Skip to main content
Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) logoLink to Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
. 2008 Jun 25;23(8):1932–1940. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den242

Human semen quality and sperm DNA damage in relation to urinary metabolites of pyrethroid insecticides

John D Meeker 1,5, Dana B Barr 2, Russ Hauser 3,4
PMCID: PMC2733825  PMID: 18579513

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Exposure to synthetic pyrethroid insecticides is widespread, and is expected to increase among the general population due to the need to replace other common insecticides following regulatory use restrictions. On the basis of limited studies, there is animal and human evidence for altered reproductive or endocrine function following pyrethroid exposure.

METHODS

The present study measured urinary pyrethroid metabolites [3-phenoxybenzoic acid (3PBA) and cis- and trans-3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane carboxylic acid (CDCCA and TDCCA)], semen quality, sperm motion parameters and sperm DNA damage with the neutral comet assay in 207 men recruited from an infertility clinic.

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, the highest 3PBA quartile was associated with a suggestive 20.2 million sperm/ml reduction (95% confidence interval −37.1 to + 2.6) in sperm concentration compared with men below the 3PBA median. There were significant inverse associations between TDCCA and sperm motility and sperm motion parameters when adjusting for CDCCA and other covariates. The highest TDCCA quartile was associated with a 15.5% decline (95% confidence interval −26.2 to −4.8) in sperm motility compared with men below the median. In multiple logistic analyses, there were dose-dependent increased odds for below reference sperm concentration, motility and morphology in relation to TDCCA. Among the comet assay measures, 3PBA and CDCCA were associated with increased sperm DNA damage, measured as percent DNA in the comet tail.

CONCLUSIONS

We found evidence for reduced semen quality and increased sperm DNA damage in relation to urinary metabolites of pyrethroid insecticides. These findings may be of concern due to increased pyrethroid use and prevalent human exposure.

Keywords: biomarkers, epidemiology, male, pesticides, permethrin

Introduction

Synthetic pyrethroid insecticides are among the most commonly available to consumers today. Pyrethroid usage has increased in recent years due to the need to replace common organophosphate insecticides following use restrictions in the USA and other countries. A consequence of the increased availability, use and broad-spectrum applicability of pyrethroids is widespread exposure among the general population. Urinary metabolites of pyrethroid insecticides have been measured in a substantial proportion of the general population in the USA and in Germany (CDC, 2005; Heudorf et al., 2006), and it is reasonable to expect these proportions to increase as organophosphorus insecticides continue to be phased out. Diet is a primary route of exposure to pyrethroids among non-occupationally exposed individuals (ATSDR, 2003), but permethrin and other pyrethroids have also been measured in a high proportion of household dust samples suggesting that the home environment may also comprise a major exposure source (Rudel et al., 2003; Colt et al., 2004; Tulve et al., 2006; Julien et al., 2007). Thus, exposure to pyrethroids is likely to be multi-media and multi-route, making the use of exposure biomarkers to estimate internal dose advantageous in human epidemiological studies.

Data on altered reproductive or endocrine function resulting from pyrethroid exposure are limited, but animal and in vitro studies suggest that some pyrethroids or their metabolites may possess endocrine disrupting properties (Tyler et al., 2000; Mani et al., 2002; ATSDR, 2003; Zhang et al., 2007) and adversely affect semen quality (Salem et al., 1988; Elbetieha et al., 2001; Yousef et al., 2003; el-Demerdash et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2007). In humans, several studies of occupational exposure to pyrethroids, namely fenvalerate, suggest reductions in semen quality and increased DNA damage and chromosomal aberrations in sperm among exposed workers (Bian et al., 2004; Kamijima et al., 2004; Xia et al., 2004; Lifeng et al., 2006). Two recent studies among Chinese men have also assessed non-occupational exposure to pyrethroids by measuring metabolite concentrations in urine, and have reported suggestive associations with reduced sperm concentration (Perry et al., 2007; Xia et al., 2007).

The present study adds to the previous human studies of non-occupational pyrethroid exposure and altered semen quality by offering more statistical power (Perry et al., 2007), by including additional pyrethroid metabolites in the analysis (Xia et al., 2007) and by expanding outcome measures to include the assessment of sperm DNA damage measured by neutral comet assay. Investigation of environmental impacts on sperm DNA damage is important since growing and consistent evidence shows that sperm DNA damage adversely affects male fertility, contributing to poorer embryo development and lower pregnancy rates among partners of men undergoing assisted reproductive treatments (Duran et al., 2002; Morris et al., 2002; Agarwal and Allamaneni, 2004; Lewis and Aitken, 2005; Borini et al., 2006).

Methods

Subject recruitment

Between January 2000 and April 2003, men between 18 and 54 years of age were recruited from the Vincent Memorial Andrology lab at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and invited to participate in the study. Approximately 65% of eligible men agreed to participate. The primary reason cited by non-participants was lack of time. Exclusionary criteria included prior vasectomy, self-reported medical risk factors for infertility (e.g. varicocele or orchidopexy) or current use of exogenous hormones. A retrospective review of anonymized clinic records of non-participants, who met the same eligibility criteria as the study subjects, found that there were no differences between participants and non-participants in regards to age or semen parameters (Hauser et al., 2005). Height and weight were measured, and all men completed a brief nurse administered questionnaire at the time of recruitment, and provided health information. The Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH), MGH and University of Michigan Human Subjects Committees approved the study and all subjects signed an informed consent.

Semen sample collection

Semen was collected on site at MGH in a sterile plastic specimen cup after a recommended period of abstinence of 48 h. After liquefaction at 37°C for 30 min, semen quality parameters and motion characteristics were measured at the clinic. The remaining unprocessed semen was frozen in 0.25 ml cryogenic straws (CryoBiosystem, I.M.V. Division, San Diego, CA, USA) by immersing the straws directly into liquid nitrogen (−196°C). Previous work in our laboratory showed that this freezing method produced comet assay results that were highly correlated with results from fresh, unfrozen samples (Duty et al., 2002). Semen samples were later analyzed in batches, where straws were thawed by gently shaking in a 37°C water bath for 10 s and the semen was immediately processed for the comet assay.

Semen quality

Concentration, motility and motion parameters

Semen samples were analyzed for sperm concentration and motion parameters by computer-aided semen analyzer (CASA, HTM-IVOS Version 10HTM-IVOS, Beverly, MA, USA). Setting parameters and the definition of measured sperm motion parameters for CASA were established by the Hamilton-Thorn Company. To measure both sperm concentration and motility, 5 µl of semen from each sample was placed into a pre-warmed (37°C) Makler counting chamber (Sefi—Medical instruments, Haifa, Israel). A minimum of 200 sperm cells from at least four different fields were analyzed from each specimen. Motile sperm was defined as World Health Organization (WHO) grade ‘a’ sperm (rapidly progressive with a velocity ≥25 µm/s at 37°C) plus ‘b’ grade sperm (slow/sluggish progressive with a velocity ≥5 µm/s but <25 µm/s) (WHO, 1999). Measurement of CASA motion characteristics has been previously described (Duty et al., 2004; Meeker et al., 2004). Of seven CASA variables that were measured, only three were chosen [straight-line velocity (VSL), curvilinear velocity (VCL) and linearity (LIN=VSL/VCL × 100)] for inclusion in the present analysis due to a high degree of dependence between several of the measures.

Morphology

At least two slides were made for each fresh semen sample. The resulting thin smear was allowed to air dry for an hour before staining with a Diff-Quik staining kit (Dade Behring AG, Dudingen, Switzerland). Morphological assessment was performed with a Nikon microscope using an oil immersion 100× objective (Nikon Company, Tokyo, Japan). A minimum of 200 sperm cells were counted from two slides for each specimen. Strict scoring criteria were used to classify men as having normal or below normal morphology (Kruger et al., 1988).

Neutral comet assay

The comet assay procedure used in the present study to assess sperm DNA damage has been previously described (Singh and Stephens, 1998; Duty et al., 2003). Briefly, 20 µl of a semen/agarose mixture (0.7% 3:1 high resolution agarose; Amresco, Solon, OH, USA) was embedded between two additional layers of agarose on microgel electrophoresis glass slides (Erie Scientific, Portsmouth, NH, USA). Slides were then immersed in a cold lysing solution to dissolve the cell membrane and make chromatin accessible for the enzyme digestion steps. After 1 h cold lysis, slides were transferred to a solution for enzyme treatment with 10 µg/ml of RNase (Amresco) and incubated at 37°C for 4 h. Slides were then transferred to a second enzyme treatment with 1 mg/ml proteinase K (Amresco) and incubated at 37°C for 18 h. The slides were placed on a horizontal slab in an electrophoretic unit, equilibrated for 20 min and underwent electrophoresis for 1 h. DNA in the gel was then precipitated, fixed in ethanol and dried. Slides were stained and observed with fluorescence microscope. Comet extent, tail distributed moment (TDM) and percent DNA located in the tail (Tail%) were measured on 100 sperm in each semen sample using VisComet software (Impuls Computergestutzte Bildanalyse GmbH, Gilching, Germany). Comet extent is a measure of total comet length from the beginning of the head to the last visible pixel in the tail. Tail% is a measurement of the proportion of total DNA that is present in the tail. TDM is an integrated value that takes into account both the distance and intensity of comet fragments:

graphic file with name den24201.jpg

where ΣI is the sum of all intensity values that belong to the head, body or tail, and X is the x-position of the intensity value.

Urine sample collection and analysis

A single spot urine sample was collected from each subject. Urine samples were frozen at −20°C and sent to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) where the pyrethroid metabolites 3-phenoxybenzoic acid (3PBA), cis-3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane carboxylic acid (CDCCA) and trans-3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane carboxylic acid (TDCCA) were measured. 3PBA is a common metabolite of several pyrethroids including cyhalothrin, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, fenvalerate and permethrin. CDCCA and TDCCA are metabolites of cis-permethrin and trans-permethrin, respectively, in addition to other pyrethroids such as cyfluthrin and cypermethrin. Analytical chemistry procedures used for measurement of pyrethroid metabolites in urine have been previously described (Baker et al., 2004). Briefly, samples were fortified with stable isotope analogs of the target analytes, underwent solid-phase extraction and were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry using turbo ion-spray atmospheric pressure ionization. The limit of detection (LOD) was 0.1 µg/l for all three metabolites. 4-Fluoro-3PBA (4F3PBA) and cis-3-(2,2-dibromovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane carboxylic acid (DBCA), specific metabolites of cyfluthrin and deltamethrin, respectively, were also measured, but due to low detection rates were excluded from further analysis. Specific gravity (SG) was used to adjust urine samples for dilution. SG was measured using a handheld refractometer (National Instrument Company, Inc., Baltimore, MD, USA).

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed using SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Descriptive statistics on subject demographics were calculated, along with the distributions of urinary pyrethroid metabolite concentrations, semen quality and motion parameters, and sperm DNA damage measures. Bivariate analysis was conducted between all semen quality, sperm DNA damage, pyrethroid metabolite and demographic variables to investigate differences between distributions or categories and the potential for confounding. Differences were tested statistically using parametric or non-parametric methods where appropriate.

Owing to the high proportion of samples below the LOD for 3PBA (46%), CDCCA (47%) and TDCCA (49%), SG-adjusted pyrethroid metabolites were categorized into low, medium or high groups. The low group consisted of values below the median for each metabolite. The medium group was comprised of values greater than or equal to the median but <75th percentile value, whereas the high groups consisted of values ≥75th percentile. Categories of the sum of CDCCA and TDCCA, as well as the sum of all three pyrethroid metabolites, were also modeled as exposure variables. For values below the LOD, zero was used in the calculation of these summed variables prior to categorizing into low, medium or high groups.

Multiple linear regression was used to assess associations between urinary pyrethroid metabolite categories and continuous measures of semen quality, sperm motion and sperm DNA damage. Sperm concentration was transformed using the natural logarithm, whereas all other semen quality, sperm motion and DNA damage measures were modeled untransformed. Age, body mass index (BMI), race, abstinence period and smoking were considered as covariates, and were included or excluded from models based on biologic and statistical considerations (Kleinbaum et al., 1998). The association between urinary pyrethroid metabolite categories and sperm concentration, motility and morphology was also assessed by multiple logistic regression, where subjects were dichotomized as either above or below WHO (1999) reference levels for sperm concentration (20 million sperm/ml) and motility (50% motile sperm). The strict criteria (4% normal) were used as a cut-off for sperm morphology (Kruger et al., 1988). Reference subjects were those that were above the reference level for all three parameters. Azoospermic men were not included in the analyses for CASA motion and sperm DNA damage parameters since they were not measurable.

Results

Among the 207 men for whom data on urinary pyrethroid metabolite concentration and semen quality parameters were available, the majority was white and had never smoked (Table I). The mean (SD) age and BMI were 36 (5.6) years and 28 (4.7), respectively. Distributions of semen quality, sperm motion and sperm DNA damage measures, and of SG-adjusted urinary pyrethroid metabolite concentrations, are presented in Tables II and III, respectively. In preliminary bivariate analyses, the proportion of subjects in the high metabolite concentration groups did not differ by season (P-values > 0.05), but increasing exposure groups for 3PBA, CDCCA and TDCCA were associated with greater age (P-values for trend <0.05). Semen quality parameters were associated with abstinence period categories as previously reported (Meeker et al., 2007). Pyrethroid metabolite groups for CDCCA and TDCCA were moderately correlated with each other (Spearman coefficient = 0.66) and with 3PBA (Spearman coefficients = 0.54 and 0.68, respectively).

Table I.

Demographic categories by semen parametersa (n = 207).

Comparison subjects (n = 90)b Semen parameters
Sperm concentration <20 million/ml (n = 42) Sperm motility <50% motile (n = 106) Sperm morphology <4% normal (n = 51)
Age, mean (SD) 35.7 (5.3) 36.5 (6.5) 36.6 (5.6) 36.5 (5.9)
BMI, mean (SD) 28.5 (4.8) 28.5 (4.2) 27.5 (4.3) 28.7 (4.3)
Abstinence time, n (%)
 ≤2 days 24 (27) 14 (33) 27 (25) 9 (18)
 3 days 26 (29) 10 (24) 31 (29) 16 (31)
 4 days 17 (19) 6 (14) 20 (19) 11 (22)
 5 days 10 (11) 6 (14) 12 (11) 5 (10)
 6 or more days 13 (14) 6 (14) 16 (15) 10 (20)
Race, n (%)
 White 82 (91) 33 (79) 85 (80) 42 (82)
 Black/Afr-Amer 2 (2) 2 (5) 6 (6) 3 (6)
 Hispanic 1 (1) 2 (5) 5 (5) 1 (2)
 Other 5 (6) 4 (10) 8 (8) 4 (8)
Smoking status, n (%)
 Never smoker 67 (74) 26 (62) 74 (70) 36 (71)
 Ever smoker 22 (24) 15 (36) 30 (28) 14 (27)
  Former 15 (17) 10 (24) 24 (23) 9 (18)
  Current 7 (8) 5 (12) 6 (6) 5 (10)

aInformation on race and smoking missing for four men.

bComparison group consists of men with all three semen parameters above the reference level.

Table II.

Distribution of semen quality parameters, sperm motion parameters and sperm DNA damage measures.

Mean Selected percentiles
10th 25th 50th 75th 90th 95th
Semen quality (n = 207)
 Concentration (106/ml) 107 5.2 26.8 76.8 157 236 263
 Motility (%) 47.1 11 25 49 70 77 82
 Morphology (% normal) 7.1 1 4 7 10 14 15
Sperm motion (n = 193)
 Straight-line velocity (μm/s) 45.2 32.4 38.4 46.7 52.4 57.7 63.6
 Curvilinear velocity (μm/s) 79.0 57.3 67.2 79.0 91.0 104 107
 Linearity (%) 57.8 50 54 58 62 67 69
DNA damage (n = 143)
 Comet extent (μm) 116 78.1 92.5 112 134 162 177
 Tail distributed moment (μm) 51.1 34.6 40.9 50.2 58.4 71.0 74.5
 Percent DNA in tail (%) 33.8 17.1 22.8 32.3 44.8 51.9 57.9

Table III.

Distribution of SG-adjusted pyrethroid metabolites in urine (ng/ml), n = 207.

Pyrethroid metabolite Selected percentiles
10th 25th 50th 75th 90th 95th Max
3PBA <0.10 <0.10 0.14 0.45 1.31 2.48 61.3
cis-DCCA <0.10 <0.10 0.14 0.29 0.58 1.55 23.2
trans-DCCA <0.10 <0.10 0.12 0.39 1.25 4.07 36.8
cis + trans-DCCA <0.10 0.11 0.27 0.65 1.85 6.01 59.9
Sum pyrethroid <0.10 0.16 0.46 1.02 3.12 8.13 121

In multivariate linear regression, semen quality parameters, sperm motion parameters and sperm DNA damage measures were regressed on categories (<50th, 50th–75th and >75th percentile) of SG-adjusted pyrethroid metabolite concentrations (Table IV). Compared with men with values below the median, men in the highest 3PBA category had suggestive declines in sperm concentration and sperm motility. For sperm concentration, which was transformed by the natural logarithm, the regression coefficient of −0.37 represents a 21.2 [95% confidence intervals (CI) −37.1 to + 2.6] million sperm/ml decrease in adjusted geometric mean sperm concentration compared with men with 3PBA below the median. TDCCA concentration above the 75th percentile was also associated with a suggestive 20.3 (95% CI −35.3 to + 2.6) million sperm/ml decline in sperm concentration and a statistically significant 10% (95% CI −19% to −1%) reduction in sperm motility.

Table IV.

Adjusted regression coefficients for change in semen quality and sperm motion parameters associated with urinary pyrethroid metabolite groups.

Metabolite percentiles Semen quality parametersa
CASA motion parametersb
Concentrationc Motility Morphology VSL VCL LIN
3PBA
 <50th 0 0 0 0 0 0
 50th–75th 0.13 (−0.26, 0.53) 1.37 (−7.23, 9.97) 1.17 (−0.44, 2.78) −1.31 (−5.08, 2.46) −3.59 (−10.1, 2.88) 1.08 (−1.82, 3.98)
 >75th −0.37 (−0.78, 0.04) −6.73 (−15.5, 2.07) −0.22 (−1.87, 1.43) −1.62 (−5.52, 2.28) −3.91 (−10.6, 2.79) −0.71 (−3.71, 2.29)
P for trend 0.14 0.19 0.98 0.38 0.2 0.78
cis-DCCA
 <50th 0 0 0 0 0 0
 50th–75th 0.38 (−0.02, 0.78) 5.66 (−2.92, 14.2) 1.17 (−0.44, 2.78) −2.66 (−6.43, 1.12) −4.21 (−10.7, 2.29) −0.49 (−3.41, 2.43)
 >75th −0.29 (−0.69, 0.11) −3.34 (−12.1, 5.37) 0.31 (−1.32, 1.95) −1.66 (−5.50, 2.19) −3.97 (−10.6, 2.65) −0.70 (−3.67, 2.27)
P for trend 0.36 0.65 0.54 0.29 0.18 0.62
trans-DCCA
 <50th 0 0 0 0 0 0
 50th–75th 0.24 (−0.15, 0.64) 2.66 (−5.89, 11.2) 0.42 (−1.21, 2.04) −0.11 (−3.87, 3.64) −0.99 (−7.47, 5.50) 0.88 (−2.00, 3.76)
 >75th −0.38 (−0.80, 0.04) −9.96 (−18.8, −1.06) −0.26 (−1.95, 1.43) −2.96 (−6.99, 1.06) −4.02 (−11.0, 2.92) −2.04 (−5.13, 1.05)
P for trend 0.19 0.06d 0.86 0.19d 0.27d 0.30d
cis − + trans-DCCA
 <50th 0 0 0 0 0 0
 50th–75th 0.20 (−0.20, 0.59) 2.72 (−5.80, 11.2) 0.43 (−1.19, 2.04) 2.51 (−1.22, 6.23) 2.61 (−3.82, 9.05) 1.27 (−1.61, 4.14)
 >75th −0.33 (−0.75, 0.08) −9.84 (−18.5, −1.14) −0.12 (−1.77, 1.54) −2.32 (−6.23, 1.59) −3.70 (−10.5, 3.07) −1.59 (−4.61, 1.44)
P for trend 0.23 0.06 0.98 0.46 0.43 0.47
Sum pyrethroids
 <50th 0 0 0 0 0 0
 50th–75th −0.01 (−0.40, 0.38) −0.31 (−8.90, 8.28) 0.48 (−1.14, 2.10) −2.23 (−5.96, 1.51) −4.50 (−10.9, 1.91) 0.59 (−2.29, 3.46)
 >75th −0.36 (−0.77, 0.05) −7.64 (−16.4, 1.14) 0.08 (−1.57, 1.74) −1.97 (−5.89, 1.94) −3.90 (−10.6, 2.82) −1.14 (−4.15, 1.88)
P for trend 0.11 0.11 0.84 0.25 0.18 0.56

aAdjusted for age and abstinence period, n = 207.

bAdjusted for age and abstinence period, n = 193.

cln-transformed.

dWhen additionally adjusting for cis-DCCA, became statistically significant (results not shown).

Since the regression estimates for CDCCA and TDCCA differed and those for TDCCA were noticeably stronger, further analysis was conducted by including both metabolites in the same multivariate model to account for the shared parent compounds between the two metabolites (e.g. cypermethrin). When CDCCA concentration above or below the median was also included in the TDCCA models, the associations of TDCCA with sperm motility and all three sperm motion parameters were stronger and the P-values for trend were statistically significant (data not shown). For example, for sperm motility, the regression estimates for the three TDCCA groups were: 0 (reference), 0.54 (95% CI −8.9 to + 9.0) and −15.5 (−26.2 to −4.8), with a P-value for trend of 0.01. Trend P-values for VSL, VCL and LIN were 0.02, 0.04 and 0.008, respectively. The association between TDCCA and sperm concentration also became stronger after adjusting for CDCCA. TDCCA concentration above the 75th percentile was associated with a significant 34.2 (95% CI −51.1 to −5.7) million sperm/ml decline in sperm concentration (P-value for trend across the three TDCCA groups = 0.06).

In multiple logistic regression analyses in which sperm concentration, motility and morphology were categorized as above or below reference value (Table V), the odds of having sperm concentration below 20 million/ml were increased 2.7-fold (95% CI 1.1–6.9) for men with TDCCA above the 75th percentile compared with those with TDCCA below the median (P-value for trend = 0.06). As with the linear regression analysis, the associations between the high TDCCA group and semen quality became larger and stronger after adjustment for CDCCA. For below reference sperm concentration, the odds ratios for the three TDCCA groups were 1.0 (reference), 1.32 (95% CI 0.5–3.7) and 6.3 (1.8–21.9) with a P-value for trend of 0.006. For below reference sperm motility and morphology, the odds ratio estimates for the highest TDCCA group compared with the lowest was 2.7 (1.1–6.6) and 3.0 (1.0–9.0), respectively, with trend P-values of 0.06 and 0.07.

Table V.

Adjusteda odds ratios for below reference semen quality parameters associated with urinary pyrethroid metabolite groups.

Metabolite percentiles na Concentration
Motility
Morphology
nb OR (95% CI) nb OR (95% CI) nb OR (95% CI)
3PBA
 <50th 47 20 1 51 1 25 1
 50th–75th 24 6 0.59 (0.21, 1.68) 25 0.93 (0.46, 1.85) 11 0.80 (0.33, 1.91)
 >75th 19 16 1.95 (0.82, 4.67) 30 1.36 (0.66, 2.78) 15 1.35 (0.58, 3.17)
P for trend 0.2 0.46 0.58
cis-DCCA
 <50th 41 22 1 55 1 28 1
 50th–75th 29 6 0.38 (0.14, 1.06) 21 0.53 (0.26, 1.05) 10 0.49 (0.20, 1.18)
 >75th 20 14 1.28 (0.54, 3.06) 30 1.05 (0.52, 2.13) 13 0.90 (0.38, 2.11)
P for trend 0.84 0.83 0.58
trans-DCCA
 <50th 46 17 1 52 1 23 1
 50th–75th 27 9 0.92 (0.36, 2.35) 21 0.66 (0.33, 1.34) 13 0.91 (0.39, 2.11)
 >75th 17 16 2.72 (1.07, 6.92) 33 1.61 (0.77, 3.36) 15 1.59 (0.66, 3.83)
P for trend 0.06b 0.35c 0.37d
cis− + trans-DCCA
 <50th 44 16 1 52 1 25 1
 50th–75th 29 10 0.94 (0.37, 2.36) 21 0.60 (0.30, 1.20) 11 0.67 (0.29, 1.58)
 >75th 17 16 2.66 (1.07, 6.63) 33 1.57 (0.76, 3.25) 15 1.47 (0.62, 3.47)
P for trend 0.05 0.41 0.54
Sum pyrethroids
 <50th 48 19 1 49 1 26 1
 50th–75th 23 9 0.99 (0.39, 2.54) 26 1.08 (0.54, 2.16) 11 0.86 (0.36, 2.06)
 >75th 19 14 1.86 (0.76, 4.54) 31 1.51 (0.74, 3.08) 14 1.26 (0.54, 2.96)
P for trend 0.21 0.28 0.67

na, number of men above reference level for all three semen parameters by pyrethoid metabolite category.

nb, number of men below reference level for that semen parameter by pyrethoid metabolite category.

aAdjusted for age and abstinence period.

bWhen also adjusted for cis-DCCA, odds ratio (OR) estimates become 1.0, 1.32 (0.48, 3.67) and 6.29 (1.80, 21.9); P for trend = 0.006.

cWhen also adjusted for cis-DCCA, OR estimates become 1.0, 0.85 (0.40, 1.81) and 2.66 (1.08, 6.59); P for trend = 0.06.

dWhen also adjusted for cis-DCCA, OR estimates become 1.0, 1.18 (0.49, 2.91) and 2.98 (0.99, 8.98); P for trend = 0.07.

Because the comet assay was introduced after the study began, sperm DNA damage measures were available for only 143 of the men in the present analysis (Table VI). 3PBA and CDCCA were associated with increased sperm DNA damage measured as Tail%, but not comet extent or TDM. The association between 3PBA categories and Tail% was monotonic, suggesting a dose–response trend (P-value for trend = 0.02). Compared with the low 3PBA group, the regression coefficients for medium and high 3PBA groups were equivalent to increases in Tail% of 7.5% (95% CI −10% to 25%) and 20% (3–37%), respectively, relative to the study population median (median = 32.3% of DNA in comet tail).

Table VI.

Adjusteda regression coefficients for change in DNA damage associated with urinary pyrethroid metabolite groups.

Metabolite percentiles Sperm DNA damage measures
Comet extent TDM Tail %
3PBA
 <50th 0 0 0
 50th–75th −14.4 (−27.9, −0.92) −5.58 (−11.3, 0.16) 2.42 (−3.11, 7.94)
 >75th 4.59 (−9.05, 18.2) −1.29 (−7.09, 4.52) 6.45 (0.86, 12.0)
P for trend 0.81 0.46 0.02
cis-DCCA
 <50th 0 0 0
 50th–75th −2.19 (−16.2, 11.9) −2.44 (−8.36, 3.47) 4.46 (−1.20, 10.1)
 >75th 3.93 (−10.1, 17.9) −0.17 (−6.07, 5.73) 4.97 (−0.67, 10.6)
P for trend 0.64 0.85 0.06
trans-DCCA
 <50th 0 0 0
 50th–75th −5.11 (−19.0, 8.77) −3.64 (−9.48, 2.20) 4.09 (−1.54, 9.73)
 >75th 4.53 (−9.58, 18.6) 0.97 (−4.96, 6.90) −0.47 (−6.20, 5.25)
P for trend 0.65 0.94 0.92
cis − + trans-DCCA
 <50th 0 0 0
 50th–75th −9.05 (−22.9, 4.82) −4.47 (−10.3, 1.37) 5.57 (−0.07, 11.2)
 >75th 4.82 (−9.11, 18.7) 1.15 (−4.72, 7.02) 1.42 (−4.24, 7.08)
P for trend 0.69 0.93 0.43
Sum pyrethroids
 <50th 0 0 0
 50th–75th −16.2 (−29.7, −2.62) −7.63 (−13.3, −1.93) 4.68 (−0.92, 10.3)
 >75th 2.61 (−11.1, 16.3) −0.42 (−6.18, 5.35) 2.51 (−3.16, 8.18)
P for trend 0.94 0.55 0.27

aAdjusted for age and smoking, n = 143.

Discussion

In the present study, we found associations between urinary metabolites of pyrethroid insecticides and decreased semen quality, as well as evidence for a relationship between pyrethroid metabolites and sperm DNA damage. We cannot rule out the possibility that some of our statistically significant or suggestive results were due to chance since multiple comparisons were made. Nevertheless, these findings may be of concern due to the increased use of pyrethroid pesticides resulting in widespread exposure among the general population. In addition, the associations we report are among men with urinary pyrethroid metabolite concentrations similar to or slightly lower than those measured among the US general population in the most recent (Third) National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals (CDC, 2005). Median, 75th and 95th percentile concentrations for unadjusted 3PBA among males in the Third National Report were 0.29, 0.68 and 3.23 µg/l compared with 0.12, 0.42 and 2.27 µg/l in the present study. For TDCCA, these percentiles were <LOD, 0.40 and 2.37 µg/l among males in the Third National Report compared with 0.10, 0.36 and 3.34 in the present study. Pyrethroid metabolite concentrations in the present study were also similar to those found in urine samples from adults and children in the German general population (Heudorf and Angerer, 2001; Schettgen et al., 2002). A recent cross-validation study showed that comparable pyrethroid metabolite data were obtained among unknown urine samples between the US and German laboratories using different extraction and analytical techniques (Barr et al., 2007).

Exposure biomarkers are the preferred method for estimating individual exposures in environmental epidemiological studies of pesticides since they can account for all exposure sources and exposure routes, and urinary metabolites are advantageous due to ease of urine sample collection and large sample volumes (low limits of detection). However, a limitation of relying solely on their use is that they usually do not allow for the determination of primary exposure sources or the differentiation between exposure to the parent compound or the breakdown products in the environment. In addition, pyrethroids and other non-persistent pesticides are rapidly metabolized and excreted, so metabolite concentrations in urine reflect exposure over hours or days preceding sample collection. The ability of a single urine sample to predict metabolite concentrations over longer periods of interest is not yet known, but consistent individual time-activity patterns from day to day and month to month coupled with stable microenvironmental pyrethroid concentrations (or pyrethroid residues in food) may lead to ‘pseudo-steady state’ metabolite concentrations over long periods of time (NRC, 2006). Likewise, the temporal reliability for non-persistent insecticide metabolites, such as those from carbaryl and chlorpyrifos, may be adequate when categorizing individuals into broad exposure groups (Meeker et al., 2005), as was done in the present analysis. Despite these potential limitations, the use of exposure biomarkers of pyrethroid insecticides is a strength of the present study.

Our suggestive findings of an association between 3PBA and sperm concentration are consistent with those recently reported by Xia et al. (2007). Similar in design to the present study, Xia and colleagues recruited 376 men (mean age ∼30 years) who had no specific occupational exposure to pyrethroids through a Chinese infertility clinic from March 2004 to March 2006. Urinary 3PBA concentrations were measured, as were semen quality and sperm motion parameters. The men were divided into 3PBA quartiles, and men in the highest quartile had significantly increased odds (OR = 2.0, 95% CI 1.0–4.1) of having <20 million sperm/ml compared with men in the lowest 3PBA quartile. This is similar in magnitude to the odds ratio we report among the highest 3PBA quartile (OR = 2.0, 95% CI 0.8–4.7), though the comparison group in the present study is men below the 50th percentile for 3PBA concentration (i.e. combined first and second quartiles). The wider confidence intervals in the present study likely reflect the smaller study size and thus lower statistical power. In addition, 3PBA concentrations among the Chinese men were higher, where the 50th and 75th percentile values (lower bound concentrations for third and fourth quartiles) for unadjusted 3PBA were 1.25 and 1.90 µg/l compared with 0.12 and 0.42 µg/l in the present study. However, the highest unadjusted 3PBA concentration was greater in the present study (53.6 µg/l compared with 30.9 µg/l in the Chinese study). We also reported an increased odds of having below reference sperm concentration for men in the highest TDCCA quartile, but CDCCA and TDCCA were not measured in the Chinese study which limits our ability to further compare results.

Our findings of a suggestive inverse association between sperm concentration and both 3PBA and TDCCA are consistent with preliminary results from another recent Chinese study (Perry et al., 2007). In that study, Perry et al. recruited 202 young and newly married men from an agricultural area in rural China. Urine samples from 18 of the men were randomly chosen to be analyzed for pesticide metabolite concentrations, including 3PBA, CDCCA and TDCCA, at the same CDC laboratory that analyzed the urine samples from the present study. Sperm concentrations were compared among men above or below the median pesticide metabolite concentration. CDCCA was only detected in two of the samples and was thus excluded from further analysis. The crude geometric mean sperm concentration among men above the median for 3PBA was 12 million sperm/ml lower than among the men below the 3PBA median. For TDCCA, men above the median concentration had a crude geometric mean sperm concentration 34 million sperm/ml less than men with TDCCA below the median. Although the study was too small to perform detailed or powerful statistical analyses, the results were suggestive of an association and were consistent with our findings among a larger study population. Unadjusted 3PBA concentrations were higher than those found in the present study (median 1.1 µg/l compared with 0.12 µg/l), whereas median and range TDCCA concentrations were very similar between the two studies.

Our results do not support additive effects on semen and sperm quality among the pyrethroids represented by the various metabolites assessed, as summed metabolite values generally showed weaker associations with semen quality and sperm DNA damage than individual metabolites. The differences in our findings between CDCCA and TDCCA suggest an association between environmental exposures to trans-permethrin or TDCCA, but not cis-permethrin or CDCCA, and reduced sperm concentration, motility and sperm motion parameters. Conversely, CDCCA and 3PBA, but not TDCCA, were associated with increased sperm DNA damage, potentially suggesting differential biological mechanisms on the male reproductive system between pyrethroid insecticides. Studies of pyrethroid exposure and sperm DNA damage or genotoxicity are limited to men exposed occupationally to fenvalerate (Bian et al., 2004; Xia et al., 2004), and exposure information on fenvalerate among the general population is scarce. According to estimates from 1997, only 30 000 pounds of fenvalerate was applied in the USA, compared with over 1 million pounds of permethrin that same year (ATSDR, 2003). More studies on pyrethroid exposure and sperm DNA damage/fragmentation are needed, as sperm DNA integrity is becoming more clinically relevant as increased evidence surfaces on its ability to predict male fertility and birth outcomes (Erenpreiss et al., 2006).

Data on endocrine or reproductive effects specific to trans-permethrin or TDCCA are also lacking, as cis-permethrin is associated with higher acute toxicity than trans-permethrin (ATSDR, 2003). A recent study of mice orally administered cis-permethrin at doses of 0, 35 or 70 mg/kg·day for 6 weeks reported significant dose-dependent declines in epididymal sperm count and sperm motility, and testicular and circulating levels of testosterone, along with a dose-dependent increase in circulating LH (Zhang et al., 2007). Further, testicular residue concentrations of cis-permethrin from the individual animals were strongly inversely correlated with testicular testosterone levels. Exposure-related reductions in mRNA and protein expression levels of peripheral benzodiazepine receptor, steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, and cytochrome P450 side-chain cleavage were also observed, as well as structural changes in Leydig cell mitochondria, suggesting these disruptions resulted in a reduction of cholesterol transport and conversion essential for testicular steroidogenesis. A previous study in rats also found reduced sperm counts, testosterone, FSH and LH following ingestion of tap water containing cypermethrin (Elbetieha et al., 2001). On the basis of these findings and the results of the present human study, similarly detailed work on trans-permethrin and other pyrethroids is needed to provide a clearer understanding on the specific exposures and mechanisms potentially involved in the associations reported here.

In conclusion, we found evidence for reduced semen quality and increased sperm DNA damage in relation to urinary metabolites of pyrethroid insecticides, though the specific pesticide(s) and biological mechanisms potentially responsible are not yet clear. Some of our findings are consistent with other human studies among populations with higher levels of pyrethroid exposure, which suggests future research should be concerned with male reproductive effects from both occupational and environmental (non-occupational) pyrethroid exposure. Future work in our group includes the assessment of reproductive hormone levels associated with pyrethroid exposure among these men, and investigation of additive or synergistic effects between pyrethroids and other insecticides (organophosphates and carbamates; see Hodgson and Rose, 2007) on intermediate measures of male reproductive health among a larger, more statistically powerful, cohort of men.

Conflict of interest: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the NIEHS or CDC.

Funding

This work was supported by grants ES009718 and ES00002 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH).

References

  1. Agarwal A, Allamaneni SS. The effect of sperm DNA damage on assisted reproduction outcomes. A review. Minerva Ginecol. 2004;56:235–245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ATSDR. Toxicological Profile for Pyrethrins and Pyrethroids. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry; 2003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker SE, Olsson AO, Barr DB. Isotope dilution high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for quantifying urinary metabolites of synthetic pyrethroid insecticides. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2004;46:281–288. doi: 10.1007/s00244-003-3044-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barr DB, Leng G, Berger-Preiss E, Hoppe HW, Weerasekera G, Gries W, Gerling S, Perez J, Smith K, Needham LL, et al. Cross validation of multiple methods for measuring pyrethroid and pyrethrum insecticide metabolites in human urine. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007;389:811–818. doi: 10.1007/s00216-007-1463-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bian Q, Xu LC, Wang SL, Xia YK, Tan LF, Chen JF, Song L, Chang HC, Wang XR. Study on the relation between occupational fenvalerate exposure and spermatozoa DNA damage of pesticide factory workers. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61:999–1005. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.014597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Borini A, Tarozzi N, Bizzaro D, Bonu MA, Fava L, Flamigni C, Coticchio G. Sperm DNA fragmentation: paternal effect on early post-implantation embryo development in ART. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2876–2881. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. CDC. Third National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2005. http://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/pdf/thirdreport.pdf. (date last accessed 5 December 2007). [Google Scholar]
  8. Colt JS, Lubin J, Camann D, Davis S, Cerhan J, Severson RK, Cozen W, Hartge P. Comparison of pesticide levels in carpet dust and self-reported pest treatment practices in four US sites. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2004;14:74–83. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Duran EH, Morshedi M, Taylor S, Oehninger S. Sperm DNA quality predicts intrauterine insemination outcome: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:3122–3128. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.12.3122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Duty SM, Singh NP, Ryan L, Chen Z, Lewis C, Huang T, Hauser R. Reliability of the comet assay in cryopreserved human sperm. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1274–1280. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.5.1274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Duty SM, Singh NP, Silva MJ, Barr DB, Brock JW, Ryan L, Herrick RF, Christiani DC, Hauser R. The relationship between environmental exposures to phthalates and DNA damage in human sperm using the neutral comet assay. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:1164–1169. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Duty SM, Calafat AM, Silva MJ, Brock JW, Ryan L, Chen Z, Overstreet JW, Hauser R. The relationship between human environmental exposure to phthalates and computer aided sperm analysis motion parameters. J Androl. 2004;25:293–302. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb02790.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. el-Demerdash FM, Yousef MI, Kedwany FS, Baghdadi HH. Role of alpha-tocopherol and beta-carotene in ameliorating the fenvalerate-induced changes in oxidative stress, hemato-biochemical parameters, and semen quality of male rats. J Environ Sci Health B. 2004;39:443–459. doi: 10.1081/pfc-120035929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Elbetieha A, Da'as SI, Khamas W, Darmani H. Evaluation of the toxic potentials of cypermethrin pesticide on some reproductive and fertility parameters in the male rats. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2001;41:522–528. doi: 10.1007/s002440010280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Erenpreiss J, Spano M, Erenpreisa J, Bungum M, Giwercman A. Sperm chromatin structure and male fertility: biological and clinical aspects. Asian J Androl. 2006;8:11–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7262.2006.00112.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hauser R, Godfrey-Bailey L, Chen Z. Does the potential for selection bias in semen quality studies depend on study design? Experience from a study conducted within an infertility clinic. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2579–2583. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Heudorf U, Angerer J. Metabolites of pyrethroid insecticides in urine specimens: current exposure in an urban population in Germany. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109:213–217. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Heudorf U, Butte W, Schulz C, Angerer J. Reference values for metabolites of pyrethroid and organophosphorous insecticides in urine for human biomonitoring in environmental medicine. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2006;209:293–299. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2006.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hodgson E, Rose RL. Human metabolic interactions of environmental chemicals. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2007;21:182–186. doi: 10.1002/jbt.20175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Julien R, Adamkiewicz G, Levy JI, Bennett D, Nishioka M, Spengler JD. Pesticide loadings of select organophosphate and pyrethroid pesticides in urban public housing. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2008;18:167–174. doi: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kamijima M, Hibi H, Gotoh M, Taki K, Saito I, Wang H, Itohara S, Yamada T, Ichihara G, Shibata E, et al. A survey of semen indices in insecticide sprayers. J Occup Health. 2004;46:109–118. doi: 10.1539/joh.46.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE, Nizam A. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company; 1998. Selecting the best regression equation. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, Swanson RJ, Matta JF, Oehninger S. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:112–117. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59660-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lewis SE, Aitken RJ. DNA damage to spermatozoa has impacts on fertilization and pregnancy. Cell Tissue Res. 2005;322:33–41. doi: 10.1007/s00441-005-1097-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lifeng T, Shoulin W, Junmin J, Xuezhao S, Yannan L, Qianli W, Longsheng C. Effects of fenvalerate exposure on semen quality among occupational workers. Contraception. 2006;73:92–96. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.06.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mani U, Islam F, Prasad AK, Kumar P, Suresh Kumar V, Maji BK, Dutta KK. Steroidogenic alterations in testes and sera of rats exposed to formulated fenvalerate by inhalation. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2002;21:593–597. doi: 10.1191/0960327102ht298oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Meeker JD, Ryan L, Barr DB, Herrick RF, Bennett DH, Bravo R, Hauser R. The relationship of urinary metabolites of carbaryl/naphthalene and chlorpyrifos with human semen quality. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:1665–1670. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Meeker JD, Barr DB, Ryan L, Herrick RF, Bennett DH, Bravo R, Hauser R. Temporal variability of urinary levels of nonpersistent insecticides in adult men. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2005;15:271–281. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Meeker JD, Godfrey-Bailey L, Hauser R. Relationships between serum hormone levels and semen quality among men from an infertility clinic. J Androl. 2007;28:397–406. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.106.001545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Morris ID, Ilott S, Dixon L, Brison DR. The spectrum of DNA damage in human sperm assessed by single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet assay) and its relationship to fertilization and embryo development. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:990–998. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.4.990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. NRC. Human Biomonitoring for Environmental Chemicals. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academies Press; 2006. pp. 167–172. [Google Scholar]
  32. Perry MJ, Venners SA, Barr DB, Xu X. Environmental pyrethroid and organophosphorus insecticide exposures and sperm concentration. Reprod Toxicol. 2007;23:113–118. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2006.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rudel RA, Camann DE, Spengler JD, Korn LR, Brody JG. Phthalates, alkylphenols, pesticides, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, and other endocrine-disrupting compounds in indoor air and dust. Environ Sci Technol. 2003;37:4543–4553. doi: 10.1021/es0264596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Salem MH, Abo-Elezz Z, Abd-Allah GA, Hassan GA, Shaker N. Effect of organophosphorus (dimethoate) and pyrethroid (deltamethrin) pesticides on semen characteristics in rabbits. J Environ Sci Health B. 1988;23:279–290. doi: 10.1080/03601238809372604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schettgen T, Heudorf U, Drexler H, Angerer J. Pyrethroid exposure of the general population—is this due to diet. Toxicol Lett. 2002;134:141–145. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(02)00183-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Singh NP, Stephens RE. X-ray-induced DNA double-strand breaks in human sperm. Mutagenesis. 1998;13:75–79. doi: 10.1093/mutage/13.1.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tulve NS, Jones PA, Nishioka MG, Fortmann RC, Croghan CW, Zhou JY, Fraser A, Cavel C, Friedman W. Pesticide measurements from the first national environmental health survey of child care centers using a multi-residue GC/MS analysis method. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40:6269–6274. doi: 10.1021/es061021h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tyler CR, Beresford N, van der Woning M, Sumpter JP, Thorpe K. Metabolism and environmental degradation of pyrethroid insecticides produce compounds with endocrine activities. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2000;19:801–809. [Google Scholar]
  39. World Health Organization (WHO) WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm–Cervical Mucus Interaction. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  40. Xia Y, Bian Q, Xu L, Cheng S, Song L, Liu J, Wu W, Wang S, Wang X. Genotoxic effects on human spermatozoa among pesticide factory workers exposed to fenvalerate. Toxicology. 2004;203:49–60. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2004.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Xia Y, Han Y, Wu B, Wang S, Gu A, Lu N, Bo J, Song L, Jin N, Wang X. The relation between urinary metabolite of pyrethroid insecticides and semen quality in humans. Fertil Steril. 2007 doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.049. in press, available online doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Yousef MI, El-Demerdash FM, Al-Salhen KS. Protective role of isoflavones against the toxic effect of cypermethrin on semen quality and testosterone levels of rabbits. J Environ Sci Health B. 2003;38:463–478. doi: 10.1081/PFC-120021666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang SY, Ito Y, Yamanoshita O, Yanagiba Y, Kobayashi M, Taya K, Li C, Okamura A, Miyata M, Ueyama J, et al. Permethrin may disrupt testosterone biosynthesis via mitochondrial membrane damage of Leydig cells in adult male mouse. Endocrinology. 2007;148:3941–3949. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-1497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES