Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Pharmacol. 2008 Feb 14;73(5):1424–1433. doi: 10.1124/mol.107.042028

Simvastatin Protects against Amyloid β and HIV-1 Tat-Induced Promoter Activities of Inflammatory Genes in Brain Endothelial Cells

Ibolya E András 1, GeunBae Rha 1, Wen Huang 1, SungYong Eum 1, Pierre-Olivier Couraud 1, Ignacio A Romero 1, Bernhard Hennig 1, Michal Toborek 1
PMCID: PMC2731660  NIHMSID: NIHMS115914  PMID: 18276775

Abstract

Increased deposition of amyloid β (Aβ) is characteristic for normal aging and human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1)-associated alterations of the central nervous system. In addition, both Aβ and HIV-1 are known to induce cellular oxidative stress and disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Therefore, we hypothesize that Aβ and HIV-1 protein Tat can potentiate their proinflammatory effects at the brain endothelium level. To address this hypothesis, we studied promoter activity of three proinflammatory genes in an in vitro BBB model of human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMEC) cocultured with a human astrocyte cell line producing Tat (SVGA-Tat cells) and exposed to Aβ. Treatment of HBMEC with Aβ(1-40) in the presence of SVGA-Tat cells resulted in a significant up-regulation of E-selectin, CC chemokine ligand-2, and interleukin-6 promoter activities and protein levels compared with the individual effects of Aβ or Tat. In addition, Aβ markedly amplified E-selectin promoter activity in HBMEC cocultured with HIV-1-infected Jurkat T cells. Simvastatin, the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, effectively blocked proinflammatory reactions induced by Aβ in cocultures with SVGA-Tat cells or with HIV-1-infected Jurkat cells. The present study indicates that a combined exposure to Aβ and Tat or HIV-1 can synergistically potentiate the expression of inflammatory genes in brain endothelial cells. In addition, simvastatin may provide a beneficial influence by reducing these effects at the BBB level.


A new challenge in the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Western countries is an increase in infection rates among the older population. It is estimated that approximately 15 to 20% of HIV-1-infected people in the United States are 50 years of age or older (Shah and Mildvan, 2006). This is partly caused by increased survival rates as a result of more effective antiretroviral therapy. In addition, the rates of new HIV-1 infections are rapidly growing in older people. Because of a variety of sociological, biological, and medical implications, this trend may further increase in the near future. These facts are of significant concern because elderly patients develop AIDS more rapidly and have higher morbidity and mortality rates. In addition, older patients are more likely to develop HIV-associated dementia. This phenomenon seems not to be related to the length of HIV-1 infection (Valcour and Paul, 2006), suggesting that aging can independently aggravate HIV-1-associated central nervous system pathology.

Among a variety of mechanisms that can be affected by HIV infection and aging, alterations of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) seem to be especially important. Even normal aging can lead to the BBB disturbances, including disrupted microvascular integrity, higher permeability to albumin, and accumulation and depositions of amyloid β (Aβ) that precede neuronal degeneration and dementia (Price and Morris, 1999). In addition, disturbances of the BBB are associated with HIV-1 infection and HIV-1 trafficking into the brain (Persidsky and Poluektova, 2006).

It has been hypothesized that the BBB pathology in HIV-1 infection is mediated by soluble factors released from infected cells. One such mediator may be the HIV-1 protein Tat, which normally serves as a transcriptional transactivator critical for HIV-1 replication (Nath and Geiger, 1998). In support of its pathogenic role, Tat was detected in the perivascular cells of AIDS patients with HIV-associated encephalitis (Gartner, 2000). Tat can easily cross cell membranes and can affect brain endothelial cells, including stimulation of inflammatory responses and alterations of tight junction protein expression (Toborek et al., 2005). It is interesting that Tat can elevate Aβ levels in the central nervous system by inhibiting the Aβ-degrading enzyme, neprilysin (Rempel and Pulliam, 2005). This phenomenon may have important implications for older HIV-infected patients. Indeed, HIV-1 infection and prolonged antiretroviral therapy were demonstrated to contribute to an increase in Aβ deposition in older HIV-infected individuals (Green et al., 2005). In addition, Aβ levels in the cerebrospinal fluid were shown to correlate with AIDS dementia complex (Brew et al., 2005).

Aβ is the major constituent of senile plaques and cerebrovascular deposits. It is deposited in the brain parenchyma and cerebral blood vessels in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). It was demonstrated that the BBB can regulate Aβ transport into the brain via two main receptors: the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 and the receptor for advanced glycation end products (Deane and Zlokovic, 2007). The main forms of Aβ are the 1 to 40 and 1 to 42 fragments originating from amyloid precursor protein by physiological proteolytic processes. Soluble Aβ(1-40) is present mainly in the circulation and in cerebral vascular amyloid. In contrast, Aβ(1-42) is mainly localized to the senile plaques (Seubert et al., 1992). Exposure to Aβ can affect the metabolism of endothelial cells by several mechanisms, including the induction of inflammatory responses (Paris et al., 2002; Toborek et al., 2005). Aβ can also stimulate the infection of target CD4-positive cells by HIV-1 (Wojtowicz et al., 2002).

Based on these reports, we hypothesize that Aβ and HIV-1 Tat can potentiate their toxic effects. Because of their role in HIV and aging pathology, we focused on the mechanisms of microvascular endothelial injury and the BBB dysfunction. The present study indicates that Aβ(1-40) and Tat can crossamplify their proinflammatory effects in an in vitro model of the BBB.

Materials and Methods

Cell Cultures

Human Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells

Brain endothelial cells used in the present study represent the first stable, fully characterized, and well-differentiated human brain endothelial cell line (Weksler et al., 2005). Human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMECs) were cultured in EBM-2 medium (Clonetics, East Rutherford, NJ) supplemented with vascular endothelial growth factor, insulin-like growth factor-1, epidermal growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, hydrocortisone, ascorbate, gentamicin, and 2.5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) as described originally (Weksler et al., 2005). Collagen type I (BD Biosciences Pharmingen, San Jose, CA) was used for coating the cell culture dishes.

Tat-Expressing Astrocytes

SVGA cells, which represent a human astrocyte cell line, were stably transfected with Tat expression construct (SVGA-Tat cells) as described and characterized previously (Chauhan et al., 2007). Control SVGA cells were transfected with an empty vector. The cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS (Hyclone, Logan, UT), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin at 37°C and 5% CO2.

Jurkat T Cells

Jurkat cells (a human peripheral blood leukemia T cell line) were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) containing 10% FBS (Hyclone), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin at 37°C and 5% CO2.

Coculture Models

HBMEC were plated onto polycarbonate membranes of the upper chamber of the Transwell system (pore size, 0.4 µm; Corning Costar, Corning, NY). SVGA, SVGA-Tat, or Jurkat cells were cultured in the lower chamber of the system.

Generation of HIV-1 Stock and Infection of Jurkat Cells

HIV-1 stock was generated using 293T cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA). The cells were grown in DMEM containing 10% FBS and antibiotics (100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin). When the cultures reached ∼70% confluence, the cells were transfected with the NL4-3 plasmid containing full-length proviral DNA using calcium phosphate. After transfection, cells were incubated for 24 h in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% FBS and penicillin plus streptomycin (100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin). Then culture supernatants were collected, filtered through 0.45 µm filters (Millipore, Bedford, MA), and frozen at −80°C. HIV-1 p24 levels in the supernatants were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ZeptoMetrix, Buffalo, NY) as the marker of HIV-1 infection.

HIV-1 stock was used to infect Jurkat T cells. In brief, 4 × 106 Jurkat cells were cultured in T-25 flasks (Corning Costar) in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. The cells were infected with viral isolate containing 65 ng of HIV-1 p24 and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2. The cultures were maintained for up to 18 days with fresh medium added every other day. Noninfected Jurkat cells were used as controls.

Treatment Factors

Aβ(1-40) (active peptide) and Aβ(40-1) (negative control with the reverse amino acid sequence) were purchased from Anaspec (San Jose, CA) and dissolved in sterile ultrapure water obtained from ELGA Purelab Classic (Lowell, MA). Freshly solubilized Aβ solutions without preaggregation were used in our experiments. Such form of Aβ was demonstrated to induce proinflammatory reactions in isolated rat brain microvessels (Paris et al., 2002).

The cells were treated with Aβ(1-40) at the concentrations of 0.1 to 1 µM for 20 h in EBM-2 medium. HIV-1 Tat strongly binds to serum proteins; therefore, all experiments in cocultures with SVGA-Tat cells were performed in EGM-2 medium without serum or growth factors. However, the experiments that involved treatment with Aβ in the presence of HIV-infected Jurkat cells were performed in cell culture media containing 10% FBS. Cells cultured on chamber slides were treated with 1 µM Aβ(1-40) and SVGA or SVGA-Tat conditioned medium. In selected experiments, coculture systems were pretreated for 15 min with 5 or 10 µM simvastatin followed by cotreatment with Aβ(1-40) for 20 h. Both simvastatin and Aβ were added to the upper and lower chambers of the Transwell systems. Simvastatin was left in cell culture media for the duration of Aβ treatment. Our preliminary studies (data not shown) indicated that simvastatin concentrations between 5 and 20 µM did not affect cell viability.

Promoter Constructs

Inflammatory gene promoter constructs (pGL3 E-selectin, pGL3 CCL-2, and pGL3 IL-6) were generated based on the pGL3 luciferase basic vector (Promega, Madison, WI). In brief, 5′-flanking regions of human E-selectin (−1014/+36), CCL-2 (−1699/+18), and IL-6 (−1026/+15) were amplified by polymerase chain reaction from human genomic DNA and individually cloned into the pGL3 basic vector by inserting fragments between MluI and NcoI site.

To generate pcDNA3 Tat86 expression construct, HIV Tat(1–86) sequence was amplified using Tat1 BamHI primer, 5′-AGA TCT GGA TCC ATG GAG CCA GTA GAT CCT-3′ and Tat86 XhoI primer, 5′-GAA TTC CTC GAG CTA TTC CTT CGG GCC TGT CGG GTC CCC TCG GGA TTG GGA GGT GGG TTG CTT TGA TAG AGA AGC TTG-3′ harboring exon II of Tat (underlined) and pNL4-3 template. The amplified fragment was digested with BamHI and XhoI and then cloned into the pcDNA3 vector.

To generate the pGL3 LTR construct, 5′-LTR region of HIV-1 was amplified by polymerase chain reaction from the pNL4−3 plasmid and cloned into the pGL3 basic vector. pEGFP LTR construct was a gift from Dr. Avindra Nath (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD). Promoterless pEGFP was generated from the pEGFP LTR construct by eliminating the 5′-LTR region. Renilla reniformis luciferase pRL-TK control vector was purchased from Promega.

Transient Transfections of HBMEC

HBMEC were cultured on the filter inserts in cocultures with SVGA, SVGA-Tat, or Jurkat cells and grown to 90% confluence. To prepare a transfection solution, lipofectin (4 µl/ml) was mixed with Opti-MEM medium (both from Invitrogen) for 30 min. Then, 2 µg/ml pGL3 E-selectin, pGL3 CCL-2, or pGL3 IL-6 promoter constructs was added, followed by incubation for an additional 10 min at room temperature to allow DNA-lipofectin complexes to form.

Filter inserts with HBMEC were removed from the coculture systems, placed in empty 12-well plates, and washed twice with Opti-MEM to remove serum residues. Then, 250 µl of the transfection solution containing individual promoter gene constructs was added to each filter insert, and the cells were incubated for 5 h at 37°C. Transfection solutions were aspirated, and cultures were returned into the Transwell coculture systems. Cultures were allowed to recover in a normal growth medium for 24 h. Then, the growth medium was replaced with serum free EGM-2 basal medium (for endothelial cells) and DMEM (for astrocytes), and cocultures were treated with Aβ added into both the upper and lower chambers.

Transient Transfections of Astrocytes

SVGA cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 or lipofectin (both from Invitrogen). In brief, SVGA cells were seeded on the 6-or 24-well plates and grown to ∼90% confluence. Before transfections, Opti-MEM medium was mixed with Lipofectamine 2000 (10 µl/well for the 6-well plates) or lipofectin (1 µl/well for the 24-well plates) for 30 min. Then, pEGFP LTR, pEGFP (both 500 ng/well for the 6-well plates), pcDNA3, pcDNA3 Tat86 (2 µg/well for the 6-well plates or 400 ng/well for the 24-well plates), and pRL-TK (10 ng/well for the 24-well plates) were added to prepare individual transfection solutions. The cells were washed with Opti-MEM, the specific transfection mixtures were added to each well, and transfections were performed for 4 h at 37°C. Then, cultures were washed and allowed to recover in growth medium for 20 h. Astrocytes transfected with the EGFP constructs were imaged using an inverted fluorescence microscope. In cultures transfected with other constructs, luciferase activity was determined as described below.

Luciferase Activity Assay

Firefly and R. reniformis luciferase activities were measured using the Dual Luciferase Assay System (Promega). In brief, cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and incubated on a shaker for 30 min at 24°C with passive lysis buffer. Cell lysates were transferred to the Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged to remove cell debris. Then, 10 µl of the cell extracts was mixed with 100 µl of luciferase assay reagent containing luciferin plus ATP and luminescence was measured in a luminometer with dual automatic injector (Turner Designs, Sunnyvale, CA). The samples were then mixed with the Stop and Glo reagent, and R. reniformis luciferase activity was determined as an internal control.

All transfection results from astrocytes were expressed as the ratio of the firefly to R. reniformis luciferase activity. On the other hand, Aβ used for treatment of HBMEC interfered with the R. reniformis luciferase assay. Therefore, firefly luciferase activity in HBMECs was normalized to total protein levels, and the transfection results were expressed as relative light units per microgram of protein.

Immunofluorescence Microscopy

HBMECs cultured on Permanox chambered plastic slides were fixed with ethanol for 30 min at 4°C. After washing with PBS and blocking with 3% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 30 min, samples were incubated overnight at 4°C with rabbit polyclonal anti-E-selectin antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). The excess of primary antibody was removed, slides were washed with PBS and incubated with Texas Red-conjugated secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 2 h at room temperature. After washing with PBS, slides were mounted using ProLong Gold Antifade reagent containing 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Invitrogen) to visualize the nuclei. Specimens were covered with coverslips and evaluated under an epifluorescence Nikon Eclipse E600 microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The images were captured using a Spot charge-coupled device camera system.

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

Concentrations of CCL-2 and IL-6 were quantified using commercially available human CCL-2 and IL-6 Immunoassay kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Assays were performed using aliquots of cell culture media collected from both the luminal and abluminal chambers of the Transwell coculture systems.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using SigmaStat 2.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). One- or two-way analysis of variance was used to compare responses among treatments. Treatment means were compared using Bonferroni’s least significant procedure and p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Morphological Characterization of HBMECs and SVGA-Tat Cells

HIV-1 can infect astrocytes, which then produce viral proteins such as Tat. Astrocytes constitute the most abundant cell type in the brain, and viral proteins produced by infected astrocytes are likely to have significant neuropathological effects. Therefore, the present study was based on coculture systems of HBMEC with astrocytes expressing HIV Tat protein (SVGA-Tat cells) or normal SVGA cells used as controls.

The phase contrast micrographs in Fig. 1 depict confluent HBMECs and SVGA cells. HBMECs cultured on cell culture dishes exhibited typical monolayer morphology of elongated, fusiform shape of endothelial cells. The experimental design of the present study required HBMEC cultures on filter inserts. Therefore, we also determined that HBMECs cultured on microporous filters had normal morphology. In addition, confluent SVGA-Tat and SVGA control cells exhibited typical morphology characteristic of astrocyte cultures.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Morphological characterization of immortalized HBMECs, control astrocytic cell line (SVGA), and SVGA overexpressing Tat. Top, phase-contrast micrographs of a confluent HB-MEC monolayer with the typical morphology of elongated, fusiform shape of endothelial cells cultured on a cell culture dish (A) and on a filter insert (B). Endothelial cells cultured on filter inserts have no morphological changes compared with those grown on cell culture dishes. Bottom, phase-contrast micrograph of confluent control SVGA astrocytes (C) and SVGA-Tat astrocytes (D). Control SVGA and SVGA-Tat cells exhibit similar morphology characteristic for astrocyte cultures, such as multipolar shape and overlapping morphology.

Tat Expression by SVGA-Tat Astrocytes

To confirm the expression and activity of Tat protein in our culture systems, SVGA-Tat and control SVGA astrocytes were transfected with pEGFP LTR (Fig. 2A) or pGL3 LTR (Fig. 2B) promoter constructs. SVGA-Tat cells transfected with pEGFP LTR (Fig. 2A, middle) exhibited markedly stronger EGFP fluorescence compared with control SVGA cells (Fig. 2A left). In contrast, transfections with the promoterless pEGFP construct revealed only background fluorescence both in SVGA-Tat and control SVGA cells. To further confirm the specificity of these responses, control SVGA cells were transiently transfected with pcDNA3 Tat86 and pEGFP LTR constructs. As illustrated (Fig. 2A right), this procedure resulted in efficient and specific LTR transactivation, similar to that in SVGA-Tat astrocytes.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Tat expression by SVGA-Tat astrocytes. A, control SVGA and SVGA-Tat astrocytes were transfected with the pEGFP LTR (bottom) or promoterless pEGFP (negative control, top) constructs. To confirm the specificity of Tat detection, normal SVGA astrocytes were transiently transfected with the pcDNA3 Tat86 expression vector and cotransfected with the pEGFP LTR or the promoterless pEGFP constructs. EGPF expression was detected by immunofluorescence microscopy. B, to quantify Tat transactivation, control SVGA and SVGA-Tat astrocytes were transfected with pGL3 LTR or pGL3 basic vector (negative control). As a positive control, SVGA astrocytes were transiently transfected with pcDNA3 Tat86 expression vector (or pcDNA3 empty vector) and pGL3 LTR. To normalize transfection rates, all cells were cotransfected with the R. reniformis luciferase reporter plasmid pRL-TK. Luciferase activity was analyzed by dual luciferase assay 20 h after transfections and normalized according to R. reniformis luciferase activity. Values are mean ± S.E.M. (n = 4–6).

To further characterize SVGA-Tat cells, Tat transactivation was quantified by transfection with the pGL3 LTR construct, followed by measuring of luciferase activity. Transfections with the pGL3 basic vector were performed as negative controls. A strong induction of luciferase activity was observed in SVGA-Tat cells but not in control SVGA cells (Fig. 2B). Strong transactivation of LTR promoter was also observed in control SVGA cells transiently transfected with the pcDNA3 Tat86 and pGL3 LTR constructs (positive control).

Tat and Aβ Selectively Amplified Promoter Activities and Protein Levels of Proinflammatory Mediators in HBMECs

Coculture systems of HBMECs with SVGA-Tat astrocytes were used to investigate the combined effects of Aβ and Tat on promoter activity of selected proinflammatory genes. HBMECs cocultured with SVGA-Tat or control SVGA cells were transfected with the firefly luciferase reporter constructs containing human E-selectin, CCL-2, or IL-6 promoter sequence. Then, both HBMEC and astrocytes were exposed to 0.1, 0.5, or 1 µM Aβ(1-40) for 20 h. In cocultures of HBMECs with control SVGA cells, Aβ induced a marked increase in the promoter activity of E-selectin (Fig. 3A) and CCL-2 (Fig. 3B); however, it did not affect promoter activity of IL-6 (Fig. 3C). On the other hand, exposure to Aβ in cocultures with SVGA-Tat cells markedly amplified promoter activities of all studied proinflammatory genes (Figs. 3, A–C). These effects were achieved by 1 µM Aβ for E-selectin and IL-6 promoters and by 0.5 µM Aβ for CCL-2 promoter.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Aβ amplifies Tat-induced promoter activities of proinflammatory genes in brain endothelial cells. HBMECs cocultured with control or Tat-expressing astrocytes (SVGA and SVGA-Tat cells, respectively) were transfected with the firefly luciferase reporter constructs containing the human E-selectin (A), CCL-2 (B), and IL-6 (C) promoter sequences. Cells in the coculture system were treated with the indicated concentrations of Aβ(1-40) 24 h after transfections. Aβ(40-1) at the concentration of 1 µM was used as a negative control. Luciferase activity was analyzed in HBMECs after a 20-h exposure to Aβ. Values are mean ± S.E.M., n = 4. *, statistically different compared with the corresponding controls within the HBMECs plus SVGA or HBMECs plus SVGA-Tat cocultures. †, data in cocultures of HBMECs with SVGA-Tat are significantly different compared with cocultures of HBMEC with control SVGA and exposed to the corresponding concentration of Aβ.

To verify the specificity of the Aβ(1-40) effects, cocultures were also exposed to the reverse-sequence Aβ peptide (Aβ40-1) at the concentration of 1 µM. As illustrated in Fig. 3, A to C, Aβ(40-1) did not affect transactivation of the inflammatory gene promoters.

In addition to promoter activities, we determined the effects of Aβ and/or SVGA-Tat on protein levels of E-selectin, CCL-2, and IL-6 (Fig. 4, A–C). Based on the results of the dose-response experiments presented in Fig. 3, A to C, Aβ was used at the concentration of 1 µM to stimulate E-selectin and IL-6 protein expression and at 0.5 µM to induce CCL-2 protein production. As illustrated in Fig. 4A (top right), treatment with Aβ alone slightly elevated E-selectin immunoreactivity. Similar effects were also apparent in HBMECs exposed to conditioned medium from SVGA-Tat cultured (bottom left). However, the most marked increase in E-selectin immunoreactivity was observed in HBMECs treated with Aβ in the presence of conditioned medium from SVGA-Tat cells (bottom right). Potentiation of proinflammatory effects of Aβ and SVGA-Tat were also observed in experiments in which levels of secretary CCL-2 and IL-6 proteins were determined in cell culture media (Fig. 4, B and C, respectively).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Aβ and Tat synergistically amplify protein expression of proinflammatory mediators in brain endothelial cells. A, HBMECs cultured on chambered slides were exposed to 1 µM Aβ(1-40) and/or conditioned media from SVGA or SVGA-Tat cells for 6 h. E-selectin immunoreactivity was determined by immunofluorescence microscopy. Red color reflects E-selectin-positive immunoreactivity, and blue color represents 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole staining for DNA that visualizes the nuclei. Arrows indicate intensification of E-selectin immunoreactivity by Aβ and/or SVGA-Tat conditioned media. B and C, HBMECs were cocultured with SVGA-Tat or control SVGA cells and treated with Aβ(1-40) at 0.5 µM (B) or 1 µM (C). CCL-2 and IL-6 protein levels were determined in the culture media by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Values are mean ± S.E.M. (n = 3–8). *, statistically different compared with the corresponding controls within the HBMECs plus SVGA or HBMECs plus SVGA-Tat cocultures. †, data in cocultures of HBMECs with SVGA-Tat are significantly different compared with cocultures of HBMECs with control SVGA and exposed to the corresponding concentration of Aβ.

Simvastatin Protected against Tat and Aβ-Induced Stimulation of Promoter Activities of Proinflammatory Genes in HBMECs

Statins have been demonstrated to have pleiotropic effects, including anti-inflammatory and anti-HIV properties. Therefore, we hypothesized that they can protect against Tat and Aβ-induced proinflammatory effects. To address this hypothesis, HBMECs were cocultured with SVGA-Tat or control SVGA cells and transfected with the pGL3 E-selectin, pGL3 CCL-2, or pGL3 IL-6 construct. Then, the cocultures were pretreated for 15 min with 10 µM (Fig. 5, A and B) or 5 µM (Fig. 5C) simvastatin, followed by exposure to Aβ(1-40) for 20 h. Aβ was used at the concentration of 1 µM to stimulate E-selectin and IL-6 promoters and at 0.5 µM to induce CCL-2 promoter. Consistent with data presented in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4, Aβ in the presence of SVGA-Tat induced a marked increase in E-selectin (Fig. 5A), CCL-2 (Fig. 5B), and IL-6 (Fig. 5C) promoter activities. Treatment with simvastatin up-regulated the IL-6 promoter activity in control (i.e., not exposed to Aβ) cocultures of HBMECs with SVGA-Tat cells. Nevertheless, simvastatin effectively protected against up-regulation of E-selectin and IL-6 promoters in cocultures of HBMECs with SVGA-Tat and exposed to Aβ. Inhibition of IL-6 promoter activity was achieved by 5 µM simvastatin; however, 10 µM simvastatin was required to block E-selectin promoter activity.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Simvastatin protects against Aβ and Tat-induced promoter activities of proinflammatory genes in brain endothelial cells. Transfections and luciferase activity assays were performed as described in the legend to Fig. 3. In addition, selected cultures were pretreated for 15 min with 10 µM (A and B) or 5 µM (C) simvastatin before coexposure to 1 µM (A and C) or 0.5 µM (B) Aβ(1-40) for 20 h. Values are mean ± S.E.M. (n = 4–6). *, statistically different compared with the corresponding controls within the HBMECs plus SVGA or HBMECs plus SVGA-Tat cocultures. †, Data in cocultures of HBMEC with SVGA-Tat are significantly different compared with cocultures of HBMECs with control SVGA and exposed to the corresponding concentration of Aβ. #, data in cocultures exposed to simvastatin are significantly different compared with the corresponding cocultures without added simvastatin.

Aβ Amplified HIV-1-Stimulated Transactivation of E-Selectin Promoter in HBMECs

In the final series of experiments, we investigated whether exposure to Aβ can stimulate E-selectin promoter activity in the presence of HIV-1. HBMECs were transfected with the pGL3 E-selectin construct and cocultured with HIV-1-infected or control Jurkat cells for 24 h. Cultures were then pretreated for 15 min with 10 µM simvastatin or vehicle control and exposed to 1 µM Aβ(1-40) for 20 h. The experiments were performed 7, 14, and 18 days after infection of Jurkat cells. The results were similar; therefore, individual data from these separate experiments were combined in a single figure (Fig. 6). Stimulation of HBMECs by HIV-1-infected Jurkat cells resulted in a sufficient increase in E-selectin promoter activity. In addition, treatment with Aβ markedly elevated these effects. Most importantly, pretreatment with simvastatin effectively protected against both HIV-1 and HIV-1 plus Aβ-induced transactivation of the E-selectin promoter construct.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Simvastatin protects against Aβ and HIV-1-induced promoter activity of E-selectin in brain endothelial cells. Transfections with the pGL3 E-selectin promoter construct were performed as described in the legend to Fig. 3. The next day, the transfected HBMECs were placed in cocultures with normal or HIV-1-infected Jurkat cells, followed by a treatment with 1 µM Aβ(1-40) for 20 h. Selected cultures were pretreated for 15 min with simvastatin (10 µM) before Aβ(1-40) coexposure. E-selectin promoter activity was analyzed by luciferase assay and normalized to cellular protein levels. Values are mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6–10). *, statistically different compared with the corresponding controls within the cocultures of HBMECs with normal or HIV-1-infected Jurkat cells. †, data in cocultures of HBMECs with HIV-1-infected Jurkat cells are significantly different compared with cocultures of HBMEC with normal Jurkat cells and exposed to the corresponding concentration of Aβ. #, data in cocultures exposed to simvastatin are significantly different compared with the corresponding controls without added simvastatin.

Discussion

The mechanisms of HIV entry into the brain are still unclear; however, they may occur through the so-called Trojan horse mechanism, via HIV-infected monocytes crossing the BBB (Gartner, 2000). Thus, induction of inflammatory reactions that mediate monocyte adhesion to the brain endothelium and transendothelial migration are of particular significance. Therefore, in the present studies, we focused on the expression of inflammatory mediators, such as E-selectin (an adhesion molecule), CCL-2 (a chemokine), and IL-6 (an inflammatory cytokine) in brain endothelial cells. Up-regulation of these inflammatory mediators can induce alterations of the BBB integrity by facilitating adhesion and migration of leukocytes into the brain (Buckner et al., 2006). The present study was based on coculture systems in which HBMECs were exposed to Tat produced by transfected astrocytes. Such cocultures are clinically relevant, because HIV can infect astrocytes, which then are able to produce viral proteins, such as Tat. Astrocytes along with HBMECs are the structural and functional part of the BBB. In addition, astrocytes are susceptible to Aβ treatment and can influence HBMEC inflammatory responses. Indeed, we observed that Aβ stimulated E-selectin promoter activity in HBMECs cocultured with SVGA astrocytes (Fig. 3A) but not with Jurkat cells (Fig. 6).

The facts that 1) deposits of Aβ increase in normal aging (Price and Morris, 1999), 2) Aβ can induce vascular alterations (Deane and Zlokovic, 2007), and 3) Aβ may be involved in HIV-associated pathology (Wojtowicz et al., 2002) prompted us to study the hypothesis that Aβ and Tat may cross-potentiate their toxic effects and alter the functions of the BBB. Indeed, the results of the present study indicated that coexposure to Aβ(1-40) and Tat or HIV-1-infected cells can synergistically elevate promoter activity of E-selectin, CCL-2, and IL-6. These effects were also confirmed at the protein levels (Fig. 4). Although the proinflammatory influence of Tat and Aβ in endothelial cells has been recognized (Toborek et al., 2005), the evidence that these factors can exert synergistic proinflammatory effects is the new finding of the present study.

As illustrated in Fig. 3, exposure to Aβ resulted in a dose-dependent increase in promoter activities of E-selectin and IL-6. On the other hand, CCL-2 promoter was activated by Aβ at the concentration of 0.1 and 0.5 µM but not at 1 µM. Although Aβ is generally considered to be a pro-oxidative factor, evidence indicates that Aβ-mediated regulation of cellular oxidation may depend on the ratio of Aβ to other pro-oxidative factors. Indeed, pro-oxidative/antioxidative effects of Aβ can be regulated by the molar ratio of Aβ to Cu2+. When Cu2+ is bound to two molar equivalents of Aβ, lipid peroxidation is inhibited and Aβ exerts antioxidant effects (Hayashi et al., 2007). Thus, it is possible that these finely tuned regulations of cellular redox balance might be responsible for the lack of CCL-2 stimulation by 1 µM Aβ.

The transfection experiments with the promoter constructs performed in the present study indicate that induction of inflammatory genes by Aβ, Tat, or HIV-1 occurs primarily at the transcriptional levels. In agreement with these results, it has been shown that Tat-induced expression of tumor necrosis factor-α is regulated by an NF-κB-dependent pathway in macrophages and astrocytes (Chen et al., 1997). The NF-κB-dependent pathway is also involved in Tat-induced up-regulation of IL-6 and IL-8 expression in human breast cancer cells (Lee et al., 2005). In addition, treatment with Tat can induce DNA binding activities of other transcription factors, such as cAMP response element-binding protein and activator protein-1, which are known to regulate inflammatory responses (Kumar et al., 1998; Toborek et al., 2005).

Aβ also seems to induce the activity of several transcription factors involved in the regulation of inflammatory gene expression. For example, Aβ treatment resulted in a poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1-facilitated DNA binding of NF-κB (Chiarugi and Moskowitz, 2003) in microglial cells. Exposure to Aβ stimulated activation of early growth response-1 transcription factor, which is involved in the expression of cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α and IL-1β) and chemokines (macrophage inflammatory protein-1β, CCL-2, and IL-8) in monocytes (Giri et al., 2004). Transcription factor CCAAT/ enhancer-binding protein-δ was also shown to be involved in Aβ-mediated induction of IL-6 and CCL-2 (Hu et al., 2000). Thus, Tat and Aβ-mediated stimulation of a variety of transcription factors may be responsible for cross-potentiation of inflammatory responses as observed in our study.

Another important finding was that treatment with statins, such as simvastatin, protected against Aβ and Tat or HIV-1-induced inflammatory responses. Statins are drugs that effectively diminish cholesterol biosynthesis by inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase. In HIV-infected patients, statins have been successfully introduced to improve disturbances in lipid profile (Dubé et al., 2003). On the other hand, statins such as simvastatin can also increase NF-κB activation and superoxide production via heme oxygenase-1-dependent mechanism (Hsieh et al., 2008). Such effects could be responsible for an increase in IL-6 promoter activity observed in simvastatin-treated HBMEC in the presence of SVGA-Tat cells.

Observed in the present study, the protective effects of simvastatin on Tat and Aβ-induced inflammatory responses are supported by literature reports. For example, it was shown that statins down-regulated vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, E-selectin, IL-6, IL-8, CCL-2 expression, and had immunomodulatory effects in endothelial cells (Greenwood et al., 2006). In monocytes, statins inhibited adhesion and migration (Pozo et al., 2006). Statins also decreased inflammatory responses in microglia and attenuated experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (Nath et al., 2004). Anti-inflammatory properties of statins seem to be related to decreased synthesis of several isoprenoid intermediates, which normally are involved in post-translational modification of proteins, including the γ-subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins and Ras and Rho proteins (Liao, 2005). Isoprenylation of Ras and Rho is required for covalent attachment, subcellular localization, and membrane trafficking of these molecules. The Ras and Rho signaling can stimulate inflammatory reactions; thus, a decrease in isoprenylation prevents activation of these kinases and may induce anti-inflammatory responses (Liao, 2005).

In the present study, simvastatin not only protected against Tat and Aβ-induced inflammatory reactions but also was highly effective against HIV-mediated stimulation of E-selectin promoter transactivation. The protective effects suggest that statins may be a valuable group of drugs for supplemental therapy in HIV infection. Indeed, a short-term statin treatment was demonstrated to decrease HIV-1 viral load in patients and inhibit HIV-1 infection through down-regulation of Rho activity (del Real et al., 2004). However, these effects were not confirmed in another study in which no anti-HIV activity of statins was observed in cell culture or in HIV-positive patients (Moncunill et al., 2005). It also should be noted that most statins are metabolized through the CYP3A4 pathway, which is inhibited by protease inhibitors widely used in antiretroviral therapy. Thus, interactions between statins and protease inhibitors may result in an increase in tissue statin concentrations, leading to drug toxicity. On the other hand, statins such as pravastatin and fluvastatin are the least influenced by the CYP3A4 pathway and, therefore, might be safer when administered with protease inhibitors (Dubé et al., 2003).

Evidence also indicates that statins may provide useful treatment in pathologies related to Aβ pathology, such as AD dementia. Retrospective epidemiological studies revealed that patients with high cholesterol levels and treated with statins less frequently developed AD (Jick et al., 2000). A relative safety of simvastatin was demonstrated in a 5-year clinical study (Pedersen et al., 1996), suggesting that statins might be safely used to prevent the development of AD. The beneficial effects of statins were also shown in patients with mild to moderate AD (Sparks et al., 2006). Finally, experimental studies revealed that statins can protect neurons against Aβ toxicity, increase learning capabilities in mice, and decrease Aβ levels both in cultured hippocampal neurons and in vivo in guinea pigs (Fassbender et al., 2001; Li et al., 2006). However, there are also reports that do not support these findings or even suggest that statins can induce cognitive impairment (Padala et al., 2006). Thus, to elucidate these controversies, at least two large multicenter trials have been initiated using simvastatin and atorvastatin (Miida et al., 2005) in an attempt to better understand the effects of statin therapy on dementia.

In summary, Aβ(1-40) and HIV-1 Tat protein cross-amplified promoter activities of three different proinflammatory genes in HBMECs. Similar synergistic effects were observed in HBMECs exposed to Aβ in the presence of HIV-1-infected Jurkat cells. It is most interesting that simvastatin effectively attenuated these effects. The present results indicate that Aβ and HIV Tat may synergistically induce inflammatory reactions in brain endothelial cells. In addition, statins may provide a beneficial influence by reducing these effects at the BBB level.

Acknowledgments

pNL4−3 was obtained from the AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, Division of AIDS, National Institutes of Health/ National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. SVGA and SVGA-Tat cells were generous gift from Dr. Avindra Nath, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants MH63022, MH072567, and NS39254. The authors have no competing financial interests.

ABBREVIATIONS

HIV

human immunodeficiency virus

amyloid β

AD

Alzheimer’s disease

AIDS

acquired immune deficiency syndrome

BBB

blood-brain barrier

CCL-2

CC chemokine ligand-2, chemoattractant protein-1

EGFP

enhanced green fluorescent protein

HBMEC

human brain microvascular endothelial cell

IL

interleukin

NF-κB

nuclear factor-κB

LTR

long terminal repeats

SVGA

a human astrocytic subclone of SVG cells

DMEM

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium

FBS

fetal bovine serum

PBS

phosphate-buffered saline

References

  1. Brew BJ, Pemberton L, Blennow K, Wallin A, Hagberg L. CSF amyloid beta42 and tau levels correlate with AIDS dementia complex. Neurology. 2005;65:1490–1492. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000183293.95787.b7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buckner CM, Luers AJ, Calderon TM, Eugenin EA, Berman JW. Neuroimmunity and the blood-brain barrier: molecular regulation of leukocyte transmigration and viral entry into the nervous system with a focus on neuroAIDS. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2006;1:160–181. doi: 10.1007/s11481-006-9017-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chauhan A, Hahn S, Gartner S, Pardo CA, Netesan SK, McArthur J, Nath A. Molecular programming of endothelin-1 in HIV-infected brain: role of Tat in up-regulation of ET-1 and its inhibition by statins. FASEB J. 2007;21:777–789. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-7054com. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen P, Mayne M, Power C, Nath A. The Tat protein of HIV-1 induces tumor necrosis factor-α production. Implications for HIV-1-associated neurological diseases. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:22385–22388. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.36.22385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chiarugi A, Moskowitz MA. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 activity promotes NF-kappaB-driven transcription and microglial activation: implication for neurodegenerative disorders. J Neurochem. 2003;85:306–317. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01684.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Deane R, Zlokovic BV. Role of the blood-brain barrier in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2007;4:191–197. doi: 10.2174/156720507780362245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. del Real G, Jimenez-Baranda S, Mira E, Lacalle RA, Lucas P, Gomez-Mouton C, Alegret M, Pena JM, Rodriguez-Zapata M, Alvarez-Mon M, et al. Statins inhibit HIV-1 infection by down-regulating Rho activity. J Exp Med. 2004;200:541–547. doi: 10.1084/jem.20040061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dubé MP, Stein JH, Aberg JA, Fichtenbaum CJ, Gerber JG, Tashima KT, Henry WK, Currier JS, Sprecher D, Glesby MJ. Guidelines for the evaluation and management of dyslipidemia in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected adults receiving antiretroviral therapy: recommendations of the HIV Medical Association of the Infectious Disease Society of America and the Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37:613–627. doi: 10.1086/378131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fassbender K, Simons M, Bergmann C, Stroick M, Lutjohann D, Keller P, Runz H, Kuhl S, Bertsch T, von Bergmann K, et al. Simvastatin strongly reduces levels of Alzheimer’s disease β-amyloid peptides Aβ 42 and Aβ 40 in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:5856–5861. doi: 10.1073/pnas.081620098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gartner S. HIV infection and dementia. Science. 2000;287:602–604. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5453.602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Giri RK, Rajagopal V, Kalra VK. Curcumin, the active constituent of turmeric, inhibits amyloid peptide-induced cytochemokine gene expression and CCR5-mediated chemotaxis of THP-1 monocytes by modulating early growth response-1 transcription factor. J Neurochem. 2004;91:1199–1210. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02800.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Green DA, Masliah E, Vinters HV, Beizai P, Moore DJ, Achim CL. Brain deposition of beta-amyloid is a common pathologic feature in HIV positive patients. AIDS. 2005;19:407–411. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000161770.06158.5c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Greenwood J, Steinman L, Zamvil SS. Statin therapy and autoimmune disease: from protein prenylation to immunomodulation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:358–370. doi: 10.1038/nri1839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hayashi T, Shishido N, Nakayama K, Nunomura A, Smith MA, Perry G, Nakamura M. Lipid peroxidation and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal formation by copper ion bound to amyloid-beta peptide. Free Radic Biol Med. 2007;43:1552–1559. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hsieh CH, Jeng SF, Hsieh MW, Chen YC, Rau CS, Lu TH, Chen SS. Statin-induced heme oxygenase-1 increases NF-κB activation and oxygen radical production in cultured neuronal cells exposed to lipopolysaccharide. Toxicol Sci. 2008;102:150–159. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hu HM, Tian Q, Baer M, Spooner CJ, Williams SC, Johnson PF, Schwartz RC. The C/EBP bZIP domain can mediate lipopolysaccharide induction of the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-6 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:16373–16381. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M910269199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jick H, Zornberg GL, Jick SS, Seshadri S, Drachman DA. Statins and the risk of dementia. Lancet. 2000;356:1627–1631. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03155-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kumar A, Manna SK, Dhawan S, Aggarwal BB. HIV-Tat protein activates c-Jun N-terminal kinase and activator protein-1. J Immunol. 1998;161:776–781. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee YW, Hirani AA, Kyprianou N, Toborek M. Human immunodeficiency virus-1 Tat protein up-regulates interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 expression in human breast cancer cells. Inflamm Res. 2005;54:380–389. doi: 10.1007/s00011-005-1371-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li L, Cao D, Kim H, Lester R, Fukuchi K. Simvastatin enhances learning and memory independent of amyloid load in mice. Ann Neurol. 2006;60:729–739. doi: 10.1002/ana.21053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Liao JK. Effects of statins on 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase inhibition beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:24F–33F. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Miida T, Takahashi A, Tanabe N, Ikeuchi T. Can statin therapy really reduce the risk of Alzheimer’s disease and slow its progression? Curr Opin Lipidol. 2005;16:619–623. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000191246.68443.ff. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Moncunill G, Negredo E, Bosch L, Vilarrasa J, Witvrouw M, Llano A, Clotet B, Este JA. Evaluation of the anti-HIV activity of statins. AIDS. 2005;19:1697–1700. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000183517.60384.db. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nath A, Geiger J. Neurobiological aspects of human immunodeficiency virus infection: neurotoxic mechanisms. Prog Neurobiol. 1998;54:19–33. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(97)00053-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nath N, Giri S, Prasad R, Singh AK, Singh I. Potential targets of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor for multiple sclerosis therapy. J Immunol. 2004;172:1273–1286. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.2.1273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Padala KP, Padala PR, Potter JF. Simvastatin-induced decline in cognition. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40:1880–1883. doi: 10.1345/aph.1H014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Paris D, Townsend KP, Obregon DF, Humphrey J, Mullan M. Proinflammatory effect of freshly solubilized beta-amyloid peptides in the brain. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2002;70:1–12. doi: 10.1016/s0090-6980(02)00111-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pedersen TR, Berg K, Cook TJ, Faergeman O, Haghfelt T, Kjekshus J, Miettinen T, Musliner TA, Olsson AG, Pyorala K, et al. Safety and tolerability of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin during 5 years in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:2085–2092. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Persidsky Y, Poluektova L. Immune privilege and HIV-1 persistence in the CNS. Immunol Rev. 2006;213:180–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2006.00440.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pozo M, de Nicolas R, Egido J, Gonzalez-Cabrero J. Simvastatin inhibits the migration and adhesion of monocytic cells and disorganizes the cytoskeleton of activated endothelial cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006;548:53–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Price JL, Morris JC. Tangles and plaques in nondemented aging and “preclinical” Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol. 1999;45:358–368. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(199903)45:3<358::aid-ana12>3.0.co;2-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rempel HC, Pulliam L. HIV-1 Tat inhibits neprilysin and elevates amyloid beta. AIDS. 2005;19:127–135. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200501280-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Seubert P, Vigo-Pelfrey C, Esch F, Lee M, Dovey H, Davis D, Sinha S, Schlossmacher M, Whaley J, Swindlehurst C, et al. Isolation and quantification of soluble Alzheimer’s beta-peptide from biological fluids. Nature. 1992;359:325–327. doi: 10.1038/359325a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Shah S, Mildvan D. HIV and aging. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2006;8:241–247. doi: 10.1007/s11908-006-0065-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sparks DL, Sabbagh M, Connor D, Soares H, Lopez J, Stankovic G, Johnson-Traver S, Ziolkowski C, Browne P. Statin therapy in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2006;185:78–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2006.00689.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Toborek M, Lee YW, Flora G, Pu H, András IE, Wylegala E, Hennig B, Nath A. Mechanisms of the blood-brain barrier disruption in HIV-1 infection. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2005;25:181–199. doi: 10.1007/s10571-004-1383-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Valcour V, Paul R. HIV infection and dementia in older adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:1449–1454. doi: 10.1086/503565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Weksler BB, Subileau EA, Perriere N, Charneau P, Holloway K, Leveque M, Tricoire-Leignel H, Nicotra A, Bourdoulous S, Turowski P, et al. Blood-brain barrier-specific properties of a human adult brain endothelial cell line. FASEB J. 2005;19:1872–1874. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-3458fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wojtowicz WM, Farzan M, Joyal JL, Carter K, Babcock GJ, Israel DI, Sodroski J, Mirzabekov T. Stimulation of enveloped virus infection by β-amyloid fibrils. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:35019–35024. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203518200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES