Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1980 Oct;12(4):620–623. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.4.620-623.1980

Use of the rapid fermentation test in determining carbohydrate reactions of fastidious bacteria in clinical laboratories.

D G Hollis, F O Sottnek, W J Brown, R E Weaver
PMCID: PMC273651  PMID: 6999028

Abstract

The rapid fermentation test was used to determine the carbohydrate reactions of some of the fastidious bacteria encountered in clinical laboratories, such as: Haemophilus species, including Haemophilus vaginalis; Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans; Cardiobacterium hominis; Kingella species; Corynebacterium species; Propionibacterium species; and Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae. Results were usually obtained within 4 h by using inocula from 24- or 48-h blood or chocolate agar media.

Full text

PDF
620

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Back A. E., Oberhofer T. R. Use of the Minitek system for biotyping Haemophilus species. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Mar;7(3):312–313. doi: 10.1128/jcm.7.3.312-313.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown W. J. A comparison of three fermentation methods for the confirmation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Health Lab Sci. 1976 Jan;13(1):54–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown W. J. Modification of the rapid fermentation test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Jun;27(6):1027–1030. doi: 10.1128/am.27.6.1027-1030.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown W. J. Stability of working reagents for the Modified Rapid Fermentation Test (MRFT). Health Lab Sci. 1977 Jul;14(3):172–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kellogg D. S., Jr, Turner E. M. Rapid fermentation confirmation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Appl Microbiol. 1973 Apr;25(4):550–552. doi: 10.1128/am.25.4.550-552.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kilian M. A taxonomic study of the genus Haemophilus, with the proposal of a new species. J Gen Microbiol. 1976 Mar;93(1):9–62. doi: 10.1099/00221287-93-1-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Riley P. S., Tatum H. W., Weaver R. E. Pseudomonas putrefaciens isolates from clinical specimens. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Nov;24(5):798–800. doi: 10.1128/am.24.5.798-800.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES