Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Behavior Analyst logoLink to The Behavior Analyst
. 1983 Fall;6(2):153–160. doi: 10.1007/BF03392394

Misconception and miseducation: Presentations of radical behaviorism in psychology textbooks

James T Todd, Edward K Morris
PMCID: PMC2741965  PMID: 22478585

Abstract

Behavior analysts have recently expressed concern about what appear to be misrepresentations of behaviorism in psychology textbooks. This paper presents an analysis of currently used textbooks in the areas of introductory, social, cognitive, personality, and developmental psychology that confirms this. Topics on which behavior analysis is most often misrepresented relate to the role of animal learning research, environmentalism, the “empty organism,” language, and the overall utility of the approach. Because textbooks are often a major medium of interaction between the public and behaviorism, behavior analysts must work to correct these errors and to prevent possible negative consequences of widespread misunderstanding. Several potential solutions to these problems are presented that take into account current publishing practices and the monetary contingencies which support them.

Full text

PDF
153

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abroms K. I., Bennett J. W. Current genetic and demographic findings in Down's syndrome: how are they presented in college textbooks on exceptionality? Ment Retard. 1980 Jun;18(3):101–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Epstein R., Lanza R. P., Skinner B. F. Symbolic Communication Between Two Pigeons, (Columba livia domestica). Science. 1980 Feb 1;207(4430):543–545. doi: 10.1126/science.207.4430.543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fodor J. A. The mind-body problem. Sci Am. 1981 Jan;244(1):114-20, 122-3. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0181-114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  5. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  6. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  8. SKINNER B. F. Are theories of learning necessary? Psychol Rev. 1950 Jul;57(4):193–216. doi: 10.1037/h0054367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. SKINNER B. F. Superstition in the pigeon. J Exp Psychol. 1948 Apr;38(2):168–172. doi: 10.1037/h0055873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Scholz S., Albert E. Vererbung der HLA-gekoppelten Krankheitsempfänglichkeit bei Zöliakie. MMW Munch Med Wochenschr. 1980 Apr 18;122(16):602–604. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sidman M., Tailby W. Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):5–22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Skinner B. F. Selection by consequences. Science. 1981 Jul 31;213(4507):501–504. doi: 10.1126/science.7244649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Skinner B. F. The phylogeny and ontogeny of behavior. Contingencies of reinforcement throw light on contingencies of survival in the evolution of behavior. Science. 1966 Sep 9;153(3741):1205–1213. doi: 10.1126/science.153.3741.1205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wolf M. M. Social validity: the case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Summer;11(2):203–214. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Behavior Analyst are provided here courtesy of Association for Behavior Analysis International

RESOURCES