Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2009 Jun 29;53(9):3992–3995. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01597-08

Vancomycin and Daptomycin Pharmacodynamics Differ against a Site-Directed Staphylococcus epidermidis Mutant Displaying the Small-Colony-Variant Phenotype

Marina Wu 1, Christof von Eiff 3, Nahed Al Laham 3, Brian T Tsuji 1,2,4,*
PMCID: PMC2737885  PMID: 19564372

Abstract

Catheter-related bloodstream infections due to slow-growing Staphylococcus epidermidis small-colony variants (SCVs) are extremely difficult to treat. Daptomycin and vancomycin pharmacodynamics were evaluated against a site-directed hemB mutant of S. epidermidis displaying the SCV phenotype and compared to that of the parental strain. The maximal killing effect decreased by 7.7-fold for vancomycin and 1.5-fold for daptomycin against the SCV mutant and were well characterized by a Hill-type mathematical model (R2 > 0.97).


Staphylococcus epidermidis is the most common pathogen involved in catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) (8). Clinical experience demonstrates that agents with proven in vitro activity are often unable to cure these infections when infected-device salvage is attempted. The persistent and often recurrent course of device-associated infections has been linked, in part, to the ability of S. epidermidis to establish adherent, multilayered biofilms on surfaces of inserted or implanted foreign bodies (15-17). In addition, infections caused by these pathogens are extremely difficult to treat due to the emergence of multidrug resistance and reduced susceptibility to vancomycin (5, 8).

A number of recurrent foreign-body-associated infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococcal small-colony variants (SCVs), including several pacemaker-related infections, have been described (2, 9, 13, 16). Reduced susceptibility and tolerance to a variety of antimicrobials, including aminoglycosides, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin, have been described and may complicate management of infections due to phenotypic variants. While antibiotic killing activity and pharmacodynamic parameters have been studied in detail for Staphylococcus aureus SCVs (3, 9, 12), data on such phenotypic variants of Staphylococcus epidermidis are missing. Since SCVs recovered from clinical specimens have been genetically undefined and exhibit a high rate of reversion to the large-colony form, a clinically derived, site-directed S. epidermidis mutant was constructed by interrupting one of the hemin-biosynthetic genes, hemB, in S. epidermidis by inserting an ermB cassette into hemB (1). Therefore, this S. epidermidis mutant along with the corresponding parent strain with normal phenotype was utilized as a tool to compare vancomycin and daptomycin pharmacodynamic parameters.

The bacterial strains utilized in this study were S. epidermidis O-47 and its respective hemB mutant O-47 hemB::ermB, which exhibits a stable SCV phenotype (1, 6). The construction of the mutant and its characteristics were previously described (1). Analytical-grade daptomycin powder was obtained from Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Lexington, MA. Analytical-grade vancomycin powder was obtained from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO. Fresh working solutions of daptomycin and vancomycin were made prior to each experimental run. Mueller-Hinton broth (Difco, Detroit, MI) supplemented with 25 mg/liter calcium and 12.5 mg/liter magnesium was utilized for all experiments involving vancomycin; Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with 50 mg/liter calcium and 12.5 mg/liter magnesium was utilized for all experiments involving daptomycin. MICs were determined by quadruplicate broth microdilution techniques in accordance with standards of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (4). Time-kill experiments were performed as previously described (12). The following concentrations for daptomycin and vancomycin were evaluated: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128 mg/liter against a starting inoculum of S. epidermidis of approximately 107 CFU/ml. Samples were withdrawn for determination of bacterial counts at 0, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h. All time experiments were completed in duplicate.

An integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic area measure (log ratio area) was applied to all CFU data as previously described (13), using equation 1. The traditional approach (log ratio change) was also used (equation 2). See reference 13 for more details.

graphic file with name M1.gif (1)
graphic file with name M2.gif (2)

A four-parameter concentration-effect Hill-type model was fit to the effect parameter using Systat (version 12; Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA) as previously described (12) and equation 3.

graphic file with name M3.gif (3)

AU CFUdrug is the number of CFU of the culture with drug (in arbitrary units), AU CFUgrowth control is the number of CFU of the culture with controlled growth, the dependent variable (E) is either the log ratio area or the log ratio change, E0 is the measured effect at a zero drug concentration, Emax is the maximal effect, C is the concentration of drug, EC50 is the concentration for which there is a 50% maximal effect, and H is the Hill or sigmoidicity constant.

Against S. epidermidis strain O-47 and its hemB mutant, which displays the SCV phenotype, the MICs of vancomycin were 2.0 and 4.0 mg/liter and of daptomycin were 0.25 and 0.25 mg/liter, respectively. The antibacterial activities and pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and daptomycin against the O-47 strain and the hemB mutant are displayed in Fig. 1. Vancomycin achieved bactericidal activity against the parent strain with a normal phenotype at concentrations of >4 mg/liter, which occurred at 24 h. At higher concentrations, vancomycin demonstrated concentration-independent killing, with apparent thresholds of 4 and 8 mg/liter, after which increases in drug concentration did not result in subsequent increases in killing activity. Daptomycin displayed bactericidal activity against the parent strain at concentrations of >2 mg/liter. However, with daptomycin, a greater concentration-dependent trend was observed, with increasing concentrations resulting in greater reduction in bacterial colonies. In contrast, vancomycin achieved little activity against the hemB mutant, which displayed the SCV phenotype, even at a concentration of 128 mg/liter, with maximal reductions of less than 1 log in bacterial counts after 24 h. However, for daptomycin, although early killing of the mutant was attenuated, with concentrations of >16 mg/liter achieving bactericidal activity by 8 h, all concentrations of >4 mg/liter were able to achieve bactericidal activity at 24 h.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Vancomycin (Vanco) and daptomycin (Dapto) time-kill experiments evaluating their bactericidal activities versus the S. epidermidis strain O-47, displaying the normal phenotype (N), and the corresponding hemB mutant, displaying the SCV phenotype (SCV). (A) Vancomycin versus O-47; (B) vancomycin versus the hemB mutant; (C) daptomycin versus O-47; (D) daptomycin versus the hemB mutant. The pharmacodynamic relationships between concentration (mg/liter) and log ratio change for vancomycin versus O-47 (E), vancomycin versus the hemB mutant (F), daptomycin versus O-47 (G), and daptomycin versus the hemB mutant (H) and the log ratio areas for vancomycin versus O-47 (I), vancomycin versus the hemB mutant (J), daptomycin versus O-47 (K), and daptomycin versus the hemB mutant (L) are shown.

Model-fitted parameter estimates for vancomycin and daptomycin against both strains are shown in Table 1. Model fits for the Hill-type model to the data were excellent, with all coefficients of determination (R2) being >0.97. There was a difference in the pharmacodynamic activities of both drugs against the strains with the two different phenotypes, with the Emax and EC50 of vancomycin and daptomycin decreasing for the mutant with the SCV phenotype. Additionally, there was a greater discrepancy for Emax between vancomycin and daptomycin when S. epidermis displaying the SCV phenotype was compared to the normal phenotype: the vancomycin Emax for the strain with the SCV phenotype was approximately 7.7 times lower than that for the strain with the normal phenotype, and the daptomycin Emax was 1.5 times lower (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Pharmacodynamic-model-fitted parameter estimates for vancomycin and daptomycin versus S. epidermidis strainsa

Agent Strain Log ratio area
Log ratio change
E0 Emax H EC50 R2 E0 Emax H EC50 R2
Vancomycin O-47 −0.0134 (0.0204) 2.91 (0.0258) 16.3 (>100) 3.45 (4.59) 0.999 2.20 (0.104) 5.84 (0.142) 17.2 (>100) 3.94 (17.9) 0.998
hemB mutant −0.0000313 (0.0695) 0.379 (0.0743) 18.8 (>100) 0.526 (71.7) 0.976 −0.263 (0.133) 0.531 (0.143) 27.2 (>100) 0.502 (>100) 0.981
Daptomycin O-47 −0.146 (0.0477) 3.16 (0.0605) 8.20 (1.83) 2.54 (0.145) 0.999 2.00 (0.109) 6.98 (0.137) 10.6 (2.66) 2.76 (0.235) 0.999
hemB mutant 0.0674 (0.0675) 1.99 (0.0865) 1.48 (0.167) 2.21 (0.192) 0.999 0.883 (0.364) 7.76 (0.552) 1.54 (0.307) 4.55 (0.645) 0.994
a

Data are reported as maximum likelihood parameter estimates (percent standard errors are shown in parentheses). Emax is expressed in log10 CFU/ml.

While current guidelines for the management of S. epidermidis CRBSIs continue to recommend the use of vancomycin as first-line therapy, newer antibiotics may need to be considered due to the propensity for CRBSIs to result in antibiotic-refractory infections (8). Bacteria either are embedded in large, adherent biofilms or may persist intracellularly as SCVs in nonprofessional phagocytes and thus evade the host immune response and the actions of antimicrobial agents (9, 13, 15). As both phenomena may explain the poor clinical and bacteriologic response to standard antimicrobial regimens, we were particularly interested in comparing the pharmacodynamic parameters of vancomycin and daptomycin, two antimicrobials often used to treat S. epidermidis infections.

In the current study, we determined that vancomycin and daptomycin exhibited differential killing profiles against a site-directed hemB mutant displaying the SCV phenotype and against its respective parent strain with a normal phenotype: vancomycin exhibited little effect against the strain with the SCV phenotype, while daptomycin retained much of its activity against this strain. The decreased activity of vancomycin against the hemB mutant may potentially be explained, in part, by the strain's enhanced adhesive properties, as hemB mutants have been shown to express increased amounts of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin and stronger adhesion properties (1, 3, 11). This increased adhesion may potentially contribute to enhanced biofilm properties and cell wall sequestration mechanisms hampering antimicrobial activity. Interestingly, vancomycin was previously shown to display little activity against methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus embedded in biofilm, whereas daptomycin achieved bactericidal activity against biofilm-embedded methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (10). Additionally, as the SCV phenotype is characterized by its slow growth, it has previously been demonstrated that vancomycin ceases to achieve bactericidal activity in stationary-phase S. aureus but that daptomycin's bactericidal activity is not hampered (7, 14). The current findings are also consistent with previous studies of hemB mutants of S. aureus where vancomycin failed to achieve bactericidal activity (12). Taken together with the results of other studies, these findings may provide additional insight into the mechanisms of vancomycin tolerance and allow us to explore potential alternatives against difficult-to-treat, persistent infections. It is important to note that the definitive treatment of S. epidermidis SCV infections may involve surgical-device removal, which is frequently performed in clinical practice, as these results may apply only to situations of device salvage, such as with infected prosthetic valves or pacemakers. Although only one stable hemB SCV mutant of S. epidermidis has been constructed to date, further investigations with additional stable SCV mutant clinical isolates are necessary to confirm these findings before these results can be applied to clinical practice.

(This study was presented in part at the 48th Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy and the Infectious Diseases Society of America 46th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 25 to 28 October 2008.)

Acknowledgments

We thank Alan Forrest for his guidance on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses and Pamela Kelchlin and Damir Begic for their technical assistance.

This study was funded by the University at Buffalo, State University of New York. No outside support was obtained to fund this study.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 29 June 2009.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Al Laham, N., H. Rohde, G. Sander, A. Fischer, M. Hussain, C. Heilmann, D. Mack, R. Proctor, G. Peters, K. Becker, and C. von Eiff. 2007. Augmented expression of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin in a defined Staphylococcus epidermidis mutant with the small-colony-variant phenotype. J. Bacteriol. 189:4494-4501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baddour, L. M., and G. D. Christensen. 1987. Prosthetic valve endocarditis due to small-colony staphylococcal variants. Rev. Infect. Dis. 9:1168-1174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Baumert, N., C. von Eiff, F. Schaaff, G. Peters, R. A. Proctor, and H. G. Sahl. 2002. Physiology and antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus small colony variants. Microb. Drug Resist. 8:253-260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2006. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; seventh edition. Approved guideline M7-A7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  • 5.Garrett, D. O., E. Jochimsen, K. Murfitt, B. Hill, S. McAllister, P. Nelson, R. V. Spera, R. K. Sall, F. C. Tenover, J. Johnston, B. Zimmer, and W. R. Jarvis. 1999. The emergence of decreased susceptibility to vancomycin in Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 20:167-170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Heilmann, C., C. Gerke, F. Perdreau-Remington, and F. Gotz. 1996. Characterization of Tn917 insertion mutants of Staphylococcus epidermidis affected in biofilm formation. Infect. Immun. 64:277-282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mascio, C. T., J. D. Alder, and J. A. Silverman. 2007. Bactericidal action of daptomycin against stationary-phase and nondividing Staphylococcus aureus cells. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:4255-4260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mermel, L. A., B. M. Farr, R. J. Sherertz, I. I. Raad, N. O'Grady, J. S. Harris, and D. E. Craven. 2001. Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 32:1249-1272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Proctor, R. A., C. von Eiff, B. C. Kahl, K. Becker, P. McNamara, M. Herrmann, and G. Peters. 2006. Small colony variants: a pathogenic form of bacteria that facilitates persistent and recurrent infections. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4:295-305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Raad, I., H. Hanna, Y. Jiang, T. Dvorak, R. Reitzel, G. Chaiban, R. Sherertz, and R. Hachem. 2007. Comparative activities of daptomycin, linezolid, and tigecycline against catheter-related methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus bacteremic isolates embedded in biofilm. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:1656-1660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Seggewiss, J., K. Becker, O. Kotte, M. Eisenacher, M. R. Yazdi, A. Fischer, P. McNamara, N. Al Laham, R. Proctor, G. Peters, M. Heinemann, and C. von Eiff. 2006. Reporter metabolite analysis of transcriptional profiles of a Staphylococcus aureus strain with normal phenotype and its isogenic hemB mutant displaying the small-colony-variant phenotype. J. Bacteriol. 188:7765-7777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tsuji, B. T., C. von Eiff, P. A. Kelchlin, A. Forrest, and P. F. Smith. 2008. Attenuated vancomycin bactericidal activity against Staphylococcus aureus hemB mutants expressing the small-colony-variant phenotype. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:1533-1537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.von Eiff, C., C. R. Arciola, L. Montanaro, K. Becker, and D. Campoccia. 2006. Emerging Staphylococcus species as new pathogens in implant infections. Int. J. Artif. Organs 29:360-367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.von Eiff, C., G. Peters, and K. Becker. 2006. The small colony variant (SCV) concept—the role of staphylococcal SCVs in persistent infections. Injury 37(Suppl. 2):S26-S33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.von Eiff, C., G. Peters, and C. Heilmann. 2002. Pathogenesis of infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2:677-685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.von Eiff, C., P. Vaudaux, B. C. Kahl, D. Lew, S. Emler, A. Schmidt, G. Peters, and R. A. Proctor. 1999. Bloodstream infections caused by small-colony variants of coagulase-negative staphylococci following pacemaker implantation. Clin. Infect. Dis. 29:932-934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vuong, C., C. Gerke, G. A. Somerville, E. R. Fischer, and M. Otto. 2003. Quorum-sensing control of biofilm factors in Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Infect. Dis. 188:706-718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES