Abstract
The aim of the present investigation was to prepare and evaluate the influence of adding fines on the in vitro performance of liposomal amikacin dry powder inhaler (AMK LDPI) formulations. Liposomes composed of hydrogenated soyaphosphatidylcholine, cholesterol and saturated soyaphosphatidylglycerol (AMK 1), or stearylamine (AMK 2) were prepared by a reverse phase evaporation technique, extruded to reduce size and separated from unentrapped drug. Purified liposomal dispersion was subjected to lyophilization using optimized cryoprotectant to achieve maximum percentage drug retentio (PDR). Lactose carrier in varying mass ratios with or without addition of fines in different mixing sequences was used to formulate AMK LDPI formulations. AMK LDPI formulations were characterized for angle of repose, compressibility index, dispersibility index, scanning electron microscopy, and fine perticle fraction (FPF). PDR was found to be 97.6%±2.2% for AMK1 and 98.5%±1.9% for AMK2 using sucrose as optimized cryoprotectant in lipid:sucrose ratio of 1∶4. Lactose carrier containing 10% fines (wt/wt) was found to be the optimum blend at 1∶5 mass ratio of liposome:lactose. The addition of fines and the order of mixing of fines were found to influence the FPF with significantly different device fractions. FPF of AMK LDPI formulations using Rotahaler as the delivery device at 30, 60, and 90 L/min were found to be 21.85%±2.2% and 24.6%±2.4%, 25.9% ±1.8% and 29.2%±2.1%, and 29.5%±2.6% and 34.2%±2.0% for AMK1 and AMK2, respectively. From the studies performed in this investigation, it was observed that liposomal charge, addition of fines and order of mixing fines, has a significant effect (P<.05) on in vitro deposition of drug from LDPI formulation.
Keywords: liposomes, dry powder inhalers, amikacin, lactose, fines, fine particle fraction
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (219.0 KB).
References
- 1.Kumana CR, Yuen KY. Parenteral aminoglycoside therapy, selection, administration and monitoring. Drugs. 1994;47:902–913. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199447060-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Molitoris BA. Cell biology of aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity: newer aspects. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 1997;6:384–388. doi: 10.1097/00041552-199707000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Senior J. Fate and behavior of liposomes in vivo. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 1987;3:123–193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Patel HM. Serum opsonins and liposomes: their interaction and opsonophagocytosis. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 1992;15:57–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ganderton D. The generation of respirable cloud from coarse powder aggregates. J Biopharm Sci. 1992;3:101–105. [Google Scholar]
- 6.French DL, Edwards DA, Niven RW. The influence of formulation on emission, deaggregation and deposition of dry powders for inhalation. J Aerosol Sci. 2004;27:769–783. doi: 10.1016/0021-8502(96)00021-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Steckel H, Muller BW. In vitro evaluation of dry powder inhalers II: Influence of carrier particle size and concentration on in vitro deposition. Int J Pharm. 1997;154:31–37. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(97)00115-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Staniforth JN. Proceedings of Drug Delivery to the Lungs VII. London, UK: The Aerosol Society; 2004. Improvement in dry powder inhaler performance: surface passivation effects; pp. 86–89. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zeng XM, Tee SK, Martin GP, Marriott C. Proceedings of Drug Delivery to the Lungs VII. London, UK: The Aerosol Society; 2004. Effect of mixing procedure and particle size distribution of carrier particles on the deposition of salbutamol sulphate from dry powder inhaler formulations; pp. 40–43. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lucas P, Anderson K, Staniforth JN. Protein deposition from dry powder inhalers: fine particle multiplets as performance modifiers. Pharm Res. 1998;15:562–569. doi: 10.1023/A:1011977826711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kim JC, Kim JD. Preparation by spray drying of amphotericin B-phospholipid composite particles and their anticellular activity. Drug Deliv. 2001;8:143–147. doi: 10.1080/107175401316906900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Farr SJ, Kellaway IW, Carman-Meakin B. Assessing the potential of aerosol generated liposomes from pressurized pack formulations. J Control Release. 1987;5:119–127. doi: 10.1016/0168-3659(87)90003-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.McCallion ONM, Taylor KMG, Bridges PA, Thomas M, Taylor AJ. Jet nebulizers for pulmonary drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2004;130:1–11. doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(95)04233-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Davidson IG, Langner EJ, Plowman SV, Blair JA. Release mechanism of insulin encapsulated in trehalose ester derivative microparticles delivered via inhalation. Int J Pharm. 2003;254:211–222. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(03)00035-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Alcock R, Blair JA, O'Mahony DJ, Raoof A, Quirk AV. Modifying the release of leuprolide from spray dried OED microparticles. J Control Release. 2002;82:429–440. doi: 10.1016/S0168-3659(02)00165-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fiegel J, Fu J, Hanes J. Poly(ether-anhydride) dry powder aerosols for sustained drug delivery in the lungs. J Control Release. 2004;96:411–423. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.02.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Surendrakumar K, Martyn GP, Hodgers EC, Jansen M, Blair JA. Sustained release of insulin from sodium hyaluronate based dry powder formulations after pulmonary delivery to beagle dogs. J Control Release. 2003;91:385–394. doi: 10.1016/S0168-3659(03)00263-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sethuraman VV, Hickey AJ. Powder properties and their influence on dry powder inhaler delivery of an antitubercular drug. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2002;3:E28–E28. doi: 10.1208/pt030428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fu J, Fiegel J, Krauland E, Hanes J. New polymeric carriers for controlled drug delivery following inhalation or injection. Biomaterials. 2002;23:4425–4433. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00182-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Joshi M, Misra A. Dry powder inhalation of liposomal Ketotifen fumarate: formulation and characterization. Int J Pharm. 2001;223:15–27. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(01)00705-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Joshi MR, Misra A. Liposomal budesonide for dry powder inhaler: preparation and stabilization. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2001;2:E25–E25. doi: 10.1208/pt020425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cortesi R, Esposito E, Gambarin S, Telloli P, Menegatti E, Nastruzzi C. Preparation of liposomes by reverse-phase evaporation using alternative organic solvent. J Microencapsul. 1999;16:251–256. doi: 10.1080/026520499289220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rizk M, Younis F. Spectrophotometric assay of certain aminoglycoside antibiotics using chloranil. Anal Lett. 1984;17:1803–1809. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Carr RL. Evaluating flow properties of solids. Chem Eng. 1965;72:163–168. [Google Scholar]
- 25.British Pharmacopoeia Commission. Pressurized inhalations: deposition of the emitted dose. In:British Pharmacopoeia, Vol 2. London, UK: Her Majesty's Stationary Office; 1993:A194-A196.
- 26.Hino T, Serigano T, Yamamoto H, Takeuchi H, Niwa T, Kawashima Y. Particle design of wogon extract dry powder for inhalation aerosols with granulation method. Int J Pharm. 1998;168:59–68. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(98)00083-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Betageri GV, Jenkins SA, Parsons DL. Liposome Drug Delivery Systems. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing Company; 1993. pp. 16–17. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Staniforth JN. Preformulation aspects of dry powder aerosols. In: Byron PR, Dalby RN, Farr SJ, editors. Respiratory Drug Delivery V. Buffalo Grove, IL: Interpharm Press; 2004. pp. 65–73. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gonda I. Physico-chemical principles in aerosol-delivery. In: Crommelin DJA, Midha KK, editors. Topics in Pharmaceutical Sciences. Stuttgart, Germany: Medipharm Scientific Publishers; 1992. pp. 95–115. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hickey AJ. Inhalation Aerosols—Physical and Biological Basis for Theerapy. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker Inc; 2004. pp. 441–473. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hamaker HC. London-van der Waals forces attraction between spherical particles. Physica (Utrecht) 1937;4:1058–1072. doi: 10.1016/S0031-8914(37)80203-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]