Table 3.

Association of Lens Status and Graft Failure According to Corneal Diagnosis

			Multivariate Modelsb
	N	5-yr Graft Failurea ± 95% CI	Hazard Ratio	95% CI	P-value
Fuchs’ Dystrophy					0.34
Pre-operative phakic, post-operative phakic	153	5% ± 3%	1.00
Pre-operative phakic, post-operative pseudophakicc	299	7% ± 3%	1.61	0.67, 3.84
Pre-operative pseudophakic/aphakic, post-operative pseudophakic d	202	9% ± 4%	1.92	0.78, 4.72
Post-operative aphakice	22	14% ± 15%	3.26	0.80, 13.30
Pseudophakic/Aphakic Corneal Edema					0.001
Post-operative pseudophakic (PC IOL)f	218	21% ± 6%	1.00
Post-operative pseudophakic (Sutured PCL)g	54	24% ±13%	1.20	0.61, 2.37
Post-operative pseudophakic (AC IOL)h	89	42% ± 12%	2.72	1.65, 4.49
Post-operative aphakici	8	*	*	*

CI = Confidence interval

^aKaplan-Meier estimates.

^bModels adjusted for glaucoma history and race

^cIOLs: 288 posterior chamber, 8 sutured posterior chamber, and 3 anterior chamber. Graft failure rate was similar in an analysis limited to posterior chamber IOLs

^dIOLs:195 posterior chamber, 3 sutured posterior chamber, and 4 anterior chamber. Graft failure rate was similar in an analysis limited to posterior chamber IOLs

^ePre-operatively, 13 aphakic, 8 phakic, and 1 pseudophakic

^fPre-operatively, 213 pseudophakic and 5 aphakic

^gPre-operatively, 45 pseudophakic and 9 aphakic

^hPre-operatively, 85 pseudophakic and 4 aphakic. IOLs: 87 anterior chamber and 2 iris-fixated.

ⁱPre-operatively, 2 pseudophakic and 6 aphakic