Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1979 Sep;10(3):357–364. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.3.357-364.1979

Evaluation of the new API 20C strip for yeast identification against a conventional method.

G A Land, B A Harrison, K L Hulme, B H Cooper, J C Byrd
PMCID: PMC273169  PMID: 385621

Abstract

The new API 20C yeast identification system together with appropriate microscopic morphology determinations achieved a 97% correlation with a rapid conventional method. Whereas a group composed of Candida, Torulopsis, Saccharomyces, and Rhodotorula was identified with ease (98% overall correlation), a second group, containing Cryptococcus, Trichosporon, and Geotrichum species, appeared to give the system the most difficulty (90% correlation). Within this group particular difficulty was encountered in identifying varieties of Cryptococcus albidus, C. terreus, C. laurentii, Trichosporon beigelli, and Geotrichum spp. as to species. The API 20C system should be incubated the full 72 h prescribed by the manufacturer. However, when used in conjunction with appropriate morphological tests, presumptive identifications of some Candida and Torulopsis species may be made at 24 to 48 h. To facilitate identifications of the more difficult group of yeasts, ancillary tests for determining nitrate reductase, urease, and phenol oxidase activities should be considered as additions to the strip. Incorporating the phenol oxidase test would be especially important for identification of Cryptococcus neoformans, a yeast which should be identified as quickly and as accurately as possible. The API 20C system with computer assistance has proved to be an easy-to-inoculate, versatile, and fairly rapid method of yeast identification, giving results comparable to those obtained by conventional methodologies.

Full text

PDF
357

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams E. D., Jr, Cooper B. H. Evaluation of a modified Wickerham medium for identifying medically important yeasts. Am J Med Technol. 1974 Sep;40(9):377–388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowman P. I., Ahearn D. G. Evaluation of commercial systems for the identification of clinical yeast isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Jul;4(1):49–53. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.1.49-53.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowman P. I., Ahearn D. G. Evaluation of the Uni-Yeast-Tek kit for the identification of medically important yeasts. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Oct;2(4):354–358. doi: 10.1128/jcm.2.4.354-358.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buesching W. J., Kurek K., Roberts G. D. Evaluation of the modified API 20C system for identification of clinically important yeasts. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 May;9(5):565–569. doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.5.565-569.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cooper B. H., Johnson J. B., Thaxton E. S. Clinical evaluation of the Uni-Yeast-Tek system for rapid presumptive identification of medically important yeasts. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Apr;7(4):349–355. doi: 10.1128/jcm.7.4.349-355.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fleming W. H., Hopkins J. M., Land G. A. New culture medium for the presumptive identificaion of Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Feb;5(2):236–243. doi: 10.1128/jcm.5.2.236-243.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Haley L. D. Identification of yeasts in clinical microbiology laboratories. Am J Med Technol. 1971 Apr;37(4):125–131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Huppert M., Harper G., Sun S. H., Delanerolle V. Rapid methods for identification of yeasts. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Jul;2(1):21–34. doi: 10.1128/jcm.2.1.21-34.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Land G. A., Dorn G. L., Fleming W. H., 3rd, Beadles T. A., Foxworth J. H. Isolation and rapid identification of yeasts from compromised hosts. Mycopathologia. 1978 Dec 18;65(1-3):123–131. doi: 10.1007/BF00447183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Land G. A., Vinton E. C., Adcock G. B., Hopkins J. M. Improved auxanographic method for yeast assimilations: a comparison with other approaches. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Sep;2(3):206–217. doi: 10.1128/jcm.2.3.206-217.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Roberts G. D., Wang H. S., Hollick G. E. Evaluation of the API 20 c microtube system for the identification of clinically important yeasts. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Mar;3(3):302–305. doi: 10.1128/jcm.3.3.302-305.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Segal E., Ajello L. Evaluation of a new system for the rapid identification of clinically important yeasts. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Aug;4(2):157–159. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.2.157-159.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zwadyk P., Jr, Tarlton R. A., Proctor A. Evaluation of the API 20C for identification of yeasts. Am J Clin Pathol. 1977 Mar;67(3):269–271. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/67.3.269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES