific and highly spermatogenesis-enriched chromatin factors were correctly identified. By immunolocalization, eight proteins, representing four different families (GSP-3, GSP-4 (Glc-seven phosphatase), SMZ-1, SMZ-2 (sperm meiosis PDZ), HTAS-1 (histone two A sperm) and SPCH-1, SPCH-2, SPCH-3 (sperm chromatin enriched)), associate specifically with spermatogenic meiotic chromosomes and mature sperm chromatin (Fig. 2b–e and Table 1). These proteins resemble the single known C. elegans sperm-specific chromatin-associated protein SPE-11 (spermatogenesis defective), also identified by our proteomic analysis. SPE-11 is a paternal factor supplied to eggs for subsequent use in embryonic development8 (Fig. 2a and Table 1). Three other proteins (TOP-1 (topoisomerase), GLH-2 (germ line helicase) and HCP-4CENP-C (holocentric chromosome-binding protein) known to function in somatic cells9–11 also associate with sperm chromatin, indicating possible roles in spermatogenesis (Fig. 2f, h, Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 3). In sum, all 11 tested candidates revealed previously undetected associations with spermatogenic chromatin.
Table 1.
Gene ID | Gene name |
Descriptor |
Caenorhabditis elegans |
Mammalian |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Localization | RNAi cytological defects |
Phenotype | Sum: new evidence for fertility function |
Known homologue |
Fertility link | ||||
Male | Hermaphrodite | ||||||||
Category I | |||||||||
F48C1.7 | spe-11 | Paternal factor required for development8 | High levels on sperm DNA during and after meiotic divisions | None detected | Embryos do not form hard eggshells, Emb (mutant) | Male Ste (mutant)/(RNAi resistant) | |||
W09C3.6* | gsp-3 | Glc7/PP1 phosphatase | High levels in sperm, strong around meiotic and mature sperm DNA | Defective sperm chromosome segregation | Embryos do not form hard eggshells, Emb | High male Ste | Spermatogenesis-specific localization/meiotic sperm chromosome segregation defects | M, Ppp1cc (1 × 10−102) H, PPP1C (1 × 10−95) |
M, Ppp1cc KO male infertile |
T03F1.5* | gsp-4 | Glc7/PP1 phosphatase | High levels in sperm, strong around meiotic and mature sperm DNA | Defective sperm chromosome segregation | Embryos do not form hard eggshells, Emb | High male Ste | Spermatogenesis-specific localization/meiotic sperm chromosome segregation defects | M, Ppp1cc (1 × 10−102) H, PPP1C (1 × 10−95) |
M, Ppp1cc KO male infertile |
C25G4.6† | smz-1 | PDZ protein-protein interaction domain | High levels in sperm, strong around 50% of mature sperm DNA | Defective sperm chromosome segregation | Embryos do not form hard eggshells, Emb | High male Ste | Spermatogenesis-specific localization/meiotic sperm chromosome segregation defects | ||
T21G5.4† | smz-2 | PDZ protein-protein interaction domain | High levels in sperm, strong around 50% of mature sperm DNA | Defective sperm chromosome segregation | Embryos do not form hard eggshells, Emb | High male Ste | Spermatogenesis-specific localization/meiotic sperm chromosome segregation defects | ||
ZK1251.1 | htas-1 | Histone H2A variant | High levels on sperm DNA during and after meiotic divisions | None detected (mutant) | None detected | Partial Ste (mutant)/(RNAi resistant) | Spermatogenesis-specific localization, mutant hermaphrodite has decreased fertility | M, H2AX (2 × 10−21), macroH2A(3 × 10−27) H, H2AX (3 × 10−21), macroH2A (3 × 10−27) |
M, H2AX KO male infertile |
C04G2.8‡ | spch-1 | SNBP-like | High levels on sperm DNA during and after meiotic divisions | Low penetrance male meiotic problems | None detected | Low Ste/(RNAi resistant) | Spermatogenesis-specific localization | M, histone H1T2 (2.3 × 10−14) H, SON DNA-binding protein (1.3 × 10−19) |
M, Histone H1T2 KO male infertile |
C10G11.9‡ | spch-2 | SNBP-like | High levels on sperm DNA during and after meiotic divisions | None detected | None detected | (RNAi resistant) | Spermatogenesis-specific localization | M, histone H1T2 (2.3 × 10−14) H, SON DNA-binding protein (1.3 × 10−19) |
M, Histone H1T2 KO male infertile |
T27A3.4‡ | spch-3 | SNBP-like | High levels on sperm DNA during and after meiotic divisions | None detected | None detected | (RNAi resistant) | Spermatogenesis-specific localization | M, histone H1T2 (2.3 × 10−14) H, SON DNA-binding protein (6.5 × 10−20) |
M, Histone H1T2 KO male infertile |
Category II | |||||||||
M01E5.5 | top-1 | Topoisomerase I9 | Sperm: high levels around mature sperm DNA | Abnormal gonad morphology, meiotic problems with large nuclei in later germ line | Abnormal gonad morphology, oogenesis arrest or Emo | Complete F1 sterility, Gro | Localization around mature sperm chromatin | M, TOP-1 (3 × 10−154) | M, TOP-1 KO Embryonic lethal |
Other: nucleolar, absent during meiosis | H, TOP-1 (1 × 10−156) | H, decreased Top-1 activity in testes of infertile men with varicocele | |||||||
C55B7.1 | glh-2 | RNA helicase10 | Sperm: surrounding sperm meiotic chromosomes | None detected | None detected | WT | Localization around sperm meiotic chromatin | M, Ddx4 (VASA) (1 × 10−105) | M, Ddx4 KO male infertile |
Other: P-granule localization in germ line | H, DBY (1 × 10−92), DDX4 (1 × 10−105) | H, DBY is frequently deleted in infertile patients | |||||||
T03F1.9 | hcp-4 | CENP-C centromere component11 | Sperm: surrounding sperm chromosomes during and after meiotic divisions | No F1 progeny | No F1 progeny | Complete F1 lethality, Emb | Localization around mature sperm chromatin | M, CENP-C11 | |
Other: uniformly distributed on oocyte meiotic chromosomes, polewards on mitotic chromosomes | H, CENP-C11 |
The categories are described in the text. Degrees of sterility are defined in Supplementary Methods. Symbols (*, †, ‡) denote highly identical genes whose products may be depleted simultaneously by RNAi. Mammalian fertility link references are listed in Supplementary Table 8. RNAi resistant means that the protein product was detectable by immunolocalization in animals subjected to RNAi of the corresponding gene. Extent of homology is indicated in parenthesis (BLAST e-values) in ‘Known homologue’ column. Emb, embryonic lethality; Emo, endomitotic reduplication; Gro, slow growing; H, human homologues; KO, mouse knockout of corresponding gene; M, mouse homologues; Ste, sterility; WT, wild type.
Functional analysis of the 132 proteins further validated our approach. The importance of each protein for fertility was evaluated with the use of RNA interference (RNAi) against cognate genes to reduce gene products. The sterility of treated animals was assayed by brood counts, and chromosome or gonad abnormalities were assessed by cytology (Methods). Although genes required for spermatogenesis are notoriously insensitive to RNAi (S. Ward and S. L’Hernault, personal communication), sterility or embryonic lethality was found for 50 of 132 genes (Supplementary Table 6) and germline cytological defects for 20 of these 50 genes (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 7). RNAi treatment of 18 of 20 genes disrupted aspects of male fertility, including sperm meiotic chromosome segregation and male germline morphology (Table 1, Supplementary Table 7 and Supplementary Figs 4 and 5). Thus, RNAi analysis showed spermatogenesis-enriched proteins to be important for fertility and embryonic development.
Proteomic identification of factors co-purified with sperm chromatin coupled with injection RNAi and quantitative screening resulted in a higher rate for identifying reproductive factors than that for previous studies. Our rate (38%; 50 of 132) is tenfold that (less than 3%) for RNAi-treated genes detected by microarray analysis for enriched transcript levels during spermatogenesis versus oogenesis12. Proteomic analysis identified factors overlapping with (42) and differing from (90) genes transcriptionally enhanced during spermatogenesis. Sterility and embryonic lethality caused by RNAi were observed for 41% of non-overlapping and 31% of overlapping factors. Our rate is also threefold that (10%) for identifying fertility genes through C. elegans genome-wide RNAi screens13,14.
Many C. elegans homologues of mammalian fertility factors were identified: 29 of 132 C. elegans proteins (representing 24 protein families) correspond to 19 genetically disrupted mouse homologues (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 8); 37% (7 of 19) of mouse knockouts (corresponding to 14 worm homologues in 7 families) caused male infertility. Half (7 of 14) of these worm homologues function in spermatogenesis based on RNAi phenotype (GSP-3 and GSP-4) or have specific association with spermatogenic chromatin (HTAS-1, SPCH-1, SPCH-2, SPCH-3 and GLH-2). Our subtractive proteomics approach is therefore valid for finding evolutionarily conserved, spermatogenesis-enriched proteins essential for fertility.
Analysis of these diverse proteins in C. elegans revealed essential functions in spermatogenesis, including roles in meiotic chromosome segregation and chromosome condensation and architecture. Analysed proteins were divided into three categories on the basis of protein localization and RNAi phenotypes: category I proteins have spermatogenesis-specific localization, category II proteins have newly discovered roles in spermatogenesis and previously described roles in other cellular processes (Table 1), and category III proteins have other roles in fertility (Supplementary Table 7).
Category I proteins GSP-3 and GSP-4 are nearly identical homologues of PP1-γ, a glc7/PP1 phosphatase required for mouse male meiosis and spermiogenesis15. GSP-3 and GSP-4 encase chromosomes during meiotic divisions and in mature sperm (Fig. 2b). RNAi against either caused variably penetrant male sterility as a result of chromosome segregation defects, including chromosome bridges and incompletely separated chromosomes (Supplementary Fig. 4a–d). Previous gsp-3 and gsp-4 RNAi experiments showed hermaphrodite sterility16,17. Fertility in gsp-4(RNAi) (Supplementary Table 6) and gsp-3(RNAi)17 hermaphrodites was restored by mating with wild-type males, indicating defective spermatogenesis. GSP-3 and GSP-4 may act as the sperm-specific counterparts to the other C. elegans Glc7/PP1 phosphatases, GSP-1 and GSP-2, which antagonize the Aurora B kinase-mediated release of chromosome cohesion during mitosis and oocyte meiosis18. Hence, studies in worms and mice suggest that GSP family members act directly on chromatin to achieve proper chromosome segregation and fertility in various species.
Also identified were spermatogenesis-specific proteins that lack homology to known fertility factors, yet are essential for sperm meiotic chromosome segregation and male fertility. SMZ-1 and SMZ-2 are 89% identical, contain PDZ (protein–protein interaction) domains, and represent a novel protein family vital for spermatogenic chromosome segregation. These proteins localize to male germline nuclei during and after meiosis and concentrate around sperm chromatin in 30–50% of spermatids (Fig. 2c). smz-1(RNAi) or smz-2(RNAi) spermatocytes failed to progress through meiotic divisions. Defective meiotic chromosomes did not congress to the metaphase plate or segregate (Supplementary Fig. 4e). Thus, our approach identified highly conserved and C. elegans sperm-specific proteins that are important for male meiosis and fertility.
Many organisms use SNBPs such as histone variants and protamines to establish unique sperm chromosome structure. In mammals, histone H2A variants such as H2AX substitute for H2A during spermatogenesis and are required for male fertility19. We identified the first C. elegans SNBPs, including the histone H2A variant HTAS-1, which has 51% identity to canonical histones. It localizes with meiotic chromosomes and persists on mature sperm chromatin (Fig. 2e). Histone variants are therefore part of the unique constitution of sperm chromatin in worms and mammals.
Proteomic analysis further identified SPCH-1, SPCH-2 and SPCH-3, three small, abundant, highly basic proteins, which resemble invertebrate protamines such as the surf clam SNBP, PL-I (BLAST expectation score (E value) 10−23)20. As expected for SNBPs, SPCH proteins are spermatogenesis-specific, localize to meiotic DNA and encase mature sperm chromatin (Fig. 2d). They are also homologous to mouse HANP/H1T2 (ref. 21) (Table 1), which localizes to mouse sperm chromatin, is required for the nuclear localization of protamines and is important for male fertility22. Although the rapid evolution of male reproductive genes23 has made C. elegans SNBPs difficult to identify, proteomic analysis pinpointed SNBPs with similar features in vertebrates and invertebrates.
Unknown roles in DNA compaction and chromosome segregation during spermatogenesis were revealed for proteins with functions in other cell types (category II; Table 1). The topoisomerase I homologue TOP-1 is a nucleolar protein in somatic and germ cells9, but unlike the subtracted nucleolar protein FIB-1 (Fig. 2g), TOP-1 surrounds mature sperm chromatin (Fig. 2f) and functions during spermatogenesis. Abnormally large sperm nuclei and aberrant progression through male meiosis were caused by top-1(RNAi), possibly indicating either defective DNA condensation or abnormal DNA content (Supplementary Fig. 5a, b).
Because topoisomerases alter DNA twist and writhe, TOP-1 may resolve C. elegans chromosomes during meiotic divisions, condense DNA during spermatogenesis or decondense DNA after fertilization, which are functions related to those of yeast topoisomerase I in mitosis24. Alternatively, because human topoisomerase I is a kinase that phosphorylates SR proteins (key regulators of RNA processing events such as splicing)25, TOP-1 could control RNA regulation during sperm formation. In fact, top-1(RNAi) defects resembled those caused by RNAi of rsp-6, which encodes an SR protein (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 5b, c). Other sperm-enriched SR proteins, RSP-1 (three occurrences) and RSP-2 (one occurrence), function together during spermatogenesis: double-mutant males are sterile26.
Of identified factors, 23% (30 of 132) show homology to translation or splicing factors, many belonging to large families. Our subtractive proteomic analysis differentiated between family members to identify those with spermatogenesis-specific chromosome association or function. For example, unlike the subtracted P-granule RNA helicase GLH-1 (Fig. 2i), the GLH-2 family member surrounds sperm meiotic chromosomes (Fig. 2h). Although disruption of glh-2 had no effect, disruption of vbh-1 (vasa and belle-like helicase; two occurrences) caused male sterility (R. Navarro, personal communication). Similarly, disruption of the homologous RNA helicase Mvh (murine VASA) causes male infertility27.
Our study provides clues to the underlying causes of mammalian infertility by identifying and analysing spermatogenesis-enriched chromatin proteins in the nematode C. elegans. Cross-species comparison of sperm proteomes, characterized by approaches similar to ours, will elucidate the molecular basis for sperm evolution and male fertility.
Our list of proteins represents a resource for identifying causes of human infertility, thereby providing candidates for any disease locus residing in a multigenic region correlated with a fertility defect. One illustration is azoospermia, the complete lack of sperm28. DBY, which encodes a VASA RNA helicase, falls within a Y-chromosome region correlated with this defect, and is further implicated in spermatogenesis by our analysis.
Of the 132 proteins detected by our strategy, 70 (53%) have human homologues not yet tested for roles in fertility (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 9).Analysis of these proteins in mice and humans has the potential to define new mammalian fertility factors. These factors present opportunities for the development of diagnostic tests to assess sperm competence and human reproductive potential, and represent potential targets for the development of safe male contraceptives.
METHODS
Purification of spermatogenic and oogenic chromatin
Germ-cell isolation and chromatin purification are described in Supplementary Methods; 5–20% of spermatogenic nuclei were in various stages of meiosis as judged by a cytological examination of 4′ ,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-stained chromosomes. Similarly, 10–30% of fer-1(hc1) oocytes were in diakinesis, 50–70% were oocytes that had undergone endomitotic reduplication (Emo), and 20–30% were fertilized embryos, allowing the subtraction of chromatin and meiotic factors. Subsequent SDS–PAGE and staining with colloidal blue (Novex) of purified chromatin revealed that core histones were the most abundant proteins in both cell types, showing similar enrichment of chromatin proteins (Supplementary Fig. 2). Major sperm proteins (MSPs), the most abundant proteins in sperm cytosol and pseudopods29, were undetectable in our chromatin preparations by staining with colloidal blue, indicating that sperm cellular components had been effectively removed.
Proteomic identification and subtractive analysis
A total of eleven 12-step LC–LC–MS–MS experiments (six of spermatogenic chromatin and five of oogenic chromatin) were performed to enhance the detection of peptides from small proteins and low-abundance proteins. For each experiment, 50–100µg of protein was digested and analysed (Supplementary Methods). To ensure the subsequent subtraction of low-abundance oogenic factors, more stringent criteria were adopted for identifying proteins from spermatogenic germ cells (a minimum of two different peptides per protein from each individual preparation) than from oogenic cells (a minimum of two different peptides per protein from all data sets of five preparations combined).
Prioritization of enriched and reliably detected proteins by using two abundance measurements from MudPIT reduced the number of proteins to a manageable subset for functional studies. The first, total spectrum count (TSC), represents the total number of tandem mass spectra collected for each protein from all preparations and was used to assess relative protein abundance30. The second measure, ‘occurrence’, was the number of preparations in which each protein was identified and indicates the reliability of protein detection across different preparations. Occurrence is especially useful for proteins that are not sampled frequently in any one mass spectrometric analysis. By choosing only spermatogenic proteins represented by three or more occurrences, we reduced the number of candidate proteins from 1,099 to 502. These well-represented spermatogenic proteins comprise 46%(502 of 1,099) of individual proteins identified by MudPIT analysis and constitute 88% of the mass of total proteins in spermatogenic preparations, as estimated by TSC (Supplementary Table 5a). Enrichment of proteins such as core histones was confirmed by high TSC and high occurrence (6 of 6 preparations; Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 3). Correspondingly, MSPs were detected in only very low abundance (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3).
The entire oogenic protein list (812) was subtracted from the prioritized spermatogenic protein list (502). Subtractive analysis removed appropriate factors and reduced the number of proteins to 132 (Supplementary Methods).
Functional analysis
RNAi analysis was conducted for genes corresponding to each of the 132 abundant sperm chromatin proteins by injecting 1–4 mg ml−1 double-stranded RNA into him-8(e1849) animals. Quantitative screening and statistical analysis of F2 animals from RNAi-treated grandparents were used to assess the functions of each gene in fertility (Supplementary Methods). F1 parents producing statistically lower progeny numbers were further analysed by observing the morphology of germ-cell chromosomes (Supplementary Methods). To assess male fertility, FS male progeny were tested for their ability to rescue the fertilization defect of spe-8 dpy-4 hermaphrodites.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank S. Strome, K. Bennett, H.-S. Koo, L. Moore, E. Shulze and J. Aris for providing antibodies; A. Villenueve, G. Stanfield, S. Mitani and the C. elegans Genetic Center (CGC) for providing strains; V. Reinke, L. Moore and R. Navarro for sharing unpublished data; D. King for peptide synthesis; A. Chan for help with microscopy; S. Chu for statistical analysis; A. Severson, T. Cline, A. Skop, E. Xu and J. Gladden for comments on the manuscript; and members of the Meyer laboratory for input on this project. This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health grants to D.S.C., J.R.Y. and B.J.M. B.J.M. is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Footnotes
Author Information Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests.
References
- 1.Agarwal A, Said TM. Role of sperm chromatin abnormalities and DNA damage in male infertility. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2003;9:331–345. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmg027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kimmins S, Sassone-Corsi P. Chromatin remodelling and epigenetic features of germ cells. Nature. 2005;434:583–589. doi: 10.1038/nature03368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Washburn MP, Wolters D, Yates JR. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nature Biotechnol. 2001;19:242–247. doi: 10.1038/85686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Eng JK, McCormack A, Yates JR. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1994;5:976–989. doi: 10.1016/1044-0305(94)80016-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tabb DL, McDonald WH, Yates JR. DTA Select and Contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2002;1:21–26. doi: 10.1021/pr015504q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schirmer EC, Florens L, Guan T, Yates JR, Gerace L. Nuclear membrane proteins with potential disease links found by subtractive proteomics. Science. 2003;301:1380–1382. doi: 10.1126/science.1088176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Skop AR, Liu H, Yates J, Meyer BJ, Heald R. Dissection of the mammalian midbody proteome reveals conserved cytokinesis mechanisms. Science. 2004;305:61–66. doi: 10.1126/science.1097931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Browning H, Strome S. A sperm-supplied factor required for embryogenesis in C. elegans. Development. 1996;122:391–404. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.1.391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lee MH, Park H, Shim G, Lee J, Koo HS. Regulation of gene expression, cellular localization, and in vivo function of Caenorhabditis elegans DNA topoisomerase I. Genes Cells. 2001;6:303–312. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2001.00423.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gruidl ME, et al. Multiple potential germ-line helicases are components of the germ-line-specific P granules of Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:13837–13842. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Moore LL, Roth MB. HCP-4, a CENP-C like protein in Caenorhabditis elegans, is required for resolution of sister centromeres. J. Cell Biol. 2001;153:1199–1208. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.6.1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Reinke V, Gil I, Ward S, Kazmer K. Genome-wide germline-enriched and sex-biased expression profiles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development. 2004;131:311–323. doi: 10.1242/dev.00914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kamath RS, et al. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature. 2003;421:231–237. doi: 10.1038/nature01278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sonnichsen B, et al. Full genome RNAi profiling of early embryogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2005;434:462–469. doi: 10.1038/nature03353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Varmuza S, et al. Spermiogenesis is impaired in mice bearing a targeted mutation in the protein phosphatase 1c gamma gene. Dev. Biol. 1999;205:98–110. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1998.9100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Boag PR, Ren P, Newton SE, Gasser RB. Molecular characterisation of a male specific serine/threonine phosphatase from Oesophagostomum dentatum (Nematoda: Strongylida), and functional analysis of homologues in Caenorhabditis elegans. Int. J. Parasitol. 2003;33:313–325. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(02)00263-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hanazawa M, Mochii M, Ueno N, Kohara Y, Iino Y. Use of cDNA subtraction and RNA interference screens in combination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:8686–8691. doi: 10.1073/pnas.141004698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rogers E, Bishop JD, Waddle JA, Schumacher JM, Lin R. The aurora kinase AIR-2 functions in the release of chromosome cohesion in Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. J. Cell Biol. 2002;157:219–229. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200110045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Celeste A, et al. Genomic instability in mice lacking histone H2AX. Science. 2002;296:922–927. doi: 10.1126/science.1069398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lewis JD, McParland R, Ausio J. PL I of Spisula solidissima, a highly elongated sperm specific histone H1. Biochemistry. 2004;43:7766–7775. doi: 10.1021/bi0360455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lewis JD, Song Y, de Jong ME, Bagha SM, Ausio J. A walk though vertebrate and invertebrate protamines. Chromosoma. 2003;111:473–482. doi: 10.1007/s00412-002-0226-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Martianov I, et al. Polar nuclear localization of H1T2, a histone H1 variant, required for spermatid elongation and DNA condensation during spermiogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:2808–2813. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406060102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Swanson WJ, Vacquier VD. The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins. Nature Rev. Genet. 2002;3:137–144. doi: 10.1038/nrg733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang JC. Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular perspective. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002;3:430–440. doi: 10.1038/nrm831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rossi F, et al. Specific phosphorylation of SR proteins by mammalian DNA topoisomerase I. Nature. 1996;381:80–82. doi: 10.1038/381080a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kawano T, Fujita M, Sakamoto H. Unique and redundant functions of SR proteins, a conserved family of splicing factors, in Caenorhabditis elegans development. Mech. Dev. 2000;95:67–76. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(00)00339-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tanaka SS, et al. The mouse homolog of Drosophila Vasa is required for the development of male germ cells. Genes Dev. 2000;14:841–853. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Vogt PH. Azoospermia factor (AZF) in Yq11: towards a molecular understanding of its function for human male fertility and spermatogenesis. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2005;10:81–93. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60807-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ward S, Klass M. The location of the major protein in Caenorhabditis elegans sperm and spermatocytes. Dev. Biol. 1982;92:203–208. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(82)90164-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu H, Sadygov RG, Yates JR. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance. Anal. Chem. 2004;76:4193–4201. doi: 10.1021/ac0498563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.