Summary
In the absence of active volume regulation processes, cell volume is inversely proportional to osmolarity, as predicted by the Boyle Van’t Hoff relation. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that nuclear volume has a similar relationship with extracellular osmolarity in articular chondrocytes, cells that are exposed to changes in the osmotic environment in vivo, and furthermore, we explored the mechanism of the relationships between osmolarity and nuclear size and shape. Nuclear size was quantified using two independent techniques, confocal laser scanning microscopy and angle-resolved low coherence interferometry. Nuclear volume was osmotically-sensitive but this relationship was not linear, showing a decline in the osmotic sensitivity in the hypo-osmotic range. Nuclear shape was also influenced by extracellular osmolarity, becoming smoother as the osmolarity decreased. The osmotically-induced changes in nuclear size paralleled the changes in nuclear shape, suggesting that shape and volume are interdependent. The osmotic sensitivity of shape and volume persisted after disruption of the actin cytoskeleton. Isolated nuclei contracted in response to physiologic changes in macromolecule concentration but not in response to physiologic changes in ion concentration, suggesting solute size has an important influence on the osmotic pressurization of the nucleus. This finding in turn implies that the diffusion barrier that causes osmotic effects is not a semi-permeable membrane, but rather due to size constraints that prevent large solute molecules from entering small spaces in the nucleus. As nuclear morphology has been associated previously with cell phenotype, these findings may provide new insight into the role of mechanical and osmotic signals in regulating cell physiology.
Keywords: cell mechanics, chromatin, cartilage, osteoarthritis
Introduction
The ability to perceive and respond to biophysical factors, such as mechanical or osmotic stresses, is critical for normal cell behavior. For example, many cell types exhibit biological responses to physical stimuli such as mechanical deformation, hydrostatic pressure, fluid shear stress, or osmotic stresses. These physical parameters are often coupled to one another in tissues that possess a charged, hydrated, extracellular matrix, such as articular cartilage40, 44, 48, 49, 52–54, 66, 72. Such stresses may alter cell behavior by initiating traditional cell signaling processes involving the activation of ion channels 32, 36, 46, 64 or other membrane-bound receptors17, 19. It has also been hypothesized that physical stresses propagate through the cell and act directly on the nucleus and other intracellular organelles, exerting a biological influence at a subcellular level16. In this respect, the physical conformation of the nucleus is associated with many important biological phenomena. For example, the nuclei of epithelial cells enlarge dramatically when they become cancerous 5. Chromatin condensation is one of the first changes to occur in apoptosis 42. Nuclear lamins A/C accumulate as stem cells differentiate 7, 18, 62 and the stiffness of the lamina network increases as a result 58. Interestingly, lamin B1, the only sub-type that does not affect the stiffness of the lamina network 45, is unchanged during differentiation. The significance, if any, of these physical changes can be better interpreted through more detailed knowledge of the biophysical properties of the cell nucleus.
It is now apparent that extracellular matrix interacts with the cytoplasm and other intracellular organelles such as the nucleus via a solid-state connection to the cytoskeleton29, 41, 47, 74. There has been considerable speculation that this connection provides a mechanism by which extracellular stresses can be transmitted intracellularly in a manner that can alter cell signaling directly at the level of the nucleus37, 47. Osmotic stress, on the other hand, does not depend on solid connections, but rather is “transmitted” by the diffusion of ions and water through fluid compartments and is modulated by local fixed charge density. Since the cell membrane is permeable to water, osmotic stress is rapidly propagated to the interior of the cell in the presence or absence of solid structures in the cytoplasm. However, the physical effects of extracellular osmotic stress on the cell nucleus, as well as the intrinsic physicochemical properties of the nucleus, are not well understood.
A few previous studies have examined the physical and biomechanical properties of the cell nucleus. The nucleus is stiffer and more viscous than the cytoplasm23, 25, 35, potentially contributing to the stiffness of the cell as a structure 12. Furthermore, defective nuclear mechanics due to genetic alterations in nuclear cytoskeletal proteins compromise the mechanical integrity of the whole cell 8. The nuclear envelope is supported by a network of intermediate filaments called lamins and filled with chromatin 30. The stiffest part of the nucleus is the lamin network, while the most viscous part is the chromatin. Both appear to show power law dynamics after the application of a step load 20. Computational studies have shown that the mechanical response of the whole nucleus is highly sensitive to the stiffness of the nuclear lamina 73. Chromatin contains many charged groups that limit its compaction by repelling one another and cause it to condense or expand in response to changes in ion concentration 67–69. Small molecules and ions diffuse freely into and out of the nucleus through the nuclear pore complexes that populate the nuclear envelope 57. In charged hydrated tissues such as cartilage, bulk compression of the tissue changes the shape and volume of the chondrocyte and its nucleus in a coordinated manner10, 33, 43. However, if the F-actin cytoskeleton is disrupted with cytochalasin D, the effects of tissue compression on nuclear shape disappear, but the effects on volume remain 33.
Osmotic loading affects a range of biological processes in articular chondrocytes including calcium signaling 26, protein synthesis 6, gene expression 39 and cytoskeletal reorganization15, 27, 34. The physical response that accompanies these biological responses is well-understood at the whole-cell level. When active responses are suppressed, the reciprocal of osmolarity exhibits a linear relationship with cell volume, as predicted by the Boyle Van’t Hoff relation55. Many mammalian cells obey the Boyle Van’t Hoff relation, including chondrocytes 11, 34, neutrophils 70 and human islet cells 22. Changes in the extracellular osmotic environment cause intracellular changes such as alterations in genome architecture 1 due to an increase of macromolecular crowding in the cytoplasm that causes histone aggregation through an excluded volume effect 61. The volume of the chondrocyte nucleus changes with changes in osmolarity 56 but it is not known if the osmotic response of the nucleus shares the linear character of the cell response. We hypothesized that the nucleus, similar to the cell, would behave as an ideal osmometer, following the Boyle Van’t Hoff relation. The goal of this study was to examine this hypothesis by systematically quantifying the dynamic and equilibrium morphologic response of the cell nucleus to changes in extracellular osmolarity using two independent methods, confocal microscopy and angle-resolved low coherence interferometry (a/LCI). Further experiments examined the mechanisms of the observed behavior.
Results
Cell volume was found to be linearly related to inverse normalized osmolarity throughout the domain tested, indicating that chondrocytes obey the Boyle Van’t Hoff relation for the volumetric response of an ideal osmometer. The osmotically active volume fraction of the chondrocyte was determined from a linear fit to be 67% (R2=0.97).
Nucleus volume was also sensitive to osmolarity but in a non-linear manner. The nucleus volume increased linearly with inverse normalized osmolarity in the hyper-osmotic range. In the hypo-osmotic range, the slope of the relationship decreased continuously, suggesting an upper limit to nuclear expansion. The key features of the relationship between nucleus volume and osmolarity were found to be the same regardless of whether it was measured using fluorescent microscopy or a/LCI (Fig. 1A). For the sake of comparison, the Ponder’s plot data was separated into four cases representing the two different structures, the cell and the nucleus (as measured by fluorescence microscopy), and two different ranges, hyper-osmotic and hypo-osmotic. In each case, the data was fit to a straight line to allow comparisons of the osmotic sensitivity to be made (Fig. 1B). A two factor ANOVA revealed a main effect of structure (cell vs. nucleus), no main effect of osmotic range and a significant interaction between structure and osmotic range. The osmotic sensitivity of the cell did not change significantly between the hyper- and hypo-osmotic ranges but the sensitivity of the nucleus did change. The nucleus was more sensitive than the cell in the hyper-osmotic range and less so in the hypo-osmotic range. The nucleus volume response in the hyper-osmotic range was highly linear (R2 = 0.992) and the y-intercept of the linear fit was 0.204. This finding implies that the solid volume fraction of the nucleus is 20.4%.
Figure 1.
(A) The Ponder’s relation (inverse osmolarity vs. normalized volume) was found to be linear for the cell but nonlinear for the nucleus. The non-linearity of the response of the nucleus was independent of the techniques used to measure nuclear size (i.e., fluorescent microscopy or angle resolved low coherence interferometry (a/LCI)). For nucleus by a/LCI, n = 11. For cell and nucleus by microscopy measurements, n is as per table 1. Error bars represent one standard error. V/Viso = volume/iso-osmotic volume, Ciso/C = iso-osmotic osmolarity/osmolarity. (B) Values of the slope of the Ponder’s plot calculated for the cell and the nucleus (as measured by fluorescence microscopy) in the hyper- and hypo-osmotic range (error bars denote the 95% confidence interval). Bars with different letters are significantly different. The observed differences are protected by a two way ANOVA, which returns a significant main effect of structure (cell versus nucleus), no significant main effect of osmotic range (hyper-osmotic or hypo-osmotic) and a significant interaction between structure and range. Slopes were considered different to statistically significant degree if the 95% confidence intervals of the slopes do not overlap. Bars labeled with different letters are statistically significantly different to one another.
An existing mathematical model describing osmotic swelling of gels 2 was modified to introduce a membrane representing the nuclear lamina (see Materials and Methods). This model was fit to the hypoosmotic volume data as measured by confocal microscopy to estimate the properties of the nuclear membrane. The optimal fit was obtained when the dilational modulus of the nuclear envelope was 0.023N/m and the nuclear envelope became taut at an extracellular osmolarity of 321 mOsm (see Fig. 2). The r2 value of the fit was 0.9998. The model was optimized from a range of initial values to ensure the uniqueness of the reported optimal result. The optimization was repeated for several values of the K, the bulk modulus of the nucleus. It was found that the optimal value of the membrane stiffness scaled with the bulk modulus over four orders of magnitude from 100 Pa to 1 MPa. However, the optimal value of the osmolarity at which the nuclear membrane became taut remained the same across this range.
Figure 2.
Observed nuclear volume data from 480 mOsm to 200mOsm along with the model for the same osmotic range with best-fit membrane properties and bulk modulus of 10 kPa.
Extracellular osmolarity influenced nucleus shape (Fig. 3). The contour ratio increased linearly with inverse normalized osmolarity in the hyper-osmotic range, indicating that the shape was becoming smoother. The slope of the relationship decreased in the hypo-osmotic range, appearing to approach a limit. This behavior was similar to the behavior of the relationship between nucleus volume and inverse normalized osmolarity.
Figure 3.
In the nucleus, the relationship between osmolarity and contour ratio followed a similar trend to the relationship between osmolarity and volme at equilibrium. Error bars represent one standard error.
The relationship of shape and size to osmolarity was also apparent qualitatively (Fig. 4). Cell shape was approximately circular (i.e., spherical) at every osmolarity, except for small distortions at the peak value. The size of the cell increased continuously with decreasing osmolarity throughout the range shown. The irregular shape of the nucleus at elevated osmolarity became approximately circular and the nucleus expanded as the osmolarity decreased.
Figure 4.
Typical images of a single cell (top) and its nucleus (bottom) during equilibrium experiments at a range of osmolarities. The number above the each image pair indicates the osmolarity in mOsm. The number below each pair of images indicates the inverse normalized osmolarity.
The transient changes in the cross-sectional area of the cell and nucleus changed monotonically with time, showing negligible evidence of volume recovery (Fig. 5), as evidenced by the fact that an exponential expression with a single time constant fit the data well. In the cell, the time constant for volume decrease in response to hyper-osmotic stress was lower than that for volume increase with hypo-osmotic stress. Other differences between time constants were not significant at 95% confidence (Table 2).
Figure 5.
Cell and nucleus cross sectional area transients showed rapid first order dynamics with no evidence of recovery. (A) The means and standard errors of the cell transient response along with the best fit of Eq. 13 and the 95% confidence interval (n = 46 and 45 for hypo-osmotic and hyper-osmotic tests respectively). (B) The means and standard errors of the nucleus transient response along with the best fit of Eq. 13 and the 95% confidence interval (n = 39 for both the hyper-osmotic and the hypo-osmotic tests). Note that means are presented for illustrative purposes only and the actual fit was to the whole population of data points rather than to their means.
Table 2.
Time constants in seconds along with 95% confidence intervals for best fits to transient responses.
| Hypo-osmotic | Hyper-osmotic | |
|---|---|---|
| Cell | 9.838 ± 1.013 (n = 46) | 5.670 ± 0.939 (n = 45) |
| Nucleus | 7.800 ± 3.924 (n = 39) | 7.245 ± 1.788 (n = 39) |
The rate of change in nucleus shape was lower than that of nucleus size. The transient of the contour ratio required 120 seconds to reach its peak value. As a result, the perimeter length of the nucleus initially increases rapidly under hypo-osmotic loading to a peak at about 15 seconds before decaying steadily for the rest of the experiment (Fig. 6) as the shape evolves to accommodate the constant cross sectional area within a shorter perimeter.
Figure 6.
The shape changed more slowly than the size. To accommodate this, the perimeter was extended at early time points before recovering as the shape evolved into a smoother profile. Error bars represent one standard error (n = 39).
The morphological response of the nucleus to hyper-osmotic loading was not influenced by cytochalasin D treatment. Upon transition from 380 mOsm media to 580 mOsm media, nuclear volume decreased by approximately 27%, regardless of whether they had been pretreated with cytochalasin D (Fig. 7A). A two-way factorial ANOVA revealed a main effect of osmolarity but no main effect of cytochalasin D treatment and no interaction between osmolarity and cytochalasin D treatment. The reduction of volume at high osmolarity was highly significant (p<0.001). Similarly, the contour ratio decreased by 5%, regardless of treatment. Two-way factorial ANOVA showed a main effect of osmolarity but no main effect of treatment and no interaction between treatment and osmolarity. The reduction in the contour ratio at high osmolarity was also highly significant (p<0.001) (Fig. 7B).
Figure 7.
The morphological effect of hyper-osmotic loading is not influenced by cytochalasin D treatment. (A) The nuclear volume is reduced by approximately 26% in both the untreated and cytochalasin D treated case. (B) The nuclear contour ratio is increased by approximately 5% in both the untreated and the cytochalasin D treated case, n = 34 nuclei per group, error bars represent one s.d., * indicates statistically significant difference.
Isolated nuclei contracted in response to increased macromolecule concentration but not in response to increased ion concentration. A highly significant (p<0.001) reduction of 9% in the volume of isolated nuclei occurred when they were subjected to an increase in macromolecule concentration consistent with observed hyper-osmotic shrinkage of the cell. However, a similar increase in ion concentration caused no detectable change in the volume of the isolated nuclei (Fig. 8). The macromolecules used were 10 kDa dextrans, which are several orders of magnitude larger than ions but still small enough to pass through the pores in the nuclear envelope. This was confirmed with rhodamine-labeled dextrans (Fig. 9).
Figure 8.
Isolated nuclei contracted in response to increased macromolecule concentration but not in response to increased ion concentration, n = 100–126, error bars represent one s. d., * indicates statistically significant difference. “Hyper ions” denotes elevated ion concentration. “Hyper macro” denotes elevated macro molecule concentration (see Materials and Methods for details).
Figure 9.
(A) Merged DIC and rhodamine fluorescence image of isolated nuclei incubated with rhodamine-labeled 10 kDa dextrans at room temperature. (B) Plot of intensities of DIC image and rhodamine fluorescence along in the green line in (A). There is almost no difference in the intensity of rhodamine staining inside and outside the isolated nuclei.
Discussion
The findings of our study indicate that the equilibrium osmotic response of chondrocytes matches that of an ideal osmometer, as described by the Boyle Van’t Hoff relationship, and the transient results show negligible recovery over time. Therefore, the equilibrium and transient responses of the cells suggest that they behave in a passive manner under these experimental conditions. The transient changes in cross-sectional area of the nucleus also showed negligible recovery. However, under these same conditions, the equilibrium volumetric response of the nucleus to changes in osmolarity, as measured by two independent methods, was found to be highly non-linear. The mechanisms involved in this non-linear physicochemical behavior are not completely understood, but changes in the shape of the nucleus were found to parallel changes in the size of the nucleus under equilibrium conditions, suggesting that the two are interdependent. By contrast, shape change lagged size change in transient experiments. Further experiments suggest that the mechanism of nuclear morphology change is not cytoskeletal force transmission or concentration of intracellular ions but concentration of intracellular macromolecules.
In a previous study of nuclear size in chondrocytes subjected to a single step change of 200 mOsm, nuclei changed less than cells in the hypo-osmotic case but the changes were not signficantly different in the hyper-osmotic case 56. These findings are in agreement with the results of the present study, where we found that the slope of the Ponder’s plot (i.e. the volume response) was only 0.24 for the nuclei while it was 0.66 for the cells in the hypo-osmotic range. However, in contrast to the previous results, we found a difference between the cell and nucleus in the hyper-osmotic range, where the slope of the Ponder’s plot was 0.67 for the cells and 0.8 for the nuclei. The difference between the cell and nucleus responses was greater in the hypo-osmotic range than in the hyper-osmotic range (see Fig. 1B), supporting the asymmetry seen in the previous study 56.
The hyper-osmotic response of the nucleus on a Ponder’s plot was found to be linear with a y-intercept of 20.4%, suggesting that this is the solid volume fraction of the nucleus. This agrees with the findings of Rowat et al., who reported that micropipette aspiration of nuclei reduced their volume but it was difficult to reduce the nuclear volume by more than 70%63. Despite the linearity of the response, the nucleus does not have the semi-permeable membrane characteristic of an ideal osmometer. The nuclear envelope is punctuated by pores that render it permeable to small ions57. There was a significant reduction in the volume of isolated nuclei loaded with increased concentrations of macromolecules but no significant change in the volume of isolated nuclei loaded with increased concentrations of ions (Fig. 8). This suggests that the nucleus dilates because the macromolecular concentration in the cytoplasm changes when the cell volume changes. These findings are consistent with other reports in the literature. Albiez et al. reported that nuclear architecture was altered by hyper-osmotic loading with saline but that the effect was abolished by permeabilization of the cell membrane1. Richter et al. reported that changes in ion concentration did not influence the nuclei of permeabilized cells but changes in macromolecule concentration did 61.
Macromolecules may exert an osmotic stress even on systems such as the nucleus that are not surrounded by a semi-permable membrane. Size exclusion of large molecules from small tortuous spaces in a gel creates dilute regions that are osmotically pressurized. The size exclusion effect is quantified by the partition coefficient, the ratio between solute concentrations inside and outside the gel. If the partition coefficient is less than one, the gel is osmotically pressurized. Experimental evidence for this phenomenon in alginate beads along with a theoretical analysis was provided by Albro et al.2. They found that the partition coefficient of a solute molecule is a function of its size, since larger molecules are excluded from a larger fraction of the pores in the gel. Monovalent ions are small enough to enter even the smallest pores so that no osmotic response is expected for osmotic loading with saline in this model. On the other hand, large molecules such as 10 kDa dextrans are expected to have a partition coefficient substantially less than unity and exert substantial osmotic pressure. This is indeed the case for isolated chondrocyte nuclei (Fig. 8). The increase in macromolecular concentration was intended to model the change in the cytoplasm of a cell subject to an extracellular osmolarity of 580 mOsm. However, the reduction in the volume of the isolated nuclei was only 9% whereas the reduction of volume for nuclei inside cells subjected to 580 mOsm was 28%. This may be because the solution used to load isolated nuclei contained only macromolecules of 10 kDa. The cytoplasm contains larger molecules that may have smaller partition coefficients with the nucleoplasm and hence exert a larger osmotic load. Also, the cytoplasm contains molecules too large to pass through the nuclear pores that exert a conventional osmotic pressure on the nucleus. Hence, it is unsurprising that the volume reduction in isolated nuclei is less than for nuclei in situ.
The model presented by Albro et al.2 predicts a linear relationship between osmolarity and volumetric strain so the Ponder’s plot of the model output has a continuously declining slope. However, the decline in the slope is not sharp enough to fit the abrupt plateau in the observed volume data in the present study. This characteristic, combined with the observed correlation between shape and volume, motivated a modification of the model to include a membrane tension term to model the mechanical integrity of the nuclear lamina (see Materials and Methods). This model allowed estimation of the stiffness of the nuclear lamina along with the osmolarity at which the nuclear lamina becomes taut. The value determined for the stiffness of the nuclear lamina depends heavily on the value used for the bulk modulus of the nucleus, a property that can only be estimated from the available literature. A more accurate value for this property would increase the power of this approach to non-invasively determine the mechanical properties of the nuclear membrane. The osmolarity at which the nuclear lamina becomes taut, 321 mOsm, is not sensitive to the value of the bulk modulus. It is significant that this value lies below the osmolarity experienced by chondrocytes (380 mOsm), suggesting that physiologic changes in cartilage osmolarity (secondary to mechanical loading) would result in changes in nucleus size in situ.
Nucleus shape changed more slowly than the nucleus size under hypo-osmotic load (Fig. 6). The mechanism of this behavior is unknown but may result from inhomogeneity in the viscoelasticity of the nucleus. Previous studies suggest that the nucleoplasm creeps more rapidly than the lamina,20 so it is possible that nuclear morphology is determined initially by the nucleoplasm but thereafter is increasingly influenced by the lamina as the stiffness of the nucleoplasm decays. Since the lamina acts mechanically as a membrane, its influence is to move the nucleus towards a smoother shape that minimizes surface area and the length of the perimeter of the cross-section. The changing geometry of the nucleus may reflect the redistribution of strain between these two structures according to their changing stiffnesses. Further work is necessary to fully understand this phenomenon.
The transient response of the cell cross-sectional area was significantly slower in the hypo-osmotic condition than in the hyper-osmotic condition (see Table 2). While an equivalent change in osmolarity was applied in both conditions (100 mOsm), it is important to note that the volume change predicted by the Boyle Van’t Hoff relation is related to the reciprocal of osmolarity. In this case, the hypo-osmotic condition is a 35% increase in the reciprocal of osmolarity while the hyper-osmotic condition is a 21% decrease. The hypo-osmotic response may equilibrate more slowly because it represents a larger effective change. Also, artificial disruption of the F-actin cytoskeleton has been shown to slow volume change in both hypo- and hyper-osmotically loaded chondrocytes 56. Hypo-osmotic loading disrupts the F-actin cytoskeleton in untreated chondrocytes but hyper-osmotic loading does not 27, 34. Thus, cytoskeletal disruption and remodeling may also play a role in the observed difference in the time constants.
This study relies on measurement of volume inferred from the cross-sectional area of a cell or nucleus in a two dimensional image for the transient and equilibrium experiments on nuclei within intact cells. Therefore, an important assumption in the interpretation of this data is that the cell or nucleus in question is a sphere. In this study, chondrocytes are observed to be quite spherical, but nuclei are often spheroidal and may even have more complicated shapes as indicated in the discussion of evolving contour ratios. For this reason, measured values were normalized to the iso-osmotic condition rather than presented as absolute values. Exact knowledge of the three-dimensional shape is required to relate cross-sectional area to absolute volume but the relationship between area dilatation and volume dilatation is less sensitive. The ratio of the reference and deformed volume for an isotropic deformation field is equal to the ratio of the reference and deformed cross-sectional areas raised to the power of 1.5, regardless of geometry. Isotropic deformations were assumed for the cell and nucleus in these experiments. To validate this approach, three dimensional confocal images were taken of stained nuclei in intact chondrocytes at three different osmolarities and used to calculate volume. Then, the three dimensional images were projected on to a two dimensional plane and volumes were estimated from the projected area. As expected, the absolute volumes deduced from the two methods were different but the normalized results were identical (data not shown). This procedure allowed us to take multiple measurements of the same nucleus using two dimensional imaging without the photobleaching associated with repeated three dimensional imaging. In contrast to nuclei inside intact cells, isolated nuclei sit directly on the glass coverslip so they are constrained on one side. In this case, it was considered appropriate to image the volume directly using stacked confocal imaging and design the experiment to rely on only one pair of stacked images.
The physiological implications of changes in nuclear morphology are not fully understood, but they are observed in association with a number of important biological phenomena. Genome organization influences a host of fundamental biological processes 50, 51 and is presumably altered by changes in nucleus morphology. There is evidence that changes in nuclear shape and volume may alter nucleo-cytoplasmic transport. For example, nuclear permeability is increased in flattened cells as compared to rounded cells, and increased tension in the nuclear envelope is one mechanism that has been proposed for this phenomenon 28. A rough nuclear perimeter is observed in cases where lamin is defective due to a genetic disease such as Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) 31, supporting the idea that lamin-dependent membrane mechanics in the nuclear cortex maintain the conventional smooth shape of the eukaryotic nucleus. Despite the devastating consequences of the disease, the nuclei of HGPS cells are not more fragile than those of healthy cells but they do exhibit reduced lamin mobility and altered lamin organization 21. This finding suggests that the nuclear lamina is much more than a passive structural element and that reorganization of the lamina under load is a sensitive and important mechanotransduction process. The smoothness of the nuclear perimeter also deteriorates in normal aging 65, increasing the relevance of these changes to degenerative diseases such as osteoarthritis. While both normal aging and HGPS reduce the capacity of the nucleus to repair DNA, it is not known what connection, if any, the physical changes associated with these conditions have to DNA repair. However, it is worth noting that exposure to a hyper-osmotic environment, which is shown here to produce a rough nuclear perimeter, also inhibits DNA repair 24. The role of cause and effect may be interchangeable between biological and physical phenomena in some cases. For example, cell shrinkage and chromatin condensation are traditionally viewed as effects of apoptosis but hyper-osmotic shrinkage sensitizes hepatocytes towards CD95 ligand-induced apoptosis 60.
In summary, the findings of this study show that nucleus morphology is osmotically sensitive and the relationship between morphology and osmolarity is significantly non-linear, in contrast to the behavior of the cell. The nuclear response does not depend on integrity of the actin cytoskeleton. Isolated nuclei contract in respond to physiologic changes in macromolecule concentration but not in response to similar changes in the concentration of common intracellular ions, suggesting that osmotic pressure arises from size exclusion of large solute molecules rather than membrane confinement of ions. These results on passive cells also offer a valuable baseline for studies that seek to interpret physical changes that occur during active cell processes.
Materials and Methods
Mathematical Model
The equilibrium volume response of the nuclei was modeled using an extension of an existing model of the swelling of porous gels 2 to estimate the stiffness of the nuclear lamina. The original model describes a spherical gel without a surface membrane. The permeation of the solute molecule into the pore fluid is limited by steric exclusion. This is quanitified using the partition coefficient, κ, which establishes the following relationship (eqn. 14 in Albro et al.2) between the concentration within the gel, ceq, and the concentration in the surrounding bath, c*.
| (1) |
The partition coefficient is a determined of the pore size distribution in the gel and the size of solute molecule. The partition coefficient only departs from unity in the case of the large solute molecules for which steric exclusion effects are non-negligible. In the case of the cell nucleus, the surrounding bath is the cytoplasm and it contains many solute species, each of which has a different partition coefficient between the cytoplasm and the nucleoplasm so it is necessary to define an equivalent partition coefficient. Note that:
| (2) |
for a cell that behaves as a perfect osmometer where ccyt is cytoplasmic concentration and c* is the extracellular concentration.
For i species of cytoplasmic solute,
| (3) |
where fi is a constant characteristic of each species and independent of osmotic expansion or contraction of the cell because only water crosses the cell membrane.
Each cytoplasmic species will partition into the nucleoplasm according to its partition coefficient
| (4) |
| (5) |
where the equivalent parition coefficient, and is a constant regardless of osmotic expansion or contraction.
The equivalent partition coefficient of the chondrocyte nucleus can be determined from the hyperosmotic contraction using equation 15 in Albro et al.
| (6) |
where Ha is aggregate modulus, u is solid matrix displacement, r is the radial coordinate, a is the radius in a zero osmolarity bath, ν is the Poisson’s ratio, t is time, R is the universal gas constant and θ is the absolute temperature. Substituting in the displacement solution u(r,t → ∞) = ξr and the relation between bulk modulus, K, and aggregate modulus K = HA(1 + ν)/3(1 − ν) yields the following relation
| (7) |
Writing volume in terms of ζ and neglecting higher order terms because this is a small strain analysis leads to the following expression 20 in Albro et al. relating the normalized volume to the extracellular osmolarity.
| (8) |
where subscript r refers to the reference condition, 380 mOsm in this experiment. This allows determination of κe from the hyperosmotic response if K is specified. Most of the mechanical models of the cell nucleus in the literature model it as an incompressible material and therefore that data cannot be used to determine K. However, one investigator reported large volumetric strains under pressure in micropipette experiments 63. While the data was not presented in a form that allows exact determination of K, the range of pressures applied and strains measured suggests that a value of 10 kPa is accurate to within one order of magnitude. More accurate measurements of this property in the future would increase the utility of this model. In this analysis, a single data point corresponding to an extracellular osmolarity of 482 mOsm was used to evaluate κe on the grounds that the model was originally developed using small strain assumptions violated at higher osmolarities. The strain at 482 mOsm is the only hyperosmotic strain that is within the range for which the model was originally validated. The value of κe determined by this approach was 0.9956.
The hypoosmotic response of this model with respect to inverse normalized osmolarity is nonlinear. However, the non-linearity is not strong enough to fit the trend in the observed data. This, combined with the observed changes in shape during hypoosmotic expansion, supports the introduction of a membrane stress term. Equation 7 is a relation between volumetric strain and pressure. The membrane tension is represented as a pressure term in equation 7 using the Law of Laplace 4 to create the following equation:
| (9) |
| (10) |
where T is membrane tension, q is the radius, KA is the dilatational modulus of the membrane, A is the membrane area and Acrit is the critical area at which the membrane is drawn taut. Fitting the governing equations (9) and (10) to the data presented in Fig. 1A allows determination of the mechanical properties of the nuclear lamina, specifically the KA and ccrit, the osmolarity at which the nuclear membrane begins to resist further osmotic expansion (the critical value of the osmolarity is determined from the corresponding value of ζ using equation 7). To solve these equations, the area must be written in terms of ζ as follows:
| (11) |
and substituted into equation 9. For A<Acrit, ζ is related to c* by equation 7. For A>Acrit, the resulting form of equation 9 was solved in Mathematica (Wolfram Research Inc., Champaign, IL) to yield an analytical expression for ζ. Albro et al.’s equation 17 can be used to give the normalized volume in terms of ζ as follows
| (12) |
This model was coded in Matlab and fit to the hypoosmotic volume data numerically.
Cell isolation and culture
Chondrocytes were isolated from articular cartilage of the lateral femoral condyle of 2–3 year old skeletally mature female pigs obtained from a local abbatoir. Cells were isolated by sequential digestion in pronase and collagenase solution and seeded on glass coverslips in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 1.5% HEPES and 1% non-essential amino acids (all cell culture reagents were supplied by Gibco, Grand Island, NY). The medium was adjusted to pH 7.4, and its osmolarity was increased to 380 mOsm with sucrose and verified with a freezing point osmometer (Precision Systems Inc., Natick, MA). 380 mOsm is an approximate value for the extracellular osmolarity experienced by chondrocytes in situ 71. For confocal microscopy experiments, 0.2 ml of media containing approximately 2 × 105 cells was spread on the center of a 42mm diameter coverslip that was placed in a 60 mm diameter culture dish. Cells were incubated for 1 hour to allow attachment to the coverslip, and 5 ml of media was added to each dish before incubation was continued. For angle resolved low coherence interferometry (a/LCI) experiments, chondrocytes were seeded at a density of 7 × 105/cm2 in chambered coverglasses. Cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 for 18 hours. As a result, the chondrocytes were attached to the glass but maintained their rounded morphology at the time of the experiments 26.
Microscopic Imaging
Each coverslip was incubated in 380 mOsm saline with 10 μM acridine orange (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), a fluorescent label of nucleic acids, for 20 minutes to label the nuclei. The cells and their nuclei were visualized using confocal laser scanning microscopy (LSM 510, Carl Zeiss, Thornwood NY). Images were obtained through an inverted fluorescent microscope (Axiovert 100M, Carl Zeiss) with a C-Apochromat, 63x, water immersion, 1.2-NA objective lens. Acridine orange fluorescence was excited by an argon-ion laser (488 nm) at 2% power and the stimulated emission was collected through a 505–550 nm filter on an 8-bit intensity scale. For DIC images, the sample was also illuminated with a helium-neon laser at 80% power. Images of 1024 × 1024 pixels were recorded with a scale length of 0.12 microns per pixel. The confocal pinhole was fully open, creating an optical slice thickness in excess of 7.5 μm. For 3 dimensional imaging of isolated nuclei, the step size between images was 0.5μm and samples were incubated with Syto 13 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 30 minutes to fluorescently label nuclei acids. Other settings were identical to those used for two dimensional imaging.
Angle resolved low coherence interferometry (a/LCI) experiments
A/LCI is a non-perturbative optical technique that measures the average nuclear size of cells in a biological sample, such as tissues or, in the case of the present study, on isolated cells. A/LCI combines the capabilities of low coherence interferometry with light scattering techniques to determine nuclear morphology with subwavelength accuracy 13, 14. Low coherence interferometry uses a wide bandwidth source for the purposes of achieving high depth resolution and rejecting multiply scattered light in a signal, as in optical coherence tomography 38. This permits the ability to make sensitive measurements of light scattered from a single cell monolayer. Inverse light scattering analysis (ILSA) is predicated on the fact that elastically scattered light from an object yields a unique signature that is a function of the shape, size, and electromagnetic properties of the object. In the case of a/LCI, the angular light scattering distribution of a population of cells is processed to isolate the nuclear scattering contribution and compared to an appropriate model 59. Upon statistical comparison to the model, the characteristics of the scattering objects, in this case nuclear size, can be discerned. The nuclear size of a monolayer of chondrocytes cultured in a chambered coverglass was measured after equilibration to saline at a range of different osmolarities.
Equilibrium effects of osmolarity on cell and nuclear morphology
The coverslip was loaded into a perfusion chamber (PeCon GmbH, Kornhalde, Germany) and washed three times with saline at 380 mOsm. The chamber was mounted on the microscope stage and 9 consecutive sequences of images were recorded, each consisting of 25 DIC images at 5 second intervals followed by a single fluorescent image. At the beginning of each of these sequences, the saline in the chamber was withdrawn and replaced with saline at a different osmolarity, starting with the highest value and proceeding to the lowest. The osmolarities used are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Number of samples used in equilibrium experiments.
| Osmolarity (C) | Inverse Normalized Osmolarity (Ciso/C) | Number of cells | Number of nuclei |
|---|---|---|---|
| 906 | 0.419 | 69 | 17 |
| 717 | 0.530 | 69 | 26 |
| 586 | 0.649 | 69 | 36 |
| 482 | 0.788 | 69 | 39 |
| 378 | 1.005 | 69 | 52 |
| 280 | 1.357 | 64 | 44 |
| 237 | 1.603 | 58 | 38 |
| 215 | 1.767 | 39 | 26 |
| 200 | 1.900 | 27 | 24 |
Ciso refers to the iso-osmotic osmolarity, 380 mOsm.
Transient effects of osmolarity on cell and nuclear morphology
Samples were washed and mounted in the perfusion chamber on the microscope stage as described above. A single scan, including DIC and fluorescent images, was recorded. The saline in the chamber was then exchanged and 9 further scans were taken over the next 140 seconds at irregular time intervals so that imaging would be most frequent during the most dynamic portion of the response. The saline was exchanged with saline at 280 mOsm for hypo-osmotic transients and 480 mOsm for hyper-osmotic transients. In the transient experiments, size is quantified using cross-sectional area.
Calculation of time constants of cross-sectional area change
The following equation:
| (13) |
was fit to aggregated data points from multiple experiments using non-linear regression to calculate the time constant of the response. In this expression, A(t) is the normalized cross sectional area, K is the amplitude of the response, t is time and τ is the time constant. Non-linear regression was performed using Matlab to determine values and 95% confidence intervals for the amplitude and time constant. Values are reported to be significantly different if the confidence intervals do not overlap.
Osmotic loading of cytochalasin D treated chondrocytes
Chondrocytes were isolated and seeded on glass coverslips as described above. Cytochalasin D-treated chondrocytes were incubated with 2 μM cytochalasin D in DMEM with 10% FBS for 3 hours before testing while untreated chondrocytes were not. Both sets of chondrocytes were stained for 30 minutes with 0.5 μM Syto 13 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) before testing to fluorescently stain the nuclei. For testing, the coverslip was mounted in the perfusion chamber, washed three times in 380 mOsm media and mounted on the microscope stage. A single two-dimensional fluorescent image was taken before any fluid exchange to serve as a reference. Then, the 380mOsm media in the chamber was exchanged with fresh 380 mOsm media and a second image was taken to serve as an iso-osmotic control. Finally, the 380 mOsm media was exchanged with 580 mOsm media and a third image was taken. Two minutes was allowed for equilibration after each exchange before an image was taken.
Response of isolated nuclei to elevated concentrations of macromolecules and ions
Nuclei were chemically isolated from freshly isolated chondrocytes as described previously 35. Briefly, 10 million freshly isolated porcine chondrocytes were suspended in 0.1% IGEPAL CA-630 for 8 minutes at 4° C. The suspension was diluted 10:1 with 0.75% BSA in HBSS (both from Gibco, Grand Island, NY) and centrifuged at 500g for 20 minutes at 4° C. The pellet was resuspended in 0.75% BSA in HBSS and 100 μl droplets were spread on 42 mm coverslips and allowed to seed for 1 hour. Then, the coverslips were covered in iso-osmotic testing buffer and incubated overnight before testing. The iso-osmotic testing buffer was 15 mM HEPES, 10 mM NaCl, 140 mM KCl, 500 μM MgCl2 and 100 nM CaCl2. These ion concentrations are typical of those in a mammalian cell at equilibrium 9. For testing, the coverslips were mounted in the perfusion chamber, washed three times in iso-osmotic testing buffer and mounted on the microscope stage. To simulate the crowded environment of the cytoplasm, the buffer was exchanged for a 25% solution of 10 kDa dextran (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in iso-osmotic testing buffer, allowed to equilibrate for 2 minutes and imaged in three dimensions using the confocal microscope. For the control condition, the fluid was then withdrawn from the chamber and replaced with an identical solution. For the high macromolecule condition, the fluid in the chamber was exchanged with a 34% dextran solution in iso-osmotic testing buffer. This condition models the increase in macromolecular crowding that would arise from an abrupt 26% decrease in the cell volume, as is typical of chondrocytes subjected to 380 mOsm – 580mOsm hyper-osmotic step change (see Results). In the high ion condition, the fluid was exchanged with a 25% dextran solution in a high ion buffer consisting of 15 mM HEPES, 13.5 mM NaCl, 189 mM KCl, 676 μM MgCl2 and 135 nM CaCl2. These ion concentrations model the increase in ion concentration that would arise from an abrupt 26% decrease in the cell volume.
Image Analysis
Chondrocyte volume was determined using an edge detection algorithm applied to the DIC images as described previously 3. Briefly, the focal plane of the microscope was manipulated during the experiment to create a diffraction pattern in the form of white ring marking the edge of the cell (Fig. 4). A custom-written application in PV-WAVE software (Visual Numerics, Inc., Houston, TX) was used to define an annular region around the cell containing the ring and apply Sobel edge detection and optimization algorithms to calculate a closed curve representing the edge of the cell. This allowed direct measurement of the cross-sectional area from which volume was inferred by assuming the cell to be spherical. The cross-sectional area, perimeter length and contour ratio of the nucleus were determined from the fluorescent images using Otsu segmentation and the Image Analysis Toolbox in Matlab (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA). The contour ratio of a shape is defined as 4π × area/perimeter2,31, 45. The nucleus volume was also determined from the cross sectional area by approximating the shape to be a sphere. For isolated nuclei, raw stacked images were deconvolved using commerical deconvolution software Huygens (Scientific Volume Imaging, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). The deconvolved image was exported to Matlab and thresholded using the Iterative Self Organizing Data algorithm to determine the volume.
Acknowledgments
Supported by NIH grants AR50245, AR48182, AG15768, and AR48852. We thank Dr. Mansoor Haider for many important discussions.
References
- 1.Albiez H, Cremer M, Tiberi C, Vecchio L, Schermelleh L, Dittrich S, Kupper K, Joffe B, Thormeyer T, von Hase J, Yang S, Rohr K, Leonhardt H, Solovei I, Cremer C, Fakan S, Cremer T. Chromatin domains and the interchromatin compartment form structurally defined and functionally interacting nuclear networks. Chromosome Res. 2006;14(7):707–33. doi: 10.1007/s10577-006-1086-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Albro MB, Chahine NO, Caligaris M, Wei VI, Likhitpanichkul M, Ng KW, Hung CT, Ateshian GA. Osmotic loading of spherical gels: a biomimetic study of hindered transport in the cell protoplasm. J Biomech Eng. 2007;129(4):503–10. doi: 10.1115/1.2746371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Alexopoulos LG, Erickson GR, Guilak F. A method for quantifying cell size from differential interference contrast images: validation and application to osmotically stressed chondrocytes. J Microsc. 2002;205(Pt 2):125–35. doi: 10.1046/j.0022-2720.2001.00976.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ateshian GA, Likhitpanichicul M, Hung CT. A mixture theory analysis for passive transport in osmotic loading of cells. Journal of Biomechanics. 2006;39(3):464–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Backman V, Wallace MB, Perelman LT, Arendt JT, Gurjar R, Muller MG, Zhang Q, Zonios G, Kline E, McGilligan JA, Shapshay S, Valdez T, Badizadegan K, Crawford JM, Fitzmaurice M, Kabani S, Levin HS, Seiler M, Dasari RR, Itzkan I, Van Dam J, Feld MS. Detection of preinvasive cancer cells. Nature. 2000;406(6791):35–6. doi: 10.1038/35017638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Borghetti P, Della Salda L, De Angelis E, Maltarello MC, Petronini PG, Cabassi E, Marcato PS, Maraldi NM, Borghetti AF. Adaptive cellular response to osmotic stress in pig articular chondrocytes. Tissue Cell. 1995;27(2):173–83. doi: 10.1016/s0040-8166(95)80020-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Broers JL, Machiels BM, Kuijpers HJ, Smedts F, van den Kieboom R, Raymond Y, Ramaekers FC. A- and B-type lamins are differentially expressed in normal human tissues. Histochem Cell Biol. 1997;107(6):505–17. doi: 10.1007/s004180050138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Broers JL, Peeters EA, Kuijpers HJ, Endert J, Bouten CV, Oomens CW, Baaijens FP, Ramaekers FC. Decreased mechanical stiffness in LMNA−/− cells is caused by defective nucleo-cytoskeletal integrity: implications for the development of laminopathies. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13(21):2567–80. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddh295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bruce Alberts AJ, Lewis Julian, Raff Martin, Roberts Keith. Peter Walter Molecular Biology of the Cell. 4. Garland Science; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Buschmann MD, Hunziker EB, Kim YJ, Grodzinsky AJ. Altered aggrecan synthesis correlates with cell and nucleus structure in statically compressed cartilage. Journal of Cell Science. 1996;109:499–508. doi: 10.1242/jcs.109.2.499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bush PG, Hall AC. The osmotic sensitivity of isolated and in situ bovine articular chondrocytes. J Orthop Res. 2001;19(5):768–78. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00013-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Caille N, Thoumine O, Tardy Y, Meister JJ. Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells. J Biomech. 2002;35(2):177–87. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00201-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chalut K, Chen S, Finan J, Giacomelli M, Guilak F, Leong K, Wax A. Label-free, high-throughput measurements of dynamic changes in cell nuclei using angle-resolved low coherence interferometry. Biophys J. 2008 doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.124107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chalut KJ, Kresty LA, Pyhtila JW, Nines R, Baird M, Steele VE, Wax A. In situ assessment of intraepithelial neoplasia in hamster trachea epithelium using angle-resolved low-coherence interferometry. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(2):223–7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chao PH, West AC, Hung CT. Chondrocyte intracellular calcium, cytoskeletal organization, and gene expression responses to dynamic osmotic loading. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2006;291(4):C718–25. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00127.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chen CS, Ingber DE. Tensegrity and mechanoregulation: from skeleton to cytoskeleton. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 1999;7(1):81–94. doi: 10.1053/joca.1998.0164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chen KD, Li YS, Kim M, Li S, Yuan S, Chien S, Shyy JYJ. Mechanotransduction in response to shear stress - Roles of receptor tyrosine kinases, integrins, and Shc. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1999;274(26):18393–400. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.26.18393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Constantinescu D, Gray HL, Sammak PJ, Schatten GP, Csoka AB. Lamin A/C expression is a marker of mouse and human embryonic stem cell differentiation. Stem Cells. 2006;24(1):177–85. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Correa-Meyer E, Pesce L, Guerrero C, Sznajder JI. Cyclic stretch activates ERK1/2 via G proteins and EGFR in alveolar epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2002;282(5):L883–91. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00203.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dahl KN, Engler AJ, Pajerowski JD, Discher DE. Power-law rheology of isolated nuclei with deformation mapping of nuclear substructures. Biophys J. 2005;89(4):2855–64. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.062554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dahl KN, Scaffidi P, Islam MF, Yodh AG, Wilson KL, Misteli T. Distinct structural and mechanical properties of the nuclear lamina in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(27):10271–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601058103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.de Freitas RC, Diller KR, Lakey JR, Rajotte RV. Osmotic behavior and transport properties of human islets in a dimethyl sulfoxide solution. Cryobiology. 1997;35(3):230–9. doi: 10.1006/cryo.1997.2045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.de Vries AH, Krenn BE, van Driel R, Subramaniam V, Kanger JS. Direct observation of nanomechanical properties of chromatin in living cells. Nano Lett. 2007;7(5):1424–7. doi: 10.1021/nl070603+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dmitrieva NI, Cai Q, Burg MB. Cells adapted to high NaCl have many DNA breaks and impaired DNA repair both in cell culture and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(8):2317–22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308463100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dong C, Skalak R, Sung KL. Cytoplasmic rheology of passive neutrophils. Biorheology. 1991;28(6):557–67. doi: 10.3233/bir-1991-28607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Erickson GR, Alexopoulos LG, Guilak F. Hyper-osmotic stress induces volume change and calcium transients in chondrocytes by transmembrane, phospholipid, and G-protein pathways. J Biomech. 2001;34(12):1527–35. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00156-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Erickson GR, Northrup DL, Guilak F. Hypo-osmotic stress induces calcium-dependent actin reorganization in articular chondrocytes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003;11(3):187–97. doi: 10.1053/s1063-4584(02)00347-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Feldherr CM, Akin D. Regulation of nuclear transport in proliferating and quiescent cells. Exp Cell Res. 1993;205(1):179–86. doi: 10.1006/excr.1993.1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gieni RS, MJ Hendzel. Mechanotransduction from the ECM to the genome: Are the pieces now in place? J Cell Biochem. 2007 doi: 10.1002/jcb.21364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Goldman RD, Gruenbaum Y, Moir RD, Shumaker DK, Spann TP. Nuclear lamins: building blocks of nuclear architecture. Genes Dev. 2002;16(5):533–47. doi: 10.1101/gad.960502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Goldman RD, Shumaker DK, Erdos MR, Eriksson M, Goldman AE, Gordon LB, Gruenbaum Y, Khuon S, Mendez M, Varga R, Collins FS. Accumulation of mutant lamin A causes progressive changes in nuclear architecture in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(24):8963–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402943101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Guharay F, Sachs F. Stretch-activated single ion channel currents in tissue-cultured embryonic chick skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1984;352:685–701. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Guilak F. Compression-induced changes in the shape and volume of the chondrocyte nucleus. J Biomech. 1995;28(12):1529–41. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00100-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Guilak F, Erickson GR, Ting-Beall HP. The effects of osmotic stress on the viscoelastic and physical properties of articular chondrocytes. Biophys J. 2002;82(2):720–7. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75434-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Guilak F, Tedrow JR, Burgkart R. Viscoelastic properties of the cell nucleus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;269(3):781–6. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.2360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hamill OP, Martinac B. Molecular basis of mechanotransduction in living cells. Physiol Rev. 2001;81(2):685–740. doi: 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.2.685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hu S, Chen J, Butler JP, Wang N. Prestress mediates force propagation into the nucleus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;329(2):423–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Schuman JS, Stinson WG, Chang W, Hee MR, Flotte T, Gregory K, Puliafito CA, Fujimoto JG. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254(5035):1178–81. doi: 10.1126/science.1957169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hung CT, LeRoux MA, Palmer GD, Chao PHG, Lo S, Valhmu WB. Disparate aggrecan gene expression in chondrocytes subjected to hypotonic and hypertonic loading in 2D and 3D culture. Biorheology. 2003;40(1–3):61–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Huyghe JM, Janssen JD. Quadriphasic mechanics of swelling incompressible porous media. Int J Eng Sci. 1997;35(8):793–802. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ji JY, Lee RT, Vergnes L, Fong LG, Stewart CL, Reue K, Young SG, Zhang Q, Shanahan CM, Lammerding J. Cell nuclei spin in the absence of lamin b1. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(27):20015–26. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M611094200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kerr JF, Wyllie AH, Currie AR. Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics. Br J Cancer. 1972;26(4):239–57. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1972.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Knight MM, Bravenboer JVDB, Lee DA, van Osch GJVM, Weinans H, Bader DL. Cell and nucleus deformation in compressed chondrocyte-alginate constructs: temporal changes and calculation of cell modulus. Bba-Gen Subjects. 2002;1570(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4165(02)00144-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lai WM, Hou JS, Mow VC. A triphasic theory for the swelling and deformation behaviors of articular cartilage. J Biomech Eng. 1991;113(3):245–58. doi: 10.1115/1.2894880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lammerding J, Fong LG, Ji JY, Reue K, Stewart CL, Young SG, Lee RT. Lamins A and C but not lamin B1 regulate nuclear mechanics. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(35):25768–80. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M513511200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lansman JB, Hallam TJ, Rink TJ. Single stretch-activated ion channels in vascular endothelial cells as mechanotransducers? Nature. 1987;325(6107):811–3. doi: 10.1038/325811a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Maniotis AJ, Chen CS, Ingber DE. Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(3):849–54. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.3.849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Maroudas A, Bannon C. Measurement of swelling pressure in cartilage and comparison with the osmotic pressure of constituent proteoglycans. Biorheology. 1981;18(3–6):619–32. doi: 10.3233/bir-1981-183-624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Maroudas AI. Balance between swelling pressure and collagen tension in normal and degenerate cartilage. Nature. 1976;260(5554):808–9. doi: 10.1038/260808a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Misteli T. Spatial positioning; a new dimension in genome function. Cell. 2004;119(2):153–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Misteli T. Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function. Cell. 2007;128(4):787–800. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mow VC, Ateshian GA, Lai WM, Gu WY. Effects of fixed charges on the stress-relaxation behavior of hydrated soft tissues in a confined compression problem. Int J Solids Struct. 1998;35(34–35):4945–62. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mow VC, Kuei SC, Lai WM, Armstrong CG. Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression? Theory and experiments. J Biomech Eng. 1980;102(1):73–84. doi: 10.1115/1.3138202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mow VC, Wang CC, Hung CT. The extracellular matrix, interstitial fluid and ions as a mechanical signal transducer in articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 1999;7(1):41–58. doi: 10.1053/joca.1998.0161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nobel PS. Boyle-Vant Hoff Relation. J Theor Biol. 1969;23(3):375. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(69)90025-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Oswald ES, Chao PG, Bulinski JC, Ateshian GA, Hung CT. Chondrocyte nuclear response to osmotic loading. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;1:3659–61. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Paine PL, Moore LC, Horowitz SB. Nuclear envelope permeability. Nature. 1975;254(5496):109–14. doi: 10.1038/254109a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Pajerowski JD, Dahl KN, Zhong FL, Sammak PJ, Discher DE. Physical plasticity of the nucleus in stem cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(40):15619–24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702576104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Pyhtila JW, Wax A. Rapid, depth-resolved light scattering measurements using Fourier domain, angle-resolved low coherence interferometry. Opt Express. 2004;12(25):6178–83. doi: 10.1364/opex.12.006178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Reinehr R, Haussinger D. Hyperosmotic activation of the CD95 death receptor system. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2006;187(1–2):199–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2006.01541.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Richter K, Nessling M, Lichter P. Experimental evidence for the influence of molecular crowding on nuclear architecture. J Cell Sci. 2007;120(Pt 9):1673–80. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rober RA, Weber K, Osborn M. Differential timing of nuclear lamin A/C expression in the various organs of the mouse embryo and the young animal: a developmental study. Development. 1989;105(2):365–78. doi: 10.1242/dev.105.2.365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Rowat AC, Lammerding J, Ipsen JH. Mechanical properties of the cell nucleus and the effect of emerin deficiency. Biophys J. 2006;91(12):4649–64. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.086454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Sackin H. Mechanosensitive Channels. Annual Review of Physiology. 1995;57:333–53. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.57.030195.002001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Scaffidi P, Misteli T. Lamin A-dependent nuclear defects in human aging. Science. 2006;312(5776):1059–63. doi: 10.1126/science.1127168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sun DD, Guo XE, Likhitpanichkul M, Lai WM, Mow VC. The influence of the fixed negative charges on mechanical and electrical behaviors of articular cartilage under unconfined compression. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme. 2004;126(1):6–16. doi: 10.1115/1.1644562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Thoma F, Koller T. Influence of Histone-H1 on Chromatin Structure. Cell. 1977;12(1):101–7. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90188-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Thoma F, Koller T. Unravelled Nucleosomes, Nucleosome Beads and Higher-Order Structures of Chromatin - Influence of Non-Histone Components and Histone H-1. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1981;149(4):709–33. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90354-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Thoma F, Koller T, Klug A. Involvement of histone H1 in the organization of the nucleosome and of the salt-dependent superstructures of chromatin. J Cell Biol. 1979;83(2 Pt 1):403–27. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.2.403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ting-Beall HP, Needham D, Hochmuth RM. Volume and osmotic properties of human neutrophils. Blood. 1993;81(10):2774–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Urban JP, Hall AC, Gehl KA. Regulation of matrix synthesis rates by the ionic and osmotic environment of articular chondrocytes. J Cell Physiol. 1993;154(2):262–70. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041540208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Urban JP, Maroudas A, Bayliss MT, Dillon J. Swelling pressures of proteoglycans at the concentrations found in cartilaginous tissues. Biorheology. 1979;16(6):447–64. doi: 10.3233/bir-1979-16609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Vaziri A, Mofrad MR. Mechanics and deformation of the nucleus in micropipette aspiration experiment. J Biomech. 2007;40(9):2053–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Wang N, Butler JP, Ingber DE. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science. 1993;260(5111):1124–7. doi: 10.1126/science.7684161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]









