Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior logoLink to The Analysis of Verbal Behavior
. 1991;9:127–143. doi: 10.1007/BF03392867

Rule-governed behavior: Unifying radical and paradigmatic behaviorism

G Leonard Burns, Arthur W Staats
PMCID: PMC2748521  PMID: 22477636

Abstract

Commonalities and differences between Skinner's analysis of verbal behavior and the paradigmatic behaviorism (PB) approach are described as a means of introducing the latter to behavior analysis. The focus is on treating the topic of rule-governed behavior—a topic of current interest in behavior analysis in addressing the challenge of cognitive psychology—within the PB framework. Dealing behaviorally with traditional psychology interests is considered important in PB, and this article aims to advance toward that goal. PB has presented a framework that deals with not only the behavioral description of language but also with language function as well as language acquisition. This includes a treatment of the manner in which verbal stimuli generally can control motor behavior. This framework includes analyses in addition to those present in the behavior analytic framework, along with empirical developments, and these can be used to enhance a behavioral understanding of important parts of verbal behavior and the effects of verbal stimuli on behavior, including rule-governed phenomena. Our purpose is to use the particular topic of rule-governed behavior to argue that a more explicit interaction between radical and paradigmatic behaviorism would advance behaviorism and also enable it to have a stronger impact upon psychology and the scientific community.

Full text

PDF
127

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bentall R. P., Lowe C. F. The role of verbal behavior in human learning: III. Instructional effects in children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Mar;47(2):177–190. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkowitz L., Knurek D. A. Label-mediated hostility generalation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1969 Nov;13(3):200–206. doi: 10.1037/h0028125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blakely E., Schlinger H. Rules: Function-altering contingency-specifying stimuli. Behav Anal. 1987 Fall;10(2):183–187. doi: 10.1007/BF03392428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brownstein A. J., Shull R. L. A rule for the use of the term, "Rule-governed behavior". Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;8(2):265–267. doi: 10.1007/BF03393158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Catania A. C., Matthews B. A., Shimoff E. Instructed versus shaped human verbal behavior: Interactions with nonverbal responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Nov;38(3):233–248. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Early C. J. Attitude learning in children. J Educ Psychol. 1968 Jun;59(3):176–180. doi: 10.1037/h0025879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Galizio M. Contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior: instructional control of human loss avoidance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Jan;31(1):53–70. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Glenn S. S. Maladaptive functional relations in client verbal behavior. Behav Anal. 1983 Spring;6(1):47–56. doi: 10.1007/BF03391873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Guess D. A functional analysis of receptive language and productive speech: acquisition of the plural morpheme. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Spring;2(1):55–64. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hayes L. J., Thompson S., Hayes S. C. Stimulus equivalence and rule following. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):275–291. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hayes S. C., Brownstein A. J., Zettle R. D., Rosenfarb I., Korn Z. Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 May;45(3):237–256. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hekmat H. Systematic versus semantic desensitization and implosive therapy: a comparative study. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1973 Apr;40(2):202–209. doi: 10.1037/h0034552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hekmat H., Vanian D. Behavior modification through covert semantic desensitization. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1971 Apr;36(2):248–251. doi: 10.1037/h0030734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hummel J. H., Abercrombie C., Koepsel P. Teaching students to analyze examples of classical conditioning. Behav Anal. 1991 Fall;14(2):241–246. doi: 10.1007/BF03392579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee V. L. Prepositional phrases spoken and heard. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Mar;35(2):227–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Malott R. W. Rule-governed behavior and behavioral anthropology. Behav Anal. 1988 Fall;11(2):181–203. doi: 10.1007/BF03392471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McPherson A., Bonem M., Green G., Osborne J. G. A citation analysis of the influence on research of Skinner's verbal behavior. Behav Anal. 1984 Fall;7(2):157–167. doi: 10.1007/BF03391898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Michael J. Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):149–155. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  20. Peterson R. F. Some experiments on the organization of a class of imitative behaviors. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Fall;1(3):225–235. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rose G. D., Staats A. W. Depression and the frequency and strength of pleasant events: exploration of the Staats-Heiby theory. Behav Res Ther. 1988;26(6):489–494. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(88)90144-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. STAATS A. W., FINLEY J. R., MINKE K. A., WOLF M. REINFORCEMENT VARIABLES IN THE CONTROL OF UNIT READING RESPONSES. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Mar;7:139–149. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. STAATS A. W. Learning theory and opposite speech. J Abnorm Psychol. 1957 Sep;55(2):268–269. doi: 10.1037/h0043902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. STAATS A. W., MINKE K. A., FINLEY J. R., WOLF M., BROOKS L. O. A REINFORCER SYSTEM AND EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE FOR THE LABORATORY STUDY OF READING ACQUISITION. Child Dev. 1964 Mar;35:209–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1964.tb05932.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. STAATS A. W., STAATS C. K., BIGGS D. A. Meaning of verbal stimuli changed by conditioning. Am J Psychol. 1958 Jun;71(2):429–431. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. STAATS A. W., STAATS C. K., CRAWFORD H. L. First-order conditioning of meaning and the parallel conditioning of a GSR. J Gen Psychol. 1962 Jul;67:159–167. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1962.9711540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. STAATS A. W., STAATS C. K. Effect of number of trials on the language conditioning of meaning. J Gen Psychol. 1959 Oct;61:211–223. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1959.9710255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. STAATS A. W., STAATS C. K., HEARD W. G. Language conditioning of meaning to meaning using a semantic generalization paradigm. J Exp Psychol. 1959 Mar;57(3):187–192. doi: 10.1037/h0042274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. STAATS A. W., STAATS C. K., HEARD W. G., NIMS L. P. Replication report: meaning established by classical conditioning. J Exp Psychol. 1959 Jan;57(1):64–64. doi: 10.1037/h0048859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. STAATS A. W. Verbal and instrumental response-hierarchies and their relationship to problem-solving. Am J Psychol. 1957 Sep;70(3):442–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. STAATS C. K., STAATS A. W. Meaning established by classical conditioning. J Exp Psychol. 1957 Jul;54(1):74–80. doi: 10.1037/h0047716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sailor W. Reinforcement and generalization of productive plural allomorphs in two retarded children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1971 Winter;4(4):305–310. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1971.4-305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sailor W., Taman T. Stimulus factors in the training of prepositional usage in three autistic children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1972 Summer;5(2):183–190. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Schlinger H., Blakely E. Function-altering effects of contingency-specifying stimuli. Behav Anal. 1987 Spring;10(1):41–45. doi: 10.1007/BF03392405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Shimoff E., Matthews B. A., Catania A. C. Human operant performance: Sensitivity and pseudosensitivity to contingencies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Sep;46(2):149–157. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Skinner B. F. The steep and thorny way to a science of behavior. Am Psychol. 1975 Jan;30(1):42–49. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.30.1.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Staats A. W., Butterfield W. H. Treatment of nonreading in a culturally deprived juvenile delinquent: an application of reinforcement principles. Child Dev. 1965 Dec;36(4):925–942. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Staats A. W. Experimental-longitudinal methods in assessment, research, and treatment. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1977;5(3):323–333. doi: 10.1007/BF00913702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Staats A. W., Gross M. C., Guay P. F., Carlson C. C. Personality and social systems and attitude-reinforcer-discriminative theory: interest (attitude) formation, function, and measurement. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1973 May;26(2):251–261. doi: 10.1037/h0034399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Staats A. W., Hammond O. W. Natural words as physiological conditioned stimuli: food-word-elicited salivation and deprivation effects. J Exp Psychol. 1972 Nov;96(1):206–208. doi: 10.1037/h0033508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Staats A. W., Minke K. A., Martin C. H., Higa W. R. Deprivation-satiation and strength of attitude conditioning: a test of attitude-reinforcer-discriminative theory. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1972 Nov;24(2):178–185. doi: 10.1037/h0033307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Staats A. W., Staats C. K., Finley J. R. Operant conditioning of serially ordered verbal responses. J Gen Psychol. 1966 Jan;74(1ST):145–155. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1966.9710316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Staats A. W., Staats C. K., Minke K. A. Operant conditioning of a class of word associates. J Gen Psychol. 1966 Jan;74(1ST):157–164. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1966.9710317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Tryon W. W., Briones R. G. Higher-order semantic counterconditioning of Filipino women's evaluations of heterosexual behaviors. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1985 Jun;16(2):125–131. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(85)90047-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zanna M. P., Kiesler C. A., Pilkonis P. A. Positive and negative attitudinal affect established by classical conditioning. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1970 Apr;14(4):321–328. doi: 10.1037/h0028991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Analysis of verbal behavior are provided here courtesy of Association for Behavior Analysis International

RESOURCES