Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 2003 Jun 10;88(12):2004–2005. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600966

Impact of medical specialists' locus of control on communication skills in oncological interviews

Y Libert 1,2, P Janne 1, D Razavi 2, I Merckaert 2, P Scalliet 1, N Delvaux 2, A-M Etienne 3, S Conradt 3, J Klastersky 2, J Boniver 3, Ch Reynaert 1
PMCID: PMC2741102

Correction to: British Journal of Cancer (2003) 88, 502–509. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600797

Unfortunately because of a typesetting error, Tables 1 and 3 were reproduced incorrectly. The correct versions are printed below:

Table 1. Socioprofessional characteristics of physicians with internal and external LOC (upper and lower quartiles of the Rotter I-E scale scores distribution).

  Internal LOC External LOC
Age (years)
 Mean (s.d.) 43 (6.3) 39 (5.7)
Gender
 Male 16 (72.7) 8 (44.4)
 Female 6 (27.3) 10 (55.6)
Medical speciality
 Oncology 5 (22.7) 7 (38.9)
 Radiotherapy 3 (13.6) 2 (11.1)
 Haematology 4 (22.2)
 Gynaecology 4 (18.2) 3 (16.7)
 Others 10 (45.5) 2 (11.1)
Medical specialisation training achieved
 Yes 20 (90.9) 18 (100)
 No 2 (9.1)
Medical practice (years)
 Mean (s.d.) 17 (6.5) 14 (5.5)
Medical practice in oncology (years)
 Mean (s.d.) 13 (6.8) 11 (6.4)
Number of cancer patients cared during last week
 Mean (s.d.) 19 (17.3) 26 (18.0)
Medical practice
 In hospital 18 (81.8) 15 (83.3)
 In one-day clinic 10 (45.5) 8 (44.4)
 Private 6 (27.3) 5 (27.8)
Previous training in communication skills in the last year
 Workshops, readings, conferences and others 10 (45.5) 9 (50.0)

Except when stated otherwise, values are expressed as frequencies, percentages are between brackets. No statistically significant differences were found between both groups except for the fact that all the haematologists were in the group of physicians with external LOC and the two physicians still in medical specialisation training were in the group of physicians with internal LOC.

Table 3. Characteristics of interviews led by physicians with internal and external LOC (upper and lower quartiles of the Rotter I-E scale scores distribution).

  Internal LOC External LOC
Age (years)  
 Mean (s.d.) 55 (15.5) 58 (13.1)
Gender
 Male 9 (45.0) 4 (23.5)
 Female 11 (55.0) 13 (76.5)
School level completeda
 Junior high school or less 6 (30.0) 3 (17.7)
 High school graduate 6 (30.0) 6 (32.3)
 College or university graduation 8 (40.0) 8 (47.1)
Karnofsky performance status (KPS)a
 80 or more 14 (70.0) 14 (82.4)
 Less than 80 6 (30.0) 3 (17.7)
Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)
 Emotional distress total mean scores (s.d.) 11.0 (5.3) 11.8 (6.2)
Multidimensional health locus of control (MHLC)
 Internal HLC mean scores (s.d.) 24.6 (5.2) 22.7 (5.5)
 External Chance HLC mean scores (s.d.) 20.9 (7.3) 21.8 (5.7)
 External Powerful Others HLC mean scores (s.d.) 25.8 (6.9) 25.8 (7.2)
Type of cancera
 Solid tumour 19 (95.0) 14 (82.4)
 Haematologic cancer 1 (5.0) 3 (17.7)
Prognosis
 Less than 1 year 7 (35.0) 4 (23.5)
 1 year or more 13 (65.0) 13 (76.5)
Disease status
 In remission, no change or too early to assess 13 (35.0) 12 (70.6)
 In progression 7 (65.0) 5 (29.4)
Current cancer treatment
 Yes 9 (45.0) 11 (64.7)
 No 11 (55.0) 6 (35.3)
Months since diagnosis
 Mean (s.d.) 29 (43.1) 37 (54.7)
Type of information
 Diagnosis related 11 (55.0) 5 (29.4)
 Not diagnosis related 9 (45.0) 12 (70.6)
Type of news
 Neutral 6 (30.0) 8 (47.1)
 Good 5 (25.0) 5 (29.4)
 Bad 9 (45.0) 4 (23.5)

Except when stated otherwise, values are expressed as frequencies, percentages are in brackets. No statistically significant differences were found between both groups.

a

χ2 not applicable because of a lack of observations in the cells.

The publisher would like to apologise for any inconvenience this may have caused.


Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES