Abstract
Only 13 of 38 hospital laboratories surveyed include a Gram stain routinely in microbiological sputum examination. In a prospective three-hospital study, 60% of over 1,200 "sputum" specimens consisted predominantly of saliva, as judged by cell composition. Compared with the results of cultures in which microorganisms presumptively identified on sputum smears were specifically sought ("directed cultures"), cultures of the same specimens processed in the routine manner missed pneumococci 61%, haemophili 23%, and yeasts 44% of the time. The findings were similar in all three hospitals despite differences in administration, staffing, primary culture media, and workload. Unless microscopic examination is routinely included, half of all microbiological information rendered on sputum specimens is meaningless and subject to dangerous misapplication. Furthermore, culture must be guided by microscopic findings, or respiratory pathogens will frequently be missed. Finally, when routine culture and smear disagree, the culture cannot be assumed to be correct. Microscopic examination should be mandatory in sputum microbiology, both for specimen evaluation and as a guide to what to look for in culture.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72641/72641dc6ed24ef7f93d56b67dec7e2c92a498735" alt="518"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/728ee/728ee35d2095b8451f318f0921f7c37ad6c83e75" alt="519"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ce12/2ce1243ea7294f7e2876263ba9c7965ff7cc512e" alt="520"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70571/7057192ca8a8474c0b29c57a43aeb234b5f10b03" alt="521"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63ba8/63ba8db3904ee02d3c7868ae2832dbfb2d121a48" alt="522"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0961/c096185323730eef9e5ab908e439a3e191095f99" alt="523"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fe13/2fe13485284f1bd6e7dc2ee88c3bc05baf28a6a1" alt="524"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02091/02091ea94dccf8d199ca7ede6d0d2b9c6e8f8921" alt="525"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d745/6d745521a1cd7c090c1993e3168400cd8b098a23" alt="526"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18a1e/18a1eb17959d4751dd57d39640b87f14b11926eb" alt="527"
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Austrian R. The role of the microbiological laboratory in the management of bacterial infections. Med Clin North Am. 1966 Sep;50(5):1419–1432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barrett-Connor E. The nonvalue of sputum culture in the diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1971 Jun;103(6):845–848. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1971.103.6.845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bartlett R. C. A plea for clinical relevance in medical microbiology. Am J Clin Pathol. 1974 Jun;61(6):867–872. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/61.6.867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chodosh S. Examination of sputum cells. N Engl J Med. 1970 Apr 9;282(15):854–857. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197004092821507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HEINEMAN H. S., BRAUDE A. I. ANAEROBIC INFECTION OF THE BRAIN. OBSERVATIONS ON EIGHTEEN CONSECUTIVE CASES OF BRAIN ABSCESS. Am J Med. 1963 Nov;35:682–697. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(63)90139-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johanson W. G., Pierce A. K., Sanford J. P. Changing pharyngeal bacterial flora of hospitalized patients. Emergence of gram-negative bacilli. N Engl J Med. 1969 Nov 20;281(21):1137–1140. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196911202812101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lepow M. L., Balassanian N., Emmerich J., Roberts R. B., Rosenthal M. S., Wolinsky E. Interrelationships of viral, mycoplasmal, and bacterial agents in uncomplicated pneumonia. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1968 Apr;97(4):533–545. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1968.97.4.533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Merrill C. W., Gwaltney J. M., Jr, Hendley J. W., Sande M. A. Rapid identification of pneumococci. Gram stain vs. the quellung reaction. N Engl J Med. 1973 Mar 8;288(10):510–512. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197303082881007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray P. R., Washington J. A. Microscopic and baceriologic analysis of expectorated sputum. Mayo Clin Proc. 1975 Jun;50(6):339–344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rathbun H. K., Govani I. Mouse inoculation as a means of identifying pneumococci in the sputum. Johns Hopkins Med J. 1967 Jan;120(1):46–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SHULMAN J. A., PHILLIPS L. A., PETERSDORF R. G. ERRORS AND HAZARDS IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF BACTERIAL PNEUMONIAS. Ann Intern Med. 1965 Jan;62:41–58. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-62-1-41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tillotson J. R., Finland M. Bacterial colonization and clinical superinfection of the respiratory tract complicating antibiotic treatment of pneumonia. J Infect Dis. 1969 Jun;119(6):597–624. doi: 10.1093/infdis/119.6.597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WISE R. I. THE STAPHYLOCOCCUS--APPROACH TO THERAPY. Med Clin North Am. 1965 Sep;49:1403–1413. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)33273-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]