Skip to main content
PMC home page
Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online logoLink to Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online
. 2009 Jun 4;5:15–30. doi: 10.4137/ebo.s2633

Phylogenetic Analyses Reveal Monophyletic Origin of the Ergot Alkaloid Gene dmaW in Fungi

Miao Liu 1,3, Daniel G Panaccione 2, Christopher L Schardl 1
PMCID: PMC2747131  PMID: 19812724

Abstract

Ergot alkaloids are indole-derived mycotoxins that are important in agriculture and medicine. Ergot alkaloids are produced by a few representatives of two distantly related fungal lineages, the Clavicipitaceae and the Trichocomaceae. Comparison of the ergot alkaloid gene clusters from these two lineages revealed differences in the relative positions and orientations of several genes. The question arose: is ergot alkaloid biosynthetic capability from a common origin? We used a molecular phylogenetic approach to gain insights into the evolution of ergot alkaloid biosynthesis. The 4-γ,γ-dimethylallyltryptophan synthase gene, dmaW, encodes the first step in the pathway. Amino acid sequences deduced from dmaW and homologs were submitted to phylogenetic analysis, and the results indicated that dmaW of Aspergillus fumigatus (mitosporic Trichocomaceae) has the same origin as corresponding genes from clavicipitaceous fungi. Relationships of authentic dmaW genes suggest that they originated from multiple gene duplications with subsequent losses of original or duplicate versions in some lineages.

Keywords: mycotoxins; 4-γ,γ-dimethylallyltryptophan synthase gene; Clavicipitaceae; Trichocomaceae; amino acid sequence; GBlocks; gene phylogeny

Introduction

Ergot alkaloids (EA) are a group of mycotoxins causing toxicoses in humans and animals.1–3 Producers of EA include plant pathogens in the genus Claviceps, and some grass endophytes in the genera Epichloë, Neotyphodium and Balansia.2 These genera belong to the family Clavicipitaceae (order Hypocreales, phylum Ascomycota). EA are also produced by the common airborne fungus Aspergillus fumigatus, a species distantly related with clavicipitaceous fungi, belonging to the family Trichocomaceae (order Eurotiales, phylum Ascomycota).4 In the same family, some Penicillium species also produce EA.5,6 Relatively few species within these families produce ergot alkaloids and only one representative of the lineages in between the two orders containing these families has been reported to produce ergot alkaloids.7,8 Because of their significant impacts on human health and agriculture, the biochemistry and biosynthesis pathway of ergot alkaloids have attracted much attention and effort.3 Certain genes involved in the biosynthesis pathway have been characterized.9–15 Clustered arrangements of EA biosynthesis genes have been observed in A. fumigatus,10 Claviceps fusiformis,8 and Claviceps purpurea.14 A gene, dmaW, common to all these clusters, encodes 4-γ,γ-dimethylallyltryptophan (DMATrp) synthase, which has been demonstrated to be the first pathway specific step and has the key regulatory function for EA biosyntheses in Claviceps spp.15–17 Following the cloning of dmaW from C. fusiformis SD58,18 a gene cluster likely encoding enzymes of EA biosynthesis was identified by sequence analysis in the ergot fungus, C. purpurea P1.14 This cluster was thereafter designated EAS (ergot alkaloid synthesis).2 Within the EAS cluster, four genes with known functions were named according to their functions, and the other seven genes with unknown functions were named easA and easC to easH. Homologs of nine EAS-cluster genes have been found in C. fusiformis SD58,18,19 and eight homologs have been found clustered in the A. fumigatus genome10 (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Based on the sequence similarity of dmaW genes and general clustering of other hypothetical EAS genes, Coyle and Panaccione10 proposed that EA biosynthesis in A. fumigatus has a common origin with that in clavicipitaceous fungi. However, arrangement of the cluster genes in A. fumigatus is drastically different from the EAS clusters in C. purpurea and C. fusiformis.2,8 This difference in gene arrangements, and the absence of ergot alkaloids in the lineages between the two groups of EA-producing fungi, raise the question of whether the dmaW genes in clavicipitaceous and trichocomaceous fungi are true orthologs, homologs due to speciation. If the genes are truly orthologous, then multiple gene recombinations and inversions must have happened in either (or both) of the lineages after the divergence from their common origin, and the lineages between them have lost these genes. The alternative would be that the A. fumigatus EAS genes might have evolved independently from different gene duplication events.

Recently, multiple genes similar or related to dmaW have been characterized by cloning and over-expression approaches. Examples include genes for brevianamide F prenyl transferase (FtmPT1) that converts brevianamide to tryprostatin in A. fumigatus,20 reverse prenyl transferase FGAPT1 catalyzing the final step in the biosynthesis of fumigaclavine C in the same fungus,21 TdiB with indole alkaloid biosynthetic ability in A. nidulans,22 as well as SirD, involved in the biosynthesis of an epipolythiodioxopiperazine (ETP) from Leptosphaeria maculans.23 The available sequences of these genes allow us to look into the evolutionary relationships of dmaW and related genes by a phylogenetic approach.

In this study, we conduct molecular phylogenetic analysis of inferred protein sequences to test whether the known DMATrp synthases in fungi have a single origin or multiple origins. A monophyletic pattern is expected for the single origin hypotheses; whereas a polyphyletic pattern is expected for multiple origins.

Materials and Methods

Protein sequences derived from dmaW genes of clavicipitaceous fungi and A. fumigatus were obtained from previous studies.10,15,18 Protein sequences of FtmPT1, FGAPT1, and the sirD product were downloaded from GenBank (Table 1). The protein sequences from dmaW homologs were obtained by BLAST of the nonredundant protein sequence database in GenBank with the protein product deduced from dmaW from Neotyphodium lolii and A. fumigatus; sequences with relatively high similarity scores and low E-value (<3e−17) were selected (Table 1).

Table 1.

GenBank numbers and fungal isolates of protein sequences of dmaW genes and homologs.

GenBank number Fungal species Isolate Gene, Function Reference
1 AAX56314 Aspergillus fumigatus Af293 ftmPT1 = brevianamide F prenyl transferase (Grundmann, Li)21
2 EAL94098 Aspergillus fumigatus Af293 fgaPT1 = easL, reverse prenyl transferase (Unsold, Li)22
3 AAX08549 Aspergillus fumigatus Af293 fgaPT2 = dmaW, dimethylallyltryptophan synthase (Unsold, Li)40
4 XP_754328 Aspergillus fumigatus Af293 function unknown (Nierman et al)41
5 ABU51603 Aspergillus nidulans unspecified tdiB = putative prenyl transferase (Balibar)42
6 XP_681751 Aspergillus nidulans FGSC A4 function unknown (Galagan et al)43
7 XP_682498 Aspergillus nidulans FGSC A4 function unknown (Galagan et al)43
8 XP_659949 Aspergillus nidulans FGSC A4 function unknown (Galagan et al)43
9 XP_664388 Aspergillus nidulans FGSC A4 function unknown (Galagan et al)43
10 BAE56055 Aspergillus oryzae RIB 40 function unknown (Machida et al)31
11 BAE59503 Aspergillus oryzae RIB 40 function unknown (Machida et al)31
12 BAE62662 Aspergillus oryzae RIB 40 function unknown (Machida et al)31
13 BAE65189 Aspergillus oryzae RIB 4 function unknown (Machida et al)31
14 BAE63695 Aspergillus oryzae RIB 4 function unknown (Machida et al)31
15 AAP92451 Balansia obtecta B249 dmaW = dimethylallyltryptophan synthase (Wang et al)15
16 AAC18893 Claviceps fusiformis ATCC26245 dmaW = dimethylallyltryptophan synthase (Tsai et al)19
17 CAB39314 Claviceps purpurea P1 dmaW = cpd1, dimethylallyltryptophan synthase allele 1 (Tudzynski et al)14
18 CAC37396 Claviceps purpurea T5 dmaW = cpd2, putative dimethylallyltryptophan synthase allele 2 (Arntz and Tudzynski, unpublished)
19 AAZ29613 Clavicipitaceae US2005a dmaW = putative dimethylallyltryptophan synthase (Steiner et al)32
20 AAZ29614 Clavicipitaceae US2005b dmaW = putative dimethylallyltryptophan synthase (Markert et al)43
21 EAS31821 Coccidioides immitis RS function unknown (Birren et al, unpublished)
22 AAP81206 Epichloë typhina × Neotyphodium lolii Lp1 dmaW = dimethylallyltryptophan synthase (Wang et al)15
23 AAV66102 Fusarium heterosporum ATCC74349 function unknown (Sims et al)44
24 AAS92554 Leptosphaeria maculans ICBN 18 sirD = putative tyrosine dimethylallyl transferase (Gardiner et al)24
25 XP_361876 Magnaporthe grisea 70-15 function unknown (Dean et al)45
26 XP_370025 Magnaporthe grisea 70-15 function unknown (Dean et al)46
27 ABZ80612 Malbranchea aurantiaca RRC1813 MaPT = dmaW, dimethylallyltryptophan synthase (Ding et al)47
28 AAP81207 Neotyphodium coenophialum ATCC90664 dmaW = dimethylallyltryptophan synthase allele 1 (Wang et al)15
29 AAP81208 Neotyphodium coenophialum ATCC90664 dmaW = dimethylallyltryptophan synthase allele 2 (Wang et al)15
30 none Neotyphodium gansuense E818 dmaW = putative dimethylallyltryptophan synthase Unpublished data
31 XP_960156 Neurospora crassa OR74A function unknown (Galagan et al)48
32 AAZ29615 Penicillium roqueforti IasaF09 dmaW = putative dimethylallyltryptophan synthase (Steiner et al)49
33 AAK11526 Penicillium paxilli ATCC26601 paxD = function unknown (Young et al)30
34 AAT69743 Sirodesmium diversum ATCC36539 putative dimethylallyltyrosine synthase Gardiner and Howlett, unpublished
Open in a new tab

Protein sequence matrix

Due to the high divergence of amino acid sequences, we used the program MAFFT ver.5.824 to align them. The alignment was conducted through the web server (http://align.genome.jp/mafft/). The FFT-NS-i and E-INS-i alignment strategies, iterative refinement method, were used to enhance the accuracy of the alignment. The scoring matrix (for amino acid sequences) was selected from six options by comparing fitnesses of the trees in the preliminary analysis. With the scoring matrix selected, we set gap opening penalty (OP = 1.0, 2.0, 3.0) and gap extension penalty (offset value as shown in the program, OF = 0.0, 0.5, 1.0), and again compared the overall fitness of the resulting trees in more preliminary analyses. Parameters resulting in trees of high fitness were set in the final alignment. The alignments by MAFFT were submitted to the program Gblocks 0.91b,25 to eliminate the highly diverged regions and retain the conserved regions for phylogenetic analysis. Low stringency options were selected to obtain blocks.

Phylogenetic analysis

The protein matrices of ten operational taxonomic units (OTUs, six authentic dmaW and four related genes of known functions) resulting from MAFFT and Gblocks screening and comprised of the conserved regions of the protein alignment, were submitted separately to phylogenetic analysis in PAUP* 4.0b10.26 Parsimony analyses were conducted using exhaustive search. All characters had equal weight and gaps were treated as missing data.

In order to exclude the possible bias caused by insufficient OTUs, we included multiple potential homologs of dmaW products, which were obtained by BLAST search, in a more extensive phylogenetic analysis. Both conserved protein regions and the whole protein sequence were used in the separate analyses. Parsimony analysis was conducted with a heuristic search with TBR (tree bisection and reconnection) branch-swapping and 100 replicates of random sequence addition. Bootstrapping analysis was based on 1000 replicates of a full heuristic search, each with 20 replicates of a random addition sequence, and tree bisection reconnection (TBR) swapping was selected and re-arrange limit was set to 5000 per replicate.

Bayesian inferences (BI) were performed using MrBayes 3.0B527 to analyze individual data sets. The prior for amino acid model was set as mixed to allow model jumping between fixed-rate aminoacid models. Maximum likelihood analysis (ML) was performed using PHYML online server28 with the following settings: substitution model as JTT, transition/transversion ratio and gamma distribution as estimated by the program, bootstrap datasets 500.

Results

Protein sequence matrix

To choose the appropriate scoring matrix in the amino acid sequence alignment, we compared the overall fitness of the trees based on the alignments of six different scoring matrices in two strategies (Table 2). Setting scoring matrix as JTT200 resulted in the highest consistency index (CI), lowest homoplasy index (HI), relatively high retention index (RI), and shorter trees, thus we choose JTT200 for alignments. In the combination of various OP and OF in the alignment, OP/OF = 1.0/0.0 resulted in three shortest parsimonious trees with a relatively high CI, RI and low HI (Table 3).

Table 2.

Fitness of the trees resulting from maximum parsimony searches with different matrix scoring settings.

Strategy Scoring matrix Number of trees Length CI RI RC HI G-fit
BLOSUM30 1 5252 0.653 0.491 0.32 0.347 −224.198
BLOSUM45 4 5214 0.64 0.486 0.311 0.36 −219.496
FFT-NS-i BLOSUM62 6 5230 0.637 0.491 0.313 0.363 −208.403
BLOSUM80 8 5170 0.638 0.487 0.31 0.362 −207.579
JTT100 5 5187 0.646 0.494 0.319 0.354 −212.253
JTT200 2 5193 0.662 0.491 0.325 0.338 −235.767
BLOSUM30 1 5200 0.636 0.486 0.309 0.364 −211.530
BLOSUM45 6 5185 0.636 0.491 0.312 0.364 −203.114
E-INS-i BLOSUM62 6 5190 0.637 0.489 0.312 0.363 −205.306
BLOSUM80 1 5203 0.635 0.488 0.310 0.365 −204.704
JTT100 2 5229 0.631 0.483 0.305 0.369 −206.307
JTT200 3 5174 0.632 0.486 0.307 0.368 −204.534
Open in a new tab

Table 3.

Fitness of the trees resulting from maximum parsimony searches with different gap opening penalties (OP) and gap extension penalties (OF) (FFT-NS-i, JTT200).

OP OF Number of trees Length CI RI RC HI G-fit
1.0 0 3 5098 0.675 0.498 0.336 0.325 −245.815
1.0 0.5 1 5219 0.628 0.483 0.303 0.372 −206.925
1.0 1 1 5217 0.625 0.479 0.3 0.375 −197.856
2.0 0 11 5227 0.649 0.489 0.317 0.351 −226.988
2.0 0.5 4 5281 0.632 0.485 0.306 0.368 −206.599
2.0 1 1 5272 0.637 0.489 0.312 0.363 −204.882
3.0 0 7 5354 0.658 0.491 0.323 0.342 −239.881
3.0 0.5 4 5280 0.64 0.49 0.314 0.36 −210.476
3.0 1 12 5317 0.639 0.483 0.308 0.361 −206.114
Open in a new tab

For the protein sequences derived from six dmaW and four related genes of known functions, an analysis in which the scoring matrix was set as JTT200, OP as 1.0, and OF as 0.0 resulted in an alignment with 653 characters. The resulting alignment was put into Gblocks 0.91b to screen for conserved regions. The number of characters (amino acid positions) retained was 308. For the matrix from the extended OTU set (34 protein sequences), 933 characters resulted from MAFFT alignment, and 155 characters were retained after GBlocks screening.

Phylogenetic relationships

For the data set comprised of ten OTUs, parsimony analyses for the whole regions resulted in two most parsimonious trees (Fig. 1A). The two tree topologies differed in the order of branches ranches to sirD L. maculans and fgaPT1 A. fumigatus. The analysis of the conserved regions resulted in one most parsimonious tree. The tree topology differed from those of whole gene regions in the order of divergence of dmaW of A. fumigatus and Malbranchea aurantiaca (Fig. 1B). The known, authentic sequences of DMATrp synthases formed a monophyletic clade with strong bootstrap support. Defining as an outgroup those prenyl transferases known or likely to catalyze production of other products (4 OTUs), the most basal divergence separated the dmaW gene of M. aurantiaca and A. fumigatus from those of the Clavicipitaceae (Fig. 1C).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The most parsimonious trees relating amino acid sequences of the deduced products of six dmaW genes and four related genes with known functions. A) Tree based on whole gene region. Of 653 aligned characters, 250 characters are informative. Length = 1521, CI = 0.870, RI = 0.503. Arrows show the discrepancies of the two most parsimonious trees. B and C) Trees based on relatively conserved gene regions screened by GBlocks. Of 308 total aligned characters, 166 characters are informative. Length = 934, CI = 0.864, RI = 0.512. Products of dmaW genes formed a monophyletic group with 100% bootstrap support. B. Unrooted tree; C. Phylogram rooted by choosing the non-dmaW gene products as the outgroup. numbers on branches indicate bootstrap percentage of MP/posterior probabilities of BI/bootstrap percentage of ML; *indicates that particular branch does not exist in the analysis. The thick branch separates of the outgroup from the ingroup.

The analysis with conserved gene regions comprised of 34 OTUs resulted in six equally most parsimonious trees, while the whole gene region (933 characters) resulted in eight equally most parsimonious trees. The variations of branch orders among these trees were mainly from the uncertain positions of the two OTUs, the putative DMATrp synthase gene from Neotyphodium gansuense and paxD Penicillium paxilli AAK11526, which were partial sequences. The strict consensus trees of the six trees from conserved regions and eight trees from the whole gene regions showed the same pattern that, in the dmaW clade, the two putative DMATrp synthase genes from clavicipitaceous endophyte of convolvulaceous plants (AAZ29613, AAZ29614), the clade comprised of C. purpurea and C. fusiformis dmaW, as well as the putative DMATrp synthase gene from N. gansuense collapsed as a polytomy (Fig. 2A). Outside the dmaW clade, paxD P. paxilli AAK11526 along with the other six OTUs appeared as unresolved branches (Fig. 2A). All trees revealed the same monophyletic group of DMATrp synthase genes (functionally tested) and putative DMATrp synthase genes.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

A) Strict consensus tree of the six most parsimonious trees for dmaW gene products and products of multiple related genes of 34 OTUs based on relatively conserved gene regions. Of the 155 characters, 133 were parsimony-informative; length = 1366, CI = 0.594, RI = 0.499. B) One of the two most parsimonious trees of 32 OTUs based on the whole gene region. Of the 933 characters, 456 were parsimony-informative characters. Length = 4974, CI = 0.682, RI = 0.499. C) The most parsimonious trees for dmaW gene products and products of multiple related genes of 32 OTUs based on relatively conserved gene regions, which were screened by Gblocks. Total aligned characters = 155, informative characters = 135; length = 1427, CI = 0.607, RI = 0.497. OTUs in bold indicate the gene products with functions that have been confirmed. Numbers on branches indicate bootstrap percentage of MP/posterior probabilities of BI/bootstrap percentage of ML; *indicates that particular branch does not exist in the analysis; numbers in circles indicate the possible gene duplication events (also see Fig. 3).

Excluding the two partial sequences (32 OTUs included in analysis) resulted in better resolutions. Both analyses of conserved regions and the whole gene region resulted in two most parsimonious trees. The two trees from whole gene regions differed in the positions of Magnaporthe oryzae XP 361876, clade I (tdiB Aspergillus nidulans ABU51603, Neurospora crassa XP 960156 and Magnaporthe oryzae XP 370025) and clade II (fgaPT1 Aspergillus fumigatus EAL94098, Aspergillus oryzae BAE65189, and Aspergillus fumigatus XP 754328) (Fig. 2B). Comparing the phylogenies inferred from the conserved regions and from the entire sequences, within the dmaW clade, these trees differed in branching orders of B. obtecta, C. purpurea and C. fusiformis dmaW; and in branch orders of A. fumigatus AAX08549, P. roquefortii AAZ29615 and Malbranchea aurantiaca ABZ80612. All clades with strong statistic support (bootstrapping value >70) were present in all trees (Figs. 2B, C), and all trees clearly indicated monophyly of genes for authentic DMATrp synthase.

Bayesian analyses generally resulted in higher statistical support (posterior probabilities) for the clades having high bootstrap support in parsimony analyses (Figs. 1 and 2) and internal branches. ML analyses resulted tree topologies generally congruent with MP tree, i.e. clades with strong support were congruent with MP (Figs. 1 and 2).

All analyses indicated that conserved gene regions selected by GBlocks did not significantly improve the phylogenetic inference for our data sets.

Genes associated with dmaW-related sequences

Certain dmaW-related genes have been identified in gene clusters that are otherwise unrelated to the EAS clusters. These include the sirD gene of L. maculans23 and the paxD gene of Penicillium paxilli.29 Because of the close relationship of two A. oryzae homologs, and the availability of a complete genome sequence for that fungus,30 we checked the genomic contexts of these A. oryzae homologs. Neither of them has a comparable gene cluster. In both cases there are a few apparent secondary metabolism genes nearby, but not homologs of the EAS cluster genes.

Discussion

Various profiles of ergot alkaloids (EA) are produced by EA-producing fungi. Evidence for diversification of EA profiles within an individual fungus, as well as among different producers was observed by Panaccione.7 The study reported herein is a molecular phylogenetic approach to gain additional insight into the evolution of EA synthesis among fungal producers. Due to its important role in encoding the first step in EA biosynthesis, dmaW was used as a marker to infer the evolutionary relationships of the pathways. Our results demonstrate that dmaW from A. fumigatus and clavicipitaceous fungi formed a monophyletic group indicating that they evolved from a common origin. Therefore we postulate that the EAS gene clusters of the two lineages were also from a common origin, which could be a common gene cluster encoding the shared early steps of the pathways of these two lineages. These shared steps might have been present in the most recent common ancestor of the two fungal lineages.

When 34 OTUs were included in the analysis, a hypothetic gene from P. roqueforti (GenBank accession number: AAZ29615.31 was grouped in the dmaW clade. Penicillium roqueforti produces the ergot alkaloid isofumigaclavine A,6 which would require dmaW for its biosynthesis. The product of the P. roqueforti gene was 63% identical with the product of dmaW of A. fumigatus, which was the top match retrieved in a BLAST search with this protein (1e−112). These data are consistent with the P. roqueforti gene encoding the DMATrp synthase that catalyzes the initial prenylation in ergot alkaloid biosynthesis.

GenBank entries often are annotated completely on the basis of BLAST hits. Since the gene from C. fusiformis was identified as encoding DMATrp synthase,18 many sequences from other species were annotated as putative dimethylallyltryptophan synthase genes according to the similarity of their sequences to the C. fusiformis sequence. However many sequences annotated as dimethylallyltryptophan synthase genes are likely to encode related but nonidentical enzymes catalyzing prenylation or reverse prenylation of different co-substrates or at different positions of the indole rings. Examples of related but functionally different prenyl transferases include the likely tyrosine prenyl transferase in sirodesmin biosynthesis from L. maculans,23 and the reverse prenyl transferase from A. fumigatus.21

The rooted tree relating prenyl transferases with known functions showed the most basal separation of DMATrp synthase of A. fumigatus with those of the clavicipitaceous fungi. The EA profile of A. fumigatus includes a series of clavines, simpler tricyclic or tetracyclic alkaloids. In contrast, clavicipitaceous fungi usually produce more complex EA, ergopeptines and other amides of lysergic acid, in addition to the clavines. It is reasonable that more complex functions were gained along the evolutionary path.

Differences in the arrangement of EAS clusters between A. fumigatus and clavicipitaceous fungi were likely caused by multiple gene rearrangements through recombinations, deletions and insertions. The EAS gene cluster of A. fumigatus is in a subtelomeric region.10 Frequent recombinations associated with such regions provide a potential explanation for the differences between the EAS clusters of A. fumigatus and those of the clavicipitaceous fungi.7 The chromosomal locations of the clusters in clavicipitaceous species have not yet been determined. Similar rearrangements between more distant genomic locations would account for evolution of clusters, for which selection may favor their inheritance or horizontal transfer as a unit.32,33 Such rearrangements can be driven by repeats such as retroelements in the fungal genomes, such as observed throughout the ergot alkaloid and lolitrem biosynthesis gene clusters in Epichloë festucae and Neotyphodium lolii.34,35

In fungal systematics, the molecular phylogeny indicates that genus Claviceps is more closely related to genus Epichloë (asexual stage: Neotyphodium) than to Balansia;36,37 (also see Fig. 3A). In our 10 OTU gene trees, the clade of C. purpurea and C. fusiformis dmaW was closer to B. obtecta dmaW than to Epichloë spp. dmaW (Fig. 1). The discrepancy between gene tree and species tree can be explained by polymorphic lineage sorting or incomplete sampling.38 Once we included more OTUs (34 OTUs and 32 OTUs) in the analyses, the dmaW clade separated into two lineages. One lineage was comprised of C. purpurea and C. fusiformis dmaW, the two putative DMATrp synthase genes from clavicipitaceous endophytes of convolvulaceous plants (AAZ29613, AAZ29614),31 the putative DMATrp synthase gene from N. gansuense, and the DMATrp synthase gene from B. obtecta. The second lineage was comprised of putative DMATrp synthase genes from N. coenophialum and dmaW from the E. typhina × N. lolii hybrid. The divergence of these two lineages and the inconsistency of the divergence pattern with species relationships suggest that dmaW genes in clavicipitaceous fungi have experienced multiple gene duplications and loss of some copies. An alternative is that there may have been some instances of horizontal gene transfer, but the data are not conclusive in this respect. A scenario involving duplications and losses consistent with the evolutionary relationships of authentic dmaW genes is shown in Figure 3B.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

A) Partial phylogenetic relationships of species in Clavicipitaceae inferred by MP based on seven gene regions (Tree redrawn from the data of sung et al).37 B) Diagram indicating the possible gene duplication events that apparently happened in clavicipitaceous dmaW lineages. numbers in circles indicate the possible gene duplication events. Dashed lines and shaded OTUs indicate the lost lineages (orthologs).

Supplementary Material

Supplement Figure 1

Map of EAS clusters from Claviceps purpurea strain P1,14 Claviceps fusiformis strain sD58,8 and Aspergillus fumigatus.10 Arrows indicate the directions of transcription. Black arrows indicate the genes shared in three species; shaded arrows indicate the two genes shared by C. purpurea and C. fusiformis but not A. fumigatus. Lines between maps connect orthologs, and dashed lines indicate the relationships of two easH homologues in C. purpurea P1 with an apparent pseudogene in A. fumigatus.

ebo-2009-015f4.tif (611.3KB, tif)
Supplement Figure 2

Protein sequence alignment screened by GBlocks 0.91b. The selected 155 positions are underlined in blue.

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the National Research Initiative of the USDA Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service, grant number 2008-35318-04549. This article is published with the approval of the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station as publication number 09-12-058, and with the approval of the Director of the WV Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station as Scientific Article number 3037.

Footnotes

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Keller U, Tudzynski P. Ergot Alkaloids. In: Osiewacz HD, editor. The Mycota: Industrial Applications. Springer; Berlin: 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schardl CL, Panaccione DG, Tudzynski P. The Alkaloids Chemistry and Biology. Academic Press; 2006. Ergot alkaloids—biology and molecular biology; pp. 45–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tudzynski P, Correia T, Keller U. Biotechnology and genetics of ergot alkaloids. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2001;57:593–605. doi: 10.1007/s002530100801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Panaccione DG, Coyle CM. Abundant respirable ergot alkaloids from the common airborne fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2005;71:3106–11. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.6.3106-3111.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kozlovsky AG. Producers of ergot alkaloids out of Claviceps genus. In: Kren V, Cvak L, editors. Ergot: The Genus Claviceps. Harwood Academic Publishers; The Netherlands: 1999. pp. 479–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Scott PM, Merrian M-A, Polonsky J. Roquefortin and isofumigaclavine A, metabolites from Penicillium roqueforti. Experientia. 1976;32:140–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Panaccione DG. Origins and significance of ergot alkaloid diversity in fungi. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2005;251:9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.07.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lorenz N, Wilson EV, Machado C, Schardl CL, Tudzynski P. Comparison of ergot alkaloid biosynthesis gene clusters in Claviceps species indicates loss of late pathway steps in evolution of C. fusiformis. Applied Environmental Microbiology. 2007;73:7185–91. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01040-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Arntz C, Tudzynski P. Identification of genes induced in alkaloid-producing cultures of Claviceps sp. Current Genetics. 1997;31:357–60. doi: 10.1007/s002940050216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Coyle CM, Panaccione DG. An ergot alkaloid biosynthesis gene and clustered hypothetical genes from Aspergillus fumigatus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2005;71:3112–8. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.6.3112-3118.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Damrongkool P, Sedlock AB, Young CA, et al. Structural analysis of a peptide synthetase gene required for ergotpeptine production in the endophytic fungusNeotyphodium lolii. DNA Sequence. 2005;16:379–85. doi: 10.1080/10425170500273005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Haarmann T, Machado C, Lubbe Y, et al. The ergot alkaloid gene cluster in Claviceps purpurea: Extension of the cluster sequence and intra species evolution. Phytochemistry. 2005;66:1312–20. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Panaccione DG, Johnson RD, Wang J, et al. Elimination of ergovaline from a grass-Neotyphodium endophyte symbiosis by genetic modification of the endophyte. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001;98:12820–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.221198698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tudzynski P, Holter K, Correia T, et al. Evidence for an ergot alkaloid gene cluster in Claviceps purpurea. Molecular and General Genetics. 1999;261:133–141. doi: 10.1007/s004380050950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang J, Machado C, Panaccione DG, Tsai HF, Schardl CL. The determinant step in ergot alkaloid biosynthesis by an endophyte of perennial ryegrass. Fungal Genetics and Biology. 2004;41:189–98. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2003.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vazquez MJ, Roa AM, Reyes F, et al. A novel ergot alkaloid as a 5-HT(1A) inhibitor produced by Dicyma sp. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2003;46:5117–20. doi: 10.1021/jm0341204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Floss HG, Robbers JE, Heinstein PF. Regulatory control mechanisms in alkaloid biosynthesis. Recent Advances in Phytochemistry. 1974;8:141–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Krupinski VM, Robbers JE, Floss HG. Physiological study of ergot: induction of alkaloid synthesis by tryptophan at enzymatic level. Journal of Bacteriology. 1976;125:158–65. doi: 10.1128/jb.125.1.158-165.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tsai HF, Wang H, Gebler JC, Poulter CD, Schardl CL. The Claviceps purpurea gene encoding dimethylallytryptophan synthase, the committed step for ergot alkaloid biosynthesis. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 1995;216:119–25. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1995.2599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Machado C. Studies of ergot alkaloid biosynthesis genes in clavicipitaceous fungi. University of Kentucky; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Grundmann A, Li SM. Overproduction, purification and characterization of FtmPT1, a brevianamide F prenyltransferase from Aspergillus fumigatus. Microbiology. 2005;151:2199–07. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27962-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Unsold IA, Li SM. Reverse prenyltransferase in the biosynthesis of fumigaclavine C in Aspergillus fumigatus: gene expression, purification, and characterization of fumigaclavine C synthase FGAPT1. Chembiochem. 2006:158–64. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200500318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bok JW, Hoffmeister D, Maggio-Hall LA, et al. Genomic mining for Aspergillus natural products. Chemistry and Biology. 2006;13:31–7. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2005.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gardiner DM, Cozijnsen AJ, Wilson LM, Pedras MSC, Howlett BJ. The sirodesmin biosynthetic gene cluster of the plant pathogenic fungus Leptosphaeria maculans. Molecular Microbiology. 2004;53:1307–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04215.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Katoh K, Kuma Ki, Toh H, Miyata T. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Research. 2005;33:511–8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2000;17:540–2. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Swofford DL. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4 (computer program) Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. 1998 [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics. 2001;17:754–5. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Guindon S, Lethiec F, Duroux P, Gascuel O. PHYML online—a web server for fast maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic inference. Nucleic Acids Research. 2005;33(web server issue):W557–9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Young C, McMillan L, Telfer E, Scott B. Molecular cloning and genetic analysis of an indole-diterpene gene cluster from Penicillium paxilli. Molecular Microbiology. 2001;39:754–64. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02265.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Machida M, Asai K, Sano M, et al. Genome sequencing and analysis of Aspergillus oryzae. Nature. 2005;438:1157–61. doi: 10.1038/nature04300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Steiner U, Ahimsa-Müller MA, Markert A, et al. Molecular characterization of a seed transmitted clavicipitaceous fungus occurring on dicotyledoneous plants (Convolvulaceae) Planta. 2006;224:533–44. doi: 10.1007/s00425-006-0241-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Carbone I, Ramirez-Prado J, Jakobek J, Horn B. Gene duplication, modularity and adaptation in the evolution of the aflatoxin gene cluster. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2007;7:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Walton J. Horizontal gene transfer and the evolution of secondary metabolite gene clusters in fungi: an hypothesis. Fungal Genetics and Biology. 2000;30:167–71. doi: 10.1006/fgbi.2000.1224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fleetwood D, Scott B, Lane G, Tanaka A, Johnson R. A complex ergovaline gene cluster in Epichloë endophytes of grasses. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2007;73:2571–9. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00257-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Young C, Tapper B, May K, Moon C, Schardl C, Scott B. Indole-diterpene biosynthetic capability of Epichloë endophytes as predicted by ltm gene analysis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2009;75:2200–11. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00953-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sung GH, Sung JM, Hywel-Jones NL, Spatafora JW. A multi-gene phylogeny of Clavicipitaceae (Ascomycota, Fungi): Identification of localized incongruence using a combinational bootstrap approach. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2007;44:1204–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lewis EA, Sullivan RF, White JF., Jr . Distinguishing features of the tribe Balansieae. In: James F, White J, Bacon CW, Hywel-Jones NL, Spatafora JW, editors. Clavicipitalean Fungi: evolutionary biology, chemistry, biocontrol, and cultural impacts. Marcel Dekker, Inc; New York, Basel: 2003. pp. 151–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Doyle JJ. Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Systematic Botany. 1992;17:144–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Unsold IA, Li SM. Overproduction, purification and characterization of FgaPT2, a dimethylallyltryptophan synthase from Aspergillus fumigatus. Microbiology. 2005;151:1499–505. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27759-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nierman WC, Pain A, Anderson MJ, et al. Genomic sequence of the pathogenic and allergenic filamentous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. Nature. 2005;438:1151–6. doi: 10.1038/nature04332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Balibar CJ, Howard-Jone AR, Walsh CT. Terrequinone A biosynthesis through L-tryptophan oxidation, dimerization and bisprenylation. Nature Chemical Biology. 2007;3:584–92. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2007.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Galagan JE, Calvo SE, Cuomo C, et al. Sequencing of Aspergillus nidulans and comparative analysis with A. fumigatus and A. oryzae. Nature. 2005;438:1105–5. doi: 10.1038/nature04341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Markert A, Steffan N, Ploss K, et al. Biosynthesis and accumulation of ergoline alkaloids in a mutualistic association between Ipomoea asarifolia (Convolvulaceae) and a clavicipitalean fungus. Plant Physiology. 2008;147:296–05. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.116699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sims JW, Fillmore JP, Warner DD, Schmidt EW. Equisetin biosynthesis in Fusarium heterosporum. Chemical Communications. 2005:186–7. doi: 10.1039/b413523g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Dean RA, Talbot NJ, Ebbole DJ, et al. The genome sequence of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Nature. 2005;434:980–6. doi: 10.1038/nature03449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ding Y, Williams RM, Sherman DH. Molecular analysis of a 4-dimethylallyltryptophan synthase from Malbranchea aurantiaca. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2008;283:16068–76. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M801991200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Galagan JE, Calvo SE, Borkovich KA, et al. The genome sequence of the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Nature. 2003;422:859–68. doi: 10.1038/nature01554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Steiner U, Hellwig S, Leistner E. Specificity in the interaction between an epibiotic clavicipitalean fungus and its convolvulaceous host in a fungus/plant symbiotum. Plant Signaling and Behavior. 2008;3:704–6. doi: 10.4161/psb.3.9.6432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement Figure 1

Map of EAS clusters from Claviceps purpurea strain P1,14 Claviceps fusiformis strain sD58,8 and Aspergillus fumigatus.10 Arrows indicate the directions of transcription. Black arrows indicate the genes shared in three species; shaded arrows indicate the two genes shared by C. purpurea and C. fusiformis but not A. fumigatus. Lines between maps connect orthologs, and dashed lines indicate the relationships of two easH homologues in C. purpurea P1 with an apparent pseudogene in A. fumigatus.

ebo-2009-015f4.tif (611.3KB, tif)
Supplement Figure 2

Protein sequence alignment screened by GBlocks 0.91b. The selected 155 positions are underlined in blue.

Supplement_Figure_2_in_PDF.ppt (3.9MB, ppt)

Articles from Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES