Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 2000 May 27;320(7247):1429–1432. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7247.1429

Incidence and remission rates of lower urinary tract symptoms at one year in women aged 40-60: longitudinal study

Lars Alling Møller a, Gunnar Lose a, Torben Jørgensen b
PMCID: PMC27383  PMID: 10827042

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the incidence and rates of remission of lower urinary tract symptoms at one year in women aged 40-60, and to assess factors associated with remission.

Design

Ongoing longitudinal cohort study.

Setting

One rural and one urban county in Denmark.

Participants

4000 women recruited on a random basis, 2860 of whom were followed up at one year.

Measurements

Incidence and rates of remission of lower urinary tract symptoms.

Results

Prevalence, incidence, and rates of remission of lower urinary tract symptoms in 2284 women were respectively 28.5% (95% confidence interval 26.7% to 30.4%), 10.0% (8.5% to 11.4%), and 27.8% (25.6% to 30.0%). Overall, symptoms were not significantly associated with events performed or initiated in the study period: medical consultation (1.6, 0.8 to 2.8), pelvic floor physiotherapy (0.9, 0.5 to 1.8), treatment with antibiotics on suspicion of a lower urinary tract infection (1.3, 0.8 to 2.2), or other treatment (1.7, 0.7 to 4.1). Many of the individual symptoms were, however, associated with seeking professional help.

Conclusions

Lower urinary tract symptoms constitute dynamic conditions, with women experiencing more or fewer symptoms, and eventually a cessation of symptoms. The distinction between permanent and fluctuating cases may have important clinical and scientific implications.

Introduction

Urinary incontinence and other lower urinary tract symptoms are common among women of all ages.17 The impact of the clinical course of lower urinary tract symptoms has only been considered infrequently,812 yet the extent to which symptoms arise and established symptoms decrease or cease influences outcome assessment. Studies have shown that despite an increased prevalence of urinary incontinence with age most individuals do improve.8,9,11 To determine the proportion of women in whom symptoms change and eventually cease and to identify associated factors may help to target treatment resources and preventive steps.

Various factors associated with lifestyle are thought to precipitate lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary incontinence—for example, weight, physical forces (exercise, work), smoking, caffeine and fluid intake, constipation, posture.1318 No randomised studies on intervention have been published. It seems feasible, however, that adjustment or adaptation to one or more factors may influence the frequency of symptoms over time.

The estimated annual incidence of urinary incontinence in women aged 42-74 is 2.0-2.5%,10,12 and the estimated annual rate of remission of urinary incontinence in women aged 60 or more is 3.3-12.0%.8,9,11 Longitudinal data on these common symptoms are, however, sparse.

We aimed to assess the dynamic clinical course of lower urinary tract symptoms by determining both the incidence and rates of remission of such symptoms at one year and the factors attributable to remission in women aged 40-60.

Participants and methods

Between 15 and 20 June 1996 we sent a questionnaire to 4000 women selected at random from the Danish civil registration system, a system whereby Danish people are identified for life by a unique 10 digit number. Personal details of the women are published elsewhere.7

One year later 2860 women received a follow up questionnaire. Non-responders were sent a reminder after three weeks and if they still failed to respond were eventually asked to complete a short form comprising questions on urgency and incontinence. This procedure followed guidelines outlined by the local ethical committee. The baseline questionnaire included data on age, urinary incontinence, daytime frequency, nocturia, postmicturition dribble, straining, urgency, incomplete bladder emptying, and hesitancy. Women were asked about leakage caused by coughing or sneezing, moving, lifting, sleeping, sexual intercourse, urgency, and rest. We defined stress incontinence according to the International Continence Society as leakage caused by exertion (coughing or sneezing, moving, or lifting) and urge incontinence as leakage associated with urgency.19

We have suggested that an appropriate cut off point for lower urinary tract symptoms in an epidemiological context is symptoms occurring weekly or more.7 Incidence was therefore defined as the proportion of women in whom symptoms arise or increase from sometimes to weekly or more. Conversely, the rate of remission was defined as the proportion of women with symptoms occurring weekly or more at baseline in whom symptoms decreased to less than weekly and eventually ceased at one year follow up.

Our questionnaire was based on detailed questionnaires tested in England and Denmark.20,21 To calibrate the questionnaire we interviewed 13 women aged 45-55 who were admitted to the Glostrup County Hospital for a variety of lower urinary tract diseases. Validity and reproducibility of the final questionnaire tested fair.7 The kappa statistics of the main outcome measures ranged from 0.58 to 0.92.

The follow up questionnaire at one year was similar to the baseline questionnaire. During the study period activities performed or initiated with the intention to treat lower urinary tract symptoms were recorded: consulting a doctor, drugs prescribed, and pelvic floor physiotherapy. Our study was approved by the local ethical committee.

Statistical methods

We applied the χ2 test, McNemar's test, the Mann-Whitney test with correction for ties, and multivariate logistic regression analysis with Statview when appropriate. We considered a 5% level as significant.

Results

Overall, we included 2860 of 4000 (71.5%) women at baseline. Non-responders did not differ from participants in age and county of residence but had significantly fewer complaints about incontinence and urgency.7 After one year 2284 (79.9%) women completed the follow up questionnaire and were included in the follow up study. Women who dropped out tended to be older than included women. However, we found no significant difference in the occurrence or severity of baseline symptoms (weekly or daily) between included women and those who dropped out (table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline data of 2284 women included in study and 576 who dropped out, at one year follow up. Values are numbers (percentages) unless stated otherwise

Women in study Women who dropped out P value*
Symptoms or no symptoms Weekly or daily symptoms
Incontinence:
  Stress 297 (13.0)  66 (11.5) 0.32 0.48
 Continuous 68 (3.0) 11 (1.9) 0.18 0.46
 Nightly 20 (0.9)  5 (0.9) 0.98 0.73
 Sexual 46 (2.0)  7 (1.2) 0.21 0.84
 Urge 162 (7.1) 35 (6.1) 0.41 0.28
 One or more types 374 (16.4)  84 (14.6) 0.24 0.41
Other lower urinary tract symptoms:
  Hesitancy 38 (1.7) 12 (2.1) 0.47 0.51
 Straining 22 (1.0)  5 (0.9) 0.85 0.99
 Incomplete bladder emptying 97 (4.2) 24 (4.2) 0.92 0.99
 Postmicturition dribble 55 (2.4) 17 (3.0) 0.44 0.99
 Urgency 411 (18.0)  87 (15.1) 0.09 0.77
 Daytime frequency 79 (3.5) 20 (3.5) 0.91 0.74
 Night time frequency 57 (2.5) 12 (2.1) 0.56 0.54
Overall symptoms 650 (28.5) 144 (25.0) 0.17 0.78
County of residence:
  Copenhagen 1113 (48.7) 317 (55.0) 0.58
 Storstrøm 1165 (51.0) 265 (46.0)
Age (years):
  40 500 (21.9) 116 (20.1) 0.01
 45 472 (20.7) 109 (18.9)
 50 467 (20.4) 106 (18.4)
 55 437 (19.1) 112 (19.4)
 60 402 (17.6) 139 (24.1)
*

χ2 test, df=1. df=4. 

The prevalence, incidence, and rate or remission of lower urinary tract symptoms were 28.5% (95% confidence interval 26.7% to 30.4%), 10.0% (8.5% to 11.4%), and 27.8% (25.6% to 30.0%) respectively (table 2). The difference in frequency of symptoms at baseline and at one year follow up were insignificant (table 2). The incidence of and rates of remission of the subtypes of lower urinary tract symptoms ranged from 0.6% to 6.1% (median 4.5%) and 29.0% to 59.7% (median 39.5%) respectively (table 2).

Table 2.

Follow up data at one year for 2277 women. Values are percentages (95% CIs) unless stated otherwise

No Cross sectional data
Longitudinal data
Prevalence at baseline % at one year follow up P value* Incidence Remission rate
Incontinence:
  Laughing or coughing 2200  12.1 (10.7 to 13.4) 10.4 0.102 3.6 (2.8 to 4.4) 38.9 (36.7 to 41.0)
 Moving 2190 5.7 (4.7 to 6.6) 3.7 0.003 1.5 (1.0 to 2.1) 59.7 (57.6 to 61.8)
 Heavy lifting 2245 3.3 (2.6 to 4.1) 3.0 0.630 1.2 (0.8 to 1.7) 45.3 (43.2 to 47.4)
Stress: 2275  13.1 (11.7 to 14.4) 11.0 0.046 4.0 (3.2 to 4.9) 41.4 (39.2 to 43.6)
 At rest 2218 3.1 (2.3 to 3.8) 2.4 0.188 1.0 (0.6 to 1.4) 50.0 (47.9 to 52.1)
 Nightly 2226 3.1 (2.3 to 3.8) 2.4 0.188 0.4 (0.1 to 0.7) 55.0 (52.9 to 57.1)
 Sexual 2240 2.1 (1.5 to 2.6) 1.7 0.388 0.7 (0.4 to 1.1) 47.8 (45.7 to 49.9)
 Urge 2205 7.3 (6.3 to 8.4) 6.7 0.486 2.7 (2.0 to 3.4) 42.0 (39.8 to 44.1)
 One or more types 2277  16.4 (14.9 to 17.9) 14.8 0.184 5.8 (4.7 to 6.8) 37.7 (35.5 to 39.9)
Other lower urinary tract symptoms:
  Hesitancy 2235 1.7 (1.2 to 2.2) 2.3 0.189 1.4 (0.9 to 1.9) 39.5 (37.4 to 41.5)
 Straining 2223 1.0 (0.6 to 1.4) 1.0 0.881 0.6 (0.3 to 1.0) 59.1 (57.0 to 61.1)
 Incomplete bladder emptying 2266 4.3 (3.4 to 5.1) 4.5 0.802 2.6 (2.0 to 3.3) 51.5 (49.4 to 53.6)
 Postmicturition dribble 2251 2.4 (1.8 to 3.1) 2.8 0.459 1.5 (1.0 to 2.0) 40.0 (38.0 to 42.0)
 Urgency 2268  18.1 (16.5 to 19.7) 17.3 0.545 6.1 (5.0 to 7.2) 29.0 (26.9 to 31.0)
 Daytime frequency 2235 3.5 (2.8 to 4.3) 3.8 0.655 1.7 (1.1 to 2.2) 36.7 (34.7 to 38.7)
 Night time frequency 2196 2.6 (1.9 to 3.3) 3.1 0.372 1.6 (1.1 to 2.2) 36.8 (34.8 to 38.9)
Overall symptoms 2277  28.5 (26.7 to 30.4) 27.5 0.542 10.0 (8.5 to 11.4) 27.8 (25.6 to 30.0)
*

McNemar's test. 

One or more of laughing or coughing, moving, or lifting heavy objects. 

Table 3 shows the changes in incontinence symptoms reported at one year follow up compared with baseline data; one woman (0.8%) with daily incontinence at baseline reported no symptoms and 26 women (20.6%) reported symptoms only sometimes at one year, and 11 women (4.5%) with weekly incontinence at baseline reported no symptoms and 116 (46.9%) reported fewer than weekly symptoms at one year. Most, but not all, types of lower urinary tract symptoms improved during the study period as a consequence of medical awareness, performance of pelvic floor physiotherapy, or drugs (table 4).

Table 3.

Urinary incontinence in women at one year follow up compared with baseline data. Values are percentages

Prevalence One year follow up
Never Sometimes Weekly or more Daily or more
Never 69.0 28.9 1.4 0.7
Sometimes 11.8 79.8 7.6 0.8
Weekly or more 4.5 46.9 39.9 8.6
Daily or more 0.8 20.6 31.0 47.6

Table 4.

Remission of lower urinary tract symptoms at one year follow up stratified to possible associated factors (each factor adjusted for age). Values are odds ratios (95% CIs) unless stated otherwise

Attended doctor P value Pelvic floor physiotherapy P value Antibiotics* P value Treatment P value
Incontinence:
  Stress 2.4 (1.3 to 4.3) 0.005 2.0 (1.1 to 3.6) 0.462 1.0 (0.5 to 2.0) 0.952 2.1 (0.8 to 5.5) 0.154
 Urge 2.8 (1.3 to 5.7) 0.009 2.8 (1.4 to 5.7) 0.006 2.1 (1.1 to 4.1) 0.044 2.2 (0.7 to 7.3) 0.243
 Continuous 4.7 (2.0 to 11.0) 0.001 6.7 (2.7 to 13.2) <0.0001 2.8 (1.2 to 6.5) 0.015 4.8 (1.4 to 16.3) 0.038
 Nightly 6.6 (1.7 to 25.2) 0.016 6.1 (1.6 to 23.1) 0.040 3.9 (1.0 to 14.9) 0.050 10.9 (2.3 to 52.0) 0.015
 Sexual 5.4 (2.0 to 14.9) 0.001 1.6 (0.4 to 6.7) 0.459 2.4 (0.8 to 7.1) 0.110 7.9 (2.3 to 27.8) 0.001
Other lower urinary tract symptoms:
  Hesitancy 2.7 (0.6 to 12.0) 0.217 0.986 1.6 (0.4 to 7.1) 0.584 3.3 (0.4 to 25.4) 0.311
 Straining 5.3 (1.4 to 19.3) 0.012  1.5 (0.19 to 11.6) 0.713 0.9 (0.11 to 6.7) 0.880 3.9 (0.5 to 30.5) 0.193
 Incomplete bladder emptying 2.9 (1.2 to 6.7) 0.012 1.4 (0.5 to 4.0) 0.560 1.8 (0.8 to 4.0) 0.154 4.4 (1.5 to 12.7) 0.008
 Postmicturition dribble 4.0 (1.3 to 11.9) 0.018 5.0 (1.8 to 13.9) 0.004 4.2 (1.6 to 11.0) 0.004 8.0 (2.3 to 28.3) 0.002
 Urgency 2.3 (1.2 to 4.2) 0.009 1.5 (0.8 to 3.0) 0.25 1.9 (1.1 to 3.2) 0.028 1.7 (0.6 to 4.8) 0.37
 Daytime frequency 3.7 (1.4 to 9.8) 0.011 1.8 (0.6 to 6.2) 0.397 1.2 (0.4 to 4.0) 0.786 1.7 (0.2 to 12.5) 0.699
 Night time frequency 3.0 (0.9 to 10.1) 0.132 2.7 (0.8 to 9.2) 0.217 2.4 (0.8 to 7.3) 0.148 4.9 (1.1 to 21.9) 0.070
Overall 1.6 (0.8 to 2.8) 0.147 0.9 (0.5 to 1.8) 0.747 1.3 (0.8 to 2.2) 0.343 1.7 (0.7 to 4.1) 0.268
*

Infection suspected. 

Non-infectious cause suspected. 

Discussion

This is the first longitudinal study to assess the clinical course of lower urinary tract symptoms in middle aged women. We studied 4000 women aged 40-60 years randomly selected from the general population. The estimated incidence and rates of remission of symptoms were 10.0% and 59.7% respectively.

Evidence is continuously growing on the prevalence of urinary incontinence and lower urinary tract symptoms in women of all ages,17 yet few studies have dealt with outcome in the long term.812

In longitudinal studies based on a questionnaire design it is essential to know if differences between answers are real or due to inadequate instrumentation. We therefore calibrated, validated, and tested the questionnaire even though it had been validated previously.20,21 The reproducibility of the revised questionnaire was fair to excellent.7 Reproducibility had not been evaluated in previous longitudinal studies.822

Our estimated annual incidence of urinary incontinence of 5.8% corresponded well with the 2.0-2.5% reported in other studies.10,12 Rates of remission in women aged 60 or more range from 3.3% to 12.0%.8,9,11 Our study found a rate of remission in women aged 40-60 of about 30%. These large differences are probably related to differences in study design and definitions.

No intervention was scheduled as we wanted to study the normal clinical course of lower urinary tract symptoms. It is likely, however, that by simply receiving and answering questionnaires the women may have become aware of our aim. As part of the validation of our questionnaire we interviewed a subgroup of women with lower urinary tract symptoms, focusing on specific items. Some of these women asked for and received simple advice. To determine the magnitude of the influence of this advice on symptoms, we assessed the effects of consulting a doctor, drugs, and pelvic floor physiotherapy.

Although effective on individual symptoms no single treatment modality had a beneficial effect on lower urinary tract symptoms overall. This may be because the definition of lower urinary tract symptoms is commonly used to describe several symptoms with a variety of causes. As many items on the questionnaire were interrelated it was not possible from this analysis to assess the importance of each individual item. Our analysis does, however, indicate that some bias may have been introduced.

The effect of several factors on rates of remission have been studied: age, parity, body mass index, change in body mass index, functional limitations as measured by the Rosow-Breslau scale and by impairment in activities of daily living, stroke, Parkinson's disease, myocardial infarction, constipation, oestrogen use, and drugs.11 The only factors significantly associated with an increased incidence and rate of remission were age and improvement in activities of daily living respectively.11 These factors were only examined at baseline interview. In perimenopausal women a change in hormonal status may be an important cause of fluctuating lower urinary tract symptoms, but this was not studied.

In conclusion, we found that during the clinical course of lower urinary tract symptoms women experience more or fewer symptoms. Specific reasons for remission and rates of remission in women seeking treatment remain to be elucidated.

What is already known on this topic

In perimenopausal women the prevalence of urinary incontinence is about 10-15%

Several factors are responsible for lower urinary tract symptoms

Little is known about the prevalence and clinical course of lower urinary tract symptoms, and knowledge about the clinical course is an important consideration in treatment

What this study adds

During the clinical course of lower urinary tract symptoms women experience more or fewer symptoms

An awareness of why these changes occur can help in decisions about treatment

Acknowledgments

This study was supported with grants from Coloplast; Pharmacia and Upjohn; the research foundation of Bornholm, Frederiksborg, Roskilde, Storstrøms, and Vestsjællands counties; the Rudolph Foundation; the Kleins Foundation; the research foundation of Copenhagen, Faroe Island, and Greenland; the foundation of Niels and Desirees Yde; and the county hospital of Nykøbing Falster.

Editorial by Hunskaar

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: None declared.

References

  • 1.Thomas TM, Plymat KR, Blannin J, Meade TW. Prevalence of urinary incontinence. BMJ. 1980;281:1243–1245. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6250.1243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Elving LB, Foldspang A, Lam GW, Mommsen S. Descriptive epidemiology of urinary incontinence in 3,100 women age 30-59. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1989;125:37–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Milsom I, Ekelund P, Molander U, Arvidsson L, Areskoug B. The influence of age, parity, oral contraception, hysterectomy and menopause on the prevalence of urinary incontinence in women. J Urol. 1993;149:1459–1462. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36415-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yarnell JW, Voyle GJ. The prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence in women. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1981;35:71–74. doi: 10.1136/jech.35.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Samuelsson E, Victor A, Tibblin G. A population study of urinary incontinence and nocturia among women aged 20-59 years. Prevalence, well-being and wish for treatment. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76:74–80. doi: 10.3109/00016349709047789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sommer P, Bauer T, Nielsen KK, Kristensen ES, Hermann GG, Steven K, et al. Voiding patterns and prevalence of incontinence in women. A questionnaire survey. Br J Urol. 1990;66:12–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1990.tb14855.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Møller LA, Lose G, Jørgensen T. The prevalence and bothersomeness of lower urinary tract symptoms in women 40-60 years of age. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:298–305. doi: 10.1080/j.1600-0412.2000.079004298.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Campbell AJ, Reinken J, McCosh L. Incontinence in the elderly: prevalence and prognosis. Age Ageing. 1985;14:65–70. doi: 10.1093/ageing/14.2.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Herzog AR, Diokno AC, Brown MB, Normolle DP, Brock BM. Two-year incidence, remission, and change patterns of urinary incontinence in noninstitutionalized older adults. J Gerontol. 1990;45:M67–M74. doi: 10.1093/geronj/45.2.m67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Burgio KL, Matthews KA, Engel BT. Prevalence, incidence and correlates of urinary incontinence in healthy, middle-aged women. J Urol. 1991;146:1255–1259. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38063-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nygaard IE, Lemke JH. Urinary incontinence in rural older women: prevalence, incidence and remission. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44:1049–1054. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb02936.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Holtedahl K, Verelst M, Schiefloe A. A population based, randomized, controlled trial of conservative treatment for urinary incontinence in women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77:671–677. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.1998.770616.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nygaard IE, Thompson FL, Svengalis SL, Albright JP. Urinary incontinence in elite nulliparous athletes. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84:183–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bump RC, McClish DK. Cigarette smoking and urinary incontinence in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167:1213–1218. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)91691-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jozwik M. Stress urinary incontinence in women—an overuse syndrome. Med Hypotheses. 1993;40:381–382. doi: 10.1016/0306-9877(93)90225-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mommsen S, Foldspang A. Body mass index and adult female urinary incontinence. World J Urol. 1994;12:319–322. doi: 10.1007/BF00184112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Diokno AC, Brock BM, Herzog AR, Bromberg J. Medical correlates of urinary incontinence in the elderly. Urology. 1990;36:129–138. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(90)80211-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Creighton SM, Stanton SL. Caffeine: does it affect your bladder? Br J Urol. 1990;66:613–614. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1990.tb07192.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL, Andersen JT. The standardisation and terminology of lower urinary tract function. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97:1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bernstein I, Sejr T, Able I, Andersen JT, Fischer-Rasmussen W, Klarskov P, et al. Assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms in women by a self-administered questionnaire: test-retest reliability. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996;7:37–47. doi: 10.1007/BF01895104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jackson S, Donovan J, Brookes S, Eckford S, Swithinbank L, Abrams P. The Bristol female lower urinary tract symptoms questionnaire: development and psychometric testing. Br J Urol. 1996;77:805–812. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.00186.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Holtedahl K, Hunskaar S. Prevalence, 1-year incidence and factors associated with urinary incontinence: a population based study of women 50-74 years of age in primary care. Maturitas. 1998;28:205–211. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5122(97)00085-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES