Skip to main content
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior logoLink to The Analysis of Verbal Behavior
. 1992;10:23–36. doi: 10.1007/BF03392872

Effects of visual demonstration, verbal instructions, and prompted verbal descriptions on the performance of human subjects in conditional discriminations

Emilio Ribes-Iñesta, Ma Luisa Cepeda, Hortencia Hickman, Diana Moreno, Eduardo Peñalosa
PMCID: PMC2748593  PMID: 22477044

Abstract

A study was conducted to confirm prior results concerning the role of prompted verbal descriptions of visually demonstrated stimulus relations in the acquisition and transfer of identity, difference, and similarity-matching relations (Ribes et al., 1988). Four groups of human adults were trained with these three matching relations under four different procedures: (1) visual demonstration without response requirement, (2) verbal instructions, (3) visual demonstration plus prompted verbal description, and (4) visual demonstration plus verbal instructions. These procedures were presented at the beginning of the training period before subjects could respond to the experimental task. Although most subjects in the four groups acquired the conditional discrimination under the three matching relations, only those in the two instruction-related groups showed some intramodal and extramodal transfer in tests with stimuli that had not been used in training. These results suggest the importance of measuring extra-situational and trans-situational generalization, and raise the need to distinguish between formal and functional verbal factors in the regulation of human behavior.

Full text

PDF
23

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cerutti D. T. Discrimination theory of rule-governed behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Mar;51(2):259–276. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Critchfield T. S., Perone M. Verbal self-reports of delayed matching to sample by humans. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 May;53(3):321–344. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sidman M., Tailby W. Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):5–22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Stromer R., Osborne J. G. Control of adolescents' arbitrary matching-to-sample by positive and negative stimulus relations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 May;37(3):329–348. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Analysis of verbal behavior are provided here courtesy of Association for Behavior Analysis International

RESOURCES