Skip to main content
Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice logoLink to Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
. 2007 Jun 15;5(2):79–96. doi: 10.1186/1897-4287-5-2-79

Gene Expression Profiling in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Adenomas and Desmoid Disease

Nikola A Bowden 1,2, Amanda Croft 1,2, Rodney J Scott 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC2736996  PMID: 19725988

Abstract

Gene expression profiling is a powerful method by which alterations in gene expression can be interrogated in a single experiment. The disease familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is associated with germline mutations in the APC gene, which result in aberrant β-catenin control. The molecular mechanisms underlying colorectal cancer development in FAP are being characterised but limited information is available about other symptoms that occur in this disorder. Although extremely rare in the general population, desmoid tumours in approximately 10% of FAP patients. The aim of this study was to determine the similarities and differences in gene expression profiles in adenomas and compare them to those observed in desmoid tumours. Illumina whole genome gene expression BeadChips were used to measure gene expression in FAP adenomas and desmoid tumours. Similarities between gene expression profiles and mechanisms important in regulating formation of FAP adenomas and desmoid tumours were identified. This study furthers our understanding of the mechanisms underlying FAP and desmoid tumour formation.

Keywords: gene expression profiling, FAP, adenomos, desmoid tumours

Introduction

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a rare form of colorectal cancer caused by germline mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene. Approximately 70–90% of FAP patients have identifiable germline mutations in APC [1,2]. FAP is clinically characterized by the formation of hundreds to thousands of adenomas that carpet the entire colon and rectum [3]. Although initially benign the risk of malignant transformation increases with age such that, if left untreated, colorectal carcinoma usually develops before the age of 40 years [4].

Loss of APC results in dysregulation of the Wnt signalling pathway that leads to the constitutional activation of the transcription factor Tcf-4, which has been associated with adenoma formation [5]. Alterations in Wnt signalling cause stem cells to retain their ability to divide in the upper intestinal crypt, thereby forming monocryptal adenomas [6]. Eventually the adenomas may acquire metastatic potential, resulting in carcinoma development [7]. Not all adenomas will progress to malignant tumours; however, due to the abundance of adenomas carcinoma development is virtually assured [8].

Apart from the apparent loss of APC function, little is known about the molecular processes involved in adenoma initiation [6]. Similarly, the molecular events occurring during the transformation of adenomas into carcinomas are poorly understood, as are the mechanisms that underlie the development of extra-colonic disease in FAP.

It is well established that FAP patients are susceptible to benign extra-colonic tumours, including desmoid tumours [3]. Although rare in the general population, desmoids occur in approximately 10% of FAP patients and they are the second most common cause of death [9]. Desmoid tumours are poorly encapsulated and consist of spindle-shaped fibroblast cells with varying quantities of collagen [10]. Despite their apparent inability to metastasize, desmoid tumours can be extremely aggressive [11].

It has been speculated that desmoid formation is a result of an abnormal wound healing response [12]. Desmoids can affect surrounding viscera, causing potentially fatal complications [13]. FAP-associated desmoid tumours are usually associated with germline APC mutations [14], but somatic APC mutations have been detected in sporadic desmoid tumours [15].

Microarray technology has an enormous potential for applications in the endeavour to better understand tumours and their development [16]. The ability to detect expression levels of thousands of genes can identify particular genes that are either up- or down-regulated in different tumour types [17]. Tumours that are currently categorized by similar morphology, such as desmoid tumours, may be more usefully divided into subtypes according to their expression profiles [18]. Particular expression profiles in tumours may also be capable of predicting the clinical outcome in specific patients in the early stages of tumour development [18]. In colorectal cancer, gene expression profiles of adenomas and adenocarcinomas have been compared and subsets of genes expressed at common levels in both lesions have been identified as well as expression patterns that are unique to each [19]. Gene expression profiling has the potential to identify factors involved in the malignant transformation of adenomas, and may aid in the diagnosis of benign versus malignant disease.

Although genome-wide expression studies have been reported on FAP adenomas and desmoid tumours, the present one of the first to compare the two tissue types. The first aim of this study was to identify distinct gene expression profiles for colorectal and stomach FAP adenomas and desmoid tumours. The second aim was to determine the similarity between the gene expression profiles in FAP adenomas and desmoid tumours to identify mechanisms important in regulating formation of these lesions. To achieve this, mRNA from normal colon, FAP stomach and colon adenomas and desmoid tumours was measured using whole human genome expression BeadChips (Illumina). The findings of this study further our understanding of the mechanisms underlying FAP and desmoid tumour formation.

Materials and methods

FAP adenoma and tumour tissue and controls

Frozen adenoma tissue from 4 FAP patients was available for this study. Colorectal FAP adenoma A was from an individual aged 40 at the time of surgery. Genetic testing revealed a heterozygous A5465T change in the APC gene, causing a missense change from aspartic acid to valine at position 1822 in the amino acid sequence. The specimen obtained for this study was obtained as a result of a proctocolectomy. The pathology report indicated that over 100 tubulovillous adenomas were present in the original specimen, with no evidence of invasive tumour. Patients B, C and D harboured the same frameshift mutation, a 4 base pair deletion at position 3462–3465 of the APC gene. Patient B was diagnosed with FAP at the age of 11 years, patient C at 13 years of age, and patient D at the age of 37 years. One gastric adenoma was obtained from patient D, in addition to a colonic adenoma. Normal colon tissue from 7 healthy individuals with no history of FAP or desmoid disease was used as a mixed reference sample for this study.

Desmoid Disease Tissue

Desmoid tumour tissue from two individuals was available for this study. Patient A had FAP-associated desmoid disease. There was a family history of FAP, but no known history of desmoid disease. The individual harboured a 1 bp deletion in exon 15 of the APC gene resulting in a frameshift that introduced a premature stop codon at amino acid position 964. Patient B had a family history of FAP and desmoid disease. This patient harboured a 17 bp duplication in exon 15 of the APC gene, which introduced a premature stop codon at amino acid position 1969. A previously established fibroblast cell line from a healthy individual with no history of FAP or desmoid disease was used as a control for this study. The fibroblast cell line was cultured in 1× Complete DMEM media at 37°C (5% CO2).

RNA Extraction

2–3 mm2 pieces of fresh frozen FAP adenoma and desmoid tumour tissue were cut from the original sample and transferred immediately to 1 ml Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA). Similarly, approximately 1–10 × 106 control fibroblast cells were lysed in 1 ml Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA). RNA was extracted per manufacturer's instructions. The RNA pellet was washed with 75% ethanol, before being dissolved in 20 μl water.

The total RNA was purified using a Qiagen RNeasy MiniElute Cleanup Kit as per manufacturer's instructions. The concentration of the purified total RNA samples was measured using a Quant-It RiboGreen RNA Assay Kit (Invitrogen, USA) and a fluorometer (Fluostar OPTIMA) as per manufacturer's instructions.

RNA amplification

To synthesise first and second strand cDNA and amplify biotinylated cRNA from the total RNA, an Illumina Totalprep RNA Amplification Kit was used as per manufacturer's instructions.

The purified cRNA samples were quantified to determine the volume required for the BeadChip hybridisation step via the Quant-iT RiboGreen RNA Assay Kit as described previously.

Illumina BeadChip Procedure

Hybridisation to the Illumina Sentrix 8 BeadChip was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions without modification. The Sentrix 8 BeadChips were read using an Illumina Beadarray reader (San Diego, CA, USA).

Data Analysis

Analysis and normalisation of expression data from the 24,000 transcripts was carried out using BeadStudio 2.0 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The t-test error model and cubic spline normalisation was used for all samples. A differential analysis was applied to all adenoma and tumour samples using the Illumina custom test of significance, utilising the mixed normal colon control as the reference group. GeneSpring 5.0 (Agilant, Santa Clara, CA, USA) used standard correlation and distance to create dendrograms (Experiment trees) to show relationships between gene expression profiles. A second dendrogram (Gene tree) was created for each gene list using standard correlation and distance to show relationships between the expression levels of genes across the groups.

Results

Gene expression data from over 23,000 genes on Illumina HumRef-8 BeadChips was analysed and normalised using Illumina BeadStudio 2.0 software. Cubic spline normalisation and the t-test error model were employed for all the FAP adenoma, normal colon and desmoid tumour samples. Correlation analyses identified the average R2 value of the duplicates for each sample as 0.950 ± 0.04. An average of each duplicate pair was then taken before additional analysis was carried out.

Differential gene expression analysis in FAP adenomas and healthy colon tissue

Differential analysis using the mixed normal colon control as the reference group was applied to all adenoma and tumour samples. Genes in each analysis were excluded if their fluorescence detection score was less than 0.99, and if their differential score was less than 13 (p > 0.05). From the genes that met the exclusion criteria, according to detection and differential scores, lists were generated for genes both up- and down-regulated more than 2-fold in the FAP adenoma samples compared to the mixed normal colon control. The genes commonly up- and down-regulated across all the FAP adenomas are shown in Tables 1 and 2 and genes that were commonly up- or down-regulated across the 4 colorectal FAP adenomas only are shown in Tables 3 and 4 respectively.

Table 1.

Genes commonly up-regulated more than 2-fold in all FAP polyps compared to normal colon

Symbol Gene Name
Transcription/Transcriptional Regulation
TBPL1 TBP-like 1

Other
ZCWCC2 Zinc finger, CW-type with coiled-coil domain 2
KIAA1324 Maba1
FLJ20366 Hypothetical protein FLJ20366
ATOH8 Atonal homolog 8 (Drosophila)

Table 2.

Genes commonly down-regulated more than 2-fold in all FAP polyps compared to normal colon

Symbol Gene Name
Cell Cycle Control
PPP3CB Protein phosphatase 3 (formerly 2B), catalytic subunit, beta isoform (calcineurin A beta)

Transport
SLC20A1 Solute carrier family 20 (phosphate transporter), member 1
P2RX4 Purinergic receptor P2X, ligand-gated ion channel, 4, tv-2

Metabolism
PC Pyruvate carboxylase, nuclear gene encoding mitochondrial protein, tv-2
PRSS3 Protease, serine, 3 (mesotrypsin)
ST6GALNAC6 CMP-NeuAC: (beta)-N-acetylgalactosaminide (alpha) 2,6-sialyltransferase member IV

Signal Transduction
IL2RG Interleukin 2 receptor, gamma (severe combined immunodeficiency)
TJP3 Tight junction protein 3 (zona occludens 3)

Cell Adhesion
CDC42 Cell division cycle 42 (GTP binding protein, 25 kDa), tv-2
GSN Gelsolin (amyloidosis, Finnish type), tv-2
TAGLN Transgelin

Apoptosis
DAPK3 Death-associated protein kinase 3

Structural
KRT19 Keratin 19
TPM2 Tropomyosin 2 (beta)

Other
CTGF Connective tissue growth factor
EPS8L2 EPS8-like 2
LRRC1 Leucine rich repeat containing 1
NS5ATP13TP2 NS5ATP13TP2 protein
PTPRR Protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, R, tv-2
RICH1 RhoGAP interacting with CIP4 homologs 1
SMTN Smoothelin, tv-2

Table 3.

Genes commonly up-regulated 2-fold or more in colorectal FAP polyps compared to normal colon

Symbol Gene Name
Cell Cycle Control
CCNB2 Cyclin B2
CDKN3 Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 3
AURKB Aurora kinase B

Cell Cycle
HCAP-G Chromosome condensation protein G
PRC1 Protein regulator of cytokinesis 1, tv-1
KIF2C Kinesin family member 2C
CHC1 Chromosome condensation 1
SMC4L1 SMC4 structural maintenance of chromosome 4-like 1 (yeast)
Pfs2 DNA replication complex GINS protein PSF2
RNASEH2A Ribonuclease H2, large subunit

Transcription/Transcriptional Regulation
FLJ20315 Hypothetical protein FLJ20315
TBPL1 TBP-like 1
LOC89958 Hypothetical protein LOC89958
HMGN1 High-mobility group nucleosome binding domain 1
ZNF22 Zinc finger protein 22 (KOX 15)
PTTG1 Pituitary tumour-transforming 1
NFE2L3 Nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 3
SOX9 SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 9 (campomelic dysplasia, autosomal sex-reversal)

Transport
SLC12A2 Solute carrier family 12 (sodium/potassium/chloride transporters) member 2
CLCA1 Chloride channel, calcium activated, family member 1
LCN2 Lipocalin 2 (oncogene 24p3)

Metabolism
SORD Sorbitol dehydrogenase
TPRT Trans-prenyltransferase
QTRT1 Queuine tRNA-ribosyltransferase 1 (tRNA-guanine transglycosylase)
PAICS Phosphoribosylaminoimidazole carboxylase, Phosphoribosylaminoimidazole succinocarboxamide synthetase
DPH2L2 DPH2-like 2 (S. cerevisiae), tv-1
ALOX5 Arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase
IARS Isoleucine-tRNA synthetase, tv-short
BRIX BRIX
TK1 Thymidine kinase 1, soluble

Oncogenesis
EPHB2 EphB2 (EPHB2), tv-1
BCL11A B-cell CLL/lymphoma 11A (zinc finger protein) tv-1
MAP17 Membrane-associated protein 17
GDF15 Growth differentiation factor 15

Signalling
RACGAP1 Rac GTPase activating protein 1

mRNA Processing
LSM5 LSM5 homolog, U6 small nuclear RNA associated (S. cerevisiae)
THOC3 THO complex 3

Cell Adhesion
C20orf42 Chromosome 20 open reading frame 42

Translation
UK114 Translational inhibitor protein p14.5

Other
ZCWCC2 Zinc finger, CW-type with coiled-coil domain 2
KIAA1324 Maba1
FLJ10514 Hypothetical protein FLJ10514
ENC1 Ectodermal-neural cortex (with BTB-like domain)
PTTG2 Pituitary tumour-transforming 2
C21orf59 Chromosome 21 open reading frame 59
WDR12 WD repeat domain 12
LXN Latexin protein

Other
KIAA1892 KIAA1892
KIAA1797 KIAA1797
GLCE Glucuronyl C5-epimerase
KIAA0101 KIAA0101 gene product
RRP46 Exosome component Rrp46
S100P S100 calcium binding protein P
PRDX4 Peroxiredoxin 4
FLJ20366 Hypothetical protein FLJ20366
F12 Coagulation factor XII (Hageman factor)
IGFBP2 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 (36 kD)
GW112 Differentially expressed in hematopoietic lineages
C10orf3 Chromosome 10 open reading frame 3
ATOH8 Atonal homolog 8 (Drosophila)
MFN1 Mitofusin 1, nuclear gene encoding mitochondrial protein, tv-2
QPCT Glutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferase (glutaminyl cyclase)
UBE2S Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2S

Table 4.

Genes commonly down-regulated 2-fold or more in colorectal FAP polyps compared to normal colon

Symbol Gene Name
Cell Cycle Control
FOSB FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog B
PPP3CB Protein phosphatase 3, catalytic subunit, beta isoform (calcineurn A beta)

Cell Cycle
MXI1 MAX interacting protein 1, tv-2
CABLES1 Cdk5 and Abl enzyme substrate 1
PMP22 Peripheral myelin protein 22, tv-3
DTR Diphtheria toxin receptor (heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor)

Transcription/Transcriptional Regulation
HLX1 H2.0-like homeo box 1 (Drosophila)
NKX2–3 NK2 transcription factor related, locus 3 (Drosophila)
SOX18 SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 18
FNBP1 Formin-binding protein 1
COL4A1 Collagen, type IV, alpha 1
SIRT6 Sirtuin (silent mating type information regulation 2 homolog) 6 (S. cerevisiae)
SIRT7 Sirtuin (silent mating type information regulation 2 homolog) 7 (S. cerevisiae)
AIM1L Absent in melanoma 1-like
C19orf21 Chromosome 19 open reading frame 21

Transport
FBXO32 F-box only protein 32, tv-2
KCNMA1 Potassium large conductance calcium-activated channel, subfamily M, alpha member 1
MYADM Myeloid-associated differentiation marker
AQP8 Aquaporin 8
SLC17A4 Solute carrier family 17 (sodium phosphate), member 4
SLCO2A1 Solute carrier organic anion transporter family, member 2A1
SGK Serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase
P2RX4 Purinergic receptor P2X, ligand-gated ion channel, 4, tv-2
SLC20A1 Solute carrier family 20 (phosphate transporter), member 1
VAMP5 Vesicle-associated membrane protein 5 (myobrevin)

Metabolism
MGC4171 Hypothetical protein MGC4171
LIPH Lipase, member H
KIAA0992 Palladin
KIAA0828 KIAA0828 protein
SULT1A2 Sulfotransferase family, cytosolic, 1A, phenol-preferring, member 2, tv-1
UPP1 Uridine phosphorylase 1, tv-1
BTNL3 Butyrophilin-like 3, tv-2
KIAA0934 KIAA0934 protein
AK1 Adenylate kinase 1
DPYSL3 Dihydropyrimidinase-like 3
PLCD1 Phospholipase C, delta 1
CA4 Carbonic anhydrase IV
SVIL Supervillin, tv-1
PC Pyruvate carboxylase, nuclear gene encoding mitochondrial protein, tv-2
TMPRSS2 Transmembrane protease, serine 2
PRSS3 Protease, serine, 3 (mesotrypsin)
PCK1 Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1 (soluble)
ST6GALNAC6 CMP-NeuAC: (beta)-N-acetylgalactosaminide (alpha)2,6-sialyltransferase member IV
RARRES2 Retinoic acid receptor responder (tazarotene induced) 2

Tumour Suppression
PPAP2A Phosphatidic acid phosphatase type 2A, tv-1

Signalling
RGL1 Ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator-like 1
EFNA1 Ephrin-A1, tv-1
SDCBP2 Syndecan binding protein (syntenin) 2, tv-2
GUCA2A Guanylate cyclase activator 2A (guanylin)
BSG Basigin (OK blood group), tv-4
TRIF TIR domain containing adaptor inducing interferon-beta
ILK Integrin-linked kinase
TJP3 Tight junction protein 3 (zona occludens 3)
PRKCD Protein kinase C, delta
ITPKA Inositol 1,4,5-trisposphate 3-kinase A
IL2RG Interleukin 2 receptor, gamma (severe combined immunodeficiency)
LNK Lymphocyte adaptor protein

Cell Adhesion
PC-LKC Protocadherin LKC
DCN Decorin, tv-E
FLNA Filamin A, alpha (actin binding protein 280)
MSN Moesin
SORBS1 Sorbin and SH3 domain containing 1
TAGLN Transgelin
CDC42 Cell division cycle 42 (GTP binding protein, 25 kDa), tv-2
COL4A2 Collagen, type IV, alpha 2
DBN1 Drebin 1, tv-1
GSN Gelsolin (amyloidosis, Finnish type), tv-2
ACTG2 Actin, gamma 2, smooth muscle, enteric
ACTA2 Actin, alpha 2, smooth muscle, aorta
CGN Cingulin

Apoptosis
RIPK3 Receptor-interacting serine-threonine kinase 3
FOSL2 FOS-like antigen 2
DAPK3 Death-associated protein kinase 3
LGALS1 Lectin, galactoside-binding, soluble, 1 (galactin 1)
GADD45B Growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible, beta

Structural
CLDN5 Claudin 5 (transmembrane protein deleted in velocardiofacial syndrome)
KRT19 Keratin 19
TPM2 Tropomyosin 2 (beta)

Other
DUSP5 Dual specificity phosphatase 5
CLIPR-59 CLIP-170-related protein
PTPRR Protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, R, tv-2
SMTN Smoothelin, tv-2
CEACAM1 Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 (biliary glycoprotein)
EPS8L2 EPS8-like 2
RICH1 RhoGAP interacting with CIP4 homologs 1
PDZK2 PDZ domain containing 2
CHKL Choline kinase-like, tv-1
DIP13B DIP13 beta
NS5ATP13TP2 NS5ATP13TP2 protein
M-RIP Myosin phosphatase-Rho interacting protein

MTMR9 Myotubularin related protein 9
LRRC1 Leucine rich repeat containing 1
CTGF Connective tissue growth factor
DSCR1L1 Down syndrome critical region gene 1-like 1
TU12B1-TY TU12B1-TY protein
MYH11 Myosin, heavy polypeptide 11, smooth muscle, tv-SM1
FLJ23471 MICAL-like 2, tv-2
DKFZP434B044 Hypothetical protein DKFZp434B044
MUCDHL Mucin and cadherin-like, tv-2
MMP28 Matrix metalloproteinase 28, tv-1
TRIM15 Tripartite motif-containing 15, tv-1
COL6A2 Collagen, type VI, alpha 2, tv-2C2
SELM Selenoprotein SelM
ZAK Sterile alpha motif and leucine zipper containing kinase AZK
SMTN Smoothelin, tv-3
TNXB Tenascin XB, tv-XB-S
EPS8L1 EPS8-like 1, tv-3
FLJ10350 Hypothetical protein FLJ10350
DKFZP762C186 Tangerin
TBC1D1 TBC1 (tre-2/USP6, BUB2, cdc16) domain family, member 1
KIAA1145 KIAA1145 protein
PKIG Protein kinase (cAMP-dependent, catalytic) inhibitor gamma, tv-2
PKIB Protein kinase (cAMP-dependent, catalytic) inhibitor beta, tv-3
IGSF9 Immunoglobulin superfamily, member 9
LOC90313 Hypothetical protein BC004507
FLJ22582 Hypothetical protein FLJ22582
KIAA0063 KIAA0063 gene product
FSTL1 Follistatin-like 1
PRNP Prion protein (Creutzfeld-Jakob disease, Gerstmann-Strausler-Scheinker syndrome, fatal familial insomnia), tv-2
ANKRD25 Ankyrin repeat domain 25
STOM Stomatin, tv-2
FLJ46603 FLJ46603 protein
RAIN Ras-interacting protein
DHRS9 Dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR family) member 9, tv-1
LIMS2 LIM and senescent cell antigen-like domains 2
ARHGEF18 Rho/rac guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 18
KIAA0285 KIAA0285 gene product
PDLIM7 PDZ and LIM domain 7 (enigma), tv-1
CXX1 CAAX box 1
MGP Matrix GIa protein
PTPRH Protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, H
SPARC Secreted protein, acidic, cysteine-rich (osteonectin)
FLJ90022 Hypothetical protein FLJ90022
SERPING1 Serine (or cysteine) proteinase inhibitor, clade G (C1 inhibitor), member 1, (angioedema, hereditary)
CSRP1 Cysteine and glycine-rich protein 1
KIAA0513 KIAA0513 gene product

OAS1 2',5'-oligoadenylate synthetase 1, 40/46 kDa

Cluster analysis was performed using GeneSpring 5.0 software in order to further characterise the similarity across the FAP samples and to determine if there was differential gene expression compared to healthy colon tissue. The stomach FAP duplicates display profiles slightly distinct from the other FAP adenomas. The normal colon duplicate profiles are unique to all other profiles (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Cluster analysis of FAP polyps and mixed normal colon. The columns represent the gene expression profiles of each sample. Green – low expression level, yellow – medium expression level, red – high expression level. The relationships between each sample are shown by the upper dendrogram. The colouring in the upper dendrogram represents the sample type: green (left) – normal colon; blue – colorectal FAP polyps; yellow – stomach FAP. 1 – Normal Colon Duplicate; 2 – Normal Colon Duplicate; 3 – Colorectal FAP Polyp A Duplicate; 4 – Colorectal FAP Polyp A Duplicate; 5 – Colorectal FAP Polyp D Duplicate; 6 – Colorectal FAP Polyp D Duplicate; 7 – Colorectal FAP Polyp B Duplicate; 8 – Colorectal FAP Polyp B Duplicate; 9 – Colorectal FAP Polyp C Duplicate; 10 – Colorectal FAP Polyp C Duplicate; 11 – Stomach FAP Polyp D Duplicate; 12 – Stomach FAP Polyp D Duplicate.

Differential gene expression analysis in desmoid tumours and control fibroblasts

The average expression in the desmoid tumours was compared to the control fibroblast cell line and significantly altered expression identified by differential gene expression analysis. Genes in each analysis were excluded if their fluorescence detection score was less than 0.99, and if their differential score was less than 13 (p > 0.05). Genes with differential expression and up- or down-regulated more than 2-fold in the desmoid tumour samples compared to the normal fibroblast cell line were compiled into lists (Tables 5 and 6).

Table 5.

Genes commonly up-regulated 2-fold or more in desmoid tumours compared to normal fibroblast cells

Symbol Gene Name
Cell Cycle Control
PTN Pleiotrophin (heparin binding growth factor 8, neurite growth-promoting factor 1)
GAS7 Growth arrest-specific 7, tv-b
CDKN1C Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1C (p57, Kip2)
TGFB3 Transforming growth factor, beta 3

Cell Cycle
NEK3 NIMA (never in mitosis gene a)-related kinase 3, tv-2

Transcription/Transcriptional Regulation
BHLHB2 Basic helix-loop-helix domain containing, class B, 2
COL4A1 Collagen, type IV, alpha 1
COL4A2 Collagen, type IV, alpha 2
DNAJB2 DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily B, member 2
ELF2 E74-like factor 2 (ets domain transcription factor), tv-1
EVI1 Ecotropic viral integration site 1
FKBP1A FK506 binding protein 1A, 12 kDa, tv-12A
FLJ10404 Hypothetical protein FLJ10404
HDAC8 Histone deacetylase 8
JUN v-jun sarcoma virus 17 oncogene homolog (avian)
KIF2C Kinesin family member C2
NUCKS Nuclear ubiquitous casein kinase and cyclin-dependent kinase substrate
PBX2 Pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor 2
PPIE Peptidylprolyl isomerase E (cyclophilin E), tv-2
PRR3 Proline-rich polypeptide 3
TEAD2 TEA domain family member 2
TLE2 Transducin-like enhancer of split 2 (E(sp1)) homolog, Drosophila
TLE4 Transducin-like enhancer of split 4 (E(sp1)) homolog, Drosophila
ZNF22 Zinc finger protein 22 (KOX15)
ZNF254 Zinc finger protein 254
TDRD3 Tudor domain containing 3
ZNF300 Zinc finger protein 300
MEF2C MADS box transcription enhancer factor 2, polypeptide C (myocyte enhancer factor 2C)
NAB1 NGFI-A binding protein 1 (EGR1 binding protein 1)
Hes4 bHLH factor Hes4
C19orf13 Chromosome 19 open reading frame 13
ARNT Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, tv-2
ZNF266 Zinc finger protein 266
ZNF26 Zinc finger protein 26 (KOX 20)
MGC51082 Hypothetical protein MGC51082
TGIF2 TGFB-induced factor 2 (TALE family homeobox)
MYST3 MYST histone acetyltransferase (monocytic leukemia) 3
M96 Likely ortholog of mouse metal response element binding transcription factor 2
BAZ2B Bromodomain adjacent to zinc finger domain, 2B

Transport
NXT1 NTF2-like export factor 1
ABCA1 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family A, member 1
SLC25A29 Solute carrier family 25, member 29
SLC16A9 Solute carrier family 16 (monocarboxylic acid transporters), member 9
PSCD1 Pleckstrin homology, Sec7 and coiled-coil domains 1(cytohesin 1), tv-2
AQP1 Aquaporin 1(Channel-forming integral protein, 28 kDa) tv-1
SCNN1D Sodium channel, nonvoltage-gated, delta
SLC22A17 Solute carrier family 22 (organic cation transporter), member 17, tv-2

Metabolism
SULT1A1 Sulfotransferase family, cytosolic, 1A, phenol-preferring, member 1, tv-1
CH25H Cholesterol 25-hydroxylase
QTRTD1 Queuine tRNA-ribosyltransferase domain containing 1
FLJ23749 Hypothetical protein FLJ23749
FLJ10706 Hypothetical protein FLJ10706
USP52 Ubiquitin specific protease 52
RARRES2 Retinoic acid receptor responder (tazarotene induced) 2
ADAM19 A distintegrin and metalloproteinase domain 19 (meltrin beta), tv-2
AUTS2 Autism susceptibility candidate 2
GALNT3 UDP-N-acetyl-alpha-D-galactosamine:polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 3 (GalNAc-T3)
KIAA0140 KIAA0140
ODC-p Ornithine decarboxylase-like
PCSK5 Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 5

Oncogenesis
AKAP13 A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein 13, tv-3
MGP Matrix Gla protein
EWSR1 Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1, tv-EWS-b
SFRP4 Secreted frizzled-related protein 4
SRPUL Sushi-repeat protein

Signalling
GABBR1 Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) B receptor, 1, tv-2
CAPS Calcyphosine, tv-2
NET1 Neuroepithelial cell transforming gene 1
PRKCH Protein kinase C, eta
PPP2R2B Protein phosphatase 2 (formerly 2A), regulatory subunit B (PR52), beta isoform, tv-4
RGS16 Regulator of G-protein signalling 16
PTHR1 Parathyroid hormone receptor 1
TMPEI Transmembrane, prostate androgen induced RNA, tv-4
ARHU Ras homolog gene family, member U
CHN1 Chimerin (chimaerin) 1
EFNB3 Ephrin-B3
GFRA2 GDNF family receptor alpha 2
GNB4 Guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), beta polypeptide 4
IL11RA Interleukin 11 receptor, alpha, tv-1
ITPKB Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate 3-kinase B
KIF13B Kinesin family member 13B
MAP4K1 Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 1
MLP MARCKS-like protein
PDGFRL Platelet-derived growth factor receptor-like
PRKCABP Protein kinase C, alpha binding protein
RASD1 RAS, dexamethasone-induced 1
TNFAIP6 Tumour necrosis factor, alpha-induced protein 6

Cell Adhesion
COL7A1 Collagen, type VII, alpha 1 (epidermolysis bullosa, dystrophic, dominant and recessive)
ISLR Immunoglobulin superfamily containing leucine-rich repeat, tv-1

Apoptosis
PPP1R13B Protein phosphatase 1, regulatory (inhibitor) subunit 13B
AXUD1 AXIN1 up-regulated 1
CASP10 Caspase 10, apoptosis-related cysteine protease, tv-B
MX1 Myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 1, interferon-inducible protein p78 (mouse)
PCBP4 Poly(rC) binding protein 4, tv-4
TNFRSF19 Tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 19, tv-2
TNFRSF25 Tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 25, tv-7

Tumourigenesis
BARD1 BRCA1 associated RING domain 1
LOH11CR2A Loss of heterozygosity, 11, chromosomal region 2, gene A

Immune Response
HLA-DPA1 Major histocompatibility complex, class II, DP alpha 1
C1R Complement component 1, r subcomponent
CXCL14 Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 14
IFI27 Interferon, alpha-inducible protein 27, tv-α
MX2 Myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 2 (mouse)

RNA Processing
DHX8 DEAH (Asp-Glu-Ala-His) box polypeptide 8
HNRPA1 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1, tv-1
SFRS11 Splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 11

Structural
ACTL6 Actin-like 6
FBLN1 Fibulin 1 (FBLN1), tv-C
FBLN1 Fibulin 1 (FBLN1), tv-D
SMTN Smoothelin, tv-2

Other
MT1H Metallothionein 1H
C12orf14 Chromosome 12 open reading frame 14
PELI1 Pellino homolog 1 (Drosophila)
IFI44 Interferon-induced protein 44
C10orf6 Chromosome 10 open reading frame 6
C2orf11 Chromosome 2 open reading frame 11
FLJ31951 Hypothetical protein FLJ31951
ISYNA1 Myo-inositol 1-phosphate synthase A1
FLJ31614 Hypothetical protein FLJ31614
AD031 AD031 protein
CASC3 Cancer susceptibility candidate 3
GBA2 Glucosidase, beta (bile acid) 2
CGI-85 CGI-85 protein, tv-2
C14orf80 Chromosome 14 open reading frame 80
ACAS2L Acetyl-Coenzyme A synthetase 2 (AMP forming)-like, nuclear gene encoding mitochondrial protein
DTX3 Deltex 3 homolog (Drosophila)
FLJ23059 Hypothetical protein FLJ23059
PIK3R1 Phosphoinositide-3-kinase, regulatory subunit, polypeptide 1 (p85 alpha), tv-2
KIAA1223 KIAA1223
STARD9 START domain containing 9
LOC375786 Hypothetical gene supported by AL713796
SR140 U2-associated SR140 protein
MIDN Midnolin
SEC31L2 SEC31-like 2 (S. cerevisiae), tv-1
FLJ12178 Hypothetical protein FLJ12178
LOC157567 Hypothetical protein LOC157567
FLJ25005 FLJ25005 protein
WARP von Willebrand factor A domain-related protein, tv-1
KIAA1036 KIAA1036
LOC374969 Hypothetical protein LOC374969
LOC155435 Hypothetical protein LOC155435
MGC9913 Hypothetical protein MGC9913
CASKIN2 CASK interacting protein 2
CFDP1 Craniofacial development protein 1
SPAG5 Sperm associated antigen 5
MMP23B Matrix metalloproteinase 23B
AKAP8L A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein 8-like
FLJ11029 Hypothetical protein FLJ11029
DDIT4 DNA-damage-inducible tv-4
APCDD1 Adenomatous Polyposis Coli down-regulated 1
CDW92 CDW92 antigen

Table 6.

Genes commonly down-regulated 2-fold or more in desmoid tumours compared to normal fibroblast cells

Symbol Gene Name
Cell Cycle
GRN Granulin
QSCN6 Quiescin Q6
STAT1 Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1,91 kDa, tv-α
STAT1 Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1,91 kDa, tv-β
TIMP1 Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (erythroid potentiating activity, collagenase inhibitor)

Transcription/Transcriptional Regulation
HIST1H2BK Histone 1, H2bk
LOXL1 Lysyl oxidase-like 1
MSC Musculin (activated B-cell factor-1)
PRRX1 Paired related homeobox 1, tv-pmx-1b
ZDHHC14 Zinc finger, DHHC domain containing 14

Transport
GLRB Glycine receptor, beta
PCOLCE2 Procollagen C-endopeptidase enhancer 2
SCAMP3 Secretory carrier membrane protein 3, tv-1
SLC31A2 Solute carrier family 31 (copper transporters), member 2

Metabolism
AK1 Adenylate kinase 1
AKR1C3 Aldo-keto reductase family 1, member C3 (3-alpha hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, type II)
C1RL Complement component 1, r subcomponent-like
COMT Catechol-O-methyltransferase, tv-MB-COMT
CTSL Cathepsin L, tv-2
GCLM Glutamate-cysteine ligase, modifier subunit
GNPDA2 Glucosamine-6-phosphate deaminase 2
IDH1 Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (NADP+), soluble
NQO1 NAD(P)H dehydrogenase, quinone 1
PTGIS Prostaglandin I2 (prostacyclin) synthase
SMPDL3A Sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase, acid-like 3A
SPPL2A Putative intramembrane cleaving protease
STS Steroid sulfatase (microsomal), arylsulfatase C, isozyme S
UBE2G1 Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2G 1 (UBC7 homolog, C. elegans), tv-1
UCHL1 Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase L1 (ubiquitin thiolesterase)

Tumour Suppression
MADH3 MAD, mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 3 (Drosophila)

Signalling
DEPDC6 DEP domain containing 6
DIRAS1 DIRAS family, GTP-binding RAS-like 1
PDGFRA Platelet-derived growth factor receptor, alpha polypeptide
PENK Proenkephalin
SARA2 SAR1a gene homolog 2 (S. cerevisiae)
SNTB1 Syntrophin, beta 1 (dystrophin-associated protein A1, 59 kDa, basic component 1)
DKFZp564I1922 Adlican

mRNA Processing
CSTF1 Cleavage stimulation factor, 3' pre-RNA, subunit 1, 50 kDa

Cell Adhesion
CNTNAP1 Contactin-associated protein 1
THBS2 Thrombospondin 2
ZYX Zyxin

Apoptosis
C20orf97 Chromosome 20 open reading frame 97
DAPK1 Death-associated protein kinase 1
MAPK1 Mitogen-activated protein kinase 1, tv-1

Structural
KRT18 Keratin 18, tv-1
TUBG1 Tubulin, gamma 1

Immune Response
ANKRD15 Ankyrin repeat domain 15, tv-1
DPP4 Dipeptidylpeptidase 4 (CD26, adenosine deaminase complexing protein 2)
MR1 Major histocompatibility complex, class I-related

Other
ANGPTL2 Angiopoietin-like 2
ANTXR2 Anthrax toxin receptor 2
BCKDHB Branched chain keto acid dehydrogenase E1, beta polypeptide (maple syrup urine disease), nuclear gene
encoding mitochondrial protein, tv-2
BZRP Benzodiazapine receptor (peripheral), tv-PBR-S
C11orf17 Chromosome 11 open reading frame 17, tv-2
C6orf32 Chromosome 6 open reading frame 32
C9orf88 Chromosome 9 open reading frame 88
CDC42EP2 CDC42 effector protein (Rho GTPase binding) 2
CRLF1 Cytokine receptor-like factor 1
DIRC2 Disrupted in renal carcinoma 2
EDEM1 ER degradation enhancer, mannosidase alpha-like 1
FLJ20073 FLJ20073 protein
FLJ20272 Hypothetical protein FLJ20272
FLJ22582 Hypothetical protein FLJ22582
HOM-TES-103 HOM-TES-103 tumour antigen-like, tv-3
HSPC157 HSPC157 protein
KIAA0196 KIAA0196 gene product
LOC196463 Hypothetical protein LOC196463
LOC221091 Similar to hypothetical protein
LOC286343 Hypothetical protein LOC286343
LOC387908 Similar to Ferritin heavy chain (Ferritin H subunit)
LOC57168 Similar to aspartate beta hydroxylase (ASPH)
LRRFIP2 Leucine rich repeat (in FLII) interacting protein 2
LYPLA1 Lysophospholipase I
MGC12992 Hypothetical protein MGC12992
MGST1 Microsomal glutathione S-transferase 1, tv-1a
MOCOS Molybdenum cofactor sulfurase
NNT Nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase
PKM2 Pyruvate kinase, muscle, tv-1
PPAP2B Phosphatidic acid phosphatase type 2B, tv-2
PSFL Anterior pharynx defective 1B-like
PTX3 Pentaxin-related gene, rapidly induced by IL-1 beta
S100A4 S100 calcium binding protein A4 (calcium protein, calvasculin, metastasin, murine placental homolog), tv-2
SLIT3 Slit homolog 3 (Drosophila)
SMP1 Small membrane protein 1
TRIM4 Tripartite motif-containing 4, tv-β
UNQ564 UNQ564
ZC3HAV1 Zinc finger CCCH type, antiviral 1, tv-2

To reveal any correlation between the expression profiles of desmoid tumours and FAP adenomas, the data from each group were compared. In the upper dendrogram (Figure 2) it can be seen that all the FAP adenomas cluster in the same group. The desmoid tumours and the normal fibroblast cell line clustered in an entirely different group to the FAP samples. The FAP adenomas and the normal colon have distinct gene profiles compared to the desmoid tumours and the normal fibroblasts. Within the FAP adenomas, the stomach adenoma and the normal colon have slightly different gene profiles compared to the colorectal adenomas.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Cluster analysis of FAP polyps, normal colon, desmoid tumours and normal fibroblasts. The columns represent the gene expression profiles of each sample. Green – low expression level, yellow – medium expression level, red -high expression level. The relationships between each sample are shown by the upper dendrogram. The colouring in the upper dendrogram represents the sample type: green (left) – normal colon; blue – colorectal FAP polyps; orange – stomach FAP polyp; green (right) – desmoid tumours; purple – fibroblast cell line. 1 – Normal Colon Duplicate; 2 – Normal Colon Duplicate; 3 – Colorectal FAP Polyp A Duplicate; 4 – Colorectal FAP Polyp A Duplicate; 5 – Colorectal FAP Polyp D Duplicate; 6 – Colorectal FAP Polyp D Duplicate; 7 – Colorectal FAP Polyp B Duplicate; 8 – Colorectal FAP Polyp B Duplicate; 9 – Colorectal FAP Polyp C Duplicate; 10 – Colorectal FAP Polyp C Duplicate; 11 – Stomach FAP Polyp D Duplicate; 12 – Stomach FAP Polyp D Duplicate; 13 – Desmoid Tumour A Duplicate; 14 – Desmoid Tumour A Duplicate; 15 – Desmoid Tumour C Duplicate; 16 – Desmoid Tumour C Duplicate; 17 – Fibroblast Cell Line Duplicate; 18 – Fibroblast Cell Line Duplicate.

Discussion

In this study, 24 K Illumina HumRef-8 BeadArrays were used to compare gene expression of FAP adenomas, desmoid tumours and normal fibroblasts. To date there have been a number of small scale gene expression studies on FAP adenoma tissue, the vast majority of which have employed immunohistochemistry (IHC). Most of these studies have been performed on individual genes that include E-cadhein, α-, β- and -catenin, COX-1, COX-2, and c-myc [20-25]. In addition, one study used semi-quantitative RT-PCR to study GKLF [26]. The only report examining global gene expression in human FAP adenoma tissue identified 84 differentially expressed genes in adenomas compared to normal colon tissue [27].

In this study, the gene expression profiles obtained from the FAP adenomas indicate that colorectal adenomas are similar but distinctly different to the stomach adenomas. There were a large number of commonly expressed genes identified across the colorectal FAP adenomas, but when the differentially expressed genes from the stomach adenoma were included in the analysis the number of commonly expressed genes decreased dramatically. The genes that were differentially expressed in the four colonic adenomas and one stomach adenoma were investigated more closely in an attempt to identify common genetic features in FAP. From this analysis genes involved in the cell cycle, transcription and metabolism were the most frequently up-regulated. The most frequently down-regulated genes included those involved in metabolism, cell adhesion, signal transduction, transcription and transport. Since adenomas develop due to a breakdown in the fidelity of the Wnt signalling pathway it was not surprising to observe the over-expression of genes involved in cell cycle progression.

Altered Expression of Wnt/β-catenin Target Genes in Colorectal FAP Adenomas

It has been long established that deregulation of the Wnt signalling pathway due to APC mutations plays a major role in the progression of FAP [5]. The Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway is involved in the control of expression of Sox9, PTTG1 and EphB2, all of which were found to be up-regulated by more than 2-fold in all the colorectal FAP adenomas compared to the normal colon.

PTTG1 is regulated by a TCF binding sequence in its promoter region [28]. The normal function of PTTG1 is to regulate chromosome segregation during cell division [29]. Over-expression of PTTG1 has been reported frequently in various types of cancer, including colorectal, and has been associated with angiogenesis [30-32]. The role of PTTG1 in angiogenesis is thought to be a result of its part in mediating the secretion of the basic fibroblast growth factor into the extracellular matrix, which promotes proliferation and migration of colorectal cancer cells [30,31].

The Sox9 gene encodes a transcription factor that is required for chondrogenesis and male gonad development [32], which is under the control of the Wnt signalling pathway [33]. The expression of the Sox9 gene in the intestine is dependent on the activity of the β-catenin/TCF-4 complex, although it is unknown whether this complex interacts directly with the Sox9 promoter or through another of its targets [33].

The EphB2 gene encodes the Eph receptor B, which has been shown to be a target of the Wnt signalling pathway [34]. There is evidence to suggest that normal patterning in the epithelium of the intestinal crypts is coordinated by EphB2 and its ligand, ephrin B [34]. Over-expression of EphB2 is often found in colorectal cancers, but there is confusion about its role in tumourigenesis. Many studies on other tumours have reported EphB2 over-expression as a marker of poor prognosis, but recent studies in colorectal cancer have suggested otherwise [35,36].

Altered Expression of Cell Cycle-Related Genes in Colorectal FAP Adenomas

A number of genes found to be commonly up-regulated in the adenomas used in this study have previously been reported as being over-expressed in various types of cancers. These genes include the cell cycle-related genes Chromosome condensation protein G (HCAP-G), Protein regulator of cytokinesis 1 (PRC1), SMC4 structural maintenance of chromosome 4-like 1 (SMC4L1) and Cyclin B2 (CCNB2) [37-39]. Although these genes are associated with tumour development none have been thoroughly characterized in FAP to date.

Altered Gene Expression in Desmoid Tumours

A limited number of gene expression studies have been performed on desmoid tumours, primarily due to the difficulties in obtaining tissue. Two reports have studied gene expression in desmoid disease using 6.8 K, 19 K and 33 K Affymetrix microarrays [40,41]. Skubitz and Skubitz (2004) [40] reported that ADAM12, WISP-1, Sox-11 and fibroblast activation protein-a are uniquely expressed in desmoids. Denys et al. (2004) identified 69 differentially expressed genes in desmoid tumour tissue compared to normal fibroblasts, before focusing on the down-regulation of IGFBP-6 [41].

A number of genes that were identified as being differentially expressed in desmoid tumours in this study have been reported previously. The over-expressed genes include transforming growth factor β3 (TGFβ3), a distintegrin and metalloproteinase domain 19 (ADAM19), chimerin 1 (CHN1), and ephrin-B3 (EFNB3) [40,41]. The under-expressed genes include quiescin Q6 (QSCN6), prostaglandin I2 synthase (PTGIS), proenkephalin (PENK), keratin 18 (KRT18), cytokine receptor-like factor 1 (CRLF1), pentaxin-related gene (PTX3) and endoglin (ENG) [41].

Ephrin-B3, a Wnt Target Overexpressed in Desmoid Tumours

The known Wnt/β-catenin target gene ephrin-B3 [42] has been found in this study to be up-regulated more than 2-fold in desmoid tumours compared to normal fibroblasts. The ephrins are ligands for the EPH receptor family, whose normal function is to organize cell patterning in the intestinal crypts [34]. In addition, more recent observations suggest that ephrins are tumour suppressors, although the mechanism by which this is affected remains to be clarified [3,43,44]. Further investigation into the precise role of ephrin-B3 is required before any conclusions can be made regarding its role in desmoid disease.

Wound Healing-Associated Genes Differentially Expressed in Desmoid Tumours

Two genes, transforming growth factor β-3 (TGFβ3) and pleiotrophin (PTN), were found to be differentially expressed in desmoid tumours. Both genes are associated with wound healing and could potentially explain the growth advantage of desmoid tumours [45].

TGFβ3 is a multifunctional protein, having roles in cell proliferation and differentiation during embryogenesis and wound healing [46]. Pleiotrophin has been reported to be strongly expressed in many human cancers, and is thought to promote malignant transformation and angiogenesis [47]. It is also frequently found to be up-regulated during the wound healing process [48].

In this study, three genes associated with negative regulation of the wound response have been identified as being under-expressed in desmoid tumours. The three genes are: signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1), mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 3 (MADH3 or Smad3) and mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 6 (MADH6 or Smad6). STAT1 enhances transcription in response to interferon-, an action which has been shown to inhibit the wound healing response by preventing phosphorylation of Smad2 and Smad3 [49]. This in turn inhibits the action of TGFβ on the wound response [50]. The role of Smad3 in the wound response is not entirely understood; however, the absence of Smad3 causes an accelerated healing response, even though its over-expression has also been shown to promote healing [51,52]. Smad6 is a known inhibitor of TGFβ, and has shown to be down-regulated in keloids [53].

The abundance of wound response-related genes found to be deregulated in the desmoid tumours in this study adds to the notion that desmoid formation is an abnormal wound response. The finding of over-expressed genes involved in fibroblast proliferation and migration could explain the abnormal proliferation and local invasiveness of desmoid tumours. The down-regulation of angiogenesis-associated genes could account for the poor vascularisation of desmoids.

The limiting factor in this study of desmoid tumours is the small number of desmoids available. In order to reach more conclusions regarding the exact molecular nature of desmoids and their growth mechanisms, a much larger sample size would be required.

Comparison of FAP Adenoma and Desmoid Tumour Molecular Profiles

It has long been recognized that desmoid tumours occur with a much higher frequency in FAP patients than in the general population. The apparent role of aberrant Wnt signalling in both diseases could indicate a molecular similarity between the two. Although Wnt target genes were identified as being up-regulated in both tumour types in this study, the specific genes were different in the two groups. The finding of different Wnt targets could be attributed to the use of different control groups for the FAP adenomas and desmoid tumours. Nevertheless, the molecular profiles obtained using cluster analysis clearly demonstrated that FAP adenomas and desmoid tumours display distinctly different gene expression profiles.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by funds from the NBN Childhood Cancer Research Group, the University of Newcastle, the Clive and Vera Ramaciotti Centre for Gene Function Analysis, and the Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI).

References

  1. Ponz de Leon M, Roncucci L. The cause of colorectal cancer. Dig Liver Dis. 2000;32:426–439. doi: 10.1016/S1590-8658(00)80265-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sieber OM, Tomlinson IP, Lamlum H. The adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) tumour suppressor – genetics, function and disease. Mol Med Today. 2000;6:462–469. doi: 10.1016/S1357-4310(00)01828-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Giardiello F, Brensinger J, Petersen G. AGA technical review on hereditary colorectal cancer and genetic testing. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:198–213. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.25581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eccles DM, Luijt R van der, Breukel C, Bullman H, Bunyan D, Fisher A, Barber J, du Boulay C, Primrose J, Burn J, Fodde R. Hereditary desmoid disease due to a frameshift mutation at codon 1924 of the APC gene. Am J Hum Genet. 1996;59:1193–1201. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonk T, Humeny A, Sutter C, Gebert J, von Knebel Doeberitz M, Becker C-M. Molecular diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP): genotyping of adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) alleles by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Clin Biochem. 2002;35:87–92. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9120(02)00279-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Preston SL, Wong WM, Chan AO, Poulsom R, Jeffery R, Goodlad RA, Mandir N, Elia G, Novelli M, Bodmer WF, Tomlinson IP, Wright NA. Bottom-up histogenesis of colorectal adenomas: origin in the monocryptal adenoma and initial expansion by crypt fission. Cancer Res. 2003;63:3819–3825. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cruz-Correa M, Giardiello FM. Familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:885–894. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(03)02336-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Leslie A, Carey FA, Pratt NR, Steele RJ. The colorectal adenoma–carcinoma sequence. Br J Surg. 2002;89:845–860. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02120.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Scates D, Clark S, Phillips R, Venitt S. Lack of telomerase in desmoids occurring sporadically and in association with familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg. 1998;85:965–969. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00720.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Reitamo J, Scheinin T, Hayry P. The desmoid syndrome. New aspects in the cause, pathogenesis and treatment of the desmoid tumor. Am J Surg. 1986;151:230–237. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90076-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shields C, Winter D, Kirwan W, Redmond H. Desmoid Tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27:701–706. doi: 10.1053/ejso.2001.1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheon SS, Cheah AY, Turley S, Nadesan P, Poon R, Clevers H, Alman BA. beta-Catenin stabilization dysregulates mesenchymal cell proliferation, motility, and invasiveness and causes aggressive fibromatosis and hyperplastic cutaneous wounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:6973–6978. doi: 10.1073/pnas.102657399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brueckl WM, Ballhausen WG, Fortsch T, Gunther K, Fiedler W, Gentner B, Croner R, Boxberger F, Kirchner T, Hahn EG, Hohenberger W, Wein A. Genetic testing for germline mutations of the APC gene in patients with apparently sporadic desmoid tumors but a family history of colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1275–1281. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0949-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Couture J, Mitri A, Lagace R, Smits R, Berk T, Bouchard HL, Fodde R, Alman B, Bapat B. A germline mutation at the extreme 3' end of the APC gene results in a severe desmoid phenotype and is associated with overexpression of beta-catenin in the desmoid tumor. Clin Genet. 2000;57:205–212. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.570306.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Alman BA, Li C, Pajerski ME, Diaz-Cano S, Wolfe HJ. Increased beta-catenin protein and somatic APC mutations in sporadic aggressive fibromatoses (desmoid tumors) Am J Pathol. 1997;151:329–334. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cole KA, Krizman DB, Emmert-Buck MR. The genetics of cancer – a 3D model. Nat Genet. 1999;21(1 Suppl):38–41. doi: 10.1038/4466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bucca G, Carruba G, Saetta A, Muti P, Castagnetta L, Smith CP. Gene expression profiling of human cancers. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1028:28–37. doi: 10.1196/annals.1322.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Golub TR, Slonim DK, Tamayo P, Huard C, Gaasenbeek M, Mesirov JP, Coller H, Loh ML, Downing JR, Caligiuri MA, Bloomfield CD, Lander ES. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science. 1999;286:531–537. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5439.531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lin Y-M, Furukawa Y, Tsunoda T, Yue C-T, Yang K-C, Nakamura Y. Molecular diagnosis of colorectal tumors by expression profiles of 50 genes expressed differentially in adenomas and carcinomas. Oncogene. 2002;21:4120–4128. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Azumaya M, Kobayashi M, Ajioka Y, Honma T, Suzuki Y, Takeuchi M, Narisawa R, Asakura H. Size-dependent expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in sporadic colorectal polyps relative to adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Pathol Int. 2002;52:272–276. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1827.2002.01350.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Brabletz T, Herrmann K, Jung A, Faller G, Kirchner T. Expression of nuclear beta-Catenin and c-myc is correlated with tumor size but not with proliferative activity of colorectal adenomas. Am J Pathol. 2000;156:865–870. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64955-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Brosens LA, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Keller JJ, Hustinx SR, Carvalho R, Morsink FH, Hylind LM, Offerhaus GJ, Giardiello FM, Goggins M. Increased cyclooxygenase-2 expression in duodenal compared with colonic tissues in familial adenomatous polyposis and relationship to the -765G -> C COX-2 polymorphism. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:4090–4096. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. El-Bahrawy MA, Talbot IC, Poulsom R, Jeffery R, Alison MR. The expression of E-cadherin and catenins in colorectal tumours from familial adenomatous polyposis patients. J Pathol. 2002;198:69–76. doi: 10.1002/path.1168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jungck M, Grunhage F, Spengler U, Dernac A, Mathiak M, Caspari R, Friedl W, Sauerbruch T. E-cadherin expression is homogeneously reduced in adenoma from patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: an immunohistochemical study of E-cadherin, beta-catenin and cyclooxygenase-2 expression. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004;19:438–445. doi: 10.1007/s00384-003-0575-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Khan KN, Masferrer JL, Woerner BM, Soslow R, Koki AT. Enhanced cyclooxygenase-2 expression in sporadic and familial adenomatous polyposis of the human colon. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2001;36:865–869. doi: 10.1080/003655201750313405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dang DT, Bachman KE, Mahatan CS, Dang LH, Giardiello FM, Yang VW. Decreased expression of the gut-enriched Kruppel-like factor gene in intestinal adenomas of multiple intestinal neoplasia mice and in colonic adenomas of familial adenomatous polyposis patients. FEBS Lett. 2000;476:203–207. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01727-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Salahshor S, Goncalves J, Chetty R, Gallinger S, Woodgett JR. Differential gene expression profile reveals deregulation of pregnancy specific beta1 glycoprotein 9 early during colorectal carcinogenesis. BMC Cancer. 2005;5:66. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-5-66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hlubek F, Pfeiffer S, Budczies J, Spaderna S, Jung A, Kirchner T, Brabletz T. Securin (hPTTG1) expression is regulated by beta–catenin/TCF in human colorectal carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:1672–1677. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pfleghaar K, Heubes S, Cox J, Stemmann O, Speicher MR. Securin is not required for chromosomal stability in human cells. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Fujii T, Nomoto S, Koshikawa K, Yatabe Y, Teshigawara O, Mori T, Inoue S, Takeda S, Nakao A. Overexpression of pituitary tumor transforming gene 1 in HCC is associated with angiogenesis and poor prognosis. Hepatology. 2006;43:1267–1275. doi: 10.1002/hep.21181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Heaney AP, Singson R, McCabe CJ, Nelson V, Nakashima M, Melmed S. Expression of pituitary-tumour transforming gene in colorectal tumours. Lancet. 2000;355:716–719. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)10238-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Cho-Rok J, Yoo J, Jang YJ, Kim S, Chu IS, Yeom YI, Choi JY, Im DS. Adenovirus-mediated transfer of siRNA against PTTG1 inhibits liver cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Hepatology. 2006;43:1042–1052. doi: 10.1002/hep.21137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Drivdahl R, Haugk KH, Sprenger CC, Nelson PS, Tennant MK, Plymate SR. Suppression of growth and tumorigenicity in the prostate tumor cell line M12 by overexpression of the transcription factor SOX9. Oncogene. 2004;23:4584–4593. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Blache P, Wetering M van de, Duluc I, Domon C, Berta P, Freund JN, Clevers H, Jay P. SOX9 is an intestine crypt transcription factor, is regulated by the Wnt pathway, and represses the CDX2 and MUC2 genes. J Cell Biol. 2004;166:37–47. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200311021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Batlle E, Henderson JT, Beghtel H, Born MM van den, Sancho E, Huls G, Meeldijk J, Robertson J, Wetering M van de, Pawson T, Clevers H. Beta-catenin and TCF mediate cell positioning in the intestinal epithelium by controlling the expression of EphB/ephrinB. Cell. 2002;111:251–263. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01015-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nakada M, Niska J, Miyamori H, McDonough WS, Wu J, Sato H, Berens ME. The phosphorylation of EphB2 receptor regulates migration and invasion of human glioma cells. Cancer Res. 2004;64:3179–3185. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wu Q, Suo Z, Risberg B, Karlsson MG, Villman K, Nesland JM. Expression of Ephb2 and Ephb4 in breast carcinoma. Pathol Oncol Res. 2004;10:26–33. doi: 10.1007/BF02893405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jager D, Stockert E, Jager E, Gure AO, Scanlan MJ, Knuth A, Old LJ, Chen YT. Serological cloning of a melanocyte rab guanosine 5'-triphosphate-binding protein and a chromosome condensation protein from a melanoma complementary DNA library. Cancer Res. 2000;60:3584–3591. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Li C, Lin M, Liu J. Identification of PRC1 as the p53 target gene uncovers a novel function of p53 in the regulation of cytokinesis. Oncogene. 2004;23:9336–9347. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sarafan-Vasseur N, Lamy A, Bourguignon J, Le Pessot F, Hieter P, Sesboue R, Bastard C, Frebourg T, Flaman JM. Overexpression of B-type cyclins alters chromosomal segregation. Oncogene. 2002;21:2051–2057. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Skubitz KM, Skubitz AP. Gene expression in aggressive fibromatosis. J Lab Clin Med. 2004;143:89–98. doi: 10.1016/j.lab.2003.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Denys H, Jadidizadeh A, Amini Nik S, Van Dam K, Aerts S, Alman BA, Cassiman JJ, Tejpar S. Identification of IGFBP-6 as a significantly downregulated gene by beta-catenin in desmoid tumors. Oncogene. 2004;23:654–664. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Katoh Y, Katoh M. Comparative integromics on Ephrin family. Oncol Rep. 2006;15:1391–1395. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jubb AM, Zhong F, Bheddah S, Grabsch HI, Frantz GD, Mueller W, Kavi V, Quirke P, Polakis P, Koeppen H. EphB2 is a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:5181–5187. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Guo DL, Zhang J, Yuen ST, Tsui WY, Chan AS, Ho C, Ji J, Leung SY, Chen X. Reduced expression of EphB2 that parallels invasion and metastasis in colorectal tumours. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27:454–464. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgi259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lee CH, Bang SH, Lee SK, Song KY, Lee IC. Gene expression profiling reveals sequential changes in gastric tubular adenoma and carcinoma in situ. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:1937–1945. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i13.1937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Cox DA. Transforming growth factor-beta 3. Cell Biol Int. 1995;19:357–371. doi: 10.1006/cbir.1995.1082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Riegel AT, Wellstein A. The potential role of the heparin-binding growth factor pleiotrophin in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1994;31:309–314. doi: 10.1007/BF00666163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Christman KL, Fang Q, Kim AJ, Sievers RE, Fok HH, Candia AF, Colley KJ, Herradon G, Ezquerra L, Deuel TF, Lee RJ. Pleiotrophin induces formation of functional neovasculature in vivo. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;332:1146–1152. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.04.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. DaFonseca CJ, Shu F, Zhang JJ. Identification of two residues in MCM5 critical for the assembly of MCM complexes and Stat1-mediated transcription activation in response to IFN-gamma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:3034–3039. doi: 10.1073/pnas.061487598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. O'Kane S, Ferguson MW. Transforming growth factor beta s and wound healing. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1997;29:63–78. doi: 10.1016/S1357-2725(96)00120-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Falanga V, Schrayer D, Cha J, Butmarc J, Carson P, Roberts AB, Kim SJ. Full-thickness wounding of the mouse tail as a model for delayed wound healing: accelerated wound closure in Smad3 knock-out mice. Wound Repair Regen. 2004;12:320–326. doi: 10.1111/j.1067-1927.2004.012316.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sumiyoshi K, Nakao A, Setoguchi Y, Okumura K, Ogawa H. Exogenous Smad3 accelerates wound healing in a rabbit dermal ulcer model. J Invest Dermatol. 2004;123:229–236. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.22730.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Yu H, Bock O, Bayat A, Ferguson MW, Mrowietz U. Decreased expression of inhibitory SMAD6 and SMAD7 in keloid scarring. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:221–229. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES