Skip to main content
NCBI home page
AAPS PharmSciTech logoLink to AAPS PharmSciTech
. 2007 Mar 30;8(1):E171–E176. doi: 10.1208/pt0801025

Effect of selected non-ionic surfactants on the flow behavior of aqueous veegum suspensions

Ross A Kennedy 1,✉, Michelle L Kennedy 1,✉
PMCID: PMC2750436

Abstract

The aim of this work was to investigate the influence of some non-ionic surfactants, Tween 80 and Brij 98, on the viscosity and flow behavior of a commercial montmorillonite clay, Veegum Granules. The effect of different concentrations of the surfactants on the shear stress-shear rate rheograms of hydrated concentrated clay suspensions was determined by shear viscometry. The addition of either surfactant increased the plastic viscosity and the yield stress of the suspensions. Furthermore both surfactants altered the thixotropy of the suspensions to an extent that depended on both the surfactant concentration and the time of equilibration of the surfactant and Veegum. Brij 98 had a greater and more rapid effect. It is proposed that the surfactant polar head-groups anchor at the tetrahedral sheet surface, leaving the alkyl chains extending away from the edges and faces. Consequently, the alkyl chains undergo hydrophobic interactions that facilitate the association between the platelets and increase the physical structure within the suspension. Stereochemical differences between the polar groups may lead to differences in the way the surfactants associate with the tetrahedral sheet and hence their ultimate effect on the rheological behavior. There is a significant interaction between these surfactants and montmorillonite clays, and the rheological changes that occur could have a major impact on any pharmaceutical formulation that uses these ingredients.

Keywords: Montmorillonite clay, nonionic surfactants, rheology, thixotropy

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (298.0 KB).

References

  • 1.Deer WA, Howie RA, Zussman J. An Introduction to the Rock-Forming Minerals. Essex, UK: Longman Group Limited; 1992. pp. 369–376. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Duran JDG, Ramos-Tejada MM, Arroyo FJ, Gonzalez-Caballero F. Rheological and electrokinetic properties of sodium montmorillonite suspensions, I: rheological properties and interparticle energy of interaction. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2000;229:107–117. doi: 10.1006/jcis.2000.6956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sondi I, Milat O, Pravdic V. Electrokinetic potentials of clay surfaces modified by polymers. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1997;189:66–73. doi: 10.1006/jcis.1996.4753. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Abend S, Lagaly G. Sol-gel transitions of sodium montmorillonite dispersions. Appl Clay Sci. 2000;16:201–227. doi: 10.1016/S0169-1317(99)00040-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kennedy ML. The Adsorptive and Degradative Behaviour of Imazethapyr (Spinnaker) in Some South-eastern Australian Soils. Wagga Wagga, Australia: Charles Sturt University; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lead JR, Wilkinson KJ. Aquatic colloids and nanoparticles: current knowledge and future trends. Environ Chem. 2006;3:159–171. doi: 10.1071/EN06025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Luckham PF, Rossi S. The colloidal and rheological properties of bentonite suspensions. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 1999;82:43–92. doi: 10.1016/S0001-8686(99)00005-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Carretero MI. Clay minerals and their beneficial effects upon human health: a review. Appl Clay Sci. 2002;21:155–163. doi: 10.1016/S0169-1317(01)00085-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Burgentzle D, Duchet J, Gerard JF, Jupin A, Fillon B. Solvent-based nanocomposite coatings, I: dispersion of organophilic montmorillonite in organic solvents. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2004;278:26–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lee WF, Fu YT. Effect of montmorillonite on the swelling behavior and drug-release behavior of nanocomposite hydrogels. J Appl Polym Sci. 2003;89:3652–3660. doi: 10.1002/app.12624. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee WF, Jou LL. Effect of the intercalation agent content of montmorillonite on the swelling behavior and drug release behavior of nanocomposite hydrogels. J Appl Polym Sci. 2004;94:74–82. doi: 10.1002/app.20730. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ducker WA, Wanless EJ. Adsorption of hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide to mica: nanometer-scale study of binding-site competition effects. Langmuir. 1999;15:160–168. doi: 10.1021/la9710942. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Velegol SB, Fleming BD, Biggs S, Wanless EJ, Tilton RD. Counterion effects on hexadecyltrimethylammonium surfactant adsorption and self-assembly on silica. Langmuir. 2000;16:2548–2556. doi: 10.1021/la9910935. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Li HY, Tripp CP. Spectroscopic identification and dynamics of adsorbed cetyltrimethylammonium bromide structures on TiO2 surfaces. Langmuir. 2002;18:9441–9446. doi: 10.1021/la026071o. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Neivandt DJ, Gee ML, Tripp CP, Hair ML. Coadsorption of poly(styrenesulfonate) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide on silica investigated by attenuated total reflection techniques. Langmuir. 1997;13:2519–2526. doi: 10.1021/la962047x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2005. pp. 590–592. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Adeyeye MC, Jain AC, Ghorab MKM, Reilly WM. Viscoelastic evaluation of topical creams containing microcrystalline cellulose/sodium carboxymethyl cellulose as stabilizer. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2002;13:3–3. doi: 10.1208/pt030208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu C, Shao H, Chen F, Zheng H. Rheological properties of concentrated aqueous injectable calcium phosphate cement slurry. Biomat. 2006;27:5003–5013. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bourne MC. Food Texture and Viscosity: Concept and Measurement. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2002. pp. 92–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Deng YJ, Dixon JB, White GN. Bonding mechanisms and conformation of poly(ethylene oxide)-based surfactants in interlayer of smectite. Colloid Polym Sci. 2005;284:347–356. doi: 10.1007/s00396-005-1388-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Beall GW, Goss M. Self-assembly of organic molecules on montmorillonite. Appl Clay Sci. 2004;27:179–186. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2004.06.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Frison-Norrie S, Sporns P. Investigating the molecular heterogeneity of polysorbate emulsifiers by MALDI-TOF MS. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49:3335–3340. doi: 10.1021/jf010096w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Raith K, Schmelzer CEH, Neubert RHH. Towards a molecular characterization of pharmaceutical excipients: mass spectrometric studies of ethoxylated surfactants. Int J Pharm. 2006;319:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.03.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Woodruff J. Factors Affecting the Formulation of Sunscreen Products. Paper presented at: UVA Protection: A Major Issue of Minor Importance? Conference; June 11–12, 2001; London, UK. Available at: http://www.creative-developments.co.uk/papers.html. Accessed September 14, 2006.

Articles from AAPS PharmSciTech are provided here courtesy of American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists

RESOURCES