Skip to main content
The Behavior Analyst logoLink to The Behavior Analyst
. 1982 Spring;5(1):29–43. doi: 10.1007/BF03393138

From innovation to standard practice: Developing and disseminating behavioral procedures

Stan C Paine, G Thomas Bellamy
PMCID: PMC2742016  PMID: 22478555

Abstract

This paper proposes a three-stage continuum for discussing the development and dissemination of behavioral technology. At the level of behavioral techniques, researchers need only establish a functional relationship between technologically defined intervention procedures and socially significant target behaviors. Dissemination is conducted for informational purposes only, and the purposes and details surrounding subsequent use of the technique are left to the discretion of the user. At the level of behavioral demonstration, a collection of socially acceptable intervention procedures is refined and standardized and must be shown to produce behavior changes across a number of subjects. Here dissemination is conducted, in large part, to generate support for provision of services. At the level of behavioral models, procedural descriptions must be useroriented. Additionally, model effects must be obtainable by agents not associated with their development and must compare favorably with other treatment or service alternatives. The purpose of dissemination at this level is to obtain adoptions and replications of the model. Details of development and dissemination of behavioral technology at each of these three levels are discussed.

Full text

PDF
29

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baer D. M., Wolf M. M., Risley T. R. Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):91–97. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clark H. B., Greene B. F., Macrae J. W., McNees M. P., Davis J. L., Risley T. R. A parent advice package for family shopping trips: development and evaluation. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Winter;10(4):605–624. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Davis H. R. Management of innovation and change in mental health services. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1978 Oct;29(10):649–658. doi: 10.1176/ps.29.10.649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fawcett S. B., Mathews R. M., Fletcher R. K. Some promising dimensions for behavioral community technology. J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Fall;13(3):505–518. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Stolz S. B. Adoption of innovations from applied behavioral research: "Does anybody care?". J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Winter;14(4):491–505. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Thomas D. R. Certification of behavior analysts in Minnesota. Behav Anal. 1979 Spring;2(1):1–13. doi: 10.1007/BF03391828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wolf M. M. Social validity: the case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Summer;11(2):203–214. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Behavior Analyst are provided here courtesy of Association for Behavior Analysis International

RESOURCES