Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1978 Jun;7(6):576–583. doi: 10.1128/jcm.7.6.576-583.1978

Comparison of immunofluorescence and immunoperoxidase staining for identification of rubella virus isolates.

N J Schmidt, J Dennis, E H Lennette
PMCID: PMC275075  PMID: 78928

Abstract

To explore possible advantages which immunoperoxidase (IP) staining might have over immunofluorescence (IF) staining for identifying rubella virus isolates, direct comparative studies were done on the same coded clinical materials using the same rubella immune rabbit serum as the primary antiserum in both systems. The rubella immune rabbit serum and conjugated anti-rabbit immune globulins could be used more dilute in the IP system than in the IF system. Both IP and IF staining detected rubella antigen in all specimens which were positive by interference. IP staining also detected low levels of rubella antigen in a few additional specimens which had originally been positive for rubella virus, but which on retesting were negative by interference and IF staining. With second-cell-culture-passage material, IP and IF staining showed comparable specificity, and the few specimens which reacted nonspecifically generally did so in both systems. Cell cultures inoculated directly with urine specimens showed greater nonspecificity by IP than by IF, but this activity could be abolished by pretreatment with sodium azide and peroxide; other methods tried for inactivating endogenous peroxidase activity destroyed rubella antigen as well. The intensity of staining for positive specimens was comparable in the two systems. However, more antigen was demonstrable in both systems when BHK-21 cells were inoculated as a cell suspension and then permitted to grow into monolayers than when the same specimens were inoculated into preformed monolayers. IP staining was considered to be a highly satisfactory alternative to IF staining for identification of rubella virus isolates.

Full text

PDF
576

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. GRAHAM R. C., Jr, LUNDHOLM U., KARNOVSKY M. J. CYTOCHEMICAL DEMONSTRATION OF PEROXIDASE ACTIVITY WITH 3-AMINO-9-ETHYLCARBAZOLE. J Histochem Cytochem. 1965 Feb;13:150–152. doi: 10.1177/13.2.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gerna G. Rubella virus identification in primary and continuous monkey kidney cell cultures by immunoperoxidase technique. Arch Virol. 1975;49(2-3):291–295. doi: 10.1007/BF01317547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Heimer G. V., Taylor C. E. Improved mountant for immunofluorescence preparations. J Clin Pathol. 1974 Mar;27(3):254–256. doi: 10.1136/jcp.27.3.254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kaplow I. S. Letter: Substitute for benzidine in myeloperoxidase stains. Am J Clin Pathol. 1975 Mar;63(3):451–451. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/63.3.451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lennette E. H., Woodie J. D., Schmidt N. J. A modified indirect immunofluorescent staining technique for the demonstration of rubella antibodies in human sera. J Lab Clin Med. 1967 Apr;69(4):689–695. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pitts A., Williams E. E. Letter: Destruction of endogenous peroxidase activity in order to locate cellular antigens by peroxidase-labeled antibodies. J Histochem Cytochem. 1974 Jan;22(1):51–54. doi: 10.1177/22.1.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rawls W. E., Melnick J. L. Rubella virus carrier cultures derived from congenitally infected infants. J Exp Med. 1966 May 1;123(5):795–816. doi: 10.1084/jem.123.5.795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schmidt N. J., Dennis J., Lennette E. H. Hemadsorption and hemadsorption inhibition tests for rubella virus. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch. 1968;25(3):308–320. doi: 10.1007/BF01556559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schmidt N. J., Lennette E. H., Gee P. S., Dennis J. Physical and immunologic properties of rubella antigens. J Immunol. 1968 Apr;100(4):851–857. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schmidt N. J., Lennette E. H. Rubella complement-fixing antigens derived from the fluid and cellular phases of infected BHK-21 cells: extraction of cell-associated antigen with alkaline buffers. J Immunol. 1966 Dec;97(6):815–821. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Schmidt N. J., Lennette E. H., Woodie J. D., Ho H. H. Identification of rubella virus isolates by immunofluorescent staining, and a comparison of the sensitivity of three cell culture systems for recovery of virus. J Lab Clin Med. 1966 Sep;68(3):502–509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Straus W. Inhibition of peroxidase by methanol and by methanol-nitroferricyanide for use in immunoperoxidase procedures. J Histochem Cytochem. 1971 Nov;19(11):682–688. doi: 10.1177/19.11.682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES