Abstract
The highly selective A3 receptor agonist, 4′-thio-Cl-IB-MECA was successfully converted into selective A3 receptor antagonists by appending a second N-alkyl group on the 5′-uronamide position. This result indicates that the hydrogen bonding ability of the 5′-uronamide is essential for the conformational change required for the receptor activation. Among compounds tested, a N6-(3-bromobenzyl) derivative with 5′-dimethyluronamide exhibited the highest binding affinity (Ki = 9.32 nM) at the human A3 AR with very-low binding affinities to other AR subtypes.
INTRODUCTION
Adenosine regulates cell signaling through binding to four subtypes (A1, A2A, A2B, and A3) of adenosine receptors (ARs).1 Among these, A3 AR has been the most recently identified and good therapeutic target for the treatment of cancer, ischemia, asthma, and inflammation.2 Modification on N6 position and/or 4′-hydroxymethyl group of adenosine afforded potent and selective A3 AR agonists3 because of the structural similarity to adenosine, but not AR antagonists. Most of A3 AR antagonists belong to nonpurine heterocyclic compounds. However, because these derivatives showed poor binding affinity at the rat A3 AR, these are not suitable for establishing efficacy in animal model.4
Compounds with a nucleoside skeleton were found to be species-independent A3 AR antagonists,5 but with very low binding affinity to the A3 AR. Thus, it is of great interest to synthesize nucleoside analogues with high binding affinity to the A3 AR, showing equal binding affinity at the rat as well as human A3 ARs. Recently, we discovered the 4′-thio analogue, thio-Cl-IB-MECA6 as potent and selective human A3 AR agonist (Ki for human A3 AR = 0.38 nM) (Fig. 1). Since it is believed that the hydrogen of the methylamide is essential for the hydrogen bonding and thus for the induced-fit required for the receptor activation, it was hypothesized that removal of the hydrogen bonding ability results in the conversion of the agonistic activity into the antagonistic activity. Thus, 5′-N,N-dialkyluronamide derivatives of thio-Cl-IB-MECA were designed and synthesized as human A3 AR antagonists.7
Fig. 1.

Rationale for the design of A3 AR antagonists
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Synthesis of the desired nucleosides started from 2,6-dichloropurine derivative 36, which was prepared from D-gulonic γ-lactone (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1.

Rationale for the design of A3 AR antagonists
Treatment of 3 with various alkyl or arylamines afforded N6-substituted derivative 4. The isopropylidene group of 4 was changed to the TBS group because its removal at the final stage resulted in deglycosylation, and then 5′-benzoyl group was deprotected to give 5. Oxidation of the primary alcohol of 5 with PDC in DMF yielded the acid 6. Conversion of the acid 6 into the dialkylamide derivatives 7 was achieved by treating with various amines in the presence of EDC and HOBt.7
Radioligand binding assays were carried out in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably expressing a human AR subtype. 5′-N,N-Dimethylamide derivatives showed better binding affinity than larger 5′-N,N-dialkyl or 5′-N,N-cycloalkylamide derivatives, irrespective of N6-substituents. With dimethylamide at the 5′-position (R2 = R3 = Me) fixed, the binding affinity of various N6-substituted analogues was examined. The N6-(3-halobenzyl)amino series generally exhibited higher binding affinity at the human A3AR than the N6-dialkylamino or N6-cycloalkylamino series. Within the N6-(3-halobenzyl)amino series (R1 = 3-halobenzyl, R2 = R3 = Me), the binding affinity at the human A3AR was in the following order: 3-bromobenzyl (Ki = 9.32 nM) > 3-iodobenzyl (Ki = 15.5 nM) > 3-chlorobenzyl (Ki = 21.3 nM) > 3-fluorobenzyl (Ki = 121 nM). All synthesized compounds exhibited almost no binding affinities to other AR subtypes.
The functional assay indicated that compound 7 (R1 = 3-iodobenzyl, R2 = R3 = Me) indicated that this is a pure A3AR antagonist. The binding affinity of compound 7 was also measured at the rat A3AR to determine species differences, in which this compound showed moderate affinity (Ki = 321 ±74 nM) at the rat A3AR.7
CONCLUSION
Based on the hypothesis that the hydrogen bond-donating ability of the 5′-uronamide is responsible for the conformational change needed for receptor activation, we carried out the structure-activity relationship of 2-chloro-N6-substituted-4′-thioadenosine-5′-N,N-dialkyluronamides as pure A3 AR antagonists. From this study, it was found that the hydrogen bond-donating ability of the 5′-uronamide was essential for the pure A3AR antagonism. All synthesized A3AR antagonists could be evaluated in models of a number of disorders related to the A3AR, such as glaucoma, inflammation, and asthma.
References
- 1.Olah ME, Stiles GL. Pharmacol Ther. 2000;85:55–75. doi: 10.1016/s0163-7258(99)00051-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jacobson KA, Gao ZG. Nature Rev Drug Disc. 2006;5:247–264. doi: 10.1038/nrd1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Baraldi PG, Cacciari B, Romagnoli R, Merighi S, Varani K, Borea PA, Spalluto G. Med Res Rev. 2000;20:103–128. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1128(200003)20:2<103::aid-med1>3.0.co;2-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Baraldi PG, Tabrizi MA, Romagnoli R, Fruttarolo F, Merighi S, Varani K, Gessi S, Borea PA. Curr Med Chem. 2005;12:1319–1329. doi: 10.2174/0929867054020963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gao ZG, Kim SK, Biadatti T, Chen W, Lee K, Barak D, Kim SG, Johnson CR, Jacobson KA. J Med Chem. 2002;45:4471–4484. doi: 10.1021/jm020211+. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.(a) Jeong LS, Jin DZ, Kim HO, Shin DH, Moon HR, Gunaga P, Chun MW, Kim YC, Melman N, Gao ZG, Jacobson KA. J Med Chem. 2003;46:3775–3777. doi: 10.1021/jm034098e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Jeong LS, Lee HW, Jacobson KA, Kim HO, Shin DH, Lee JA, Gao ZG, Lu C, Duong HT, Gunaga P, Lee SK, Jin DZ, Chun MW, Moon HR. J Med Chem. 2006;49:273–281. doi: 10.1021/jm050595e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.(a) Gao ZG, Joshi BV, Klutz A, Kim SK, Lee HW, Kim HO, Jeong LS, Jacobson KA. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2006;16:596–601. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.10.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Jeong LS, Lee HW, Kim HO, Tosh DK, Pal S, Choi WJ, Gao ZG, Patel AR, Williams W, Jacobson KA, Kim HD. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2008;18:1612–1616. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.01.070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
