Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Behavior Analyst logoLink to The Behavior Analyst
. 1986 Fall;9(2):157–160. doi: 10.1007/BF03391941

Methodology, the matching law, and applied behavior analysis

Stuart A Vyse
PMCID: PMC2741895  PMID: 22478657

Abstract

The practical value of the quantitative analysis of behavior is limited by two methodological characteristics of this area of research: the use of (a) steady-state strategies and (b) relative vs. absolute response rates. Applied behavior analysts are concerned with both transition-state and steady-state behavior, and applied interventions are typically evaluated by their effects on absolute response rates. Quantitative analyses of behavior will have greater practical value when methods are developed for their extension to traditional rate-of-response variables measured across time. Although steady-state and relative-rate-of-response strategies are appropriate to the experimental analysis of many behavioral phenomena, these methods are rarely used by applied behavior analysts and further separate the basic and applied areas.

Full text

PDF
157

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baer D. M. A flight of behavior analysis. Behav Anal. 1981 Fall;4(2):85–91. doi: 10.1007/BF03391857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Epling W. F., Pierce W. D. Applied behavior analysis: New directions from the laboratory. Behav Anal. 1983 Spring;6(1):27–37. doi: 10.1007/BF03391871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Herrnstein R. J. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McDowell J. J. The importance of Herrnstein's mathematical statement of the law of effect for behavior therapy. Am Psychol. 1982 Jul;37(7):771–779. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.37.7.771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Michael J. Flight from behavior analysis. Behav Anal. 1980 Fall;3(2):1–21. doi: 10.1007/BF03391838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Myerson J., Hale S. Concurrent schedules and matching in applied settings: A reply to Fuqua. J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Fall;17(3):387–389. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Myerson J., Hale S. Practical implications of the matching law. J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Fall;17(3):367–380. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pierce W. D., Epling W. F. Choice, matching, and human behavior: A review of the literature. Behav Anal. 1983 Spring;6(1):57–76. doi: 10.1007/BF03391874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Poling A., Picker M., Grossett D., Hall-Johnson E., Holbrook M. The schism between experimental and applied behavior analysis: Is it real and who cares? Behav Anal. 1981 Fall;4(2):93–102. doi: 10.1007/BF03391858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Behavior Analyst are provided here courtesy of Association for Behavior Analysis International

RESOURCES