Skip to main content
The Behavior Analyst logoLink to The Behavior Analyst
. 1993 Fall;16(2):191–206. doi: 10.1007/BF03392623

Establishing operations

Jack Michael
PMCID: PMC2733648  PMID: 22478146

Abstract

The first two books on behavior analysis (Skinner, 1938; Keller & Schoenfeld, 1950) had chapter-length coverage of motivation. The next generation of texts also had chapters on the topic, but by the late 1960s it was no longer being given much treatment in the behavior-analytic literature. The present failure to deal with the topic leaves a gap in our understanding of operant functional relations. A partial solution is to reintroduce the concept of the establishing operation, defined as an environmental event, operation, or stimulus condition that affects an organism by momentarily altering (a) the reinforcing effectiveness of other events and (b) the frequency of occurrence of that part of the organism's repertoire relevant to those events as consequences. Discriminative and motivative variables can be distinguished as follows: The former are related to the differential availability of an effective form of reinforcement given a particular type of behavior; the latter are related to the differential reinforcing effectiveness of environmental events. An important distinction can also be made between unconditioned establishing operations (UEOs), such as food deprivation and painful stimulation, and conditioned establishing operations (CEOs) that depend on the learning history of the organism. One type of CEO is a stimulus that has simply been paired with a UEO and as a result may take on some of the motivative properties of that UEO. The warning stimulus in avoidance procedures is another important type of CEO referred to as reflexive because it establishes its own termination as a form of reinforcement and evokes the behavior that has accomplished such termination. Another CEO is closely related to the concept of conditional conditioned reinforcement and is referred to as a transitive CEO, because it establishes some other stimulus as a form of effective reinforcement and evokes the behavior that has produced that other stimulus. The multiple control of human behavior is very common, and is often quite complex. An understanding of unlearned and learned establishing operations can contribute to our ability to identify and control the various components of such multiple determination.

Keywords: establishing operations, motivation, multiple control

Full text

PDF
191

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. CALVIN J. S., BICKNELL E. A., SPERLING D. S. Establishment of a conditioned drive based on the hunger drive. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1953 Jun;46(3):173–175. doi: 10.1037/h0060708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cravens R. W., Renner K. E. Conditioned appetitive drive states: empirical evidence and theoretical status. Psychol Bull. 1970 Mar;73(3):212–220. doi: 10.1037/h0028685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. D'Amato M. R., Fazzaro J., Etkin M. Anticipatory responding and avoidance discrimination as factors in avoidance conditioning. J Exp Psychol. 1968 May;77(1):41–47. doi: 10.1037/h0025763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dickinson A. M. The detrimental effects of extrinsic reinforcement on "Intrinsic motivation". Behav Anal. 1989 Spring;12(1):1–15. doi: 10.1007/BF03392473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kalnins I. V., Bruner J. S. The coordination of visual observation and instrumental behavior in early infancy. Perception. 1973;2(3):307–314. doi: 10.1068/p020307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McKirdy L. S., Rovee C. K. The efficacy of auditory and visual conjugate reinforcers in infant conditioning. J Exp Child Psychol. 1978 Feb;25(1):80–89. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(78)90040-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McPherson A., Osborne J. G. Control of behavior by an establishing stimulus. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Mar;49(2):213–227. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Michael J. Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):149–155. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Morris E. K., Higgins S. T., Bickel W. K. The influence of Kantor's interbehavioral psychology on behavior analysis. Behav Anal. 1982 Fall;5(2):159–173. doi: 10.1007/BF03392384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rovee C. K., Fagen J. W. Extended conditioning and 24-hour retention in infants. J Exp Child Psychol. 1976 Feb;21(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(76)90052-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. ULRICH R. E., AZRIN N. H. Reflexive fighting in response to aversive stimulation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:511–520. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Behavior Analyst are provided here courtesy of Association for Behavior Analysis International

RESOURCES