Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1981 Apr;13(4):631–636. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.4.631-636.1981

Multiple-antigen slide test for detection of immunoglobulin M antibodies in newborn and infant sera by immunofluorescence.

D Gallo, J L Riggs, J Schachter, R W Emmons
PMCID: PMC273849  PMID: 6262369

Abstract

A microimmunofluorescence test was evaluated for use in measuring immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies in infant sera to five of the agents implicated in congenital and neonatal disease. Pen point dots of Toxoplasma gondii, cytomegalovirus, rubella virus, herpes simplex virus, and chlamydial cell culture antigens were applied to each circle of eight-circle printed slides. These multiple-antigen slides greatly facilitated the screening of 607 sera from infants and 117 sera from mothers for the presence of IgM antibody to these agents. Forty sera could be examined microscopically in approximately 30 min. All sera reacting with one or more antigens were tested for rheumatoid factor by the latex method, absorbed with glutaraldehyde-cross-linked human IgG, and retested for the presence of IgM antibody. IgM antibody to cytomegalovirus was demonstrated in sera from four newborns, but IgM antibody to rubella virus could not be detected until 21 days after birth, although rubella virus was isolated from sera from five younger infants. This may indicate that rubella IgM levels in many congenitally infected newborns are too low to be measured by the immunofluorescence method. Five percent of the sera from infants in this study possessed demonstrable IgM antibody to one of the antigens.

Full text

PDF
631

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ankerst J., Christensen P., Kjellén L., Kronvall G. A rountine diagnostic test for IgA and IgM antibodies to rubella virus: absorption of IgG with Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis. 1974 Sep;130(3):268–273. doi: 10.1093/infdis/130.3.268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chantler S., Devries E., Allen P. R., Hurn B. A. A rapid immunofluorescent procedure for the detection of specific IgG and IgM antibody in sera using Staphylococcus aureus and latex-IgG as absorbents. J Immunol Methods. 1976;13(3-4):367–380. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(76)90083-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cradock-Watson J. E., Bourne M. S., Vandervelde E. M. IgG, IgA and IgM responses in acute rubella determined by the immunofluorescent technique. J Hyg (Lond) 1972 Sep;70(3):473–485. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400063063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cradock-Watson J. E., Ridehalgh M. K. Specific immunoglobulins in infants with the congenital rubella syndrome. J Hyg (Lond) 1976 Feb;76(1):109–123. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400055005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Forghani B., Schmidt N. J., Lennette E. H. Demonstration of rubella IgM antibody by indirect fluorescent antibody staining, sucrose density gradient centrifugation and mercaptoethanol reduction. Intervirology. 1973;1(1):48–59. doi: 10.1159/000148832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Forsgren A., Sjöquist J. "Protein A" from S. aureus. I. Pseudo-immune reaction with human gamma-globulin. J Immunol. 1966 Dec;97(6):822–827. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hanshaw J. B., Dudgeon J. A. Congenital cytomegalovirus. Major Probl Clin Pediatr. 1978;17:97–152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hanshaw J. B., Dudgeon J. A. Herpes simplex infection of the fetus and newborn. Major Probl Clin Pediatr. 1978;17:153–181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hornsleth A., Leerhoy J., Grauballe P., Spanggaard H. Rubellavirus-specific IgM- and IgA-antibodies. The indirect immunofluorescence (IF)-technique applied to sera with reduced IgG-concentration. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B Microbiol Immunol. 1974 Oct;82B(5):742–744. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1974.tb00244.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Melish M. E., Hanshaw J. B. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Developmental progress of infants detected by routine screening. Am J Dis Child. 1973 Aug;126(2):190–194. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1973.02110190168011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Schmidt N. J., Dennis J., Lennette E. H. Comparison of immunofluorescence and immunoperoxidase staining for identification of rubella virus isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Jun;7(6):576–583. doi: 10.1128/jcm.7.6.576-583.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schmitz H., Haas R. Determination of different cytomegalovirus immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, IgM) by immunofluorescence. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch. 1972;37(1):131–140. doi: 10.1007/BF01241158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Thomas B. J., Reeve P., Oriel J. D. Simplified serological test for antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Jul;4(1):6–10. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.1.6-10.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang S. P., Grayston J. T. Immunologic relationship between genital TRIC, lymphogranuloma venereum, and related organisms in a new microtiter indirect immunofluorescence test. Am J Ophthalmol. 1970 Sep;70(3):367–374. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(70)90096-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zaia J. A., Oxman M. N. Antibody to varicella-zoster virus-induced membrane antigen: immunofluorescence assay using monodisperse glutaraldehyde-fixed target cells. J Infect Dis. 1977 Oct;136(4):519–530. doi: 10.1093/infdis/136.4.519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. van Renterghem L., van Nimmen L. Indirect immunofluorescence in toxoplasmosis: frequency, nature and specificity of polar staining. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A. 1976 Aug;235(4):559–565. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES