Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Behavior Analyst logoLink to The Behavior Analyst
. 1986 Spring;9(1):19–26. doi: 10.1007/BF03391926

Toward a technology of generalization: The identification of natural contingencies of reinforcement

Frank W Kohler, Charles R Greenwood
PMCID: PMC2741872  PMID: 22478644

Abstract

Applied behavior analysts have directed a growing effort towards the development of a technology for behavioral generalization and maintenance over the past decade. Among the list of potential generalization promoters thought to exist is the natural contingency of social reinforcement (i.e., a behavioral trap) for new behavior in its untrained form or setting, or over time. Although past researchers have noted a need to program for the generalization and maintenance of behavior change, the current understanding of behavioral traps precludes the use of these contingencies to support behavioral changes when interventions are not in operation. This article describes five forms of evidence useful for the identification and analysis of natural contingencies of reinforcement. Examples from the applied research literature are provided to illustrate the kinds of studies that would greatly enhance our knowledge of behavioral traps and improve our ability to understand and program the generalization of trained behaviors across diverse forms and settings, and over time.

Full text

PDF
19

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALLEN K. E., HART B., BUELL J. S., HARRIS F. R., WOLF M. M. EFFECTS OF SOCIAL REINFORCEMENT ON ISOLATE BEHAVIOR OF A NURSERY SCHOOL CHILD. Child Dev. 1964 Jun;35:511–518. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1964.tb05188.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Atthowe J. M., Jr Behavior innovation and persistence. Am Psychol. 1973 Jan;28(1):34–41. doi: 10.1037/h0034168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baer D. M., Wolf M. M., Risley T. R. Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):91–97. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buehler R. E., Patterson G. R., Furniss J. M. The reinforcement of behavior in institutional settings. Behav Res Ther. 1966 Aug;4(3):157–167. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(66)90002-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Buell J. Collateral social development accompanying reinforcement of outdoor play in a preschool child. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Summer;1(2):167–173. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cooke T. P., Apolloni T. Developing positive social-emotional behaviors: a study of training and generalization effects. J Appl Behav Anal. 1976 Spring;9(1):65–78. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Greenwood C. R., Sloane H. N., Baskin A. Training elementary aged peer behavior managers to control small group programmed mathematics. J Appl Behav Anal. 1974 Spring;7(1):103–114. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1974.7-103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hall R. V., Broden M. Behavior changes in brain-injured children through social reinforcement. J Exp Child Psychol. 1967 Dec;5(4):463–479. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(67)90042-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hopkins B. L. Effects of candy and social reinforcement, instructions, and reinforcement schedule leaning on the modification and maintenance of smiling. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Summer;1(2):121–129. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kohler F. W., Fowler S. A. Training prosocial behaviors to young children: an analysis of reciprocity with untrained peers. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):187–200. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nordquist V. M., Bradley B. Speech acquisition in a nonverbal isolate child. J Exp Child Psychol. 1973 Feb;15(1):149–160. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(73)90138-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. PATTERSON G. R., JONES R., WHITTIER J., WRIGHT M. A. A BEHAVIOUR MODIFICATION TECHNIQUE FOR THE HYPERACTIVE CHILD. Behav Res Ther. 1964;2(2-4):217–226. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(64)90019-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Reppucci N. D., Saunders J. T. Social psychology of behavior modification. Problems of implementation in natural settings. Am Psychol. 1974 Sep;29(9):649–660. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.29.9.649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Solomon R. W., Wahler R. G. Peer reinforcement control of classroom problem behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Spring;6(1):49–56. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stokes T. F., Baer D. M. An implicit technology of generalization. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Summer;10(2):349–367. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Strain P. S. An experimental analysis of peer social initiations on the behavior of withdrawn preschool children: some training and generalization effects. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1977 Dec;5(4):445–455. doi: 10.1007/BF00915092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Behavior Analyst are provided here courtesy of Association for Behavior Analysis International

RESOURCES