Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1976 Mar;3(3):291–301. doi: 10.1128/jcm.3.3.291-301.1976

Modification of the Minitek Miniaturized Differentiation System for characterization of anaerobic bacteria.

D Stargel, F S Thompson, S E Phillips, G L Lombard, V R Dowell Jr
PMCID: PMC274286  PMID: 773959

Abstract

The Minitek Miniaturized System (BBL) was modified for characterization of anaerobic bacteria. The modified system and the conventional Center for Disease Control method were used to test a variety of anaerobic bacteria, and results were compared. Tests performed by both techniques were indole and H2S production, esculin hydrolysis, nitrate reduction, and fermentation of glucose, mannitol, lactose, sucrose, maltose, salicin, glycerol, xylose, arabinose, mannose, rhamnose, and trehalose. The manufacturer's recommended procedure for the Minitek system was modified by using a new suspension medium (Lombard-Dowell broth) and an inoculum equivalent to the density of a McFarland no. 5 nephelometer standard. The Minitek results, recorded after 48 h, agreed satisfactorily with the conventional test results, usually recorded after 5 to 7 days of incubation. In the examination of 80 strains representing 22 different species or subspecies of anaerobic bacteria, with 16 biochemical tests performed in triplicate, 93.8% of the Minitek test results agreed with those of the corresponding conventional tests. Only tests for indole, H2S, and nitrate reduction gave less than 90% agreement. It was concluded that the modified Minitek system is a suitable substitute for the more expensive and time-consuming conventional procedure for determining carbohydrate fermentation and esculin hydrolysis by anaerobes. This system, when used in conjunction with other tests, can effectively aid in the definitive identification of commonly isolated anaerobes.

Full text

PDF
291

Images in this article

292Image
on p.292

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arank A., Syed S. A., Kenney E. B., Freter R. Isolation of anaerobic bacteria from human gingiva and mouse cecum by means of a simplified glove box procedure. Appl Microbiol. 1969 Apr;17(4):568–576. doi: 10.1128/am.17.4.568-576.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buissière J., Nardon P. Microméthode d'identification des bactéries. I. Intérèt de la quantification des caractèrs biochimiques. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 1968 Aug;115(2):218–231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hansen S. L., Hardesty D. R., Myers B. M. Evaluation of the BBL Minitek system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Nov;28(5):798–801. doi: 10.1128/am.28.5.798-801.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kiehn T. E., Brennan K., Ellner P. D. Evaluation of the Minitek system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Oct;28(4):668–671. doi: 10.1128/am.28.4.668-671.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Martin W. J. Practical method for isolation of anerobic bacteria in the clinical laboratory. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Dec;22(6):1168–1171. doi: 10.1128/am.22.6.1168-1171.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Moore H. B., Sutter V. L., Finegold S. M. Comparison of three procedures for biochemical testing of anaerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Jan;1(1):15–24. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.1.15-24.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. SNYDER M. L., DONNELLY D., NIX M. J. On some practical applications of impregnated, dried paper discs containing various reagents for the cultural differentiation of bacteria. Am J Med Technol. 1951 May-Jun;17(3):105–111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schreckenberger P. C., Blazevic D. J. Rapid methods for biochemical testing of anaerobic bacteria. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Nov;28(5):759–762. doi: 10.1128/am.28.5.759-762.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Smith P. B., Tomfohrde K. M., Rhoden D. L., Balows A. API system: a multitube micromethod for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Sep;24(3):449–452. doi: 10.1128/am.24.3.449-452.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Starr S. E., Thompson F. S., Dowell V. R., Jr, Balows A. Micromethod system for identification of anaerobic bacteria. Appl Microbiol. 1973 May;25(5):713–717. doi: 10.1128/am.25.5.713-717.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sutter V. L., Carter W. T. Evaluation of media and reagents for indole-spot tests in anaerobic bacteriology. Am J Clin Pathol. 1972 Sep;58(3):335–338. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/58.3.335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. WEAVER R. H. Quicker bacteriological results. Am J Med Technol. 1954 Jan-Feb;20(1):14–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES