Abstract
Pregnancy in a woman with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) can be complicated by both lupus activity and pregnancy mishaps. The majority of recent studies demonstrate an increase in lupus activity during pregnancy, perhaps exacerbated by hormonal shifts required to maintain pregnancy. Increased lupus activity, in turn, prompts an elevated risk for poor pregnancy outcomes, including stillbirth, preterm birth, low birth weight, and preeclamspsia. Fortunately, the majority of pregnancies in women with SLE are successful. However, the interaction between pregnancy and SLE activity can lead to complications for both mother and baby.
Keywords: Systemic lupus erythematosus, Pregnancy, Disease activity, Hydroxychloroquine, Azathioprine
Introduction
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) primarily affects women in their reproductive years, making the issue of pregnancy important to many patients. There are an estimated 4500 pregnancies to women with SLE each year in the United States. 1, 2
The impact of pregnancy on SLE activity has been debated in the literature, but the majority of studies endorse an increase in disease activity during pregnancy. In some patients, this will mean a dramatic worsening of symptoms that can be life-threatening. Most patients, however, will have an increase in symptoms making pregnancy uncomfortable, but not impacting their long-term survival.
Women with SLE have complicated pregnancies: one third will result in a cesearean section, 33% will have preterm birth, and over 20% will be complicated by preeclampsia. 1, 3 Increased lupus activity, particularly prior to conception and early in pregnancy, significantly increases the risks for these complications. For this reason, timing pregnancy to coincide with a period of SLE quiescence is a worthy goal.
This article will address the impact of pregnancy on SLE activity, of SLE activity on pregnancy outcome, and the treatment of women with SLE to minimize these effects.
SLE Activity during Pregnancy
Whether SLE activity increases during pregnancy or not has been widely debated in the literature. In murine models, increasing doses of estrogen, like those seen in pregnancy, promote physiological and immunological changes associated with increased lupus activity. 4, 5 Different methods to determine a flare and active lupus were used in many of the cohort studies of SLE pregnancy in the literature. Therefore, it is difficult to draw clear conclusions about the impact of pregnancy on SLE activity. Several small studies that matched pregnant lupus patients to non-pregnant lupus patients found no significant increase in SLE activity during pregnancy. 6–9 However, more recent studies have demonstrated a 2 to 3-fold increase in SLE activity during pregnancy. 10–13 (Table 1) Based on these studies, it appears that between 35–70% of all pregnancies will have measurable SLE activity, with most studies demonstrating the risk to be between 40–50%. 8, 9, 11–16 The risk for a moderate to severe flare is lower, and ranges between 15–30%. 14–16
Table 1.
Pregnancy probably increases lupus activity |
About 50% of women will have measurable SLE activity during pregnancy |
Most of the disease activity will be mild to moderate 15–30% of women will have highly active SLE in pregnancy |
Most common types of SLE activity in pregnancy:
|
Risk factors for increased lupus activity:
|
The risk of lupus flare is drastically increased if the woman has had active lupus in the 6 months prior to pregnancy. Two-hundred and sixty-five pregnancies to women with lupus were seen in the Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Cohort between 1987 and 2002. In this cohort, the risk for significant SLE activity during pregnancy was 7.25-fold higher if the patient had recently active lupus prior to conception (58% vs 8%, p<0.001). 16 Other studies have found a 2-fold increase in risk for lupus flare during pregnancy among women with active SLE at conception. 8, 14 Other risk factors for increased lupus activity in pregnancy include the discontinuation of antimalarial therapy and a history of highly-active lupus in the years prior to pregnancy. 13, 17
Types of Disease Activity
Fortunately, the majority of SLE activity in pregnancy is not severe. In most studies, skin, joint, and constitutional symptoms are the most commonly reported. The risk for skin disease ranges from 25 to 90%, depending on the severity measured. 12, 18, 19 The rates for arthritis during pregnancy are similarly disparate between studies, based on the severity measured. However, 2 large cohorts demonstrate a 20% risk of significant arthritis, though many more women will have an increase in less-severe joint pain. 12 Hematologic disease, in particular thrombocytopenia, is also common during pregnancy, with the risk ranging from 10–40% in different cohorts. 12, 18
The risk for lupus nephritis during lupus ranges from 4% to 30%, based on the cohort characteristics and the definition of lupus nephritis. 9, 10, 13, 20 Women with a prior history of lupus nephritis have 20–30% risk of relapse during pregnancy. 9, 13 For women who have worsening renal function due to SLE nephritis during pregnancy, an estimated 25% had continuing renal damage after pregnancy, despite aggressive therapy. 11, 13, 15 Fortunately, very few women require life-long dialysis.
Timing of SLE flares in pregnancy
Lupus flares can occur at any time during pregnancy, as well as in the several months following delivery. Though several studies have reported on the timing of activity in trimesters, there does not appear to be a consistent pattern. 8, 16, 18 It is important to keep in mind, however, that lupus patients remain at risk of flare in the months following delivery. 8, 18
Impact of SLE activity on Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnancy Loss
Overall, about 20% of pregnancies to women with SLE will end with a miscarriage or stillbirth. 3 The risk of miscarriage (a pregnancy loss prior to 20 weeks gestation) is not markedly elevated over the general population. The risk of stillbirth (a pregnancy loss after 20 weeks gestation), however, is elevated in several studies. The two most important risk factors for pregnancy loss are increased lupus activity and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). In a Greek cohort of SLE pregnancies, 6 of 8 (75%) pregnancies with high activity SLE resulted in a fetal loss, while only 14% of pregnancies without active lupus and 5% of non-SLE pregnancies ended with a loss. 18 In the Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Cohort, increased lupus activity did not increase the risk for miscarriage, but the stillbirth rate was 3-fold higher. 16 (Table 2) The timing of lupus activity impacts the pregnancy loss rate, with activity early in pregnancy being the most dangerous. Proteinuria, thrombocytopenia, and hypertension in the 1st trimester are each indendent risk factors for pregnancy loss. A woman with any of these risk factors has a 30–40% chance of suffering a pregnancy loss. 21
Table 2.
Complication | Moderate to severely active SLE (n=57) | Inactive or mildly active SLE (n=210) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|
Miscarriage | 7% | 7% | 0.9 |
Stillbirth: | 16% | 5% | <0.01 |
Extreme Preterm (<28 weeks gestation) | 17% | 6% | 0.09 |
Late Preterm (28 to 37 weeks gestation) | 49% | 26% | <0.001 |
Small for gestational age baby (<10th percentile weight for gestational age) | 30% | 21% | 0.23 |
Data from Clowse MEB, Magder L, Witter F, Petri M. The impact of increased lupus activity on obstetric outcomes. Arthritis Rheum, 2005. 52(2): p. 514–21
Preterm Birth
The risk for preterm birth (delivery prior to 37 weeks gestation) is estimated to be 33% in all lupus pregnancies. 3 In a population-based study of 555 lupus deliveries in California, 21% were preterm, which was almost 6-fold higher than the rate in healthy women. 22 Among cohorts at tertiary referral centers, however, the rate tends to be higher, ranging from 20–54%. 3, 9, 11–16, 20 Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is a prominent cause of preterm birth among lupus patients. 11, 23 While most of the preterm births are spontaneous, a significant proportion of them are induced to protect the health of either the mother or the baby. 3, 11
Risk factors for preterm birth include lupus activity prior to and during pregnancy, higher prednisone dose, and hypertension. In the Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Cohort, 66% of pregnancies with active lupus delivered preterm, vs. 32% of pregnancies without active lupus (p<0.05). (Table 2) Babies born prior to 28 weeks gestation are at highest risk for long-term medical complications and neonatal death. Within this cohort, 17% of all pregnancies with active SLE were born between 24 and 28 weeks gestation, but only 6% of those without SLE activity (p=0.09). 16
In women without SLE, an estimated one-third of spontaneous preterm births are associated with infection within the uterus. The inflammation associated with chorioamnitis is postulated to promote dissolution of the amniotic sac, ripening of the cervix, and uterine contractions, which all lead to preterm birth. Unfortunately, no data have been published about the rate of chorioamnititis in SLE pregnancies. Placenta studies, however, do not show increased rates for infection on pathology. 24 We can hypothesize that the inflammation seen in active lupus may have a similar effect on the utero-placental unit, thereby increasing preterm labor and rupture of membranes. Research to study this hypothesis is in its infancy, but in the future we hope that the role of inflammation in preterm birth will be more clearly elucidated. Once this mechanism is understood, improved methods of therapy may be developed.
Low Birth Weight
Any study of low birth weight babies, in particular among lupus pregnancies, is complicated by the high rate of preterm birth. Therefore, the correction of the weight by gestational age is generally used. A small for gestational age (SGA) baby weighs less than the tenth percentile based on national norms. 25 On average, 9.4% of all SLE pregnancy cohort births were SGA, comparable to what would be expected in the general population. 3 However, some cohorts had significant increases over the expected rate, with some as high as 35%. 11, 16 Given the relatively small risk for SGA, clear risk factors have not been identified. When a pregnancy is complicated by placental insufficiency, the baby is frequently slow to grow and fails to gain adequate weight. Placental studies report a higher incidence of thrombosis among pregnancies affected by SLE. 24 For this reason, it is not surprising that some SLE pregnancies produce growth-restricted infants.
Preeclampsia
Preeclampsia is characterized as elevated blood pressure and proteinuria starting in the latter half of pregnancy. Preeclampsia places a woman and her fetus at considerable risk for stroke, preterm birth, and even death. In severe situations, preeclampsia may evolve into eclampsia with the addition of grand mal seizures in the mother. Definitive treatment for preeclampsia is delivery of the pregnancy; once the fetus (and probably more importantly the placenta) is removed, the hypertension, proteinuria, and risks subside.
SLE pregnancies are at increased risk for preeclampsia. Preeclampsia complicates 5–8% of pregnancies in the United States. However among lupus pregnancy cohorts, the rate of preeclampsia ranges from 13 to 35%. 2, 14, 26, 27 Preeclampsia is thought to arise from vascular dysfunction in the placenta. Several experimental markers for preeclampsia, including sFlt-1 (soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase) and PIGF (placental growth factor), have been found to correspond to preeclampsia in lupus patients as they do in women with SLE. 28 Women at particular risk for preeclampsia are in their first pregnancy, have a history of preeclampsia or renal disease, have active SLE at conception, have positive anti-dsDNA or RNP antibodies, have low complement, are obese, and/or have hypertension. 11, 14, 26, 27 (Table 4)
Table 4.
Preeclampsia | SLE activity | |
---|---|---|
RISK FACTORS | ||
1st pregnancy | Increases risk | No impact |
Preeclampsia in prior pregnancy | Increases risk | No impact |
Multifetal gestation | Increases risk | Unknown impact |
History of lupus nephritis | Increases risk | Increases risk |
Timing in pregnancy | Always after 20 weeks, usually after 30 weeks gestation | Any time in pregnancy |
LABORATORY FINDINGS | ||
Active urine sediment (WBC, RBC, casts) | Usually negative | Positive |
Coombs test | Usually negative | May be positive |
Anti-platelet antibody | Usually negative | May be positive |
Complement (C3 & C4) | Usually normal | May be low |
Anti-dsDNA antibody | Usually negative | May be positive |
Serum Uric Acid | Over 5.5 mg/dl | No change |
Urine Calcium | Low | Normal |
sFlt-1 (soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase 1) | High | Unknown |
PlGF (Placental Growth Factor) | Low | Unknown |
PHYSICAL FINDINGS: Signs and Symptoms of Active SLE | ||
Dermatologic disease
|
Not present | Present |
Arthritis | Not present | Present |
Serositis | Not present | Present |
Lupus nephritis in pregnancy
Among cohorts of patients with a history of lupus nephritis prior to pregnancy, pregnancy loss rates range from 8 to 36%, excluding pregnancies that are electively terminated. 26, 29, 30 In patients with active lupus nephritis in pregnancy, fetal loss occurs in 36–52% of the pregnancies. 30, 31 Among patients with prior lupus nephritis but with stable creatinine and minimal proteinuria during pregnancy, 11–13% resulted in a fetal loss. 30, 31 Prematurity occurs in 16% to 75% of pregnancies, with most series reporting around 35–40% preterm. 26, 29, 30, 32, 33 Though a history of lupus nephritis does not preclude pregnancy, it does increase the risks for reactivation of lupus activity, preeclampsia, and pregnancy loss.
Distinguishing lupus activity from the signs and symptoms of pregnancy
SLE versus Pregnancy: Signs and Symptoms
Many of the signs and symptoms of pregnancy can be easily mistaken for signs of active SLE. (Table 3) For this reason, when the SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) was modified for pregnancy, several caveats were included to rule out pregnancy-related complications, thus allowing for a clearer measure of true SLE activity. 34 Symptoms such as severe fatigue, melasma (the “mask of pregnancy”), post-partum hair loss, increased shortness of breath, arthralgias, and headaches frequently accompany normal pregnancy.
Table 3.
Constitutional |
|
Skin |
|
Face |
|
Hair |
|
Pulmonary |
|
Musculoskeletal |
|
CNS |
|
From A Companion to Rheumatology: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Editors Tsokos, Gordon, and Smolen, with permission
Arthralgias are common among pregnant women due to increased weight as well as the effect of relaxin on the joints. A study comparing pregnant women with and without rheumatoid arthritis documented that even women without arthritis develop significant pain. The HAQ (Health Assessment Questionnaire) score for healthy women increased from 0.02 in the first trimester to 0.16 in the 2nd and 0.48 in the third (score ranges from 0 to 3). 35
As up to 30% of SLE patients are also affected by fibromyalgia, it is important to distinguish between the aches and pains of fibromyalgia and an arthritis that is accompanied by inflammation. There is very limited published information about the change in fibromyalgia symptoms in pregnancy. A single study comparing 22 pregnant women with fibromyalgia and 22 pregnant women without found a significant worsening of fibromyalgia symptoms during pregnancy. 36 As steroids do not have a role in treating fibromyalgia, they should not be given if inflammation is not present.
In normal pregnancy, the woman’s blood volume increases by 50%, which alters several laboratory parameters. The hematocrit frequently falls because of hemodilution. Up to 50% of pregnancies in healthy women may have some degree of anemia. Hemolytic anemia, however, is not considered normal and could be a sign of a lupus flare or HELLP syndrome (a severe derivative of preeclampsia with Hemolysis, Elevated Liver tests, Low Platelets). Mild thrombocytopenia, usually with a platelet count around 100,000, can occur in up to 8% of healthy pregnancies. A platelet count below this, however, is more likely to be from lupus activity and/or severe preeclampsia or HELLP syndrome.
The creatinine normally falls secondary to the increased glomerular filtration rate required to accommodate the increased blood volume. In fact, a creatinine that remains stable throughout pregnancy and does not decrease could be a sign of renal insufficiency. In women with prior renal damage from lupus nephritis, the degree of urine protein may increase. This is, again, secondary to increased blood flow through the kidneys, resulting in increased tubular flow. Therefore, alarm should not be raised unless baseline proteinuria doubles. Even in healthy pregnancies, a small degree of proteinuria (<300mg/24hrs) can be considered within the normal range.
Complement levels (C3 and C4) may fall with increased lupus activity, as these proteins are consumed in the inflammatory process. 37 In pregnancy, however, the complement levels may increase 10–50% in response to increased hepatic protein synthesis. 38 Therefore, the utility of complement measurement in pregnancy is unclear. In the Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Cohort, half of the pregnancies had hypocomplementemia at some point. Low complement alone was not particularly predictive of either lupus activity or pregnancy outcome. However, the combination of low complement and high activity lupus led to a 3–5 fold increase in pregnancy loss and preterm birth. 39
The anti-double stranded DNA antibody (dsDNA) is very sensitive for the diagnosis of lupus, and can be indicative of increased lupus activity, especially in the kidney. A rising level of dsDNA during pregnancy may correspond to increasing lupus activity. In the Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Cohort, 43% of women had a positive dsDNA during pregnancy. Women with a positive dsDNA had a higher incidence of increased lupus activity (28%) than those without this antibody (16%, p<0.05). 39 However, this antibody did not predict pregnancy outcomes. Instead, the combination of a positive dsDNA titer and highly active SLE contributed towards a 4–6 fold increase in perinatal mortality and a 2–3 fold decrease in fullterm birth. 39
The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is unreliable in pregnancy as it increases significantly in normal pregnancy. The C-reactive protein (CRP), however, may be more useful during pregnancy. In non-SLE pregnancies, an increased CRP in the 2nd trimester has been associated with preterm birth. 40 The CRP does not increase in all pregnancies, and may be more reflective of the degree of overall inflammation during pregnancy. In non-pregnant SLE patients, the CRP may increase with a lupus flare. 41–43 The use of CRP has not been systematically tested in SLE pregnancies yet.
Distinguishing lupus nephritis from preeclampsia
One of the greatest challenges of caring for pregnant SLE patients is distinguishing between preeclampsia and a lupus nephritis flare. Both present with proteinuria, hypertension, lower extremity edema, and may have more systemic effects, as well. (Table 4) The treatment of these two conditions is different: preeclampsia will remit with delivery of the fetus, but active SLE will require immunosuppression.
Preeclampsia is diagnosed when a pregnant woman develops a blood pressure >140/90 and proteinuria >0.3g per 24 hours after 20 weeks gestation. Severe preeclampsia can be accompanied by severe hypertension (≥160/110); microangiopathic hemolytic anemia with thrombocytopenia, anemia, and an elevated lactate dehydrogenase; liver damage with elevated liver enzymes, and epigastric pain; CNS ischemia causing headache, visual changes, and stroke; and renal pathology with nephrotic range proteinuria and a rising serum creatinine. Eclampsia is the addition of grand mal seizures to preeclampsia.
The breadth of symptoms that can be attributed to severe preeclampsia makes it clear that distinguishing it from active lupus is difficult, and in some situations, impossible. Table 4 outlines some risk factors, laboratory, and physical findings that may clarify the diagnosis. Prior lupus nephritis increases the risk for both a renal SLE flare in pregnancy as well as preeclampsia.
Treatment of SLE in pregnancy
All pregnant women should take a prenatal multivitamin with at least 400mg of folic acid each day. Folic acid supplementation is very important for women who have taken methotrexate prior to pregnancy, as folate deficiency can lead to neural tube defects. (Table 5)
Table 5.
Treatment | FDA Classification a | Recommended us in SLE pregnancy |
---|---|---|
Prenatal Multivitamin | A | All women |
Acetaminophen | A | As needed for pain control |
NSAID | B 1st & 2nd trimesters. D 3rd trimester | As needed for pain control in the latter 1st trimester and 2nd trimester only. Discontinue in 3rd trimester. |
Prednisone & Prednisolone | B | As needed to control lupus activity. |
Dexamethasone & Betamethasone | C | Not for treatment of lupus. As needed to treat the fetus. |
Hydroxychloroquine | C | For all women if on prior to pregnancy or to treat mild flares in pregnancy |
IVIg | C | As needed to control lupus activity. |
Mycophenolate mofetil | C | Only if no other options |
Azathioprine | D | Continue if on prior to pregnancy. May help treat flares. |
Cyclophosphamide | D | Only if no other options |
Methotrexate | X | No use |
Leflunomide | X | No use |
FDA pregnancy risk categories: A, no risk in controlled clinic trials of humans; B, human data reassuring or when absent, animal studies show no risk; C, human data are lacking and animal studies show risk or are not done; D, positive evidence of risk but the benefit may outweigh the risks; X, contraindicated in pregnancy.
Prevention of SLE Activity
The best prevention of SLE flares during pregnancy is the delay of conception until a woman has had quiescent SLE for at least 6 months. In many situations, however, this is not possible. The continuation of medications for SLE during pregnancy helps to prevent SLE flares.
Many women with SLE will be taking hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) (Plaquenil) prior to pregnancy. This medication has been proven to decrease the risk of SLE flare, improve the prognosis of SLE nephritis, and prevent death. 44–46 It is also very well tolerated with arguably the best side-effect profile of any medication available to treat SLE. An expert panel, comprised of 29 international leaders in the research and care of women with SLE, recently recommended the continuation of HCQ during pregnancy. 47 Among over 300 pregnancies described in the literature that were exposed to HCQ for the treatment of autoimmune disease, there has been no elevation of fetal anomalies identified. When chloroquine is taken at supratherapeutic doses, there may be ocular or auditory damage. However, no such changes were seen among 133 babies exposed to HCQ in utero. 48
In non-pregnant SLE patients, the cessation of HCQ is associated with a 2-fold risk of SLE flare within the following 6 months. 46 Among pregnant SLE patients, as well, the risk for flare increases when HCQ is discontinued. In the Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Cohort, 38 women discontinued HCQ just prior to or early in pregnancy due to concern about fetal exposure and 56 women continued HCQ throughout pregnancy. 17 (Table 6) Among women who discontinued the medication, the risk for increased lupus activity, whether measured by absolute physician’s estimate of activity, change in this scale, or the SLEDAI, was significantly increased. More of these women required corticosteroid therapy at higher doses than women who continued HCQ. Within this cohort, as in other reports, there was no increase in fetal abnormalities after HCQ exposure. The pregnancy outcomes among women who continued and discontinued HCQ were similar. This likely reflects the type of SLE activity that women who discontinued HCQ suffered: they did not have increased rates of lupus nephritis, anemia, or thrombocytopenia. Instead, women who discontinued HCQ had increased incidence of fatigue and joint symptoms. Though these symptoms are uncomfortable, they are generally not life-threatening nor require cytotoxic therapy. They may, however, prompt the institution or increase of corticosteroid therapy mid-pregnancy.
Table 6.
Continued HCQ | Discontinued HCQ | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Total Pregnancies | 56 | 38 | |
High PEA | 6 (11%) | 9 (24%) | .05 |
Flare rate | 17 (30%) | 21 (55%) | .05 |
SLEDAI ≥4 | 29 (52%) | 32 (84%) | .007 |
Prednisone use | 35 (63%) | 34 (89%) | 0.002 |
Maximum prednisone dose (mean +/−SD) | 16 ± 12 mg | 21 ± 16 mg | 0.06 |
Data from Clowse MEB, Magder L, Witter F, Petri M. Hydroxychloroquine in lupus pregnancy. Arthritis Rheum, 2006. 54(11): p. 3640–7
Azathioprine (Imuran) may be the safest immunosuppressant medication during pregnancy. The fetal liver does not have the enzyme required to metabolize azathioprine into its active form. 47 A report of 3 women who took azathioprine throughout pregnancy for inflammatory bowel disease or autoimmune hepatitis revealed comparable levels of 6-thioguaninenucleoties (6-TGN) but no evidence of 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP) in fetal blood at the time of delivery. 49 The level of 6-TGN is associated with myelosuppression in adults, and may rarely prompt transient myelosuppression after in utero exposure. 50 Series of pregnancies exposed to azathioprine for inflammatory bowel disease or renal transplants show no significant increase in fetal abnormalities. 47 Among renal transplant patients, however, up to 40% of the offspring were small for gestational age. It is not clear if this was a product of the underlying illness, corticosteroids, or azathioprine use. 47, 51
Little data are available about the use of azathioprine in SLE pregnancy. In the Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Cohort, 31 pregnancies were exposed to azathioprine. 52 Among the women who conceived while taking azathioprine and continued it through pregnancy, 2 of the 13 ended in a pregnancy loss, both in women who developed active SLE in pregnancy. Among the 10 women who maintained low lupus activity and azathioprine throughout pregnancy, all resulted in live births at greater than 34 weeks gestation. Based on these data, we recommend continuing azathioprine throughout pregnancy if the woman required it prior to pregnancy to treat her lupus. We also recommend switching women from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to azathioprine prior to conception to avoid the teratogenic effects of the MMF.
Treatment of SLE flares during pregnancy
Women without any signs or symptoms of active SLE require no specific treatment during pregnancy. Prior recommendations for prophylactic corticosteroids have been rescinded due to increased hypertension, preterm birth, and low birth weight seen with excess use of this medication.
Mild activity can be treated with low dose prednisone (under 20mg per day) as required. The side effects of low dose corticosteroids include increased risk for hypertension and diabetes, just as in a non-pregnant woman. There may be a 2-fold increased risk for cleft lip or palate with systemic corticosteroid use, though the absolute risk for this remains low (about 20 per 10,000 babies with corticosteroid exposure). 53, 54
NSAIDs can be used during the latter part of the 1st trimester and during the 2nd trimester. There is evidence in a murine model that COX enzymes are important for embryo implantation, which may explain the increased risk for early miscarriage in women taking NSAIDs around the time of conception. 47, 55, 56 NSAIDs are considered fairly safe in the 2nd trimester, though they may decrease fetal renal excretion and therefore promote oligohydramnios. 57, 58 NSAIDs should be stopped in the 3rd trimester for 2 reasons: they can prolong labor and may promote premature closure of the ductus arteriosis. 47
Moderate lupus activity can be treated with higher doses of corticosteroids, including pulse-dose steroids. Only a small percentage of each dose of prednisone and prednisolone cross the maternal-fetal membranes. However, fluorinated glucocorticoids, such as dexamethasone and betamethasone, easily transfer to the fetus. These steroids can be helpful in treating the fetus, in particular in promoting fetal lung maturity prior to a preterm delivery. However, they have also been associated with lasting adverse effects on the offspring. Children exposed to these corticosteroids may have increased blood pressure and cognitive deficits. 59, 60 Therefore, dexamethasone and betamethasone should not be used to treat lupus activity during pregnancy.
The commencement of azathioprine mid-pregnancy for a lupus flare may be risky. There are little data published on the use of azathioprine in lupus pregnancy. However, in the Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Cohort there was an increase in pregnancy loss among woman who used azathioprine to treat a moderate to severe flare: of the 8 pregnancies with moderate to severe flare treated with azathioprine 5 (63%) resulted in a pregnancy loss, whereas only 1 of 9 (11%) of those without azathioprine were lost (p=0.02). 52
Another option for treatment mid-pregnancy is intravenous immunoglobin (IVIg). IVIg can be particularly helpful in controlling hematologic and renal disease. 61, 62 There are no published series of IVIg use in pregnancy for lupus, however there are multiple reports of IVIg use to prevent recurrent miscarriage. In these cases, the primary outcome is live birth, and there is no change in this rate with the use of IVIg. Little has been published on the effects of IVIg on the offspring, but cell count levels seem to be stable and no congenital anomalies have been reported. IVIg that contains sucrose can prompt renal insufficiency, but this has not hampered the treatment of non-pregnant women with lupus nephritis. 62 Some women will develop headaches, rigors, or fevers with IVIg therapy, but more severe side effects are rare.
Cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) and mycophenolate mofetil (Cellcept) should be avoided during pregnancy. First trimester exposure to cyclophosphamide causes fetal abnormalities in a significant minority of patients. Exposure in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters does not increase the risk for fetal anomalies among women treated for breast cancer during pregnancy. Of the 3 SLE pregnancies with cyclophosphamide treatment during mid-pregnancy reported in the literature, however, only one resulted in a live birth. 63, 64 Cyclophosphamide should only be used when all other options are exhausted and a frank a discussion about the risk for pregnancy loss has been discussed with the mother. The data on MMF in pregnancy are scarce but worrisome. There appears to be an elevated risk for both fetal anomalies and pregnancy losses. 47
Conclusion
The hormonal and physiologic changes that occur in pregnancy can induce lupus activity. Likewise, the increased inflammatory response during a lupus flare can cause significant pregnancy complications. Distinguishing between lupus activity and signs of both healthy and pathologic pregnancy can be difficult. The collaboration of a rheumatologist and high-risk obstetrician are best equipped to care for women with lupus who become pregnant. Fortunately, most women with lupus remain well throughout pregnancy and deliver healthy babies. However, careful planning and treatment may be required to achieve this success.
Acknowledgments
Megan Clowse is a BIRCWH Scholar: NIH grant number 5K12-HD-043446.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Clowse MEB, Jamison MG, Myers E, James AH. National study of medical complications in SLE pregnancies. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 September;54(9 supplement):S263. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chakravarty EF, Nelson L, Krishnan E. Obstetric hospitalizations in the United States for women with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Mar;54(3):899–907. doi: 10.1002/art.21663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Clark CA, Spitzer KA, Nadler JN, Laskin CA. Preterm deliveries in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2003 Oct;30(10):2127–2132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cohen-Solal JF, Jeganathan V, Grimaldi CM, Peeva E, Diamond B. Sex hormones and SLE: influencing the fate of autoreactive B cells. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2006;305:67–88. doi: 10.1007/3-540-29714-6_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Grimaldi CM. Sex and systemic lupus erythematosus: the role of the sex hormones estrogen and prolactin on the regulation of autoreactive B cells. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2006 Sep;18(5):456–461. doi: 10.1097/01.bor.0000240354.37927.dd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lockshin MD. Pregnancy does not cause systemic lupus erythematosus to worsen. Arthritis Rheum. 1989 Jun;32(6):665–670. doi: 10.1002/anr.1780320602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Meehan RT, Dorsey JK. Pregnancy among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus receiving immunosuppressive therapy. J Rheumatol. 1987 Apr;14(2):252–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Urowitz MB, Gladman DD, Farewell VT, Stewart J, McDonald J. Lupus and pregnancy studies. Arthritis Rheum. 1993 Oct;36(10):1392–1397. doi: 10.1002/art.1780361011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tincani A, Faden D, Tarantini M, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus and pregnancy: a prospective study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1992 Sep–Oct;10(5):439–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Petri M. Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Center: 1987 to 1996. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1997 Feb;23(1):1–13. doi: 10.1016/s0889-857x(05)70311-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lima F, Buchanan NM, Khamashta MA, Kerslake S, Hughes GR. Obstetric outcome in systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Dec;25(3):184–192. doi: 10.1016/s0049-0172(95)80030-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Carmona F, Font J, Cervera R, Munoz F, Cararach V, Balasch J. Obstetrical outcome of pregnancy in patients with systemic Lupus erythematosus. A study of 60 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999 Apr;83(2):137–142. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(98)00312-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cortes-Hernandez J, Ordi-Ros J, Paredes F, Casellas M, Castillo F, Vilardell-Tarres M. Clinical predictors of fetal and maternal outcome in systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective study of 103 pregnancies. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2002 Jun;41(6):643–650. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/41.6.643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chakravarty EF, Colon I, Langen ES, et al. Factors that predict prematurity and preeclampsia in pregnancies that are complicated by systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jun;192(6):1897–1904. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rubbert A, Pirner K, Wildt L, Kalden JR, Manger B. Pregnancy course and complications in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1992 Oct–Dec;28(3–4):205–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1992.tb00792.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Clowse ME, Magder LS, Witter F, Petri M. The impact of increased lupus activity on obstetric outcomes. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Feb;52(2):514–521. doi: 10.1002/art.20864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Clowse ME, Magder L, Witter F, Petri M. Hydroxychloroquine in lupus pregnancy. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Nov;54(11):3640–3647. doi: 10.1002/art.22159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Georgiou PE, Politi EN, Katsimbri P, Sakka V, Drosos AA. Outcome of lupus pregnancy: a controlled study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000 Sep;39(9):1014–1019. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.9.1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Petri M, Howard D, Repke J, Goldman DW. The Hopkins Lupus Pregnancy Center: 1987–1991 update. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1992 Oct–Dec;28(3–4):188–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1992.tb00788.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wong KL, Chan FY, Lee CP. Outcome of pregnancy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. A prospective study. Arch Intern Med. 1991 Feb;151(2):269–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Clowse ME, Magder LS, Witter F, Petri M. Early risk factors for pregnancy loss in lupus. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Feb;107(2 Pt 1):293–299. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000194205.95870.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yasmeen S, Wilkins EE, Field NT, Sheikh RA, Gilbert WM. Pregnancy outcomes in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Matern Fetal Med. 2001 Apr;10(2):91–96. doi: 10.1080/714904302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Johnson MJ, Petri M, Witter FR, Repke JT. Evaluation of preterm delivery in a systemic lupus erythematosus pregnancy clinic. Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Sep;86(3):396–399. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00186-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Magid MS, Kaplan C, Sammaritano LR, Peterson M, Druzin ML, Lockshin MD. Placental pathology in systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jul;179(1):226–234. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70277-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Feb;87(2):163–168. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00386-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Moroni G, Ponticelli C. The risk of pregnancy in patients with lupus nephritis. J Nephrol. 2003 Mar–Apr;16(2):161–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Qazi UM, Petri M. Autoantibodies, low complement, and obesity predict preeclampsia in SLE: A case-control study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 September;54(9 supplement):S264. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Qazi UM, Lam C, Karumanchi A, Petri M. Soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase is a significant predictor of preeclampsia in SLE pregnancy. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 September;54(9 supplement) [Google Scholar]
- 29.Julkunen H, Kaaja R, Palosuo T, Gronhagen-Riska C, Teramo K. Pregnancy in lupus nephropathy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993 May;72(4):258–263. doi: 10.3109/00016349309068034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Huong DL, Wechsler B, Vauthier-Brouzes D, Beaufils H, Lefebvre G, Piette JC. Pregnancy in past or present lupus nephritis: a study of 32 pregnancies from a single centre. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Jun;60(6):599–604. doi: 10.1136/ard.60.6.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Moroni G, Quaglini S, Banfi G, et al. Pregnancy in lupus nephritis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 Oct;40(4):713–720. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.35678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jungers P, Dougados M, Pelissier C, et al. Lupus nephropathy and pregnancy. Report of 104 cases in 36 patients. Arch Intern Med. 1982 Apr;142(4):771–776. doi: 10.1001/archinte.142.4.771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Oviasu E, Hicks J, Cameron JS. The outcome of pregnancy in women with lupus nephritis. Lupus. 1991 Nov;1(1):19–25. doi: 10.1177/096120339100100104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Buyon JP, Kalunian KC, Ramsey-Goldman R, et al. Assessing disease activity in SLE patients during pregnancy. Lupus. 1999;8(8):677–684. doi: 10.1191/096120399680411272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.De Man YA, Hazes JMW, Van de Geijn FE, Krommenhoek C, Dolhain RJEM. How to measrue functionality and disease activity during pregnancy in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(Supplement III):196. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ostensen M, Rugelsjoen A, Wigers SH. The effect of reproductive events and alterations of sex hormone levels on the symptoms of fibromyalgia. Scand J Rheumatol. 1997;26(5):355–360. doi: 10.3109/03009749709065698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ho A, Barr SG, Magder LS, Petri M. A decrease in complement is associated with increased renal and hematologic activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Oct;44(10):2350–2357. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200110)44:10<2350::aid-art398>3.0.co;2-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Buyon JP, Tamerius J, Ordorica S, Young B, Abramson SB. Activation of the alternative complement pathway accompanies disease flares in systemic lupus erythematosus during pregnancy. Arthritis Rheum. 1992 Jan;35(1):55–61. doi: 10.1002/art.1780350109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Clowse MEB, Magder LS, Petri M. Complement and double-stranded DNA antibodies predict pregnancy outcomes in lupus patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 September;50(9 supplement):S408. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pitiphat W, Gillman MW, Joshipura KJ, Williams PL, Douglass CW, Rich-Edwards JW. Plasma C-reactive protein in early pregnancy and preterm delivery. Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Dec 1;162(11):1108–1113. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hesselink DA, Aarden LA, Swaak AJ. Profiles of the acute-phase reactants C-reactive protein and ferritin related to the disease course of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Scand J Rheumatol. 2003;32(3):151–155. doi: 10.1080/03009740310002489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Williams RC, Jr, Harmon ME, Burlingame R, Du Clos TW. Studies of serum C-reactive protein in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2005 Mar;32(3):454–461. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.ter Borg EJ, Horst G, Limburg PC, van Rijswijk MH, Kallenberg CG. C-reactive protein levels during disease exacerbations and infections in systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective longitudinal study. J Rheumatol. 1990 Dec;17(12):1642–1648. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kasitanon N, Fine DM, Haas M, Magder LS, Petri M. Hydroxychloroquine use predicts complete renal remission within 12 months among patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil therapy for membranous lupus nephritis. Lupus. 2006;15(6):366–370. doi: 10.1191/0961203306lu2313oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Alarcon GS, McGwin G, Jr, Bastian HM, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus in three ethnic groups. VII [correction of VIII]. Predictors of early mortality in the LUMINA cohort. LUMINA Study Group. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Apr;45(2):191–202. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200104)45:2<191::AID-ANR173>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.A randomized study of the effect of withdrawing hydroxychloroquine sulfate in systemic lupus erythematosus. The Canadian Hydroxychloroquine Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1991 Jan 17;324(3):150–154. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199101173240303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ostensen M, Khamashta M, Lockshin M, et al. Anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive drugs and reproduction. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8(3):209. doi: 10.1186/ar1957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Amoura Z, Duhaut P, et al. Safety of hydroxychloroquine in pregnant patients with connective tissue diseases: a study of one hundred thirty-three cases compared with a control group. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Nov;48(11):3207–3211. doi: 10.1002/art.11304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.de Boer NK, Jarbandhan SV, de Graaf P, Mulder CJ, van Elburg RM, van Bodegraven AA. Azathioprine use during pregnancy: unexpected intrauterine exposure to metabolites. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jun;101(6):1390–1392. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00538.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Davison JM, Dellagrammatikas H, Parkin JM. Maternal azathioprine therapy and depressed haemopoiesis in the babies of renal allograft patients. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 Mar;92(3):233–239. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01088.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Miniero R, Tardivo I, Curtoni ES, et al. Pregnancy after renal transplantation in Italian patients: focus on fetal outcome. J Nephrol. 2002 Nov–Dec;15(6):626–632. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Clowse MEB, Magder LS, Witter F, Petri M. Azathioprine use in lupus pregnancy. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 September;52(9 supplement) [Google Scholar]
- 53.Canfield MA, Honein MA, Yuskiv N, et al. National estimates and race/ethnic-specific variation of selected birth defects in the United States, 1999–2001. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2006 Nov;76(11):747–756. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Pradat P, Robert-Gnansia E, Di Tanna GL, Rosano A, Lisi A, Mastroiacovo P. First trimester exposure to corticosteroids and oral clefts. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2003 Dec;67(12):968–970. doi: 10.1002/bdra.10134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Scherle PA, Ma W, Lim H, Dey SK, Trzaskos JM. Regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 induction in the mouse uterus during decidualization. An event of early pregnancy. J Biol Chem. 2000 Nov 24;275(47):37086–37092. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006168200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Li DK, Liu L, Odouli R. Exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during pregnancy and risk of miscarriage: population based cohort study. Bmj. 2003 Aug 16;327(7411):368. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7411.368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Topuz S, Has R, Ermis H, Yildirim A, Ibrahimoglu L, Yuksel A. Acute severe reversible oligohydramnios induced by indomethacin in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis: a case report and review of the literature. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2004;31(1):70–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Holmes RP, Stone PR. Severe oligohydramnios induced by cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor nimesulide. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Nov;96(5 Pt 2):810–811. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01047-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Whitelaw A, Thoresen M. Antenatal steroids and the developing brain. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000 Sep;83(2):F154–157. doi: 10.1136/fn.83.2.F154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Amoura Z, Le Thi Hong D, et al. Questions about dexamethasone use for the prevention of anti-SSA related congenital heart block. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Oct;62(10):1010–1012. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.10.1010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zandman-Goddard G, Levy Y, Shoenfeld Y. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy and systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2005 December;29(3):219–228. doi: 10.1385/CRIAI:29:3:219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rauova L, Lukac J, Levy Y, Rovensky J, Shoenfeld Y. High-dose intravenous immunoglobulins for lupus nephritis--a salvage immunomodulation. Lupus. 2001;10(3):209–213. doi: 10.1191/096120301668222237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Clowse ME, Magder L, Petri M. Cyclophosphamide for lupus during pregnancy. Lupus. 2005;14(8):593–597. doi: 10.1191/0961203305lu2169oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kart Koseoglu H, Yucel AE, Kunefeci G, Ozdemir FN, Duran H. Cyclophosphamide therapy in a serious case of lupus nephritis during pregnancy. Lupus. 2001;10(11):818–820. doi: 10.1177/096120330101001110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]