Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Behavior Analyst logoLink to The Behavior Analyst
. 1989 Fall;12(2):131–141. doi: 10.1007/BF03392490

The convergence of behavioral biology and operant psychology: Toward an interlevel and interfield science

John K Robinson, William R Woodward
PMCID: PMC2742110  PMID: 22478027

Abstract

Behavioral biology and operant psychology have developed in parallel but separate paths since their origins in the 1930s. In the first three decades, both fields dealt with microscopic (or molecular) controlling variables and qualitative data. Since about 1960, both have primarily focused on macroscopic (or molar) controlling variables. Their shared interest in foraging in the 1980s suggests a limited convergence beween biologists and psychologists in data, methods, and theories. We draw on accounts of intertheoretic relations from the philosophy of science, including both interlevel theory and interfield theory, to understand this convergence. However, our greater emphasis on methods of data collection and analysis leads us to characterize the convergence as not only one of interfield theory but one of interfield science.

Keywords: ethology, behavioral ecology, optimal foraging theory, evolutionary theory, interfield theory, history of behaviorism

Full text

PDF
131

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baum W. M., Rachlin H. C. Choice as time allocation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):861–874. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baum W. M. The correlation-based law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jul;20(1):137–153. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Charnov E. L. Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol. 1976 Apr;9(2):129–136. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coleman S. R. Quantitative order in B. F. Skinner's early research program, 1928-1931. Behav Anal. 1987 Spring;10(1):47–65. doi: 10.1007/BF03392406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fantino E. Behavior analysis and behavioral ecology: A synergistic coupling. Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;8(2):151–157. doi: 10.1007/BF03393147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HERRNSTEIN R. J. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:267–272. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Herrnstein R. J. Formal properties of the matching law. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jan;21(1):159–164. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Herrnstein R. J., Hineline P. N. Negative reinforcement as shock-frequency reduction. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Jul;9(4):421–430. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Killeen P. On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):263–269. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mellgren R. L. Foraging in a simulated natural environment: There's a rat loose in the lab. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jul;38(1):93–100. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nevin J. A. Quantitative analysis. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Nov;42(3):421–434. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Skinner B. F. Selection by consequences. Science. 1981 Jul 31;213(4507):501–504. doi: 10.1126/science.7244649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Skinner B. F. The evolution of verbal behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Jan;45(1):115–122. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Skinner B. F. The phylogeny and ontogeny of behavior. Contingencies of reinforcement throw light on contingencies of survival in the evolution of behavior. Science. 1966 Sep 9;153(3741):1205–1213. doi: 10.1126/science.153.3741.1205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Skinner B. F. The shaping of phylogenic behavior. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 1975;35(5-6):409–415. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Staddon J. E., Hinson J. M., Kram R. Optimal choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 May;35(3):397–412. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wearden J. H., Burgess I. S. Matching since Baum (1979). J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Nov;38(3):339–348. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Behavior Analyst are provided here courtesy of Association for Behavior Analysis International

RESOURCES