Skip to main content
AAPS PharmSciTech logoLink to AAPS PharmSciTech
. 2006 Mar 24;7(1):E215–E220. doi: 10.1208/pt070130

Development and in vitro evaluation of chitosan-Eudragit RS 30D composite wound dressings

Sakchai Wittaya-areekul 1,, Chureerat Prahsarn 2, Srisagul Sungthongjeen 1
PMCID: PMC2750737  PMID: 16584162

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to design and evaluate chitosan-based films intended for wound dressing application. Required properties for successful wound dressing, such as liquid uptake, vapor and oxygen penetration, bioadhesiveness, and film elasticity, were examined. Water uptake and vapor penetration of the films were determined gravimetrically, while oxygen penetration was determined by Winkler’s method. The bioadhesive properties were determined with an in-house pulley system instrument using a pig gut model. Film elasticity was determined with a stretch test using an Instron apparatus. The results showed that pure chitosan films exhibited relatively high liquid uptake and the adsorption tended to decrease with the addition of Eudragit RS 30D. Moisture vapor and oxygen were found to be able to penetrate through all film formulations in comparable amounts. The bioadhesiveness test tended to show lower bioadhesive properties with the addition of Eudragit RS 30D. The formulation containing only chitosan exhibited low elongation of the film at 2 N, but the film elasticity increased with the addition of Eudragit RS 30D. In conclusion, the addition of Eudragit RS 30D could improve a film’s mechanical properties but lower its bioadhesiveness.

Keywords: wound dressing, chitosan hydrogels, Eudragit RS 30D

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (171.6 KB).

References

  • 1.Svedman P. Irrigation treatment of legs ulcers. Lancet. 1983;322:532–534. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(83)90567-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lim JK, Saliba L, Smith MJ, MacTavish J, Raine C, Curtin P. Normal saline wound dressing—is it really normal? Br J Plast Surg. 2000;53:42–45. doi: 10.1054/bjps.1999.3246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Biagini G, Bertani A, Mazzarelli R, et al. Wound management with N-carboxybutyl chitosan. Biomaterials. 1991;12:281–285. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(91)90035-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Matsuda K, Suzuki S, Isshiki N, Ikada Y. Re-freeze dried bilayer artificial skin. Biomaterials. 1993;14:1030–1035. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(93)90197-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Su CH, Sun CS, Juan SW, Hu CH, Ke WT, Sheu MT. Fungal mycelia as the source of chitin and polysaccharides and their applications as skin substitutes. Biomaterials. 1997;18:1169–1174. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00048-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mi F., Shyu S, Wu Y, Lee S, Shyong J, Huang R. Fabrication and characterization of a sponge-like asymmetric chitosan membrane as a wound dressing. Biomaterials. 2001;22:165–173. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00167-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tomihata K, Ikada Y. In vitro and in vivo degradation of films of chitin and its deacetylated derivatives. Biomaterials. 1997;18:567–573. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(96)00167-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Abhay SP, inventor. Hemostatic wound dressing. US patent 5 836 970. November 17, 1998.
  • 9.Ueno H, Murakami M, Okumura M, Kadosawa T, Uede T, Fujinaga T. Chitosan accelerates the production of osteopontin from polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Biomaterials. 2001;22:1667–1673. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00328-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Suzuki Y, Okamoto Y, Morimoto M, et al. Influence of physicochemical properties of chitin and chitosan on compliment activation. Carbohydr Polym. 2000;42:307–310. doi: 10.1016/S0144-8617(99)00161-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Harris MR, Ghebre-Sellassie I. Aqueous polymeric coating for modified release oral dosage forms. In: McGinity JW, editor. Aqueous Polymeric Coatings for Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 1997. pp. 81–100. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lehman K. Practical Course in Film Coating of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms with Eudragit. Darmstadt, Germany. Röhm Pharma Polymers. 2001;8–10:144–147. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bodmeier R, Paeratakul O. Mechanical properties of dry and wet cellulosic and acrylic polymer films prepared from aqueous colloidal polymer dispersions. Pharm Res. 1994;11:882–888. doi: 10.1023/A:1018942127524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bodmeier R, Paeratakul O. Process and formation variables affecting the drug release from chlorpheniramine maleate-loaded beads coated with commercial and self-prepared aqueous ethyl cellulose pseudolatexes. Int J Pharm. 1991;70:59–68. doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(91)90164-J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wesseling M, Kuppler F, Bodmeier R. Tackiness of acrylic and cellulosic polymer films used in the coating of solid dosage forms. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1999;47:73–78. doi: 10.1016/S0939-6411(98)00091-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Glazer BT, Marsh AG, Stierhoff K, Luther GW. The dynamic response of optical oxygen sensors and voltammetric electrodes to temporal changes in dissolved oxygen concentrations. Anal Chim Acta. 2004;518:93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2004.05.040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nakatsuka S, Andrady AL. Permeability of vitamin B-12 chitosan membranes: effect of croslinking and blending with poly(vinyl alcohol) on permeability. J Appl Polym Sci. 1992;44:17–28. doi: 10.1002/app.1992.070440103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Thacharodi D, Rao KP. Propanolol hydrochloride release behavior of crosslinked chitosan membranes. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 1993;58:177–181. doi: 10.1002/jctb.280580211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Devallencourt C, Marais S, Saiter JM, Labbe M, Metayer M. Study of transport of small molecules through ethyele-co-vinyl acetate copolymers films. Part A: water molecules. Polym Test. 2002;21:253–262. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9418(01)00078-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Okawa Y, Tokoro A, Kobyashi M, Suzuki K, Suzuki S, Suzuki M. Protective effect of chitin, chitosan and their oligosaccharides against bacterial infection in mice. Int J Immunol. 1998;10:122–122. doi: 10.1016/0192-0561(88)90464-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from AAPS PharmSciTech are provided here courtesy of American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists

RESOURCES