Skip to main content
AAPS PharmSciTech logoLink to AAPS PharmSciTech
. 2000 Jun 28;1(3):37–43. doi: 10.1208/pt010320

Evaluation of quick disintegrating calcium carbonate tablets

Hector Fausett 1, Charles Gayser 2, Alekha K Dash 1,
PMCID: PMC2750348  PMID: 14727906

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to develop a rapidly disintegrating calcium carbonate (CC) tablet by direct compression and compare it with commercially available calcium tablets. CC tablets were formulated on a Carver press using 3 different forms of CC direct compressed granules (Cal-Carb 4450®, Cal-Carb 4457®, and Cal-Carb 4462®). The breaking strength was measured using a Stokes-Monsanto hardness tester. The disintegration and dissolution properties of the tablets were studied using USP methodology. The calcium concentration was determined by an atomic absorption spectrophotometer. Scanning electron microscopy was used to evaluate the surface topography of the granules and tablets. Breaking strength of Cal-Carb 4450®, Cal-Carb 4457®, and Cal-Carb 4462® tablets was in the range of 7.2 to 7.7 kg, as compared with a hardness of 6.2 kg and 10 kg for the commercially available calcium tablets Citracal® and Tums®, respectively. The disintegration time for the tablets presented in the order earlier was 4.1, 2.1, 1.9, 2.9, and 9.7 minutes, respectively. The dissolution studies showed that all formulations released 100% of the elemental calcium in simulated gastric fluid in less than 20 minutes. In summary, this study clearly demonstrated that quick disintegrating CC tablets can be formulated without expensive effervescence technology.

Keywords: Calcium Carbonate Tablets, Quick Disintegrating, Effervescence

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (451.7 KB).

References

  • 1.Speckmann EW. What is the calcium requirement for optimal bone health? A workshop report. In: Taylor TG, Jenkins NK, editors. Proceedings of the XIII International Congress of Nutrition. London: John Libbey & Company Ltd.; 1985. pp. 580–583. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sheikh MS, Santa-Ana CA, Nicar MJ, Schiller LR, Fordtran JS. Gastrointestinal absorption of calcium from milk and calcium salts. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:532–536. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198708273170903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Recker RR, Bammi A, Barger-Lux MJ, Heaney RP. Calcium absorbability from milk products, an imitation milk and calcium carbonate. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988;47:93–95. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/47.1.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Greenspan SL. 73-year old woman with osteoporosis. JAMA. 1999;281:1531–1540. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.16.1531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Peel N, Eastell R. ABC of rheumatology. Osteoporosis. Br Med J. 1995;310:989–992. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6985.989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Walker R. General management of end stage renal disease. Br Med J. 1997;315:1429–1432. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7120.1429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mayo M, Middleton RK. Calcium carbonate in hyperphosphatemia. DICP. 1991;25:945–947. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ekman M, Reizenstein P, Teigen SW, Ronneberg R. Comparative absorption of calcium from carbonate tablets, lactogluconate/carbonate effervescent tablet, and chloride solution. Bone. 1991;12:93–97. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(91)90006-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hansen C, Werner E, Erbes HJ, Larrat V, Kaltwasser JP. Intestinal calcium absorption from different calcium preparations: influence of anion and solubility. Osteoporos Int. 1996;6:386–393. doi: 10.1007/BF01623012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Whiting SJ, Pluhator MM. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo tests for determination of availability of calcium from calcium carbonate tablets. J Am Coll Nutr. 1992;11:553–560. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1992.10718261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mason NA, Patel JD, Dressman JB, Shimp LA. Consumer vinegar test for determining calcium disintegration. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1992;49:2218–2222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schirmer RE, Kleber JW, Black HR. Correlation of dissolution, disintegration, and bioavailability of aminosalicylic acid tablets. J Pharm Sci. 1973;62:1270–1274. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600620807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bhagavan HN, Wolkoff BI. Correlation between the disintegration time and the bioavailability of vitamin C tablets. Pharm Res. 1993;10:239–242. doi: 10.1023/A:1018938911420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Garf E, Ghanem AH, Mahmoud H, Abdel-Alim H. Studies on the direct compression of pharmaceuticals. Part 19, Effect of moisture on tablet physical parameters and bioavailability. Pharm Ind. 1986;48:292–295. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chowhan ZT. The effect of low- and high-humidity aging on the hardness, disintegration time and dissolution rate of dibasic calcium phosphate-based tablets. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1980;32:10–14. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1980.tb12836.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Garr JS, Bangudu AB. Evaluation of sorghum starch as a tablet excipient. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1991;17:1–6. doi: 10.3109/03639049109043805. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nasipuri RN. Evaluation of cocoyam starch as tablet binder and disintegrant. Pharm Acta Helv. 1979;54:48–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gazikalovic E, Obrenovic D, Nidzovic Z, Toskic-Radojicic M. Use of domestically produced corn starch in the manufacture of calcium carbonate tablets. Vojnosanit Pregl. 1988;55:407–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Makino T, Yamanka M, Kitamori N. Behavior of pregelatinized starch during granulation and its influence on tablet properties. Chem Pharm Bull. 1995;43:2264–2266. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mollan MJ, Celik M. Characterization of directly compressible maltodextrins manufactured by three different processes. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1993;19:2335–2358. doi: 10.3109/03639049309047194. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from AAPS PharmSciTech are provided here courtesy of American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists

RESOURCES