Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Trauma Stress. 2009 Aug;22(4):329–333. doi: 10.1002/jts.20421

Adverse childhood events are associated with obesity and disordered eating: Results from a U.S. population-based survey of young adults

Bernard F Fuemmeler a,*, Eric Dedert b,c, F Joseph McClernon b, Jean C Beckham b,c
PMCID: PMC2748336  NIHMSID: NIHMS135013  PMID: 19588510

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between childhood abuse and obesity in young adulthood (M age = 22) in a large, U.S., representative sample (N = 15,197). Controlling for demographics and depression, men with a history of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) were at increased risk of overweight and obesity. No association between childhood abuse and obesity or overweight was observed for women in this sample. Higher percentages of skipping meals to loose weight and problematic eating were observed among women with a history of physical abuse. This is the first study to note an association between childhood abuse with obesity and problematic weight management behaviors in a sample of young adults.

Keywords: Child adversity, child maltreatment, obesity, weight management


The rising prevalence of obesity among young adults in the U.S. population is a growing public health concern. Child maltreatment and abuse may contribute to an increased risk of obesity (Gilbert, Widom, Browne, Fergusson, Webb, & Janson, 2009). Several clinical studies suggest a history of sexual abuse is common among individuals who are obese or who exhibit disordered eating (Gustafson & Sarwer, 2004). Also, chart review and insurance database studies indicate higher obesity among individuals with a history of sexual (Felitti, 1991) and nonsexual abuse (Felitti, 1993).

Preliminary data from community-based samples have confirmed some of these studies. Using data from the California Women’s Health Survey (CWHS), authors reported that obese women were 27% more likely to report a history of childhood physical or sexual abuse (Alvarez, Pavao, Baumrind, & Kimerling, 2007). Similarly, data from the Adverse Childhood Experiences Cohort indicated that those reporting four or more adverse childhood experiences had a 2-fold increased risk of severe obesity, defined as a Body Mass Index (kg/m2) ≥ 35 (Anda, Felitti, Bremner, Walker, Whitfield, Perry et al., 2006). Additionally, data from the Brain Resource International Database suggest an association between childhood abuse and obesity, even in participants who screened negative for common medical and psychiatric problems (Gunstad, Paul, Spitznagel, Cohen, Williams, Kohn et al., 2006).

While studies on childhood abuse and obesity collectively suggest an association, this field of research lacks replications in large nationally representative cohorts. Also, many of the above-mentioned studies examined obesity in middle or later adulthood. The degree to which abuse in childhood is associated with obesity in early adulthood remains largely unknown. The goal of the present study is to examine the relation between childhood physical abuse, neglect, and childhood sexual abuse (CSA) on obesity in a young adult sample from a nationally representative cohort. Depressive symptoms were included in multivariate regression models since previous research has indicated associations between depression and obesity (Faith, Matz, & Jorge, 2002). We also examined the relation between abuse, neglect, and CSA on weight management practices and eating behaviors.

Method

Participants

The study sample was drawn from 20,747 adolescents from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), a nationally representative study of adolescents. Respondents participated in surveys in three separate waves: in 1995 (Wave 1; M age = 15.6, SD = 1.7); 1996 (Wave 2; M age = 16.2, SD = 1.6); and August 2001 to August 2002 (Wave 3; M age = 22.0, SD = 1.8). The Wave 3 cross-sectional cohort includes 15,197 respondents.

The sample for this study relied on data collected during the most recent wave (n = 15,197). Participants who were pregnant (n = 379) were excluded from the analyses. By design, the Add Health survey included a sample stratified by region, urbanicity and school type, ethnic mix and size to garner a nationally representative sample. Details regarding the design and data collection are described elsewhere (Harris, Gordon-Larsen, Chantala, & Udry, 2006).

Measures

Measured height and weight were ascertained by Add Health study personnel at Wave 3. BMI, the Quetelet index (kg/m2) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), was calculated and sorted into 3 categories (normal BMI = 18 – 25; overweight BMI = 25 – 29; and obese BMI >= 30). Those in the underweight category (BMI < 18) were not included in the analyses (n = 402). In Wave 3, in-home survey participants were asked if they were trying to lose weight, and if so, the method they were using (dieting, exercising, skipping meals, taking laxatives, diuretics, or supplements, or participating in a weight loss program). All participants also reported on problematic eating behaviors (feeling afraid to eat because won’t be able to stop, and being told by a doctor that they have an eating disorder).

In Wave 3, participants were asked to retrospectively report on the presence of exposure to childhood physical abuse (i.e., prior to 6th grade), defined as being slapped, hit or kicked; being neglected during childhood, defined as a caregiver not meeting basic needs; and the occurrence of CSA, defined as being forced to engage in sexual relations with an adult caregiver. The frequency was coded as 0 for none and 1 for any occurrence reported.

The Add Health study included a 10-item version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies – Depression Scale (CES-D) (Radloff, 1977). The response scale and tense of some CES-D items were modified, but have been shown to not meaningfully affect the internal structure of the measure (Crockett, Randall, Shen, Russell, & Driscoll, 2005). This version of the CES-D has demonstrated good internal consistency (α =. 87 for Wave 3).

Factors related to socioeconomic status (SES) have been shown to be associated with obesity in the U.S., in particular educational level (Wang, 2001). Parental report of the highest education level was used as a proxy for SES. We also controlled for age and race, as they have been shown to be related to obesity and weight management practices (Flegal, Carroll, Ogden, & Johnson, 2002).

Data Analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS-callable SUDAAN (version 8.0) statistical software (Research Triangle Institute, 2001). SUDAAN allows for control of survey design effects of individuals clustered in sampling unit by school, and stratification of geographic region. Post-stratification weights were applied in order to allow the results to be comparable to young adults in the U.S. population. Controlling for socio-demographics (age, race, parental education) and current depressive symptoms, logistic regression models examined the association with overweight and obesity separately for CSA, neglect, physical abuse, and subsequently with all abuse types in the model. These analyses were stratified by gender, as previous findings have suggested possible gender differences in the association between trauma and obesity (Gunstad et al., 2006). The prevalence of weight management practices and problematic eating behaviors by abuse categories were also examined.

Results

The frequency of each type of abuse for the study sample among men and women can be viewed in Table 1. The percentages are weighted to be representative of the U.S. population. These estimates are consistent with estimates from high-income countries (Gilbert et al., 2009). For the overall sample in these analyses, 48.2% were normal weight, 27.9% were overweight, and 23.9% were obese.

Table 1.

Means and Percentages for Variables by Gender and BMI Categories, n %

Men

Total Normal Obese Overweight + obese




Demographic variables N   %   n    % n %    χ 2a    n   %    χ 2b   
Racial minority status
  Caucasian 3986 73.4 1994 76.1 873 69.1 1992 70.8
  Non-Caucasian 2328 26.6 1015 23.9 648 30.9 9.17** 1313 29.2 10.18**
Parental Education
  Less than HS 684 11.0 269 9.3 208 14.7 415 12.7
  HS or equivalent 1359 26.9 605 25.3 388 31.8 754 28.5
  Greater than HS 1626 30.2 763 29.0 376 28.7 863 31.4
  College or professional 1796 37.8 979 36.3 333 24.9 10.97** 817 27.4 9.20**
Childhood sexual abuse 294 4.8 116 3.7 91 6.9 9.76** 178 5.9 10.53**
Childhood neglect 292 4.8 122 4.4 87 6.3 3.01    170 5.1 0.84
Childhood physical abuse 894 13.6 406 13.5 218 13.8 0.04    488 13.7 0.02
M SE   M SE M SE    t-test    M SE    t-test   




Age 21.75 0.13 21.58 0.13 22.01 0.15 3.94** 21.91 0.13 4.13**
CES-D 10 -item 5.24 0.10 5.14 0.12 5.62 0.17 2.52** 5.33 0.12 1.34

Women

Total† Normal Obese Overweight + Obese




Demographic variables N     %   n    % n %   χ 2a n   %    χ 2b   

Racial Minority Status
  Caucasian 4099 74.6 1995 75.9 905 70.9 2104 73.4
  Non-Caucasian 2359 25.4 1064 24.2 633 29.1 5.42* 1295 26.6 3.01
Parental Education
  Less than HS 665 11.4 271 10.0 207 13.6 394 12.7
  HS or equivalent 1349 26.4 605 14.4 356 30.8 744 28.3
  Greater than HS 1697 30.6 762 28.8 400 31.6 935 32.2
  College or professional 1879 31.7 1032 36.9 339 24.1 7.81** 847 26.9 8.25**
Childhood sexual abuse 277 4.1 125 4.3 73 4.4 0.04    152 4.0 0.17
Childhood neglect 308 5.3 152 5.2 69 5.3 0.01    156 5.3 0.01
Childhood physical abuse 944 15.6 456 16.0 229 16.2 0.01    488 15.2 0.41
M     SE   M SE   M SE    t-test     M SE    t-test   




Age 21.84 0.12 21.68 0.13 22.03 0.13 4.00** 21.98 0.12 4.65**
CES-D 10 -item 5.5   0.08 5.45 0.10 5.74 0.17 1.60    5.54 0.12 0.65

Note. Means and Percentages are weighted to be representative of the U.S. population.

a

Tests the difference between BMI in the Normal range vs BMI in the Obese range.

b

Tests the difference between BMI in the Normal range vs BMI in the Overweight+Obese range.

c

CES-D = Center for Epidemiologic Studies – Depression Scale

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

Table 2 presents results of the multivariate models controlling for race, parental educational level, age, and depressive symptoms stratified by gender. Compared to normal weight men, obese men were more likely to report a history of CSA. This positive association was also found in overweight+obese men. For women no associations between weight classifications and abuse status were found. The fourth model indicated that CSA remained a significant predictor of weight classification among men after accounting for the other abuse categories. No significant interaction effects between CSA and other abuse categories on weight classification outcomes were found (data not shown).

Table 2.

Adjusted OR for CSA and CPA on Obesity or Overweight+Obesity

Males

Normal vs. obese Normal vs. overweight+obese


OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Model 1
   CSAa 1.63* (1.03 – 2.58) 1.46* (1.02 – 2.08)
Model 2
   Neglect 1.26 (0.78 – 2.03) 1.02 (0.68 – 1.52)
Model 3
   CPAb 0.96 (0.74 – 1.25) 0.94 (0.76 – .15)
Model 4
   CSA 1.66* (1.03 – 2.70) 1.51* (1.05 – 2.19)
   Neglect 1.22 (0.76 – 1.98) 0.99 (0.67 – 1.48)
   CPA 0.94 (0.72 – .24) 0.95 (0.76 – .18)

Females

Normal vs. obese Normal vs. overweight+obese


OR 95% CI OR 95% CI

Model 1
   CSA 0.86 (0.54 – 1.35) 0.80 (0.57 – 1.11)
Model 2
   Neglect 0.85 (0.53 – 1.37) 0.92 (0.64 – 1.33)
Model 3
   CPA 1.02 (0.77 – 1.37) 0.94 (0.77 – 1.15)
Model 4
   CSA 0.81 (0.53 – 1.23) 0.76 (0.54 – 1.06)
   Neglect 1.01 (0.61 – 1.67) 1.13 (0.77 – 1.66)
   CPA 1.00 (0.75 – 1.35) 0.93 (0.76 – 1.15)

All models control for race, parental education level, age, and depressive symptoms.

a

CSA = Childhood sexual abuse

b

CPA = Childhood physical abuse

*

p<.05

Table 3 presents the frequencies of weight management and problematic eating behaviors by abuse categories. Among woman, skipping meals was more prevalent among those with a history of physical abuse. Further, women reporting a history of CSA or physical abuse were more likely to report being told they have an eating disorder or being afraid to eat because they may lose control.

Table 3.

Prevalence of weight management practices and eating behaviors by categories of gender and categories of abuse

Men

No CSAa CSA No Neglect Neglect No PA b PA
Weight management practices among those (n = 2835) (n = 134) (n = 2804) (n = 131) (n = 2487) (n = 430)



trying to lose or maintain weight N   %† † N   %† †   N %† †   N %† † N   %† †   N   %† †  
   Exercise to change weight 2176 76.8 104 69.6 2163 77.1 98 71.0 1917 77.0 335 74.9
   Dieted to change weight 1131 40.6 63 46.8 1139 40.7 52 45.9 993 40.4 185 44.4
   Skip meals 515 17.6 33 26.0 502 17.8 37 25.7 437 17.0 96 22.1
   Took pills/laxatives/diuretics/supplements 489 16.6 24 14.0 480 16.5 28 17.2 418 16.3 79 17.0
   Took part in weight program last week 86 3.6 9 8.2  93 3.9 3 2.0 82 4.1 14 3.4
Eating Behaviors (n = 5794) (n = 294) (n = 5729) (n = 292) (n = 5100) (n = 894)



   Afraid to eat because lose control 120 1.7 17 3.7  125 1.7 12 4.14 107 1.7 28 2.8
   Told by doctor have eating disorder 99 1.8 11 2.8  103 1.8 7 2.4  85 1.8 24 2.4

Women

No CSAa CSA No Neglect Neglect No PA b PA
Weight management practices among those (n = 3011) (n = 144) (n = 3006) (n = 137) (n = 2617) (n = 502)



trying to lose or maintain weight N   %† †   N   %††   N   %††   N %††   N %††   N   %††  

   Exercise to change weight 2374 78.1 103 68.7 2362 77.8 101 74.7 2065 78.1 381 75.5
   Dieted to change weight 1258 40.1 62 44.3 1193 40.2 61 44.9 1034 39.8 207 43.0
   Skip meals 547 17.4 32 21.1 539 17.2 36 23.2 456 16.6 112 22.3*
   Took pills/laxatives/diuretics/supplements 500 16.4 24 12.9 502 16.7 19 7.0** 429 16.0 95 18.1
   Took part in weight program last week 93 3.3 6 2.1 97 3.4 2 0.4 91 3.8 7 .80**
Eating Behaviors (n = 5948) (n = 277) (n = 5872) (n = 308) (n = 5201) (n = 944)



   Afraid to eat because lose control 131 2.0 11 5.7 131 2.2 12 2.8 112 2.1 31 2.5
   Told by doctor have eating disorder 113 1.9 19 8.1** 123 2.1 9 2.8 93 1.6 40 5.0**

Chi-Square statistical tests performed when cell size greater than 5. Fisher exact used when cell size less than 5

††

Percentages are weighted to be representative of the U.S. population

a

CSA = Childhood sexual abuse

b

PA = Physical abuse

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

p < =.10.

Discussion

Findings of this study indicate young adult men, but not women, with a history of CSA are at increased risk of overweight and obesity. However, compared to women without a history of CSA, women with a history of CSA had a higher prevalence of self-reported problematic eating and possible eating disorder history.

The absence of relationships between childhood abuse and overweight/obesity in women in this study contrasts with early studies from clinical samples comprised mostly or completely of women (Felitti, 1991, 1993), as well CWHS data (Alvarez et al., 2007). However, these previous studies were conducted with women of more advanced age. Although further study is needed, effects of childhood trauma on obesity in young women may be counterbalanced by societal influences to be thin, which may be more salient for women during the adolescent and young adult period. Despite differences between our findings and those of previous clinic-based studies, our results are consistent with those of Gunstad et al. (2006) who reported relationships between a greater number of early life stressors and adult obesity in men, but not in women.

This study is limited by use of retrospective self-report for childhood maltreatment. Reliance on self-report of childhood abuse may result in underreporting, thus potentially underestimating the true association. Further, some important variables were not available in the data, thus limiting the types of models we could test. Also, other important outcomes that have been considered in recent similar studies, such as measures of central obesity and glycosylated hemoglobin (Thomas, Hypponen, & Power, 2008) were also not available in this wave of Add Health. However, examining these outcomes and their association with adverse childhood events will be possible in future data releases.

Although adverse childhood events may account for only a small proportion of the current obesity epidemic in the U.S. (Alvarez et al., 2007), risk of obesity in this select group is highly relevant. Health care providers who work with trauma survivors may be well poised to assist in delivery of health promotion and preventive interventions targeting this group. While continued research would be useful in determining and clarifying potential moderators and mechanisms, this study along with others suggests that adverse childhood events are important risk factors for not only poor psychological outcomes in adulthood, but also risky lifestyle factors and poor physical health outcomes.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Cancer Institute K071K07 CA124905-01A1 (BFF), National Institute on Drug Abuse K23DA017261-01 (FJM), K24DA016388 (JCB), R21 DA019704-01 (JCB), National Cancer Institute 2R01 CA081595 (JCB), and Veterans Affairs Merit Award MH-0018 (JCB).

This research uses data from Add Health, a program project designed by J. Richard Udry, Peter S. Bearman, and Kathleen Mullan Harris, and funded by a grant P01-HD31921 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with cooperative funding from 17 other agencies. Special acknowledgment is due Ronald R. Rindfuss and Barbara Entwisle for assistance in the original design. Persons interested in obtaining data files from Add Health should contact Add Health, Carolina Population Center, 123 W. Franklin Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27516-2524 (addhealth@unc.edu). No direct support was received from grant P01-HD31921 for this analysis.

References

  1. Alvarez J, Pavao J, Baumrind N, Kimerling R. The relationship between child abuse and adult obesity among california women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2007;33(1):28–33. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anda RF, Felitti VJ, Bremner JD, Walker JD, Whitfield C, Perry BD, et al. The enduring effects of abuse and related adverse experiences in childhood. A convergence of evidence from neurobiology and epidemiology. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 2006;256(3):174–186. doi: 10.1007/s00406-005-0624-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Adult BMI. 2009 Retrieved February 6, 2009, from http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/bmi/adult_BMI/about_adult_BMI.htm.
  4. Crockett LJ, Randall BA, Shen YL, Russell ST, Driscoll AK. Measurement equivalence of the center for epidemiological studies depression scale for Latino and Anglo adolescents: a national study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2005;73(1):47–58. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.1.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Faith MS, Matz PE, Jorge MA. Obesity-depression associations in the population. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2002;53(4):935–942. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00308-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Felitti VJ. Long-term medical consequences of incest, rape, and molestation. Southern Medical Journal. 1991;84(3):328–331. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199103000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Felitti VJ. Childhood sexual abuse, depression, and family dysfunction in adult obese patients: a case control study. Southern Medical Journal. 1993;86(7):732–736. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199307000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA. 2002;288(14):1723–1727. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gilbert R, Widom CS, Browne K, Fergusson D, Webb E, Janson S. Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. Lancet. 2009;373(9657):68–81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61706-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gunstad J, Paul RH, Spitznagel MB, Cohen RA, Williams LM, Kohn M, et al. Exposure to early life trauma is associated with adult obesity. Psychiatry Research. 2006;142(1):31–37. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gustafson TB, Sarwer DB. Childhood sexual abuse and obesity. Obes Rev. 2004;5(3):129–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2004.00145.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Harris KM, Gordon-Larsen P, Chantala K, Udry JR. Longitudinal trends in race/ethnic disparities in leading health indicators from adolescence to young adulthood. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 2006;160(1):74–81. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.160.1.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977;1:385–401. [Google Scholar]
  14. Research Triangle Institute. SUDAAN user's manual, release 8.0. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  15. Thomas C, Hypponen E, Power C. Obesity and type 2 diabetes risk in midadult life: the role of childhood adversity. Pediatrics. 2008;121(5):e1240–e1249. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang Y. Cross-national comparison of childhood obesity: the epidemic and the relationship between obesity and socioeconomic status. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2001;30(5):1129–1136. doi: 10.1093/ije/30.5.1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES