Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Behavior Analyst logoLink to The Behavior Analyst
. 2002 Fall;25(2):161–173. doi: 10.1007/BF03392055

Cognitive neuroscience from a behavioral perspective: A critique of chasing ghosts with geiger counters

Steven F Faux
PMCID: PMC2731617  PMID: 22478384

Abstract

Cognitive neuroscience is a growing new discipline concerned with relating complex behavior to neuroanatomy. Relatively new advances in the imaging of brain function, such as positron emission tomography (PET), have generated hundreds of studies that have demonstrated a number of interesting but also potentially problematic brain-behavior relations. For example, cognitive neuroscientists largely favor interpretations of their data that rely on unobserved hypothetical mechanisms. Their reports often contain phraseology such as central executive, willed action, and mental imagery. As B. F. Skinner argued for decades, cognitive constructs of neurological data may yield nothing more than a conceptual nervous system.

Keywords: cognitive neuroscience, PET, fMRI, ERP, brain imaging

Full text

PDF
161

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Almeida Rita, Ledberg Anders. Exact multivariate tests for brain imaging data. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 May;16(1):24–35. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Badgaiyan R. D. Executive control, willed actions, and nonconscious processing. Hum Brain Mapp. 2000;9(1):38–41. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(2000)9:1<38::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO;2-T. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bayliss D. M., Roodenrys S. Executive processing and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: an application of the supervisory attentional system. Dev Neuropsychol. 2000;17(2):161–180. doi: 10.1207/S15326942DN1702_02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cabeza R., Nyberg L. Imaging cognition II: An empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Jan;12(1):1–47. doi: 10.1162/08989290051137585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Collette F., Salmon E., Van der Linden M., Chicherio C., Belleville S., Degueldre C., Delfiore G., Franck G. Regional brain activity during tasks devoted to the central executive of working memory. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1999 Jan;7(3):411–417. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(98)00045-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. David A., Blamire A., Breiter H. Functional magnetic resonance imaging. A new technique with implications for psychology and psychiatry. Br J Psychiatry. 1994 Jan;164(1):2–7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.164.1.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fitzpatrick S. M., Rothman D. New approaches to functional neuroenergetics. J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 Jul;11(4):467–471. doi: 10.1162/089892999563454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fletcher P. C., Dolan R. J., Shallice T., Frith C. D., Frackowiak R. S., Friston K. J. Is multivariate analysis of PET data more revealing than the univariate approach? Evidence from a study of episodic memory retrieval. Neuroimage. 1996 Jun;3(3 Pt 1):209–215. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1996.0023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Frith C. D., Friston K., Liddle P. F., Frackowiak R. S. Willed action and the prefrontal cortex in man: a study with PET. Proc Biol Sci. 1991 Jun 22;244(1311):241–246. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1991.0077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kast B. Decisions, decisions... Nature. 2001 May 10;411(6834):126–128. doi: 10.1038/35075745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Posner M. I., DiGirolamo G. J. Cognitive neuroscience: origins and promise. Psychol Bull. 2000 Nov;126(6):873–889. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. SKINNER B. F. Are theories of learning necessary? Psychol Rev. 1950 Jul;57(4):193–216. doi: 10.1037/h0054367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sartori G., Umiltà C. The additive factor method in brain imaging. Brain Cogn. 2000 Feb;42(1):68–71. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1999.1164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sergent J. Brain-imaging studies of cognitive functions. Trends Neurosci. 1994 Jun;17(6):221–227. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(94)90002-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Servos P. Functional neuroimaging of mental chronometry. Brain Cogn. 2000 Feb;42(1):72–74. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1999.1165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shadlen M. N., Newsome W. T. Motion perception: seeing and deciding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jan 23;93(2):628–633. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.2.628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Behavior Analyst are provided here courtesy of Association for Behavior Analysis International

RESOURCES