Abstract
Ca2+-dependent inactivation (CDI) is a key regulator and hallmark of the Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ (CRAC) channel, a prototypic store-operated Ca2+ channel. Although the roles of the endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ sensor STIM1 and the channel subunit Orai1 in CRAC channel activation are becoming well understood, the molecular basis of CDI remains unclear. Recently, we defined a minimal CRAC activation domain (CAD; residues 342–448) that binds directly to Orai1 to activate the channel. Surprisingly, CAD-induced CRAC currents lack fast inactivation, revealing a critical role for STIM1 in this gating process. Through truncations of full-length STIM1, we identified a short domain (residues 470–491) C-terminal to CAD that is required for CDI. This domain contains a cluster of 7 acidic amino acids between residues 475 and 483. Neutralization of aspartate or glutamate pairs in this region either reduced or enhanced CDI, whereas the combined neutralization of six acidic residues eliminated inactivation entirely. Based on bioinformatics predictions of a calmodulin (CaM) binding site on Orai1, we also investigated a role for CaM in CDI. We identified a membrane-proximal N-terminal domain of Orai1 (residues 68–91) that binds CaM in a Ca2+-dependent manner and mutations that eliminate CaM binding abrogate CDI. These studies identify novel structural elements of STIM1 and Orai1 that are required for CDI and support a model in which CaM acts in concert with STIM1 and the N terminus of Orai1 to evoke rapid CRAC channel inactivation.
Keywords: calcium, ion channel gating, store-operated calcium entry, patch-clamp, calcium-binding proteins
Store-operated Ca2+ channels provide a major route for receptor-stimulated Ca2+ entry in nonexcitable cells (1). The Ca2+-release activated Ca2+ (CRAC) channel, the best-characterized store-operated channel, is essential for generating Ca2+ signals that drive the activation of T lymphocytes, mast cells, and platelets (2–4). CRAC channel activity is shaped by the combination of store-dependent activation and Ca2+-dependent inactivation (CDI) processes. The mechanisms linking depletion of Ca2+ from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to activation of the CRAC channel are becoming well understood: reduction of ER luminal Ca2+ causes the ER Ca2+ sensor STIM1 (5, 6) to oligomerize (7), enabling its accumulation at ER-plasma membrane junctions (3, 8, 9), where it binds directly to the CRAC channel subunit Orai1 (10–12) to open the channel (13, 14).
Compared with activation, much less is known about the mechanisms underlying CDI, one of the hallmark characteristics of the CRAC current (ICRAC) in mammalian cells. Initial studies in mast cells and T cells revealed that Ca2+ influx at hyperpolarized potentials drives rapid inactivation on a time scale of tens of milliseconds through the binding of Ca2+ to sites located several nanometers from the intracellular mouth of the pore (15, 16). Subsequent studies have suggested that calmodulin (CaM) and STIM1 both may contribute to this process. In a rat liver cell line, overexpression of a Ca2+-insensitive CaM mutant or a CaM inhibitory peptide modestly inhibited fast inactivation of a CRAC-like current (17), suggesting that CaM may promote CDI of the CRAC channel in a manner analogous to its well-established role in the inactivation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (18, 19). Also, CRAC channels fail to display CDI when they are activated by a minimal soluble fragment of STIM1 [amino acids 342–448, known as the CRAC activation domain (CAD)], revealing a critical role for STIM1 in CDI (13). Consistent with such a role, a recent report showing that the extent of inactivation correlates with the STIM1/Orai1 transfection ratio further suggests that the number of STIM1 proteins bound to a CRAC channel influences its ability to inactivate (20). Another recent study identified a STIM1 domain (amino acids 475–485) that reduces CRAC channel activity, but its effect on CDI was not examined (21).
In this study, we address the roles of STIM1 and CaM in the CDI of CRAC channels. Using a combination of serial truncations and mutagenesis, we identify a negatively charged region of STIM1 that is required for inactivation. We also identify a region in the N terminus of Orai1 that binds CaM in a Ca2+-dependent manner and demonstrate that CaM binding is required for CDI to occur. These results reveal the structural underpinnings of CRAC channel inactivation, identify Orai1 as a CaM-binding protein, and extend the known roles of STIM1 from those of Ca2+ sensor and activating ligand to that of a CRAC channel subunit that controls inactivation gating in response to local Ca2+ accumulation.
Results
CDI of Heterologously Expressed CRAC Channels.
In HEK293 cells transfected with STIM1 and Orai1 at a 1:1 mass ratio, the CRAC current (ICRAC) evoked by EGTA in the recording pipette inactivated rapidly during 200-ms hyperpolarizations to potentials of −60 to −120 mV (Fig. 1A). Similar to native ICRAC in Jurkat T cells (16), inactivation in transfected HEK cells was greatly enhanced in 20 mM Ca2+o relative to 2 mM Ca2+o, and followed a biexponential time course with time constants of ≈10 and ≈100 ms (Fig. S1). These similarities were apparent despite ICRAC densities >20-fold greater than those of untransfected Jurkat cells (Fig. S2), consistent with previous evidence that rapid CDI is a local process that is driven by Ca2+ binding to sites located within nanometers of the inner pore mouth (16).
A Short Domain of STIM1 C-Terminal to CAD Is Required for CDI.
CRAC channels can be activated independently of store depletion by direct binding of a minimal peptide derived from the cytoplasmic region of STIM1 (CAD, amino acids 342–448; also called SOAR, amino acids 344–442) (13, 14). Surprisingly, when ICRAC was activated in this way, the current failed to inactivate (Fig. 1B) (13), suggesting that elements of STIM1 outside CAD are necessary for CDI. At very hyperpolarized potentials (−120 mV), CAD-induced ICRAC increased slightly during the voltage step. This behavior varied from cell to cell and was also observed for several other noninactivating constructs described below, but it was not studied further. To identify elements of STIM1 required for CDI, we examined ICRAC in cells coexpressing Orai1 and a series of STIM1 proteins truncated at locations downstream of the CAD. Deletion of residues from amino acid 491 to the STIM1 C terminus did not affect CDI (Fig. 1 C and E), clearly demonstrating that the serine/proline-rich and polybasic domains of STIM1 are dispensable with respect to fast inactivation. However, further shortening of STIM1 (amino acids 1–469 and 1–448) completely prevented CDI (Fig. 1 D and E). Together, these results identify amino acids 470–491 as a functional domain of STIM1 required for fast inactivation of the human CRAC channel. For convenience, we refer to this region hereafter as the inactivation domain of STIM or IDSTIM.
We next tested whether the IDSTIM could restore inactivation to CRAC channels activated by soluble CAD-containing peptides. As expected from the results with truncated STIM1 in Fig. 1, extensions of CAD N-terminally to the ER membrane (STIM1234–448) or C-terminally to the start of IDSTIM (STIM1342–469) failed to restore CDI (Fig. S3 A and B). Interestingly, however, C-terminal extensions of the soluble CAD peptide that included IDSTIM only partially restored CDI. The extended peptides STIM1342-560 and STIMI342–630 supported approximately half the extent of inactivation observed with analogous constructs containing the additional regions N-terminal to CAD (i.e., STIM11–560 and STIMI1–630) (Fig. S3 C–E). Thus, ER-bound forms of STIM1 appear to inactivate CRAC channels more efficiently than soluble forms (see Discussion).
Neutralization of Conserved Acidic Residues Within IDSTIM Affects CDI.
A distinctive feature of the IDSTIM is a cluster of 7 acidic residues between amino acids 475 and 483 (DDVDDMDEE; Fig. S4A). To test for a role of these residues in CDI, we introduced mutations in this region. Neutralization of six of the acidic residues in full-length STIM1 completely prevented CDI, consistent with a critical function in mediating inactivation (4A2G; Fig. 2B). More subtle mutations altered the extent and kinetics of CDI. Neutralization of amino acids 475, 476 (DD → AA) or 478, 481 (DD → GG) reduced the extent of CDI (Fig. 2 C, D, and F), whereas neutralization of amino acids 482, 483 (EE → AA) enhanced inactivation relative to WT STIM1 (Fig. 2 E, and F). Interestingly, the EE → AA mutant in 2 mM Ca2+o inactivated to a similar extent as the WT STIM1 in 20 mM Ca2+o (Fig. S5), suggesting that the mutations increased the Ca2+ sensitivity of CDI. In sum, these results indicate that the acidic residues between amino acids 475 and 483 are critical determinants of CRAC channel CDI, and that both charge and position contribute to their function.
The importance of the negative charges in the IDSTIM for CDI raised the possibility that this region may form a binding site for Ca2+. We tested for Ca2+ binding by performing 45Ca2+ overlay experiments with WT and mutant STIM1 polypeptides (Fig. S6). 45Ca2+ binding to WT STIM1 peptide and the DD → AA, DD → GG, and the 4A2G mutant peptides approximately paralleled the degree of CDI observed for each corresponding full-length STIM1 construct; however, binding to WT STIM1 peptide was significantly weaker than binding to CaM. Also, the EE → AA mutant bound 45Ca2+ less avidly than WT peptide, in contrast to its ability to increase the Ca2+ sensitivity of CDI (Fig. S5). The low affinity of Ca2+ binding and its inconsistent correlation with CDI call into question whether IDSTIM serves as a Ca2+ sensor for CDI.
CaM Binding Domain in the Membrane-Proximal Orai1 N Terminus.
Given that the physiological role of IDSTIM as a Ca2+-binding domain is uncertain, we examined a possible function for CaM in CDI. A previous study of a hepatocyte cell line suggested that CaM contributes to ICRAC inactivation, although its site of action was unknown (17). CaM has also been shown to bind in vitro to the extreme C-terminal polybasic domain of STIM1, and on this basis, a role in control of STIM–Orai complexes was proposed (22). However, we observed that this region is not required for CDI (Fig. 1 C and E). Bioinformatics analysis predicts a CaM binding site at amino acids 70–87 in the N terminus of Orai1 (4, 23). To test whether CaM binds to Orai1, we coexpressed Flag-myc-CaM and GFP-myc-Orai1 in HEK293T cells and immunoprecipitated CaM using anti-Flag antibodies (Fig. 3A). GFP-myc-Orai1 coimmunoprecipitated with Flag-myc-CaM efficiently only in the presence of Ca2+ in the lysis buffer, suggesting that Orai1 interacts with CaM in a Ca2+-dependent manner. We mapped the CaM interaction domain of Orai1 by coexpressing Flag-myc-CaM with either the N terminus, the C terminus, or the II-III intracellular loop of Orai1 and immunoprecipitating CaM (Fig. 3B). CaM associated only with the N terminus of Orai1. Parallel experiments, in which Orai1 fragments were precipitated by CaM-Sepharose, showed that CaM interaction with the N terminus is Ca2+-dependent (Fig. S7). To refine the location of the binding region within the Orai1 N terminus, we first applied a CaM overlay assay to an Orai1 N-terminal peptide (amino acids 48–91). Horseradish peroxidase-coupled CaM was seen to bind the peptide in the presence of Ca2+, indicating a direct interaction of the two proteins (Fig. 3C). CaM-Sepharose pull-down assays using various Orai1 fragments further narrowed the interaction site for Ca2+–CaM to amino acids 68–91, which overlaps with the predicted location of the CaM binding site (Figs. 3D and 4A). Together, these results show that CaM binds in a Ca2+ -dependent manner to a 24-aa CaM binding domain in the N terminus of Orai1 (amino acids 68–91; CBDOrai).
Mutations That Eliminate CaM Binding to CBDOrai also Prevent CDI.
We next introduced mutations in Orai1 that interfere with CaM binding to test whether Ca2+–CaM binding is required for ICRAC inactivation. Because CaM often interacts with the hydrophobic surface of amphipathic helices (24), a helical wheel was used to identify hydrophobic residues on one face of CBDOrai (Fig. 4A). We generated seven CBDOrai mutations at residues A73, W76, and Y80 in Orai1 N-terminal peptides (amino acids 1–91) and measured their effects on binding to CaM by using a modified CaM-Sepharose pull-down assay. The assay included a WT Orai1-GFP peptide that could be distinguished from the mutants based on size and allowed internal comparisons with the extent of CaM binding by WT Orai1. Five mutations (A73E, W76A, W76E, W76S, and Y80E) abolished CaM binding, whereas two other mutations (Y80A and Y80S) retained binding (Fig. 4A). To assess their effects on inactivation, identical point mutations were made in full-length Orai1, which was then coexpressed with STIM1 in HEK293 cells. All five mutations that disrupted CaM binding blocked inactivation of ICRAC (Fig. 4 C–G), whereas the two mutations that retained CaM binding yielded strong CDI with accelerated kinetics, consistent with allosteric effects on the inactivation transition (Fig. 4 H and I and Fig. S8). The consistent correlation between CaM binding and CDI strongly suggests that Ca2+–CaM binding to the N terminus of Orai1 is required for ICRAC inactivation.
Discussion
Our results show that interactions of STIM1 and CaM with Orai1 underlie rapid CDI of the CRAC channel. Based on early observations that only fast Ca2+ buffers like 1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid (BAPTA) can bind Ca2+ quickly enough to reduce CDI of ICRAC (15, 16), a simple diffusion model predicted that at least two Ca2+ ions must bind within several nanometers of the pore to drive inactivation (16). Our results now reveal that Ca2+–CaM binds to Orai1 immediately adjacent to the plasma membrane and therefore may provide Ca2+ binding sites required for CDI. It is unclear whether Ca2+ binding to the cluster of negative charges in IDSTIM is also involved.
A role in CDI significantly extends the functions of STIM1 and its relationship to the CRAC channel. STIM1 is now well established as an ER Ca2+ sensor for CRAC channel activation (5, 6, 9, 25) and as a ligand that binds directly to Orai1 to open the channel (13, 14). The finding that a part of STIM1 (the IDSTIM) is required for the CRAC channel to respond to an extrinsic ligand (Ca2+) shows that STIM1 also acts as a functional subunit of the channel by associating with the pore-forming subunit Orai1 to enable inactivation.
Sequence variation in the regions of STIM1 and Orai1 that are required for CDI may help explain species-specific differences in ICRAC inactivation. The IDSTIM is identical among vertebrates, including human, rat, and mouse, in which ICRAC is known to inactivate (15, 26), but is not well conserved among invertebrates like Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans, in which inactivation is absent (Fig. S4A) (27, 28). Likewise, the CBDOrai is identical among human, rat, and mouse, but varies in Drosophila and C. elegans Orai at key residues (A73, W76, and Y80) that we have shown to be critical for CaM binding and CDI in human Orai1 (Fig. 4 and Fig. S4B). Mutagenesis and chimera studies will be needed to determine whether these substitutions are sufficient to explain naturally occurring differences in CDI. Also, knocking CDI-deficient variants of Orai1 or STIM1 into mice offers a feasible strategy for determining the physiological role of CDI.
A recent study reported that CRAC channel CDI depends on the expression ratio of STIM1 and Orai1, suggesting that inactivation increases with the number of STIM1s bound to the channel (20). We considered the possibility that the lack of inactivation in our experiments might have resulted from inefficient expression of some STIM1 mutants leading to a low STIM1/Orai1 coupling ratio. However, increasing the STIM1/Orai1 transfection ratio from 1:1 to 4:1 had no discernable effect on the CDI of STIM11–469 or STIM14A2G (Fig. S9). Thus, specific alterations in STIM1 rather than low coupling ratios are responsible for the absence of inactivation that we observed.
The soluble STIM1 peptides were significantly less effective than their ER-localized counterparts in supporting inactivation (Fig. S3), implying that the architecture of the store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) elementary unit itself may have an important role in regulating inactivation. It is relevant to note that the soluble CAD-derived peptides engage and activate CRAC channels throughout the plasma membrane (PM) (13), whereas ER-localized STIM1 forms dense clusters restricted to ER–PM junctions (29). Thus, a likely explanation is that tight clustering at junctions increases the propensity to inactivate, perhaps by increasing the local coupling ratio of STIM/Orai or the local intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) in the restricted space between the ER and PM. Interestingly, the degree of CDI remains constant as native CRAC channels slowly activate after store depletion (16), suggesting that the coupling stoichiometry and local [Ca2+]i are also constant or saturating as more channels enter the junctions to become activated.
The identification of IDSTIM and the CBDOrai and their roles in CDI are an important step in delineating a molecular mechanism for CDI. Given the rapid kinetics of CDI and the ability of a Ca2+-insensitive CaM to alter inactivation of a CRAC-like current in hepatocytes (17), it is likely that apo-CaM is docked near the channel before Ca2+ enters the cell, as is the case for several other types of ion channels (30–32). On channel opening, Ca2+ binding to CaM may trigger association with the membrane-proximal CBDOrai. This same region of Orai1 is also essential for CRAC channel activation through interactions with the CAD of STIM1 (13). Thus, one hypothesis is that on Ca2+ entry Ca2+–CaM displaces the CAD from the N terminus, in effect reversing the activation process to cause CDI. However, such a mechanism seems inconsistent with results of Yamashita et al. (33), who showed that CRAC channels with a pore mutation (E106D) activate normally, but fail to inactivate even with Ca2+ as the sole charge carrier. Under those conditions, the CAD is evidently bound even when local [Ca2+]i is high and Ca2+–CaM would be expected to occupy the CBDOrai site. Although we cannot rule out the possibility that the pore mutation prevents binding of CaM to CBDOrai through an allosteric effect, an alternative mechanism consistent with existing data is that Ca2+-CaM bound to the CBDOrai does not displace the CAD, but instead interacts with the IDSTIM region (amino acids 470–491) to drive Orai1 into a nonconducting inactivated state that is available to the WT but not the E106D mutant channel. Further work will be needed to understand in detail the mechanism by which STIM1, CaM, and Orai1 act in concert to evoke rapid inactivation.
Materials and Methods
Cells.
HEK293 cells were grown in DMEM with GlutaMax (GIBCO) supplemented with 10% FBS (HyClone) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Mediatech) in a humidified, 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C.
Plasmid cDNA Constructs.
N-terminally myc-tagged WT Orai1 (pEX-pGWI-myc-Orai1) has been described (13). This construct was used in all experiments examining the role of STIM1 in CDI. GFP-STIM1 (34), Cherry-STIM1 (29), and YFP-CAD (STIM1342–448), YFP-Orai1-NT1–91, YFP-Orai1-II-III142–177, YFP-Orai1-CT255–301, YFP-Orai11–70, YFP-Orai148–91, YFP-Orai148–70, and YFP-Orai168–91 constructs have been described (13).
All primers used for mutagenesis in this study are listed in SI Text, and all mutations were confirmed by sequencing. Truncated STIM1 constructs were generated by inserting a stop codon at the appropriate location into the full-length GFP-STIM1 or mCherry-STIM1 construct by QuikChange mutagenesis (Stratagene). For YFP-STIM1234–448, YFP-STIM1342–469, YFP-STIM1342–560, and YFP-STIM1342–630, PCR products were cloned into the pCR8/GW/TOPO vector (Invitrogen). Products cloned into this vector were sequenced by using GW1 primer, and Gateway LR clonase reactions (Invitrogen) were used to generate N-terminally YFP-labeled versions using the destination vector pDS-YFP-x (a gift from Tobias Meyer, Stanford University).
Mutations of the conserved negatively charged amino acids between STIM1 positions 475 and 483 were accomplished by QuikChange mutagenesis. N-terminally myc-tagged STIM1 was used as a template for generating myc-STIM1 478, 481 DD → GG. In turn, the myc-STIM1 478, 481 DD → GG construct served as the template for generating the myc-STIM14A2G construct. GFP-STIM1 475, 476 DD → AA and GFP-STIM1 482, 483 EE → AA were generated by site-directed mutagenesis of the GFP-STIM1 construct.
GFP-Orai11–91 has been described (13). For myc-Orai1-A73E, -W76A, -W76E, -W76S, -Y80A, -Y80E, and -Y80S, N-terminally myc-tagged Orai1 constructs were made by QuikChange mutagenesis. GFP-myc-Orai11–91 was generated by introducing a premature stop codon into GFP-myc-Orai1 by QuikChange. For GFP-myc-Orai11–91-A73E, -W76A, -W76E, -W76S, -Y80A, -Y80E, and -Y80S, QuikChange was applied in the background of GFP-myc-Orai11–91.
CaM was amplified by PCR and cloned into the pCR8 vector. The pDEST-pGW1-Flag-Myc-x vector (custom-designed) was used to generate Flag-Myc-CaM. CaM from pCR8-CaM was excised by NcoI and BamHI digestion and ligated into pET-3d plasmid (Novagen) to generate pET-CaM. CaM (T27C) was constructed by substituting amino acids at residue 27 of CaM (Thr to Cys) by QuikChange.
For GST-Orai148–91, Orai148–91 was excised by BamHI and EcoRI digestion from pCR8-Orai148–91 and ligated into pGEX6p-1.
Transfection.
HEK293 cells were transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) 8–24 h before electrophysiology experiments. Unless noted otherwise, STIM1- and Orai1-derived constructs were transfected in a 1:1 ratio by mass. For experiments with Cherry-STIM1-derived constructs and STIM1 constructs lacking a fluorophore, eGFP was cotransfected to visualize cells. For experiments with YFP-CAD (STIM1342–448) and other STIM1-derived constructs lacking the ER transmembrane domain, cells were incubated in the presence of 10 μM LaCl3 during the interval between transfection and electrophysiology experiments. This treatment served to reduce the toxic effect of constitutively active CRAC current on cells. The fast inactivation phenotype observed for currents induced by YFP-CAD (STIM1342–448) in pilot experiments conducted with cells cultured in the absence of 10 μM LaCl3 was identical to that seen when cells were cultured with 10 μM LaCl3.
Recording Solutions.
The 2 mM Ca2+ extracellular Ringer's solution contained 155 mM NaCl, 4.5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM D-glucose, and 5 mM Hepes (pH 7.4 with NaOH). The 20 mM Ca2+ extracellular Ringer's solution contained 130 mM NaCl, 4.5 mM KCl, 20 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM D-glucose, and 5 mM Hepes (pH 7.4 with NaOH). LaCl3 was added directly to parent solutions on the day of the experiment from a 10 mM stock to achieve the desired final concentration. The standard internal solution contained 150 mM Cs aspartate, 8 mM MgCl2, 10 mM EGTA, and 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.2 with CsOH); 10 mM EGTA in the pipette solution does not affect CDI of native CRAC channels (15, 16).
Electrophysiology.
Currents were recorded by using the standard whole-cell patch clamp technique as described (13). Cells were patch-clamped at room temperature (22–25 °C) with an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Axon Instruments/Molecular Devices) interfaced to an ITC-16 input/output board (Instrutech) and a Macintosh G3 computer. Pipettes of resistance 2–5 MΩ were fabricated from 100-μL pipettes (VWR) using a Flaming/Brown puller (model P-87; Sutter Instruments), fire-polished, and coated with Sylgard. Cell and pipette capacitances were nulled before recording. In-house routines developed on the Igor Pro platform (Wavemetrics) were used for stimulation, data acquisition, and analysis. Currents were sampled at 5 kHz and filtered at 2 kHz. Voltages were corrected for the junction potential of the pipette solution relative to Ringer's solution in the bath (−13 mV).
Cells were bathed in 2 mM Ca2+ Ringer's solution before seal formation. The holding potential was +30 mV. After break-in, cells were pulsed every 5 s with a 100-ms step to −100 mV followed by a 100-ms ramp from −100 to +100 mV until current reached a steady-state level (usually 300 s for STIM1 constructs with ER transmembrane domains, which required passive depletion of ER Ca2+ stores for current activation). Once a steady state was achieved, the external solution was changed to 20 mM Ca2+ Ringer's solution via a multibarrel local perfusion pipette. After the current level during steps to −100 mV had equilibrated to a new steady state in 20 mM Ca2+, a second stimulus protocol consisting of families of 200-ms voltage steps to −60, −80, −100, and −120 mV was applied, with a 5-s interval between steps. Last, both step-ramp and voltage-family protocols were recorded in 20 mM Ca2+ Ringer's solution with 10–100 μM LaCl3 for leak subtraction. All summary graphs of current magnitude or functions thereof use leak-subtracted current values.
Data Analysis.
Currents from voltage families demonstrating fast inactivation were fit with the biexponential function I = Io + A1e−t/τ1 + A2 e−t/τ2, where τ1 and τ2 represent slow and fast time constants of inactivation, respectively. To minimize contributions from uncompensated capacitative current, peak currents were measured at 3 ms after the beginning of the pulse, and biexponential fits of current decay were also started at the 3-ms time point. For Fig. 4, peak currents were measured at the 1.5-ms time point because of the rapid inactivation kinetics of Orai1 Y80A and Y80S. In all cases, steady-state current was measured at the 195-ms time point.
Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblot Analysis.
Eighteen hours after transfection, HEK293T cells were washed with PBS twice and lysed in 50 mM Tris·HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, and protease inhibitors with either 2 mM CaCl2 (for Ca2+ condition) or 4 mM EGTA (for Ca2+ free condition) for 15 min. Lysates were spun at 13,400 × g for 10 min, and the supernatant was incubated with anti-Flag M2 agarose beads (Sigma) for 2 h. After washing five times, lysates and immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS/PAGE and Western blotting analysis.
CaM-HRP Assays.
For purified recombinant CaM, pET3-CaM and pET-CaM (T27C) were transformed into Escherichia coli BL21 pRIL. Transformants were grown in liquid cultures. IPTG (1 mM) was added at an optical density of ≈0.5–0.7 at 600 nm; 3 h after induction at 30 °C, cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in extraction buffer [50 mM Tris·HCl (pH 7.5), 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, and protease inhibitors]. The cell suspensions were sonicated and treated with DNase (1 unit/mL of DNase I and 5 mM MgCl2) for 30 min. After clearing the lysates by centrifugation at 70,714 × g for 30 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was transferred to a new tube and added to 5 mM CaCl2 followed by a denaturation step at 85 °C for 2.5 min. The clear lysate was collected by centrifugation at 7,840 × g for 5 min and applied to phenyl-Sepharose (GE Healthcare) column. After serial washes with binding buffer [30 mM Tris·HCl (pH 7.5), 1 mM CaCl2], washing buffer [30 mM Tris·HCl (pH 7.5), 1 mM CaCl2, 200 mM NaCl], and binding buffer again, recombinant CaMs were eluted with elution buffer [30 mM Tris·HCl (pH 7.5), 2 mM EGTA]. All purified CaMs (CaM and CaM T27C) were dialyzed with 2 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.5 at 4 °C. Protein concentration was measured by the Bradford method (Bio-Rad).
Conjugation between CaM and HRP was performed as described (35). CaM-HRP gel overlay assays were performed by using crude whole bacterial lysates of GST and GST-Orai148–91 and purified CaM (T27C)-HRP as described (35)
CaM-Sepharose Pull-Down Assay.
Transiently transfected HEK293T were lysed in lysis buffer [50 mM Tris·HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, and protease inhibitor with either 2 mM CaCl2 or 4 mM EGTA] for 15 min. After centrifugation, the supernatant was applied to CaM-Sepharose 4B beads (GE Healthcare) for 1 h. After several washes with lysis buffer, SDS loading buffer was added to beads followed by SDS/PAGE.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments.
We thank Paul Hoover for generating and sharing the mCherry-STIM11–672 and mCherry-STIM11–448 constructs. F.M.M. was supported by the Department of Pathology, Stanford University. C.Y.P. was supported by Korea Research Foundation Grant KRF-2005-214-C00222 and the SPARK program. R.E.D. was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant NS048564 and Director's Pioneer Award DP1-OD003889. R.S.L. was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM045374 and a gift from the Mathers Charitable Foundation.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0906781106/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Parekh AB, Putney JW., Jr Store-operated calcium channels. Physiol Rev. 2005;85:757–810. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00057.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lewis RS. Calcium signaling mechanisms in T lymphocytes. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001;19:497–521. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Varnai P, Hunyady L, Balla T. STIM and Orai: The long-awaited constituents of store-operated calcium entry. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2009;30:118–128. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2008.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Frischauf I, et al. The STIM/Orai coupling machinery. Channels. 2008;2:261–268. doi: 10.4161/chan.2.4.6705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liou J, et al. STIM is a Ca2+ sensor essential for Ca2+-store-depletion-triggered Ca2+ influx. Curr Biol. 2005;15:1235–1241. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhang SL, et al. STIM1 is a Ca2+ sensor that activates CRAC channels and migrates from the Ca2+ store to the plasma membrane. Nature. 2005;437:902–905. doi: 10.1038/nature04147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liou J, Fivaz M, Inoue T, Meyer T. Live-cell imaging reveals sequential oligomerization and local plasma membrane targeting of stromal interaction molecule 1 after Ca2+ store depletion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:9301–9306. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702866104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wu MM, Luik RM, Lewis RS. Some assembly required: Constructing the elementary units of store-operated Ca2+ entry. Cell Calcium. 2007;42:163–172. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2007.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Luik RM, Wang B, Prakriya M, Wu MM, Lewis RS. Oligomerization of STIM1 couples ER calcium depletion to CRAC channel activation. Nature. 2008;454:538–542. doi: 10.1038/nature07065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Prakriya M, et al. Orai1 is an essential pore subunit of the CRAC channel. Nature. 2006;443:230–233. doi: 10.1038/nature05122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yeromin AV, et al. Molecular identification of the CRAC channel by altered ion selectivity in a mutant of Orai. Nature. 2006;443:226–229. doi: 10.1038/nature05108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vig M, et al. CRACM1 multimers form the ion-selective pore of the CRAC channel. Curr Biol. 2006;16:2073–2079. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Park CY, et al. STIM1 clusters and activates CRAC channels via direct binding of a cytosolic domain to Orai1. Cell. 2009;136:876–890. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yuan JP, et al. SOAR and the polybasic STIM1 domains gate and regulate Orai channels. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11:337–343. doi: 10.1038/ncb1842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hoth M, Penner R. Calcium release-activated calcium current in rat mast cells. J Physiol (London) 1993;465:359–386. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zweifach A, Lewis RS. Rapid inactivation of depletion-activated calcium current (ICRAC) due to local calcium feedback. J Gen Physiol. 1995;105:209–226. doi: 10.1085/jgp.105.2.209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Litjens T, Harland ML, Roberts ML, Barritt GJ, Rychkov GY. Fast Ca2+-dependent inactivation of the store-operated Ca2+ current (ISOC) in liver cells: A role for calmodulin. J Physiol (London) 2004;558:85–97. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.065870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Levitan IB. It is calmodulin after all! Mediator of the calcium modulation of multiple ion channels. Neuron. 1999;22:645–648. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80722-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Saimi Y, Kung C. Calmodulin as an ion channel subunit. Annu Rev Physiol. 2002;64:289–311. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.100301.111649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Scrimgeour N, Litjens T, Ma L, Barritt GJ, Rychkov GY. Properties of Orai1 mediated store-operated current depend on the expression levels of STIM1 and Orai1 proteins. J Physiol (London) 2009;587:2903–2918. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.170662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Muik M, et al. A cytosolic homomerization and a modulatory domain within STIM1 C terminus determine coupling to ORAI1 channels. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:8421–8426. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C800229200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bauer MC, O'Connell D, Cahill DJ, Linse S. Calmodulin binding to the polybasic C termini of STIM proteins involved in store-operated calcium entry. Biochemistry. 2008;47:6089–6091. doi: 10.1021/bi800496a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yap KL, et al. Calmodulin target database. J Struct Funct Genomics. 2000;1:8–14. doi: 10.1023/a:1011320027914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.O'Neil KT, DeGrado WF. How calmodulin binds its targets: Sequence independent recognition of amphiphilic α-helices. Trends Biochem Sci. 1990;15:59–64. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(90)90177-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Stathopulos PB, Zheng L, Li GY, Plevin MJ, Ikura M. Structural and mechanistic insights into STIM1-mediated initiation of store-operated calcium entry. Cell. 2008;135:110–122. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Oh-Hora M, et al. Dual functions for the endoplasmic reticulum calcium sensors STIM1 and STIM2 in T cell activation and tolerance. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:432–443. doi: 10.1038/ni1574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yeromin AV, Roos J, Stauderman KA, Cahalan MD. A store-operated calcium channel in Drosophila S2 cells. J Gen Physiol. 2004;123:167–182. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200308982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Estevez AY, Roberts RK, Strange K. Identification of store-independent and store-operated Ca2+ conductances in Caenorhabditis elegans intestinal epithelial cells. J Gen Physiol. 2003;122:207–223. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200308804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Luik RM, Wu MM, Buchanan J, Lewis RS. The elementary unit of store-operated Ca2+ entry: Local activation of CRAC channels by STIM1 at ER-plasma membrane junctions. J Cell Biol. 2006;174:815–825. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200604015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Erickson MG, Alseikhan BA, Peterson BZ, Yue DT. Preassociation of calmodulin with voltage-gated Ca2+ channels revealed by FRET in single living cells. Neuron. 2001;31:973–985. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00438-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pitt GS, et al. Molecular basis of calmodulin tethering and Ca2+-dependent inactivation of L-type Ca2+ channels. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:30794–30802. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M104959200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Maylie J, Bond CT, Herson PS, Lee WS, Adelman JP. Small conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels and calmodulin. J Physiol (London) 2004;554:255–261. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.049072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yamashita M, Navarro-Borelly L, McNally BA, Prakriya M. Orai1 mutations alter ion permeation and Ca2+-dependent fast inactivation of CRAC channels: Evidence for coupling of permeation and gating. J Gen Physiol. 2007;130:525–540. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200709872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wu MM, Buchanan J, Luik RM, Lewis RS. Ca2+ store depletion causes STIM1 to accumulate in ER regions closely associated with the plasma membrane. J Cell Biol. 2006;174:803–813. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200604014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lee SH, et al. Competitive binding of calmodulin isoforms to calmodulin-binding proteins: Implication for the function of calmodulin isoforms in plants. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1433:56–67. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4838(99)00149-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.