Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1979 Oct;10(4):409–414. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.4.409-414.1979

Comparison of Minitek and conventional methods for the biochemical characterization of oral streptococci.

J A Setterstrom, A Gross, R S Stanko
PMCID: PMC273188  PMID: 118982

Abstract

Fifty-six strains of viridans streptococci were tested in the Minitek system (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.), and the results were compared with those obtained by conventional methods. An overall agreement of 98.9% was obtained when the Minitek tests were performed as follows. (i) All disks were incubated anaerobically for 48 h except for esculin and arginine, which required 5 to 7 days. (ii) The arginine disks were overlaid with 0.1 ml of sterile mineral oil even though incubated anaerobically. (iii) The Voges-Proskauer tests were performed under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. (iv) All tests for carbohydrate fermentation except for raffinose and salicin were read after the addition of 2 to 3 drops of 0.025% phenol red (pH 7.2). Of all the tests performed, only the fermentation of starch resulted in such poor agreement as to be considered unreliable. Results for inulin (unavailable in the Minitek system) were obtained by conventional methods.

Full text

PDF
409

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carlsson J. A numerical taxonomic study of human oral streptococci. Odontol Revy. 1968;19(2):137–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Facklam R. R. Physiological differentiation of viridans streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Feb;5(2):184–201. doi: 10.1128/jcm.5.2.184-201.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gilliland S. E., Speck M. L. Use of the Minitek system for characterizing lactobacilli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Jun;33(6):1289–1292. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.6.1289-1292.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hansen S. L., Hardesty D. R., Myers B. M. Evaluation of the BBL Minitek system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Nov;28(5):798–801. doi: 10.1128/am.28.5.798-801.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hansen S. L., Stewart B. J. Comparison of API and Minitek to Center for Disease Control methods for the biochemical characterization of anaerobes. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Sep;4(3):227–231. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.3.227-231.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kiehn T. E., Brennan K., Ellner P. D. Evaluation of the Minitek system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Oct;28(4):668–671. doi: 10.1128/am.28.4.668-671.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Niven C. F., Smiley K. L., Sherman J. M. The Hydrolysis of Arginine by Streptococci. J Bacteriol. 1942 Jun;43(6):651–660. doi: 10.1128/jb.43.6.651-660.1942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Robinson P. J., Shapiro I. M. Effect of diphosphonates on root resorption. J Dent Res. 1976 Jan-Feb;55(1):166–166. doi: 10.1177/00220345760550011201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. SELBIE F. R., SIMON R. D., ROBINSON R. H. M. Serological classification of viridans streptococci from subacute bacterial endocarditis, teeth, and throats. Br Med J. 1949 Sep 24;2(4629):667–672. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4629.667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stargel D., Thompson F. S., Phillips S. E., Lombard G. L., Dowell V. R., Jr Modification of the Minitek Miniaturized Differentiation System for characterization of anaerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Mar;3(3):291–301. doi: 10.1128/jcm.3.3.291-301.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES