Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 2009 Aug 1;587(Pt 15):3755. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.177261

Exercising an option to prevent age related decline of vascular BH4 and uncoupling of eNOS

James W E Rush 1
PMCID: PMC2746606  PMID: 19648442

It is well documented that skeletal muscle vascular conductance and endothelium-dependent vasodilatation are reduced with ageing. Studies utilizing isolated skeletal muscle arterioles reveal that age-related deficits involve, at least in part, alterations in the NO signalling pathway (Muller-Delp et al. 2002; Delp et al. 2008). Although manifold factors could contribute to age-related declines in NO-mediated function, recent studies highlight the potential importance of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), a nitric oxide synthase (NOS) cofactor. When BH4 is limited, eNOS can become uncoupled and produce superoxide instead of NO. Thus, BH4 is potentially of junctional importance in the link between NO, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and vascular function.

In humans, a single oral dose of BH4 restored endothelium-dependent dilatation in the conduit brachial artery of sedentary older men (Eskurza et al. 2005). Furthermore, Delp et al. (2008) demonstrated that age-related declines in flow-mediated dilatation of rat soleus muscle arterioles resulted, at least in part, from limitations in availability of the eNOS cofactor tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), and that administration of the BH4 precursor sepiapterin improved flow-induced dilatation in vessels from aged rats. These results collectively support the argument that interventions to preserve vascular BH4 may be a therapeutic option for age-related vascular dysfunction (Pierce & LaRocca, 2008).

In the current issue of The Journal of Physiology, Sindler et al. proposed to determine if age-related declines in vascular BH4 were associated with eNOS uncoupling and ROS production, and whether these age-related changes could be reversed by a therapeutic exercise training intervention. Aerobic exercise training has previously been shown to blunt or eliminate age-dependent declines in NO-mediated endothelium-dependent dilatation and to improve skeletal muscle blood flow in a variety of models (Seals et al. 2008), and the study of Sindler et al. proposes to add novel understanding of the underlying mechanisms related to BH4. The approach is integrative, combining functional assessment of vasodilatation with biochemical measurements of BH4, NO and ROS production, all in isolated arterioles from the soleus muscle under a number of controlled pharmacological conditions. As expected, flow-mediated dilatation was impaired with ageing and restored by exercise training; novel observations point to potential underlying mechanisms: age-related reduction in BH4 occurred in conjunction with decline in flow-induced NO signalling, and increase in superoxide production (eNOS uncoupling); and exercise training prevented the age-related loss of BH4 and improved NO bio-availability by balancing accelerated NO and ROS production. These results extend the appreciation of oxidative stress impacting NO bio-availability and vasomotor function beyond the traditional, but insufficient, concept of NO destruction by ROS (Rush et al. 2005).

The findings of the study of Sindler et al. are timely, reported roughly contemporaneously with identification of the need for pharmacological therapies directed toward a similar result, the restoration of BH4 in aged blood vessels. This creates a discovery environment in which potential pharmacological- and exercise-oriented approaches to the problem will undoubtedly co-evolve. The findings of Sindler et al. additionally serve as a progenitor for many hypotheses regarding BH4 in vascular adaptations to age and exercise. Fundamental questions raised include those related to identifying the cellular mechanisms accounting for age-related declines and exercise-related restoration of vascular BH4. In this regard, emerging data suggest that H2O2 is a regulatory factor controlling BH4 synthesis in vascular cells via induction of the enzyme GTP-cyclohydrolase I (GTPCH; Shimizu et al. 2003). The data of Sindler et al. indicate that H2O2 contributes to flow-induced dilatation of skeletal muscle arterioles of young sedentary animals and that, like the flow-induced dilatation functional response itself, this H2O2 signalling declines with age but is restored by exercise training. Is it possible that this same pattern of H2O2 signalling could contribute to maintenance of BH4 in young arterioles, its loss with age, and its restoration with exercise in aged arterioles, consistent with the indicated effect of H2O2 on GTPCH expression and BH4 synthesis? If so, H2O2 takes on another important role in the acute and chronic regulation of vascular function.

A recurring theme in vascular biology is heterogeneity in phenotype and function depending on vessel type (conduit vs. resistance), location (vascular bed), and physiological circumstances (e.g. other conditions in vivo). While these considerations are in part cautionary regarding the global interpretation of the results of Sindler et al., they can more appropriately be seen as an invitation for additional studies designed to create a more integrative understanding of cellular mechanisms of vascular ageing and the therapeutic effects of exercise. The study of Sindler et al. creates a new paradigm justifying such an invitation with respect to BH4, vasomotor function and the regulation of skeletal muscle blood flow.

References

  1. Delp MD, Behnke BJ, Spier SA, Wu G, Muller-Delp JM. J Physiol. 2008;586:1161–1168. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.147686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Eskurza I, Myerburgh LA, Kahn ZD, Seals DR. J Physiol. 2005;568:1057–1065. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.092734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Muller-Delp JM, Spier SA, Ramsay MW, Delp MD. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002;283:H1662–1672. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00004.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Pierce GL, LaRocca TJ. J Physiol. 2008;586:2673–2674. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.154229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rush JWE, Denniss SG, Graham DA. Can J Appl Physiol. 2005;30:442–474. doi: 10.1139/h05-133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Seals DR, DeSouza CA, Donato AJ, Tanaka H. J Appl Physiol. 2008;105:1323–1332. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90553.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Shimizu S, Shiota K, Yamamoto S, Miyasaka Y, Ishii M, Watabe T, Nishida M, Mori Y, Yamamoto T, Kiuchi Y. Free Rad Biol Med. 2003;34:1343–1352. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(03)00172-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sindler AL, Delp MD, Reyes R, Wu G, Muller-Delp JM. J Physiol. 2009;587:3885–3897. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.172221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES