Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 4.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2008;47(38):7358–7362. doi: 10.1002/anie.200802910

Enantioselective Synthesis of All-Carbon Quaternary Stereogenic Centers by Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Additions of Alkyl and Aryl Aluminum Reagents to Five-, Six-, and Seven-Membered-Ring β-Substituted Cyclic Enones**

Tricia L May 1, M Kevin Brown 1, Amir H Hoveyda 1,*
PMCID: PMC2737810  NIHMSID: NIHMS110606  PMID: 18683828

Catalytic asymmetric conjugate addition (ACA) reactions of carbon-based nucleophiles to β,β-disubstituted enones present an efficient approach to enantioselective synthesis of all-carbon quaternary stereogenic centers[1] that reside adjacent to synthetically versatile enolates [Eq. (1)]. In spite of recent advances involving catalytic ACA reactions of alkyl metal (mostly dialkyl zinc) reagents,[25] a number of critical short-comings remain unaddressed. One noteworthy challenge concerns transformations of β-substituted cyclopentenones, processes that are often less efficient[6, 7] (vs. reactions of larger rings) but can deliver products that may be used in enantioselective syntheses of a variety of biologically active natural products.[8] Previously reported approaches, involving zinc-based reagents, are only effective with five-memberedring substrates when the enone bears an additional activating substituent.[4] Additions of trialkyl aluminum reagents to β-substituted cyclopentenones catalyzed by chiral copper phosphoramidites have been shown to proceed in three cases. In only a single instance, however, is high selectivity observed (ACA with Et3Al; 96.5:3.5 e.r., 93% ee).[5a] Herein, we disclose an efficient set of protocols for catalytic ACA reactions of alkyl and aryl aluminum reagents with a range of unactivated β-substituted cyclic enones, including cyclopentenones. Reactions, promoted in the presence of a chiral bidentate N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) copper complex (5 mol%), are efficient (up to 97% yield) and highly selective (up to >99: <1 e.r., greater than 98% ee). In the case of transformations involving additions of aryl units, the requisite aluminum-based reagents are prepared in situ from commercially available dimethylaluminum chloride and the corresponding aryl lithium compounds.

graphic file with name nihms110606f2.jpg (1)

We began our investigations by examining the ability of NHC complexes 1–4 (Scheme 1), previously developed in our laboratories,[9] to promote ACA of trialkyl aluminum reagents to cyclic enones. As the main objective of these studies is reactions of β-substituted cyclopentenones, we selected 6a to serve as the representative substrate (Table 1). Our focus on aluminum-based reagents[10] is partly due to the higher reactivity as well as the significantly lower cost of this class of alkylating agents (vs. dialkyl zinc reagents).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Air-stable chiral NHC silver(I) complexes that serve as precursors to the corresponding copper-based catalysts.

Table 1.

Initial screening of various NHC silver(I) complexes.[a]

graphic file with name nihms110606t1.jpg

Entry NHC–AgI Conversion [%][b] e.r.[c] ee [%][c]
1 1 <2
2 2 <2
3 3 56 71.5:28.5 43
4 4 72 83.5:16.5 67
5 5 88 94.5:5.5 89
[a]

Reactions were performed under N2 atmosphere.

[b]

Conversions were determined by analysis of 400 MHz 1H NMR spectra of product mixtures prior to purification.

[c]

Enantiomeric ratios and excesses were determined by chiral gas–liquid chromatography (GLC) analysis; see the Supporting Information for details.

Through an initial screening study (Table 1), we established that the first two generations of aryloxide-containing NHC copper complexes derived from 1 and 2[9a–b] do not promote the reaction of Me3Al with 6a at −78°C (entries 1 and 2, Table 1).[11] In contrast, under identical conditions, the copper complex derived from NHC sulfonate 3[4b] generates 56% conversion, affording 7a in 43% ee (71.5:28.5 e.r., entry 3, Table 1). Deletion of one of the phenyl groups of the chiral NHC compound (complex 4, entry 4, Table 1), a previously utilized ligand alteration[9g] that we surmised would enhance the effective size of a less geometrically constrained mesityl substituent, improves enantioselectivity (83.5:16.5 e.r., 67% ee). To explore whether reaction efficiency and enantiopurity of products can be further enhanced, we prepared NHC–AgI complex 5, which carries the more sterically demanding diethylphenyl substituent (entry 5, Table 1). Copper-catalyzed ACA in the presence of 2.5 mol% 5 proceeds to 88% conversion to furnish 7a in 89% ee (94.5:5.5 e.r.; entry 5, Table 1).

In the presence of 2.5 mol% NHC–AgI complexes 35 and 5 mol% Cu(OTf)2, an assortment of β-substituted cyclopentenones undergo efficient ACA with three commercially available trialkyl aluminum reagents (Table 2). These catalytic transformations deliver the desired products in 86–97% ee (93:7–98.5:1.5 e.r.) and up to 97% yield after purification. Five-membered-ring enones that bear an alkyl (entries 1–7, Table 2), an alkynyl (entry 8, Table 2), an aryl (entry 9, Table 2), or a carboxylic ester (entry 10, Table 2) substituent can be used effectively. The reactions in entries 8 and 9 of Table 2 are particularly noteworthy: the derived ACA products represent β,β-disubstituted cyclopentanones that would be obtained from ACA with alkynyl (not yet reported) and aryl metal reagents (see below) to β-alkyl-substituted cyclic enones, respectively.

Table 2.

Catalytic ACA reactions of trialkyl aluminum reagents to cyclopentenones promoted by NHC copper complexes.[a]

graphic file with name nihms110606t2.jpg

Entry Substrate [R] (alkyl)3Al NHC–AgI T [°C] t [h] Yield [%][b] e.r.[c] ee [%][c]
1 6a [CH2CH2Ph] Me3Al 5 −78 24 71 94.5:5.5 89
2 6a [CH2CH2Ph] Et3Al 5 −78 4 97 96:4 92
3 6a [CH2CH2Ph] iBu3Al 5 −30 21 74 93.5:6.5 87
4 6b [nBu] Me3Al 5 −78 15 80 94:6 88
5 6b [nBu] Et3Al 4 −78 6 86 93:7 86
6 6c [Me] Et3Al 4 −78 4 97 98.5:1.5 97
7 6c [Me] iBu3Al 4 −30 15 83 94.5:5.5 89
8 6d [C≡C-nhep] Me3Al 5 −78 24 71[d] 95.5:4.5 91
9 6e [Ph] Et3Al 5 −78 15 87 98.2 96
10 6f [CO2Me] Et3Al 3 −78 6 76 94.5:5.5 89
[a]

Reactions were performed under N2 atmosphere; greater than 98% conversion in all cases.

[b]

Yields of isolated, purified products.

[c]

Determined by chiral GLC analysis; see the Supporting Information for details.

[d]

5 mol% NHC and 10 mol% Cu salt was used to ensure complete conversion.

Copper-catalyzed ACA of trialkyl aluminum reagents can be extended to larger size cyclic enones (Table 3). Thus, under the conditions described for the transformations in Table 2 (2.5 mol% NHC–AgI complex), β-substituted cyclohexenones 8a–8c (entries 1–3, Table 3) as well as seven-membered-ring enone 9a (entries 4–5, Table 3) are transformed to the corresponding β,β-disubstituted cyclohexanones or cycloheptanones efficiently (85–91% yield after purification) and with high enantioselectivity (91.5:8.5–95:5 e.r., 83–90% ee). It is noteworthy that, compared to the previously reported transformations involving bidentate NHC complex 2 and dialkyl zinc reagents (up to 15 mol% 2 required), the present method offers a more efficient approach to enantioselective synthesis of β,β-disubstituted cyclohexanones and cycloheptanones.[3g] Three additional points in connection with the data in Table 2 and Table 3 merit mention: 1) Although 5 is optimal for most processes, in certain cases, the related NHC–AgI complexes 3 and 4 deliver higher selectivity; such differences are, however, not significant (not more than 10% ee). 2) In some instances, ACA reactions proceed faster and deliver slightly higher enantioselectivity when performed at relatively elevated temperatures; the processes in entries 1 and 5 of Table 3 are notable in this regard. For example, ACA of β-substituted cycloheptenone 9a (entry 5, Table 3) proceeds to greater than 98% conversion at 22°C within fifteen minutes to afford the desired product in 89% ee (94.5:5.5 e.r.), whereas at −78°C, 12 h is required and the desired product is obtained in 85% ee (92.5:7.5 e.r.). 3) In the reaction shown in entry 1 of Table 3, involving iBu3Al and performed at 22°C, significant amounts of the [1,2]-hydride addition product (10–15%) is isolated when Cu(OTf)2 is used. When CuCl2·2H2O is used instead, the aforementioned byproduct is not observed (less than 2% by 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis), while 10a is generated with the same selectivity as obtained with Cu(OTf)2. It should be noted that for reactions carried out at −78°C, use of CuCl2·2H2O (along with a chiral NHC) leads to less than 10% conversion.

Table 3.

Catalytic ACA reactions of trialkyl aluminum reagents with cyclohexenones and cycloheptenones promoted by NHC copper complexes.[a]

graphic file with name nihms110606t3.jpg

Entry Substrate [R] (alkyl)3Al NHC–AgI T [°C] t [h] Yield [%][b] e.r.[c] ee [%][c]
1 [d] 8a [Me] iBu3Al 4 22 0.25 89 95:5 90
2 8b [5-hexenyl] Me3Al 5 −78 12 85 95:5 90
3 8c [CO2Me] Et3Al 3 −78 6 91 91.5:8.5 83
4 9a [nBu] Me3Al 5 −78 12 90 92.5:7.5 85
5 9a [nBu] Et3Al 5 22 0.25 87 94.5:5.5 89
[a–c]

See Table 2.

[d]

5 mol % CuCl2·2 H2O was used.

Next, we turned our attention towards developing a procedure for catalytic ACA of aryl-based aluminum reagents. Since only one triaryl aluminum compound[12] is commercially available (Ph3Al), and use of such reagents would not be particularly atom-economical, an alternative procedure that provides access to a wider range of aryl metal reagents is required. To address this problem, as shown in Table 4, we envisioned that reaction of a readily accessible aryl lithium reagent with a commercially available and inexpensive dialkyl aluminum halide, such as Me2AlCl, could lead to the formation of the corresponding dialkyl aryl aluminum species.[13] It is well-established that transfer of the sp2-hybridized carbon-based substituents of aluminum-based reagents is significantly more facile than of those that are sp3-hybridized.[9g] Accordingly, as illustrated in Table 4, treatment of phenyllithium with one equivalent of commercially available Me2AlCl in pentane (−78 to 22°C, 12 h) affords a solution of Me2PhAl containing LiCl, which can be used directly—without filtration or purification—in copper-catalyzed ACA reactions of β-substituted cyclic enones (e.g., cyclopentenone 6c and cyclohexenone 8a).

Table 4.

Synthesis and in situ use of aryl aluminum reagents in coppercatalyzed ACA.[a]

graphic file with name nihms110606t4.jpg

Entry NHC–AgI Substrate Conversion [%][b] e.r.[c] ee [%][c]
1 1 6c >98 68.5:31.5 37
2 2 6c >98 73.5:26.5 47
3 3 6c >98 50:50 <2
4 4 6c >98 34:66 −32
5 5 6c >98 46.5:53.5 −7
6 1 8a >98 64:36 28
7 2 8a >98 89:11 78
8 3 8a >98 38:62 −24
9 4 8a >98 26:74 −48
10 5 8a >98 42.5:57.5 −15
[a–c]

See Table 1. Three equivalents of the aluminum-based reagent were used.

Due to the substantially different nature of the aluminum-based reagent derived from phenyllithium (vs. trialkyl aluminum compounds),[3g] we decided to probe the ability of copper complexes derived from 1–5 in promoting the addition of the in situ generated reagent to 6c and 8a. As the results summarized in Table 4 indicate, reactions performed at 22°C in the presence of 2.5 mol% NHC–AgI complex 2 (entries 2 and 7, Table 4) furnish the highest degrees of asymmetric induction. When the catalytic ACA is carried out at −50°C (48 h; see entry 1, Table 5), 12c is obtained in 66% yield and 72% ee (86:14 e.r.).

Table 5.

Copper-catalyzed ACA of aryl aluminum reagents to β-substituted cyclic enones.[a]

graphic file with name nihms110606t5.jpg

Entry Substrate Ar T [°C] t [h] Yield [%][b] e.r.[c] ee [%][c]
1 6c C6H5 −50 48 66 86:14 72
2 6c oMeC6H4 −15 48 85 99:1 98
3 6c pOMeC6H4 −50 48 67 85.5:14.5 71
4 6c oOMeC6H4 −15 48 55 97.5:2.5 95
5 8a C6H5 −30 36 71 95:5 90
6 8a oMeC6H4 +4 42 49 98:2 96
7 8a pOMeC6H4 −50 36 61 92:8 84
8 8a pCF3C6H4 −30 36 52 93:7 86
9 8a oOMeC6H4 +4 48 60 88:12 83
[a–c]

See Table 2. [c] Determined by chiral GLC or HPLC analysis (see the Supporting Information for additional details).

As the additional data summarized in Table 5 illustrate, catalytic ACA with aryl aluminum reagents, generated in situ, can be performed on five- as well as six-membered β-substituted cyclic enones, affording the desired products in up to 98% ee (entry 2, Table 5). Examination of the findings depicted in Table 5 indicates that aryl lithium species bearing electron-donating (e.g., entries 3, 4, 7 and 9, Table 5) and electron-withdrawing (entry 8, Table 5) substituents can be used effectively.[14] Enantioselectivities appear to be highest, however, when the aryl unit is sterically more encumbered (i.e., carries an ortho group: entries 2, 4, and 6, Table 5). Two additional points are noteworthy: 1) All aryl lithium reagents (except for commercially available PhLi) were easily obtained by treatment of commercially available aryl bromides with nBuLi.[15] 2) Not only can the aryl aluminum reagents be used directly (without removal of LiCl),[16] the solution generated from reaction of aryl lithium compounds with Me2AlCl can be stored under N2 for more than two months and used in catalytic ACA reactions without any noticeable diminution in efficiency or enantioselectivity.

The catalytic ACA reactions of β-substituted cyclopente-nones outlined herein put forth an additional example of the ability of bidentate NHC metal complexes in promoting processes that are not effectively initiated by alternative catalytic systems.[4b,9d, f] We demonstrate that this recently developed class of chiral carbenes, prepared in five or six steps,[17] can be structurally modified for achieving optimal results (e.g., 3–5).[18] Although the transformations involving cyclohexenones and cycloheptenones (i.e., Table 3), in some cases, are slightly less selective than those performed in the presence of other catalysts,[3c,5b] the present approach is more general, since it offers an effective solution to the important problem of ACA of five-membered-ring substrates. The protocols presented are attractive from the practical point of view, as they require the use of inexpensive and/or readily available trialkyl aluminum reagents, aryl halides, or dialkyl aluminum chlorides. In the case of ACA reactions of aryl aluminum reagents, the requisite aryl metal reagent is conveniently prepared and used in situ. The above attributes render the catalytic enantioselective methods presented herein of significant potential utility in enantioselective chemical synthesis.[19] Development of additional catalytic asymmetric protocols involving aluminum-based reagents and application of the present processes to the total synthesis of complex molecule natural products are among the objectives being pursued in our laboratories.

Footnotes

**

The NIH (GM-47480) and the NSF (CHE-0715138) provided financial support. T.L.M. is grateful for LaMattina and Novartis graduate fellowships; M.K.B. was the recipient of a Bristol-Myers Squibb graduate fellowship. Mass spectrometry facilities at Boston College are supported by the NSF (CHE-0619576).

Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.200802910.

References

  • 1.Christophers J, Baro A, editors. Quaternary Stereocenters: Challenges and Solutions for Organic Synthesis. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.a) Krause N, Hoffmann-Röder A. Synthesis. 2001:171–196. [Google Scholar]; b) Alexakis A, Benhaim C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002:3221–3236. [Google Scholar]; c) Feringa BL, Naasz R, Imbos R, Arnold LA. In: Modern Organocopper Chemistry. Krause N, editor. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2002. pp. 224–258. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.For previous studies regarding catalytic ACA reactions that furnish all-carbon quaternary stereogenic centers, see:Wu J, Mampreian DM, Hoveyda AH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:4584–4585. doi: 10.1021/ja050800f.Hird AW, Hoveyda AH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:14988–14989. doi: 10.1021/ja0553811.d’Augustin M, Palais L, Alexakis A. Angew. Chem. 2005;117:1400–1402. doi: 10.1002/anie.200462137. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1376 – 1378.Mauleón P, Carretero JC. Chem. Commun. 2005:4961–4963. doi: 10.1039/b508142d.Fillion E, Wilsily A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:2774–2775. doi: 10.1021/ja056692e.Shintani R, Duan W-L, Hayashi T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:5628–5629. doi: 10.1021/ja061430d.Lee K-s, Brown MK, Hird AW, Hoveyda AH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:7182–7184. doi: 10.1021/ja062061o.Martin D, Kehrli S, d’Augustin M, Clavier H, Mauduit M, Alexakis A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:8416–8417. doi: 10.1021/ja0629920.Matsumoto Y, Yamada K-i, Tomioka K. J. Org. Chem. 2008;73:4578–4581. doi: 10.1021/jo800613h.Wilsily A, Fillion E. Org. Lett. 2008;10:2801–2804. doi: 10.1021/ol800923q.
  • 4.a) Ref. [3b]Brown MK, May TL, Baxter CA, Hoveyda AH. Angew. Chem. 2007;119:1115–1118. doi: 10.1002/anie.200604511. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1097 – 1100.
  • 5.a) Vuagnoux-d’Augustin M, Kehrli S, Alexakis A. Synlett. 2007:2057–2060. [Google Scholar]; b) Vuagnoux-d’Augustin M, Alexakis A. Chem. Eur. J. 2007;13:9647–9662. doi: 10.1002/chem.200701001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Catalytic ACA reactions to cyclopentenones are more challenging than other classes of cyclic enones. For example, see:Escher IH, Pfaltz A. Tetrahedron. 2000;56:2879–2888.Degrado SJ, Mizutani H, Hoveyda AH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:755–756. doi: 10.1021/ja003698p.Liang L, Au-Yeung TT-L, Chan ASC. Org. Lett. 2002;4:3799–3801. doi: 10.1021/ol026581+.
  • 7.For catalytic ACA reactions with cyclic enones where reactions of cyclopentenones are either not discussed or reported to be highly inefficient, see: a) Ref. [3c]; b) Ref. [3g]; c) Ref. [3h]; d) Ref. [3i].
  • 8.For representative examples of natural products bearing a β,β-disubstituted cyclopentanone or related derivatives, see:Chetty GL, Dev S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1964;5:73–77.Segawa M, Enoki N, Ikura M, Hikichi K, Ishida R, Shirahama H, Matsumoto T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987;28:3703–3704.Su J, Zhong Y, Shi K, Cheng Q, Snyder JK, Hu S, Huang Y. J. Org. Chem. 1991;56:2337–2344.Brady SF, Singh MP, Janso JE, Clardy J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:2116–2117.
  • 9.Larsen AO, Leu W, Nieto-Oberhuber C, Campbell JE, Hoveyda AH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:11130–11131. doi: 10.1021/ja046245j.Van Veldhuizen JJ, Campbell JE, Giudici RE, Hoveyda AH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:6877–6882. doi: 10.1021/ja050179j.Lee Y, Hoveyda AH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:15604–15605. doi: 10.1021/ja067456m.Gillingham DG, Hoveyda AH. Angew. Chem. 2007;119:3934–3938. doi: 10.1002/anie.200700501. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3860 – 3864.e) Ref. [3g];Kacprzynski MA, May TL, Kazane SA, Hoveyda ah. Angew. Chem. 2007;119:4638–4642. doi: 10.1002/anie.200700841. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4554 – 4558;Lee Y, Akiyama K, Gillingham DG, Brown MK, Hoveyda AH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:446–447. doi: 10.1021/ja0782192.
  • 10.For a recent review on 1,2-and 1,4-additions with aluminum-based reagents, see:von Zezschwitz P. Synthesis. 2008:1809–1831.
  • 11.Screening of various Cu salts indicates that Cu(OTf)2 and (CuOTf)2·C6H6 are generally most effective for this class of ACA reactions. We selected Cu(OTf)2 as it is commercially available and reaction outcomes promoted by this copper source tend to be completely reproducible. Further details will be provided in the full account of this work.
  • 12.For catalytic asymmetric reactions involving (aryl)3Al reagents, see:Wu K-H, Gau H-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:14808–14809. doi: 10.1021/ja062080y.Chen C-A, Wu K-H, Gau H-M. Angew. Chem. 2007;119:5469–5472. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5373 – 5376.
  • 13.For previous reports regarding preparation of dialkyl aryl aluminum reagents, see:Belgardt NA, Storre J, Roesky HW, Noltemeyer M, Schmidt H-G. Inorg. Chem. 1995;34:3821–3822.Bumagin NA, Ponomaryov AB, Beletskaya IP. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985;26:4819–4822.Lu BZ, Jin F, Zhang Y, Wu X, Wald SA, Senanayake CH. Org. Lett. 2005;7:1465–1468. doi: 10.1021/ol0501020.For a catalytic asymmetric reaction involving Me2(aryl)Al reagents, see:Siewert J, Sandmann R, von Zezschwitz P. Angew. Chem. 2007;119:7252–7254. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701087. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7122 – 7124.
  • 14.The somewhat moderate yields for the reactions in Table 5, which are in spite of conversions greater than 98%, are partly due to difficulties associated with removal of biphenyl formed in the course of the transformation. Modified procedures that address this complication are under development.
  • 15.See the Supporting Information for additional details.
  • 16.Control experiments involving filtered solutions of aryl aluminum reagents or those where excess LiCl is added to the mixture indicate that the presence of LiCl does not have any favorable or deleterious effects on the catalytic ACA reactions when chiral complex derived from 2 is used
  • 17.NHC–AgI complexes 4 and 5 are not yet commercially available but can be prepared on a multigram scale in six steps from commercially available tert-butoxycarbonylphenylglycinol (ca. 20% overall yield of isolated product). See the Supporting Information for experimental and spectral details. In our experience, the required sequences do not require any significant experimental expertise. It should be noted that NHC complex 3 has already been used in a key step at an early stage of a complex-molecule total synthesis:Peese KM, Gin DY. Chem. Eur. J. 2007;14:1645–1665.
  • 18.For a general discussion regarding the significance of the ease of structural modification of chiral catalysts to achieving optimal results, see:Hoveyda AH, Hird AW, Kacprzynski MA. Chem. Commun. 2004:1779–1785. doi: 10.1039/b401123f.
  • 19.Studies involving vinylaluminum reagents (derived from reaction of diisobutylaluminum hydride (dibal-H) with terminal alkynes; cf. Ref. [9g];) indicate that this class of reactions requires the development of more effective NHC-based catalyst systems.

RESOURCES